ArticlePDF Available


This first part of a new series outlines the salient aspects of osseointegration, implant design and other factors which contribute to successful treatment.
dental implants
Introduction to dental
Richard Palmer1
Implants have been used to support dental
prostheses for many decades, but they have not
always enjoyed a favourable reputation. This
situation has changed dramatically with the
development of endosseous osseointegrated
dental implants. They are the nearest equiva-
lent replacement to the natural tooth, and are
therefore a useful addition in the management
of patients who have missing teeth because of
disease, trauma or developmental anomalies.
There are a number of dental implant systems
which offer predictable long-term results
backed by good scientific research and clinical
trials. In the first place it may be helpful to clar-
ify some of the commonly used terms in
implant dentistry (Table 1).
Success criteria
It is important to establish success criteria for
implant systems, and for implants to be tested
in well controlled clinical trials. The minimum
success criteria proposed by Albrektsson et al.
(IJOMI 1986; 1: 11) is set out in Table 2.
The most obvious sign of implant failure is
mobility. However, some of the criteria in
Table 2 apply to the overall requirements of an
implant system, but are not as useful when
judging the success of individual implants. This
is well illustrated by considering the radi-
ographic criteria. Bone remodelling occurs in
the first year of function in response to occlusal
forces and establishment of the normal dimen-
sions of the peri-implant soft tissues (See Part
2). The ‘ideal’ bone level is usually judged
against a specific landmark on the implant
(such as the implant/abutment junction) and it
may differ therefore between implant systems
(fig. 6). Subsequently the bone levels are usually
more or less stable, and small changes such as
0.2 mm per annum are impossible to measure
with conventional radiographs. These specified
changes therefore do not apply to individual
implants but to mean (average) changes mea-
sured across a large number of implants. For
example, a detectable change of 1mm or more
may occur at very few implants in contrast to
the majority which remain unchanged or in a
steady state. It is also difficult to stipulate what
level of change in an individual implant over a
given period of time would constitute failure. A
rapid change in bone level may be followed by a
long period of stability. On the other hand, pro-
gressive or continuous bone loss is a worrying
sign of impending failure. An implant with
marked loss of bone may therefore be judged as
‘surviving’ rather than ‘successful’.
Implants placed in the mandible (particu-
larly anterior to the mental foramina) enjoy a
higher success rate than the maxilla (approxi-
mately 95% success for implants in the
Professor of Implant Dentistry and
Periodontology, Guy's Kings and St
Thomas' Medical and Dental School,
London SE1 9RT
© British Dental Journal
1999; 187: 127–132
This first part of a new
series outlines the
salient aspects of
implant design and
other factors which
contribute to successful
Basic terminology in implant dentistry
Table 1
Osseointegration A direct structural and functional connection between ordered, living
bone and the surface of a load-carrying implant (Albrektsson
et al.
Orthopaedica Scand
1981; 52:155 (fig. 1).
Endosseous dental implant A device inserted into the jaw bone (endosseous) to support a dental pros-
thesis. It is the ‘tooth root’ analogue and is often referred to as a ‘fixture’
(fig. 2).
Implant abutment The component which attaches to the dental implant and supports the
prosthesis. A transmucosal abutment (TMA) is one which passes through
the mucosa overlying the implant. A temporary or healing abutment may
be used during the healing of the peri-implant soft tissue before the defini-
tive abutment is chosen (fig. 3).
Abutment screw A screw used to connect an abutment to the implant.
Single stage implant surgery Surgical placement of a dental implant which is left exposed to the oral
cavity following insertion. This is the protocol used in non-submerged
implant systems (fig. 4).
Two stage implant surgery Initial surgical placement of a dental implant which is buried beneath the
mucosa and then subsequently exposed with a second surgical procedure
some months later. This is used in submerged implant systems (fig. 5).
