History & Memory 16.2 (2004) 108-139
The span of time between the Taiping Rebellion (1850-64)—a radical, Christian-inspired politico-religious upheaval that ravaged seventeen provinces and took an estimated twenty million lives—and the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (1966-76)—a violent movement launched by Mao Zedong during his last decade in power to renew the spirit of the Chinese revolution—may well be characterized as the bloodiest century in Chinese history. This period witnessed the collapse of the imperial state and the emergence of a new order in a series of long, destructive shock waves. Civil strife, revolution, and war against foreign forces set off unprecedented eruptions of violence. To this were added natural calamities and environmental exhaustion, which in turn were exacerbated by the political crises and the resulting failure of the state to effectively deal with floods, droughts, the vanishing of farm lands, starvation and epidemics. To be sure, all these kinds of catastrophes had occurred repeatedly in Chinese history (as elsewhere in the world). But the thick accumulation and enormous scale of destruction and death sets this period apart from all others.
It was distinctive, too, in the growth of the proportion of the populace who became victims of political violence. An increasing number of people were persecuted and killed by their own government. How many Chinese vanished in the "democides" perpetrated by various Chinese regimes will never be exactly known, but it is safe to assume that political violence and state persecutions killed tens of millions of Chinese citizens and left even more physically and psychologically wounded. As many theories have stressed, state violence aims to control people by inflicting fear and suffering, which induce a range of traumas: from pain, anguish, fear, loss and grief, to the destruction of a coherent and meaningful reality. The century between the Taiping Rebellion and the Cultural Revolution was one of the most traumatizing in Chinese history in that traumas and suffering were no longer isolated, occasional events: they became wide-spread and ubiquitous.
The study of traumatic events and the study of memory are interrelated in many ways. Individuals usually remember terrifying events all too well for long periods, under emotional stress that sometimes does not abate (e.g. in post-traumatic stress disorder). Traumas, however, do not just afflict individuals; they affect whole communities and even nations. Many communities stricken by large traumas feel an obligation to combat forgetting and properly commemorate those who have disappeared. Indeed, some researchers maintain that trauma is essentially a social event.
Communities react to traumas in different ways: organizing rescue operations, bringing relief to victims, offering solace to families that have lost members, helping people to cope with the delayed effects of the trauma and establishing modes of commemoration and mourning. This suggests, at minimum, that communities promote rituals and patterns that influence or determine the ways in which members of the community recollect the traumatic events—in other words, that an important aspect of community response is to make the trauma meaningful. But traumatic events—according to neurologists and psychiatrists as well as literary critics—are ones that, due to their intensity, cannot be comprehended within ordinary cognitive structures, ones that are impossible to recollect in the normal processes of either personal or public memory. They call for extraordinary, conscious efforts of narration and representation.
Although often ignored in the historiography of China, the historical import of large-scale trauma is obvious. Besides causing many to suffer in the first place, traumatic events have continued to disrupt individual memories and, consequently, public discourses, profoundly affecting society and culture. No truly comprehensive history of modern China can ignore the traumas caused by both natural calamities and man-made catastrophies. Such a history must integrate the personal memories of traumatized persons with the overall representation of the past. While social or economic histories may legitimately seek to portray the ordinary aspects of everyday life during the early years of the People's Republic of China (PRC), or to set forth in general terms the modernizing efforts, successes or failures of the government, the memories...