ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

While complicated grief has been addressed in part through some recommendations for modifications in the upcoming fifth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), there remain reasons for substantial concern about its scope therein and within clinical practice. The authors issue a call to the field, reiterating that complicated grief is complicated and cannot be confined to just one syndrome or disorder. Continued research is urged, and specific caveats are identified for exploring the complex dimensions of loss and grief. The authors advocate for ongoing dialogue about and investigation of various potential forms of complicated grief.
OMEGA, Vol. 65(4) 251-255, 2012
A CALL TO THE FIELD:
COMPLICATED GRIEF IN THE DSM-5
THERESE A. RANDO, PH.D., BCETS, BCBT
The Institute for the Study and Treatment of Loss, Warwick, Rhode Island
KENNETH J. DOKA, P
H.D.
The College of New Rochelle, New York
and The Hospice Foundation of America
STEPHEN FLEMING, P
H.D., C.PSYCH
York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
MARIA HELENA FRANCO, P
H.D.
Pontifical Catholic University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
ELIZABETH A. LOBB, P
H.D., MAPPSCI,BADED
Calvary Health Care Sydney and Cunningham Centre for Palliative Care
and University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
COLIN MURRAY PARKES, MD
St. Christopher’s Hospice, London, England
ROSE STEELE, RN, P
H.D.
York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
ABSTRACT
While complicated grief has been addressed in part through some recom
-
mendations for modifications in the upcoming fifth version of the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), there remain reasons
for substantial concern about its scope therein and within clinical practice.
The authors issue a call to the field, reiterating that complicated grief is
251
Ó 2012, Baywood Publishing Co., Inc.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/OM.65.4.a
http://baywood.com
complicated and cannot be confined to just one syndrome or disorder. Con
-
tinued research is urged, and specific caveats are identified for exploring
the complex dimensions of loss and grief. The authors advocate for
ongoing dialogue about and investigation of various potential forms of
complicated grief.
INTRODUCTION
For many years, there have been calls for a diagnostic category in the American
Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM) to reflect grief that signals departure from the normal course of accom
-
modating loss and which warrants clinical attention (e.g., Horowitz, Siegel,
Holen, Bonanno, Milbrath, & Stinson, 1997; Jacobs, 1999; Parkes, 2007;
Prigerson & Jacobs, 2001; Prigerson & Maciejewski, 2006; Rando, 1993). We are
pleased that this call has been answered and that it is likely that this omission
will be addressed, in part, through some of the recommendations for modifica-
tions in the upcoming DSM-5.
The diagnostic term for complications that arise in the course of grieving has
been variously defined over the past 20 years, with a multitude of adjectives used
to describe variations from normal grief. These terms include absent, abnormal,
complicated, distorted, morbid, maladaptive, atypical, intensified and prolonged,
unresolved, neurotic, dysfunctional, chronic, delayed, and inhibited.
More recently, systematic attempts have been made to identify a form of
grieving that meets the standards of scientific research required for inclusion
in the DSM (e.g., Boelen & van den Bout, 2008; Prigerson, Vanderweker, &
Maciejewski, 2008; Shear, Simon, Wall, Zisook, Neimeyer, Duan, et al., 2011).
Foremost among these authors has been a group of researchers led by Holly
Prigerson. This team has developed and made extensive use of a research ques
-
tionnaire originally called the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) (Prigerson,
Maciejewski, Reynolds, Bierhals, Newsom, Fasiczka, et al., 1995). Subsequent
revisions include the ICG-R (Prigerson & Jacobs, 2001) and the current PG-13
(Prigerson, Horowitz, Jacobs, Parkes, Aslan, Goodkin, et al., 2009).
This tool (and its various iterations) has now been used very widely as a
measure of persisting grief beyond the normal and many who have employed it
have used the term “Complicated Grief” for the syndrome that has emerged from
these studies. However, Prigerson’s group has explicitly recognized that there
are numerous forms of complicated grief, of which their syndrome is only one.
To avoid confusion, they renamed their proposed syndrome “Prolonged Grief
Disorder” (PGD) (Prigerson et al., 2008).
Having received evidence from many sources, the task force members who are
planning the fifth edition of the DSM placed on the web a consultation document
that includes, within the section headed “G 04 Adjustment Disorders” (American
Psychiatric Association, 2012), a category named “Related to Bereavement.”
252 / RANDO ET AL.
This category falls short of being a precise diagnosis. They also included a
modified version of Prigerson’s PGD, which they term “Persistent Complex
Bereavement-Related Disorder,” and placed it in the DSM section for condi
-
tions requiring further research.
While we applaud these recommendations, we also wish to acknowledge that
these efforts to identify forms of complicated grief should continue to go further.
Moreover, they will merit additional attention as subsequent revisions of the
DSM are considered. We address our concerns to all our colleagues in the field of
grief counseling and grief-related research, as well as those colleagues actively
involved in preparation of the DSM-5.