In this part, we will
• Success criteria
• Basic guide to
Biocompatibility and
implant design
Bone factors
Loading conditions
dental implants
mandible compared with 85 to 90% for the
maxilla with systems such as Branemark,
5 years after loading). An example of the lowest
recorded success rates are for short implants
(7 mm) used in the maxilla to support overden-
tures, especially when the implants are not
joined together. A few studies have now shown
that the overall mean failure rate in smokers is
about twice that in non-smokers. Smokers
should be warned of this association and
encouraged to quit the habit. It should also be
noted that reported mean failure rates are not
evenly distributed throughout the patient pop-
ulation. Rather, implant failures are more likely
to cluster in certain individuals.
Basic guide to osseointegration
Figure 1 shows an histological section of a tita-
nium screw threaded implant which has been
in function in bone for 1 year. There is very
close apposition of bone over most of the
implant surface. It has been proposed that the
biological process leading to and maintaining
osseointegration, is dependent upon a number
of factors which include:
Biocompatibility and implant design
Implants made of commercially pure titanium
have established a benchmark in osseointegra-
tion, against which few other materials com-
pare. Related materials such as niobium are able
to produce a high degree of osseointegration
Figure 1. Histological section of an implant
with bone growing in intimate contact with the
surface. The dense bone which contains a
small medullary space fills the area between
two thread profiles which are 0.6 mm apart.
Figure 2. Three different designs of
endosseous implants being inserted into
prepared sites within the jaw bone.
Scanning electron micrographs of the
implants are shown in Figures 7 to 9.
Figure 2a is a machined threaded
implant of the Branemark design (Nobel
Biocare). Figure 2b is an Astra ST
implant which has a microthreaded
coronal portion, a macro-threaded
apical portion and the surface has been
blasted with titanium oxide. Figure 2c is
an ITI Straumann implant which has a
smooth transmucosal collar, a macro-
threaded body and a plasma sprayed
Implant design
• Implant length
• Implant diameter
• Implant shape
• Surface characteristics
• The type of prosthetic
• The occlusal scheme
• The number, distribution,
orientation, and design
of implants
• The design and proper-
ties of implant connectors
• Dimensions and location
of cantilever extensions
• Patient parafunctional
dental implants
and in addition, successful clinical results are
reported for some titanium alloys and hydrox-
yapatite coated implants. More recently
resorbable coatings have been developed which
aim to improve the initial rate of bone healing
against the implant surface and then resorb
within a short time frame to allow establish-
ment of a bone to metal contact.
The implant design has a great influence on
initial stability and subsequent function. The
main design parameters are:
Implant length – implants are generally avail-
able in lengths from about 6 mm to as much
as 20 mm. The most common lengths
employed are between 8 and 15 mm which
correspond quite closely to normal root
Implant diameter — most implants are
approximately 4 mm in diameter. At least
3.25 mm in diameter is required to ensure
adequate implant strength. Implant diameter
may be more important than implant length
in the distribution of loads to the surrounding
bone. Implant diameters up to 6 mm are avail-
able, which are considerably stronger, but they
are not so widely used because sufficient bone
width is not so commonly encountered.
Implant shape — hollow-cylinders, solid-
cylinders, hollow screws or solid screws are
commonly employed shapes which are
designed to maximise the potential area for
osseointegration and provide good initial
stability (figs 7a–9a). Even minor alterations
in the size and pitch of threads can enhance
the latter property. Screw shaped implants
also offer good load distribution characteris-
tics in function.
Surface characteristics — the degree of sur-
face roughness varies greatly between differ-
ent systems. Surfaces which are machined,
grit-blasted, etched, plasma sprayed and
coated are available. Figures 7b to 9b show
the characteristics of these surfaces viewed
with the scanning electron microscope,
showing considerable increases in potential
surface area. The optimum surface mor-
phology has yet to be defined, and some may
perform better in certain circumstances. By
Suggested minimum success criteria for dental implants*
Table 2
1. An individual, unattached implant is immobile when tested clinically.
2. Radiographic examination does not reveal any peri-implant radiolucency.
3. After the first year in function, radiographic vertical bone loss is less than 0.2 mm per annum.
4. The individual implant performance is characterised by an absence of signs and symptoms such as
pain, infections, neuropathies, paraesthesia, or violation of the inferior dental canal.
