Critical success factors in project management: Implication from Vietnam

Asia Pacific Business Review (Impact Factor: 0.49). 10/2010; 16(4):567-589. DOI: 10.1080/13602380903322957


This study will assess successful project performance based on key project factors. The indicators of project success are cost, time, technical performance and customer satisfaction as used in previous studies. The sample consisted of 239 project members and managers currently involved in infrastructure projects in Vietnam. Regression analysis was used to test five hypotheses developed from theories on project success. Three groups of factors including manager competencies, member competencies and external stability have significant positive relationships to the success criteria. The completion and implementation stages in the project life cycle are also positively related to success. The implementation stage of a project moderates both the effects of external stability and organization support on success. The implication for project managers is that implementation is the key stage in determining the success of projects.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "The external factors such as policy are the important factors that decide whether the project would success [10]. Construction process should strictly obey the national government and the local government department's related law and policy requirements. "

    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015 · World Journal of Engineering and Technology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The paper seeks to show that implementing change initiatives in organizations is extremely problematic, particularly in relation to human resource management (HRM) initiatives. The challenges inherent in implementing new HRM systems and procedures is arguably more acute in project-based organizations where temporary teams and geographically dispersed employees render the coherent implementation of new systems and procedures problematic. This paper presents the findings of case study research in which the implementation of a new performance management system for improving individual project manager performance is evaluated. A framework is developed for guiding the implementation of similar change initiatives in other project-based organizations. Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal case study methodology was adopted for the study. This enabled the ways in which resistance to change was manifested, and to be explored, and the actions necessary to circumvent barriers to its use discerned. The final framework is derived from a review of change strategies in other industries and sectors as well as from the case study findings. Findings – The paper finds that barriers to implementing new performance solutions stemmed from a lack of senior management commitment and support, ingrained working practices and an absence of appropriate training interventions. These are relatively straightforward to overcome as part of a robust implementation framework. Research limitations/implications – The assertions made within the paper are based on a single case study. Further work is required to validate the findings within other organizations. Practical implications – The posited approach in this paper provides a practical implementation methodology, which may be transferable to other project-led organizations. The framework provides a point of departure for organisations looking for practicable ways of mitigating organizational resistance to performance initiatives, particularly project-oriented businesses, which face additional challenges in terms of delivering coherent change programmes. Originality/value – In the paper the practical implementation methodology proposed provides a point of departure for companies considering strategies for successfully implementing performance management tools in the future.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2006 · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This research addresses the competencies organizations use through project manager job advertisements. We develop a list of project manager job competencies; break down the competency components into knowledge, skills, and abilities; and conduct a comparative analysis of the use of these competencies. We examine the online contents of project manager job advertisements in the public domain. Analysis shows that industry job advertisements emphasize “soft skills” and competencies in a manner different than that in the literature. Additionally, differences are found across countries and between industries. Implications from the findings highlight the incongruent dissemination of project manager competencies, regional and industrial demands, and the recruitment of project managers.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2013 · Project Management Journal
Show more