COMPLICATED GRIEF IS COMPLICATED
Our major concern is simply this: Complicated grief is complicated and
cannot be confined to one syndrome or disorder. In other words, there is not just
a single form of complicated grief, but rather many forms of it. No single form
should be construed to contain the full range of complicated grief. Instead, we
urge that a more comprehensive and robust perspective be maintained regarding
this phenomenon and that future endeavors seek to identify other forms of
complicated grief.
We call for continued research that would underlie the delineation of addi-
tional diagnostic categories with their distinct criteria. We again affirm support for
the recognition that, in a certain percentage of cases, grief does not follow the
normal course of accommodating loss and creates disorders meriting clinical
scrutiny. We believe that the work of Prigerson et al. (2008) and the research
underlying the category now termed “Prolonged Grief Disorder” meets the
standard of scientific research rightly expected of the DSM. We urge its inclusion
as one of the syndromes of complicated forms of grief. Other specific grief-related
syndromes that we feel may warrant further research and consideration include,
but are not limited to, delayed grief, inhibited grief, distorted grief, traumatic
grief, and forms of chronic grief that may be differentiated from “Prolonged Grief
Disorder.” We acknowledge the fact that complications of grief, in addition to
the syndromes delineated, can result in increased physical and mental morbidity
and mortality.
This editorial represents the opinions of the authors, not the opinions of the
Board or membership of the International Work Group on Death, Dying, and
Bereavement (IWG). As a group, we represent clinicians, researchers, writers,
and educators who come from diverse disciplines, including medicine, psychiatry,
nursing, psychology, counseling, and sociology from five countries, and have
over 200 years of collective experience focusing on issues related to loss and
grief. Convening at the Meeting of the IWG outside of Melbourne, Australia
in October 2011, this group decided to develop and issue A Call to the Field
A CALL TO THE FIELD / 253
expressing our consensus about concerns related to the development of grief-
related issues in the DSM-5 as well as subsequent revisions of the DSM.
To that end, we strongly call for consideration of the following clinical issues
and we advocate for further research that will allow this critical dialogue to
continue and influence subsequent revisions of the DSM.
CONTINUING THE DIALOGUE
We urge the DSM to broaden the understanding of grief. Grief may occur in
non-death related losses and is not restricted to close relatives or friends. Rather,
grief should be construed as deriving from separation from, or any significant
change in relationship to, someone or something to whom an individual is
meaningfully attached.
We request that the DSM be sensitive in its use of terminology—noting the
varied meanings and usage of terms such as mourning, grieving, or grief work.
For example, the term mourning has been used to both describe intrapsychic
processes of accommodating the loss, as well as cultural ways of expressing grief.
In addition, we are concerned that use of the wording “may also. . . .” in any pro-
posed criteria for the disorder might introduce a level of ambiguity to the diagnosis
that would be unintended.
We recognize, moreover, that cultural and spiritual sensitivities are essential.
Clinicians and researchers should assess the ways that cultural and spiritual/
philosophical factors complicate and facilitate the grieving process.
We affirm that any diagnosis should be preceded by a full psychosocial assess-
ment of the client. Recognition of multiple influences upon bereavement—
pertaining to the mourner, the relationship lost, the circumstances of the loss,
social variables, and physical factors—must be considered. Further, because loss
can create an “emotional tsunami” in survivors, clinicians should explore, among
other factors, the effects of a loss on self and self-identity of the survivors.
We caution that extrapolation to children and adolescents should not be under
-
taken without appropriate empirical and clinical support.
We are concerned that as of this writing there may no longer be formal
recognition of bereavement in “Other Conditions That May Be a Focus of
Clinical Attention” (formerly known as V codes). We feel that some recognition
of grief and bereavement within such a category would be useful, as such a charac
-
terization acknowledges that between “normality” and “pathology” there is a
“gray” area of symptoms and issues worthy of clinical attention.
These considerations are offered in a spirit of collegiality and deep respect
for the past decade of research and review. We praise these efforts and acknowl
-
edge their importance even as we urge continued consideration for the need
to explore the complex dimensions of loss and the many ways in which grief
may be complicated.
254 / RANDO ET AL.
REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association. (2012). DSM-5 development. G 04—Adjustment
disorders. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org/proposedrevision/pages/proposed
revision.aspx?rid=367
Boelen, V. A., & van den Bout, J. (2008). Complicated grief and uncomplicated grief
are distinguishable constructs. Psychiatry Research, 157, 311-314.
Horowitz, M. J., Siegel, B., Holen, A., Bonanno, G., Milbrath, C., & Stinson, C. H.
(1997). Diagnostic criteria for complicated grief disorders. American Journal of
Psychiatry, 154(7), 904-910.