5. As a minimum, the implant should fulfil the above criteria with a success rate of 85% at the end of a
5 year observation period and 80% at the end of a 10 year period.
*after Albrektsson
et al. IJOMI
1986; 1:11
Figure 3. Various forms of implant
abutment are illustrated. Figure 3a
shows ball abutments which are
used to support overdentures.
Figure 3b shows abutments which
are used to support individual
crowns in ‘single tooth
restorations’. The crowns are
cemented on the parallel sided
hexagon. Figure 3c shows four
conical shaped abutments which
are used to support a bridge
superstructure. In this the bridge
would be screwed to the abutments
rather than being cemented. Figure
3d shows some simple cylindrical
healing abutments which are used
during the healing phase of the
mucosa before definitive abutments
are selected.
Figure 4. An implant of the ITI
Straumann type has been
inserted and left protruding
through the mucosa in a one
stage surgical procedure. A
wide screw has been placed
on the top to protect the inner
aspect of the implant until a
definitive abutment is
dental implants
increasing surface roughness there is the
potential to increase the surface contact with
bone but this may be at the expense of more
ionic exchange and surface corrosion. Bacte-
rial contamination of the implant surface will
also be affected by the surface roughness if it
becomes exposed within the mouth.
Bone factors
The stability of the implant at the time of place-
ment is very important and is dependent upon
bone quantity and quality as well as implant
design. The edentulous ridge can be classified
in terms of shape and bone quality (fig. 10).
Following loss of a tooth the alveolar bone
resorbs in width and height. In extreme cases
bone resorption proceeds to a level which is
beyond the normal extent of the alveolar
process and well within the basal bone of the
jaws. Radiographic determination of bone
quantity and quality is considered in Part 5 and
procedures which can be used to augment bone
in Part 8. The most favourable quality of jaw
bone for implant treatment is that which has a
well formed cortex and densely trabeculated
medullary spaces with a good blood supply.
Bone which is predominantly cortical may offer
good initial stability at implant placement but
is more easily damaged by overheating during
the drilling process, especially with sites more
than 10 mm in depth. At the other extreme,
bone with a thin or absent cortical layer and
sparse trabeculation offers very poor initial
implant stability and fewer cells with a good
osteogenic potential to promote osseointegra-
tion. Success is highly dependent upon a surgi-
cal technique which avoids heating the bone.
Slow drilling speeds, the use of successive incre-
mentally larger sharp drills and copious saline
irrigation aim to keep the temperature below
that at which bone tissue damage occurs
(around 47°C for 1 minute). Further refine-
ments include cooling the irrigant and using
internally irrigated drills. Methods by which
these factors are controlled are considered in
more detail in Part 6 (Basic Implant Surgery).
Factors which compromise bone quality are
infection, irradiation and heavy smoking. The
effects of the latter two are a result of a diminu-
tion of the vascular supply to the bone which
compromises the healing response, a feature
which has been well described in the healing of
Loading conditions
Following installation of an implant it is
important that it is not loaded during the early
healing phase. Movement of the implant
within the bone at this stage results in fibrous
tissue encapsulation rather than osseointegra-
tion. This has been compared to the healing of
a fracture where stabilisation of the bone frag-
ments is very important to prevent non-union.
In partially dentate subjects it is desirable to
provide temporary/provisional prostheses
which are tooth supported to avoid early
implant loading. However, in patients who
wear mucosally supported dentures it is gener-
ally recommended that they should not be
worn over the implant area for 1 to 2 weeks.
This also helps to prevent breakdown of the
soft tissue wound. Systems such as Branemark
have advised leaving implants unloaded
beneath the mucosa for around 6 months in
the maxilla and 3 months in the mandible,
mainly because of differences in bone quality.
