Article

Promoting research into healthcare accreditation/external evaluation: Advancing an ISQua initiative

Avedis Donabedian Research Institute CIBER Epidemilogía y Salud Pública - (CIBERESP).
International Journal for Quality in Health Care (Impact Factor: 1.76). 11/2008; 21(1):27-8. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn045
Source: PubMed

Full-text preview

Available from: intqhc.oxfordjournals.org
  • Source

    Preview · Article · Jan 2009
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to identify and suggest a number of performance measures to facilitate the evaluation of accreditation programs in healthcare. The paper is based on an exploratory research which has used qualitative methods, including snowball sampling technique, email interview and thematic content analysis. Respondents (experts and professionals) were selected from a diverse spectrum ranging from healthcare organizations, universities and accreditation-associated institutions. The analysis of the data provided key measures to be considered in the evaluation of accreditation programs' impact at macro and micro levels as well as their nature and operations. The measures can be used to, for example, assess the degree of stakeholders' reliance on accreditation results, measure the cost of accreditation for participating organizations and serve as a formal mechanism for accredited organizations to appeal accreditation decisions. This paper has brought together a number of generic, yet influential and workable, measures which could be utilized for assessing the overall performance of an accreditation program in healthcare. The application of these measures depends on the features of given accreditation program and the context in which the program operates. Therefore, the next step/steps in the assessment of an accreditation program might be choosing the measures suiting that program.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2011 · International Journal for Quality in Health Care
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and Aim: Accreditation is one of the evaluating health care organization tools especially in hospitals and is also one of the priorities of Ministry of Health in Iran. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of accreditation on health service delivery in hospitals from perspective views of experts. Materials and Methods: This qualitative study was conducted by semi-structured interviews and opinions of 12 experts at Isfahan University of Medical Science in the field of hospital accreditation in 2012. After transcription of each interview, content analyses was used to minimize and structuring qualitative data. Results: According to this study, 10 main theme and 72 sub- themes were identified. Main themes included: Necessity, implementations priorities and mechanisms of Accreditation effect, accreditation impact on service quality and organizational performance, patient satisfaction, commitment and job satisfaction of staff, reducing factors the impact of accreditation, confounder factors the effect of accreditation and the executive proposals in order to implement accreditation program in Iran. Conclusion : Accreditation could be properly implemented through setting Conditions, selecting the appropriate accreditation model, justify stakeholders about the necessity of accreditation, monitoring, establishment of appropriate information systems, information transparency and changing the general attitude of the organization. It would take positive effects to achieve hospital goals and improve the quality of services. Keywords: Accreditation, Service Delivery, Qualitative Study, Semi-Structured Interview,
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2013