Jacobs, S. (1999). Traumatic grief: Diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Philadelphia, PA:
Brunner-Mazel.
Parkes, C. M. (2007). Complicated grief: The debate over a new DSM-V category.
In K. Doka (Ed.), Living with grief: Before and after the death (pp. 139-152).
Washington, DC: Hospice Foundation of America.
Prigerson, H. G., Horowitz, M. J., Jacobs, S. C., Parkes, C. M., Aslan, M., Goodkin, K.,
et al. (2009). Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed
for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Medicine, 6(8), e1000121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.
1000121
Prigerson, H. G., & Jacobs, S. C. (2001). Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: A rationale,
consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, &
R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping,
and care (pp. 613-645). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Prigerson, H. G., & Maciejewski, P. K. (2006). A call for sound empirical testing and
evaluation of criteria for complicated grief proposed for the DSM-V. Symposium
on complicated grief. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 52, 9-19.
Prigerson, H. G., Maciejewski, P. K., Reynolds, C. F. III, Bierhals, A. J., Newsom, J. T.,
Fasiczka, A., et al. (1995). Inventory of complicated grief: A scale to measure
maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Research, 59, 65-79.
Prigerson, H. G., Vanderwerker, L. C., & Maciejewski, P. K. (2008). A case for inclusion of
Prolonged Grief Disorder in DSM-V. In M. Stroebe, R. Hansson, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe
(Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and
intervention (pp. 165-186). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rando, T. A. (1993). Treatment of complicated mourning. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Shear, M. K., Simon, N., Wall, M., Zisook, S., Neimeyer, R., Duan, N., et al. (2011).
Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety,
28, 103-117. doi: 10.1002/da.20780
Direct reprint requests to:
Therese A. Rando, Ph.D., BCETS, BCBT
Clinical Director
The Institute for the Study and Treatment of Loss
33 College Hill Road, Building 30A
Warwick, RI 02886
e-mail: tarando@cox.net
A CALL TO THE FIELD / 255
... Al momento de enfrentar una pérdida Rando et al. consideran que la persona en proceso de duelo tiene afectada la autopercepción de sí y la percepción del mundo; además las personas se enfrentan a una constante preocupación por el futuro, comienzan a cuestionar muchas de las creencias a las cuales están sujetas. Así mismo tienen dificultad para enfocar su atención a la pérdida del objeto o persona, lo que puede desencadenar reacciones emocionales, cognitivas, somáticas y comportamentales (5). ...
... Todo eso duró, pues duró un buen rato o sea como ese sentimiento que tenía duró mucho tiempo". 5 Personas de Apoyo Para las personas que están atravesando por un proceso de duelo les ayuda que existan personas que pueden apoyarles, a las que le pueden contar cómo se sienten; lo cual es benéfico para que el duelo sea superado de forma más rápida. Algunas de las personas a las que acuden los participantes cuando están atravesando por un duelo, es a la madre o a algún miembro de la familia: "Sí, mi madre como siempre me escuchaba y me apoyaba y me daba consejos para que yo pudiera salir de esta situación". ...
... Es importante considerar cuales son los parámetros de normalidad para un proceso de duelo, pues éste se puede complicar y convertirse en un duelo complicado o patológico y de esa manera afectarse la calidad de vida de la persona en distintas áreas de su vida. Los resultados obtenidos en este renglón tienen concordancia con lo realizado por Freud, Rando et al., Chaurand et al. y Villacieros (1,5,11,13). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to explore the perception of grief in students. The method used was based on Grounded Theory. The sample was a total of 10 youth undergraduate students of the Psychology career from the Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud among 20-25 years old who have experienced one or more grief experience. The Discourse Analysis was the methodical strategy for analyzing the answers of the participants. The results showed that the process of grief has been experimented at least once in life of the majority of people and every person has lived in different way, depending of internal and external factors. The emotions and feelings that participants experimented due a significant lost are sadness, anger, disappointment and resentment. Likewise, it was found that when a person who has lived a process of grief it is easier for themselves to put in the place of others persons in a similar situation. Finally, in conclusion the grief could be experienced by any person and caused for different situations such as death of a familiar, a breakup of couple, the change of house or school or the loss of something material. Resumen: Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo conocer la percepción de los estudiantes sobre el duelo. El método utilizado se basó en la teoría fundamentada. Se utilizó una muestra de 10 estudiantes de la Licenciatura en Psicología del Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud con edades entre los 20 y 25 años de edad que hayan experimentado una o más experiencias de duelo. El análisis del discurso fue la estrategia metodológica empleada para analizar las repuestas de los participantes. Los resultados obtenidos en la presente investigación indican que el proceso de duelo se ha experimentado al menos una vez en la vida de la mayoría de las personas y cada persona lo vive de diferente manera, dependiendo de factores internos y externos. Las emociones y sentimientos que se enfrentan las participantes ante una pérdida significativa generalmente son de tristeza, enojo, decepción y resentimiento. Asimismo se encontró que cuando una persona ha vivenciado un proceso de duelo le es más fácil ponerse en el lugar del otro ante una situación similar. Finalmente se concluye que el duelo se puede presentar en cualquier persona y puede ser causado por distintas situaciones como la muerte de un familiar, una ruptura de pareja, el cambio de casa o escuela o bien la pérdida de algo material. Palabras Clave: Duelo, dependencia emocional, estudiantes universitarios, emociones
... Não são recentes as discussões acerca da inserção do luto nos manuais diagnósticos e estatísticos de transtornos mentais (Prigerson & Maciejewski, 2005;Rando et al. 2012;) e, a partir disso, o desenvolvimento de instrumentos que objetivam o tratamento das complicações dos processos de luto (Prigerson et al. 2009;Shear, 2010). ...