However, these are largely empirical guide-
lines, and bone quality and implant stability
will vary greatly between individuals, jaws and
sites within jaws. Currently there is no accurate
measure which precisely determines the opti-
mum period of healing before loading can
commence. Bone quality can be assessed by
measuring the cutting torque during prepara-
tion of the implant site. The stability of an
implant and increasing bone-to-implant con-
tact has been quantified using resonance fre-
Figure 5. Exposure of two
implants which have been
buried beneath the mucosa
for a period of 6 months.
Bone has grown over the top
of them and this needs to be
removed before a healing
abutment is connected.
Figure 6. A periapical radiograph of
a single tooth implant. The bone
contacts the implant up to the most
coronal thread. An abutment screw
which is more radio-opaque can be
seen connecting the abutment to the
implant. The crown is all porcelain
and is cemented to the abutment. In
this system (Branemark) the
landmark for measuring the bone
level from is the junction between
implant and abutment.
dental implants
quency analysis. This newly developed non-
invasive research tool measures the stiffness of
the implant at the bone interface. In some cir-
cumstances it has been shown that immediate
loading is compatible with subsequent suc-
cessful osseointegration, providing the bone
quality is good and the functional forces can be
adequately controlled. The latter may involve
placing an adequate number of implants and
connecting them together as soon as possible
with a rigid framework. However, these latter
protocols should be considered experimental
at the present time, and there is much data to
support the more cautious approach advo-
cated by Branemark in ensuring a high level of
predictable implant success. Some systems
employ a single stage approach in which the
implant is installed so that it protrudes
through the overlying mucosa (ie non-sub-
merged), although avoidance of early loading
is equally critical. Following the recommended
healing period (around 3 months) abutments
are connected to the implant to allow con-
struction of the prosthesis. This protocol
therefore avoids further surgery to uncover the
implants. The loading of the implant sup-
ported prosthesis is a further important con-
sideration which will be dealt with in the
following section.
Prosthetic considerations
Carefully planned functional occlusal load-
ing will result in maintenance of osseointe-
gration and possibly increased bone to
implant contact. In contrast, excessive load-
ing may lead to bone loss and/or component
failure. Clinical loading conditions are
largely dependent upon:
The type of prosthetic reconstruction
This can vary from a single tooth replacement
in the partially dentate case to a full arch
reconstruction in the edentulous individual.
Implants which support overdentures may
present particular problems with control of
loading as they may be largely mucosal sup-
ported, entirely implant supported or a com-
bination of the two.
The occlusal scheme
The lack of mobility in implant supported fixed
prostheses requires provision of shallow cuspal
inclines and careful distribution of loads in lat-
eral excursions. With single tooth implant
restorations it is important to develop initial
tooth contacts on the natural dentition and to
avoid guidance in lateral excursions on the
implant restoration. Loading will also depend
upon the opposing dentition which could be
natural teeth, another implant supported pros-
thesis or a conventional removeable prosthesis.
Surprisingly high forces can be generated
through removable prostheses.
Figure 7. This shows a scanning electron
micrograph of a Branemark/Nobel
Biocare implant. Figure 7a shows the
basic thread design and figure 7b a
higher power view of the machined
Figure 8 shows a scanning electron
micrograph of an Astra ST implant. The
conical neck has a microthread and the
apical part a coarser self tapping
thread (fig. 8a). Figure 8b shows a
higher power view of the blasted
(Tio-blast) surface at the same
magnification as figure 7b.
Figure 9 shows a scanning electron
micrograph of an ITI Straumann solid
screw implant. The polished
transmucosal neck is clearly demarcated
from the plasma sprayed body (fig. 9a).
The thread has a coarser pitch than the
implants shown in figures 7 and 8.
Figure 9b shows the plasma sprayed
surface at the same magnification as
figure 7b and 8b. The increase in surface
area is considerable.
dental implants
The number, distribution, orientation, and
design of implants
The distribution of load to the supporting bone
can be spread by increasing the number and
dimensions (diameter, surface topography,
length) of the implants. The spacing and
3-dimensional arrangement of the individual
implants will also be very important. The so-
called ‘tripod’ arrangement of three implants is
recommended in situations of high load, such
as replacement of molar teeth in the partially
dentate individual.
