Prospective study on warfarin and regional chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma

Department of Oncologic Surgery, Carl von Hess Hospital, Hammelburg, Germany.
Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases: JGLD (Impact Factor: 2.2). 09/2008; 17(3):285-90.
Source: PubMed


The aim is to prospectively examine the effect of regional gemcitabine and mitomycin-C with systemic gemcitabine together with warfarin in patients with inoperable pancreatic carcinoma, and compare the effect to systemic gemcitabine alone.
Seventeen patients received 1.25 mg of warfarin daily, gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on day 1 and mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2 on day 2 regionally and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on day 14 peripherally. The cycle was repeated every 4 weeks.
Median survival since presentation was 6.8 months, while median total survival was 9.6 months. Excluding the 3 patients who died before receiving any therapy, the median survival since presentation resulted in 10.7 months and the median total survival, 12.7 months. One patient developed bleeding that required transfusion and 2 patients developed anemia (Grades III/IV). Comparing these data to historical controls of large cohorts supports the notion that this regimen offers a viable alternative to systemic gemcitabine alone.
A regimen consisting of regional gemcitabine and mitomycin-C with systemic gemcitabine and low-dose warfarin compares favorably to the gold standard of systemic gemcitabine. These data suggest the feasibility of a large prospective study on the use of warfarin and combined regional and systemic chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "High response rates (complete response 8.7% and partial response 65.2%) in a descriptive study of 31 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer that received RIAC were accompanied by 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates of 90.9, 42.8 and 18.3% [26], respectively. Similarly, Nakchbandi [27] demonstrated improved median survival times (12.7 months) for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with RIAC. This study identified two RCTs [13], [16] where RIAC improved the 1-year OS (41.2%−28.6%), "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the efficacy and safety of regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC) versus systemic chemotherapy for stage III/IV pancreatic cancer. Randomized controlled trials of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated by regional intra-arterial or systemic chemotherapy were identified using PubMed, ISI, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic databases, for all publications dated between 1960 and December 31, 2010. Data was independently extracted by two reviewers. Odds ratios and relative risks were pooled using either fixed- or random-effects models, depending on I(2) statistic and Q test assessments of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0. Six randomized controlled trials comprised of 298 patients met the standards for inclusion in the meta-analysis, among 492 articles that were identified. Eight patients achieved complete remission (CR) with regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC), whereas no patients achieved CR with systemic chemotherapy. Compared with systemic chemotherapy, patients receiving RIAC had superior partial remissions (RR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.65; 58.06% with RIAC and 29.37% with systemic treatment), clinical benefits (RR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.84, 2.97; 78.06% with RAIC and 29.37% with systemic treatment), total complication rates (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.87; 49.03% with RIAC and 71.33% with systemic treatment), and hematological side effects (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.91; 60.87% with RIAC and 85.71% with systemic treatment). The median survival time with RIAC (5-21 months) was longer than for systemic chemotherapy (2.7-14 months). Similarly, one year survival rates with RIAC (28.6%-41.2%) were higher than with systemic chemotherapy (0%-12.9%.). Regional intra-arterial chemotherapy is more effective and has fewer complications than systemic chemotherapy for treating advanced pancreatic cancer.
    Preview · Article · Jul 2012 · PLoS ONE
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An increase in coagulation in patients with pancreatic carcinoma has long been documented. In this Review, we present what is known about the pathophysiology of increased coagulation in cancer and how it applies to pancreatic carcinoma. The relationship between the activation of coagulation or symptomatic thromboembolic disease and the development of pancreatic carcinoma is explored. Data on the relationship between thromboembolic disease and the behavior of pancreatic cancer before, during or after a diagnosis is made are also reviewed. Finally, the rationale and evidence for the use of oral anticoagulants or heparin in patients with pancreatic carcinoma is presented. This Review is a critical appraisal of what is known, and when the evidence is acceptable, on the subject of thromboembolism, anticoagulation, and treatment with anticoagulants in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2008 · Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology &#38 Hepatology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pancreatic cancer remains a major clinical challenge. Recent advances in chemotherapeutic and targeted agents have offered a modest survival benefit. One of the major complications of pancreatic cancer is venous thromboembolism. Although it is well-known fact that patients with mucinous carcinoma of the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract pose an increased risk of developing thromboembolic complications, scarce data exists regarding the incidence and pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism in pancreatic cancer patients. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in pancreatic cancer patients ranges from 17% to 57%. Clinical data also suggest that the occurrence of venous thromboembolism may be associated with poorer prognosis in such patients. Recent data suggest that anticoagulant treatments may improve cancer patient survival by decreasing thromboembolic complications as well as by anticancer effects. Thromboembolic disease in pancreatic cancer presents a life-threatening complication and is regarded as paraneoplastic manifestation of the disease. Effective management of this risk factor is very important in the management of pancreatic cancer. Given the lack of extensive data and the clinical relevance of this topic for both physicians and basic research scientists, the authors review the incidence, pathogenesis and clinical implications of venous thromboembolism in pancreatic cancer patients.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2009 · JOP: Journal of the pancreas
Show more