Since Archimedes’ legendary “Aha” experience, outstanding creative accomplishments have long been conceived as being the result of an external “higher power,” caused by divine help, often occurring after spontaneous, sudden inspiration. This view ranked creativity as a difficult or even an intangible trait to study, and it has taken quite a long period of time until empirical studies have begun to elucidate the manifold societal, interpersonal, and not least individual characteristics implicated in this fascinating human ability. With Guilford’s (1950) seminal address to the American Psychological Association (APA), the idea of creativity as a stable trait that is linked to several personality characteristics of an individual became more and more accepted in this field. Meanwhile, research from both the psychometric and the neuroscientific traditions revealed a consistent pattern of personality traits and neurocognitive mechanisms that may underlie different facets of creativity. For instance, relevant research in this field has shown that creativity is among others closely associated with intelligence (Benedek, Jauk, Sommer, Arendasy, & Neubauer, 2014; Jauk, Benedek, Dunst, & Neubauer, 2013), domain-specific knowledge/expertise (e.g., Weisberg, 1999), motivation (Collins & Amabile, 1999), or personality traits such as openness, broad interests or self-confidence (Barron & Harrington, 1981; Feist, 1998). In addition, the growing field of neuroscience studies dealing with different facets of creativity such as creative ideation or divergent thinking ability has revealed that this ability might be best characterized as being organized in widespread neural networks, including both regions associated with executive processes and cognitive control (e.g., Fink & Benedek, 2014; Gonen-Yaacovi et al., 2013) and regions closely linked with (at least a subset of) the default network of the brain (e.g., Beaty, Benedek, Kaufman, & Silvia, 2015; Beaty, Benedek, Silvia, & Schacter, 2016; Jung, Mead, Carrasco, & Flores, 2013). Such findings support the idea that both spontaneous, automatic processes (e.g., loose associations, “mind-wandering”) and more controlled modes of information processing such as cognitive control are essential components of the creative thinking process (e.g., Beaty et al., 2016). On a more general level, such findings also make an important contribution toward eliminating some of the myths and mysteries that have gathered around creativity, inasmuch as they clearly indicate that an important source of creativity must be located within the individual, rather than in intangible external sources.