The design and properties of implant connectors
Multiple implants are joined by a cast or milled
framework. A rigid connector provides good
splinting and distribution of loads between
implants. It is equally important that the con-
nector has a passive fit on the implant abut-
ments so that loads are not set up within the
prosthetic construction.
Dimensions and location of cantilever extensions.
Some implant reconstructions are designed
with cantilever extensions to provide function
(and appearance) in areas where provision of
additional implants is difficult. This may be
caused by practical or financial considerations.
Cantilever extensions have the potential to
create high loads, particularly on the implant
adjacent to the cantilever. The extent of the
leverage of any cantilever should be considered
in relation to the anteroposterior distance
between implants supporting the reconstruc-
tion. The cantilever extension should not exceed
this length and the cross sectional design should
be adequate to prevent flexing.
Patient parafunctional activities
Great caution should be exercised in treating
patients with known parafunctional activities.
Excessive loads may lead to loss of marginal
bone or component fracture.
These factors will be considered in more
detail in Parts 4 and 7.
There are a great many factors to take into
account to ensure predictable successful
implant treatment. There is no substitute for
meticulous attention to detail in all of these
areas. Failure to do so will result in higher fail-
ure rates and unnecessary complications.
Figure 10 shows examples of dental panoramic tomograms of
edentulous jaws. Both show extensive resorption of the
maxillary ridge. There is far less resorption of the mandible in
figure 10a than figure 10b. In the latter case there is reasonable
bone volume in the anterior mandible but resorption close to the
level of the inferior dental canal in the posterior part.
Submitting illustrations to the BDJ
Authors submitting manuscripts for publication in the BDJ are reminded that
two copies of all illustrations must be supplied. This will assist in speeding up
the refereeing process — manuscripts and illustrations are always sent to
referees and a set of illustrations is required at the editorial office for reference.
If you choose to submit 35-mm transparencies then one set of these and one
set of prints (colour or black & white) will be acceptable.
We strongly advise authors to keep copies of all illustrations submitted
in case letters are lost or damaged in transit. Please do not send glass-mounted
transparencies — even when securely wrapped the glass will often arrive
cracked or shattered, resulting in damage to the surface of the slide which
usually renders it unsuitable for reproduction.
... Dental implants are the most suitable procedures to replace missing teeth [1]. Multiple clinical trials and scientific research have been done on dental implant materials and designs to enhance osseointegration and to produce ideal stability of crestal bone and soft tissue around dental implants [ 2 ,3]. ...
... At patients recall (3 years after loading), the probing pocket depth (PPD) at the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces of these dental implants was done by 1mm graduated perio-probe (Hu- al. 1986 [1,24,25]. The attached gingiva width were measured by Perio-probe (HuFriedy) from the gingival margin to the mucogingival line. ...
Full-text available
Objective: To evaluate marginal bone level (MBL) and clinical performance of dental implants with laser microtextured collar after three years of loading. Material and Methods: Randomly selected were 24 patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD] 44.0 ± 11.1 years) who had dental implants in the dental center at the Arab American University in Ramallah, Palestine. 64 implants are necessary to achieve 99% confidence level with a margin of error 0.1mm. Periapical radiographs were taken for these dental implants immeadiatly after loading and 3-years after loading. Crestal bone resorption was evaluated taking into consideration the attached gingivae width. Probing pocket depth and bleeding scores were also evaluated. Results: After 3 years of loading, the crestal bone loss was 0.74 ± 1.06 SD. Probing pocket depth 3.73 ± 0.85 SD. Gingivitis index (Bleeding on probing 0.77 ± 0.86 SD). Plaque index 0.40 ± 0.76 SD. In addition, no significant differences (P = 0.708) related to the attached gingiva width and radiograpgic bone loss were observed. Conclusion: Laser microtexturing of the collar of the dental implants provide stability of hard and soft tissue around dental implants. Nevertheless, it did not eliminate crestal bone resorption. Within the limits of this study, the laser microtexuring can stabilize the soft tissue regardless of the width of attached ginigiva.
