... The purpose of the current paper is to explore some of these ethical concerns by taking a close look at the existing literature in order to answer the following question: ''What are we doing and why?' ' We now have an adequate body of knowledge that allows an initial response to this question, including a number of studies on social work practitioners, students, and faculty. A review of the literature located 26 quantitative and qualitative explorations of social work practitioners, which focused on a variety of topics, including perceptions of definitional issues (Canda, 1988a), perspectives on the integration of spirituality into social work practice (Canda, 1988b;Deresotes, 1995;Deresotes & Evans, 1995;Gilbert, 2000;Heyman, Buchanan, Marlowe, & Sealy, 2006;Holloway, 1996;Joseph, 1988;Sheridan & Bullis, 1991), linkages between spirituality and commitment to social justice (Lee & Barrett, 2007), ethical issues (Canda, Nakashima, & Furman, 2004;Murdock, 2005;Sheridan, 2008), and the use of spiritually based interventions with clients (Bullis, 1996;Canda & Furman, 1999;Furman, Benson, Grimwood, & Canda, 2004;Gilligan & Furness, 2006;Heyman, Buchanan, Musgrave, & Menz, 2006;Kvarfordt & Sheridan, 2007;Mattison, Jayaratne, & Croxton 2000;Murdock, 2005;Sheridan, 2004;Sheridan, Bullis, Adcock, Berlin, & Miller, 1992;Stewart, Koeske, & Koeske, 2006). In terms of interventions, six studies go beyond descriptions of practitioner behavior to identify significant predictors of the use of spiritually related interventions 100 M. Sheridan among social workers (Dane & Moore, 2005;Heyman, Buchanan, Musgrave, et al., 2006;Kvarfordt & Sheridan, 2008a;Murdock, 2005;Sheridan, 2004;Stewart et al., 2006) and two delineate the causal pathways of these predictors (Kvarfordt & Sheridan, 2008b;Stewart et al., 2006). ...