... The clinical lifetime of intraoral functional units has been significantly affected by information on attachment soft and hard tissues and force allocation, resulting in stability and instability situations. 4 Although, a designed implant's processing processes significantly define its precision, surface features, and capacity to interact with surrounding tissue(s) in a given biological context. 6 Traditionally, dental implants have been made of biomedicalgraded materials such as titanium (Ti) and its alloys, as well as ceramics. ...
Objective: To determine the perceptions of the dentist regarding most appropriate metallic biomaterials and selected materials based on their biocompatibility and mechanical stability. Material and methods: This descriptive study of dental implants was conducted at the LUMHS Dental department, ISRA Dental department, ADCC Hyderabad, Bhittai dental hospital Mirpur-khas. The study duration was six months. All the dentists having minimum experience of one year, both genders and of either age, were included. Data has been collected by the gathering and measuring information on target variables through a questionnaire and interviews with the dentists. All collecting all the information the data was analyzed using SPSS version 26. Results: A total of 80 dentists from different health departments were interviewed to evaluate their perceptions of the dentist regarding most appropriate metallic biomaterials and selected materials based on their biocompatibility and mechanical stability. Out of all females were 63.7% and remaining were males. Most of the dentists agreed with the painful dental implant procedure depending on the anesthesia choices. All the patients can remove metallic dental implants from the mouth. Gold (Au) alloys for dental implants because it is cost effective. Majority of the study subjects replied that the Cobalt-chromium alloy metallic implants cause trauma/injury to the teeth and have a higher chance of corrosion. The best synonymies the word reliable for metallic dental implant in their opinion, which is the mouth - friendly, light weighted and cost effective. The most reliable/suitable and most biocompatible metal to use as a dental implant is Titanium. According to dentists, the metals supremely carry the drying agent for a longer period are Titanium and Zirconium and they were thought that the dental implants can last a lifetime if they are taken care of properly. Conclusion: As per study conclusion the Titanium is the most reliable/suitable and biocompatible metal to use as a dental implant, according to the study's findings, and Titanium and Zirconium are the metals that best carry the drying agent for a longer time, according to dentists. Because gold (Au) alloys are more cost effective, and Cobalt-chromium alloys metallic implants create more complications. If people take excellent care of your dental implants, they can last a lifetime. Keywords: Metallic dental implants, dentist perceptions, mechanical stability
... 21 Furthermore, such dentures develop other issues, such as slippage and movement, which over time potentially causes increased discomfort and irritation. 22 The contact pressure generated at the denture-soft tissue contact space due to biting forces can potentially influence these situations. This pressure should be distributed uniformly in order to avoid pressure points that may affect the tissues supporting the RPD. ...
The introduction of a removable partial denture onto the dental arch significantly influences the mechanical stress characteristics of both the jawbone and oral mucosa. The aim of this study was to analyze the stress state caused by biting forces upon insertion of partial dentures into the assembly, and to understand the influence of the resulting contact pressure on its retention behavior. For this purpose, a numerical model of a removable partial denture is proposed based on 3D models developed using computer tomography data of the jawbone and the removable partial denture. The denture system rests on the oral mucosa surface and three abutment teeth. The application of bite forces on the denture generated a stick condition on the loaded regions of the denture‐oral mucosa interface, which indicates positive retention of the denture onto the oral mucosa surface. Slip and negative retention were observed in the regions of the contact space that were not directly loaded. The contact pressures observed in the regions of the oral mucosa in contact with the denture were below the clinical pressure pain threshold value for soft tissue, which potentially lowers the risk of pain being experienced by denture users. Further, the variation of the retention behavior and contact pressures across different regions of the denture assembly was observed. Thus, there is a need for adhesives or restraining mechanisms for the denture system in order to avoid bending and deformation of sections of the denture as a consequence of the applied bite force. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
... dIscussIon Implant placement in the posterior region of the mandible requires the use of imaging modality which would delineate the location of the mandibular canal, its precise distance from the crest, the width of the alveolar ridge, and its inclination. [1,5] Inspite of many shortcomings, OPG is still the most popular radiographic examination modality used by clinicians. [6,7] At present, some form of cross-sectional imaging is recommended by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology for most patients receiving oral implants. ...
Full-text available
Aim: The present study was done to evaluate the accuracy of panoramic radiography (OPG), conventional cross sectional tomography (CCST) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to precisely portray structures in the posterior mandible. Materials and Methods: The present in-vitro study was performed on 42 edentulous human mandibles. A region 2cm behind the mental foramen was imaged using an OPG machine followed by imaging the same region using CCST function of the same OPG machine and CBCT. The distances from the alveolar crest to superior margin of the mandibular canal and alveolar crest to the lower border of mandible were measured in radiographs obtained by the three modalities. This step was followed by the comparison of the measurements performed in the cut-section of the mandible considered as Gold Standard. Results: The measurements done in the images obtained by OPG machine exceeded the values of gold standard by a mean of 2.69 mm ± 2.27 mm and 5.84 mm± 0.89 mm respectively. Similarly in CCST function and CBCT images, the measurements exceeded by 4.95 mm ± 2.35mm, 9.55mm ±1.25mm and 0.24mm ±0.20mm, 0.20mm ± 0.13mm respectively. The differences between the measurements made in radiographs and cut section were statistically significant. Conclusions: It was concluded that the measurements made by CBCT images were more precise, in addition CBCT images were also helpful in accurate three dimensional localization of the mandibular canal.
... Hollow cylinders, solid cylinders, and screws are considered to be the ideal shapes for dental implants with modulated surfaces. There are several aspects to be taken into account for ensuring successful dental implantation and avoiding complications associated with it [7]. Altogether, the goal of a successful implant design is to best anchor the implant into the bony ridge so as to facilitate easy and painless procedures. ...
Dental implants are a universally employed common treatment approach for the loss of teeth. Dental implants play a vital role in the field of dentistry for overcoming various dental problems including tooth loss, crown damage, and diastema. Three-dimensional (3D) bio-printing is an emerging technology with unparalleled potential in which polymers or materials are joined or polymerized with the aid of computer-assisted designing for the development of various constructs. It enables precise control over multiple compositions, architectural accuracy, and spatial distributions for accomplishing effective recapitulation of mechanical properties, microstructure, and biological functions of target tissues and organs. Along with many unique biomedical applications, 3D printing has a great impact in dentistry for restoration and implant applications. The use of computer-aided designing and selection of polymeric material with desired features for manufacturing, printing, and implantation can be applied for curing dental deformations with greater speed and lesser effort. In this context, this chapter mainly provides an overview about recent advances in 3D bioprinting for engineering dental implants with greater biocompatibility and suitability.
... Implants play a major role in orthodontic treatments, particularly in adults, when the patient's own teeth don't offer enough support and cannot be moved safely. [2,3] The main advantage of dental implants is its convenience. If placed successfully, dental implants look and feel like your own natural teeth. ...
Digitizing and computerization plays a major role in the manufacturing of dental implants. However, dental implants are manufactured by conventional methods and due to the advancements in computer aided engineering and software applications are a important part of the upsurge of technical change that has taken digital manufacturing today. Dentists and patients have equally set high requirements on quality, material, precision and cost so providing digital solution to a dental doctors is a real challenge. This paper focusses on unique and fully digital procedure for the design and manufacturing of dental implants (root) by means of Fused Deposition Method (FDM). Autodesk Inventor 3D CAD software is used for product design, rendering and simulation of dental implant. For ease in manufacturing a customized implant design is provided to the dentists. © 2018, Transstellar Journal Publications and Research Consultancy Private Limited (TJPRC). All rights reserved.
Full-text available
Introduction High frequency ultrasound has shown as a promising imaging modality to evaluate peri-implant tissues. It is not known if the ultrasound imaging settings might influence ultrasound’s ability to differentiate implant structures. The aim of this benchtop study was to evaluate the dependence of ultrasound on imaging angles and modes to measure implant geometry-related parameters. Methods A clinical ultrasound scanner (ZS3, Mindray) with an intraoral probe (L30-8) offering combinations of harmonic and compound imaging modes was employed for imaging 16 abutments and 4 implants. The samples were mounted to a micro-positioning system in a water tank, which allowed a range of -30 to 30-degree imaging angles in 5-degree increment between the probe and samples. The abutment angle, implant thread pitch and depth were measured on ultrasound, compared to the reference readings. The errors were computed as a function of the image angles and modes. All samples were replicated 3 times for 3 image modes and 11 image angles, thus resulting in 2,340 images. Results The mean errors of ultrasound to estimate 16 abutment angles, compared to the reference values, were between -1.8 to 2.7 degrees. The root mean squared error (RMSE) ranged from 1.5 to 4.6 degrees. Ultrasound significantly overestimated the thread pitch by 26.1 μm to 36.2 μm. The error in thread depth measurements were in a range of -50.5 μm to 39.6 μm, respectively. The RMSE of thread pitch and depth of the tested 4 implants was in a range of 34.7 to 56.9 μm and 51.0 to 101.8 μm, respectively. In most samples, these errors were independent of the image angle and modes. Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, high-frequency ultrasound was feasible in imaging abutments and implant fixtures independent of scanning angle within ±30° of normal incidence and for compounding and non-compounding-based imaging modes.
Full-text available
3D printing is a pioneering technology which has shown immense potential in different area of product design, manufacturing, engineering, and biology. This technology has evolved over the time which has led to the development of high-end 3D printing machines to obtain the product with high resolution. In all cases, the object to be printed is created using computer aided design (CAD) file which is the exported as a file to be printed. Different types of 3D printing techniques have shown enormous application in the area of medicine and surgery. 3D printing equipment's and technology is supposed to revolutionize the pharmaceutical industry by providing personalized and patient oriented products. Advances the in area of high-resolution 3D printing will complement the patient specific diagnostics and personalized medicine. Overall, this technology holds many promises for the future and is expected to advance the healthcare.
Laser dimple texturing has been a surge in the surface to surface contact applications like the cutting tool/workpiece interaction, piston-cylinder assembly, bearings, prosthetic hip & knee joints, blanking punch- die assembly, etc. to control the friction and wear between the interactions. In this article, the first part presented about a broad literature review on an effect of dimple texture in various industrial applications like bio-implant components and cutting tools. In the second part, detailed information has discussed on a process of laser dimple texturing and influence of laser process parameters such as laser wavelength, laser energy, number of pulses, pulse duration and focal distance on dimple geometry. The third part describes a comprehensive literature review on challenges/limitations of laser dimple texturing process like heat affected zone, tensile residual stresses, bulges around the dimple, etc. Finally, in the fourth part, proper attention has given on recent developments like laser shock peen texturing, laser texturing under water and post-processing techniques to overcome the limitations of laser surface texturing process.
The study of osseointegration of endosseous implants is a matter of great interest, mostly due to the increase in the use of many types of implants in clinical practice. Bone ingrowth results from a complex process, in which mechanics and biology play a major role. A wide variety of diverse factors can affect the development of the process, such as the properties or geometry of the implant surface, the mechanical stimulation or the initial cell conditions. In the first part of this article [Moreo, P., García-Aznar, J.M., Doblaré, M., 2008. Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: mathematical model. J. Theor. Biol., in press] a model composed of a set of reaction-diffusion equations was proposed to simulate the formation of bone around implants, specially focused on the early stages of bone healing, that was able to contemplate the effects of surface microtopography. The goal of this second part is to use the model to analyse the effect of factors such as cell stimulation, the initial cell concentration in the host bone and the geometry of the implant. For this purpose, two different simplified versions of the model are here analysed theoretically and further insight is gained from the study of the stability of fixed points and existence of travelling waves. Additionally, numerical simulations by means of the finite element method have been performed to examine the osseointegration of a dental implant with grooves at the surface of the threads. Results obtained from the analysis and simulations show that the model can reproduce some features of peri-implant bone ingrowth.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.