... No que diz respeito à compreensão do luto, para Worden (2009) (Rando et al. 2012) ao longo dos anos também foram sendo utilizados para se referir às complicações dos processos de luto, dentre eles: anormal, complicado (em especial com Shear, 2015), atípico, disfuncional e crônico. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to explore the literature on Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) following its recent inclusion in the DSM-5-TR, analyzing the implications of this new categorization for interventions with bereaved individuals. To achieve this, the methodology used was an Integrative Literature Review in the databases: PubMed, BVS, and SciELO, using the descriptors: prolonged grief disorder, prolonged grief disorder, and prolonged grief and DSM-5-TR, with works published in the period from 2020 to 2024. A total of 980 articles were found, and after the entire analysis and selection process, 7 studies were included in the research. The results indicate that although the inclusion of PGD in the DSM-5-TR has sparked debates about the medicalization of grief and the potential risks of stigmatization and an expressive number of diagnosis, there is also growing recognition that PGD represents a distinct clinical condition that requires specific intervention. From this, it is concluded that despite the controversy, the recognition of PGD has proven to be a significant advancement in clinical practice, provided it is accompanied by adequate understanding and precise diagnostic criteria, as well as future research being developed to clarify the best therapeutic approaches.
... It is also pointed out that the inclusion of this condition as a disorder could represent a risk of "pathologizing" grief, as it is also part of expected life experiences. Moreover, such criteria could exclude important particularities that describe different types of losses (Franco, 2010;Rando et al., 2012;Santos, 2017). The discussion is extensive, and, therefore, researchers and clinicians in the grief area have decided to include the PCBD as a "special condition" in the DSM-V, not yet for clinical use, but for stimulating the development of research to clarify and deepen the understanding of the topic, confirming or refuting the ideas proposed in the fifth update of the manual. ...
... The discussion is extensive, and, therefore, researchers and clinicians in the grief area have decided to include the PCBD as a "special condition" in the DSM-V, not yet for clinical use, but for stimulating the development of research to clarify and deepen the understanding of the topic, confirming or refuting the ideas proposed in the fifth update of the manual. As advantages of improving knowledge on mourning, there is the possibility of acknowledging the condition in public policies, expanding the bereaved population's access to specialized care, as well as preventing serious cases (Franco, 2010;Rando et al., 2012;Santos, 2017). ...
Article
This study sought to identify the factors associated with the development and prevention of complicated grief in women who have lost a baby. This is a systematic review of scientific articles in the main mental health databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and APA Databases (PsycINFO). The selection and data extraction processes occurred independently and blindly by two authors, considering the eligibility criteria. The analysis included publications from 2013 to 2021 of observational studies with adult women who had experienced losing a baby (during pregnancy up to 2 years of life) and that employed standardized instruments to evaluate grief. From the 8,200 records found, 23 articles were selected for analysis. As risk factors, we identified the presence of mother’s psychopathology, history of gestational loss, and social pressure for a new pregnancy, while as protective factors, we identified the presence of another child other than the deceased one, the quality of specialized healthcare, and the social support provided by either a partner, community, or spiritual activities. Furthermore, the studies pointed to the event of losing a baby as an opportunity for posttraumatic growth. Although complicated grief is often associated with other mental health conditions, such as anxiety, depression, or posttraumatic stress, it is necessary to differentiate it for a clearer understanding of the complicated grief as a singular condition, to enable access to appropriate care for bereaved mothers and families, as well as to promote public policies which provide support to them.
... Pesquisadores e clínicos de referência na área avaliaram como vantajosa a possibilidade do reconhecimento do TLCP também no contexto social, destacando a possibilidade de contribuir com políticas públicas para a ampliação do acesso da população enlutada a atendimento especializado, quando na presença de casos graves. Por outro lado, a inclusão desta categoria no DSM-V (APA, 2013), também gerou uma discussão a respeito do risco de banalização de seu diagnóstico, da mesma forma que questionou-se o risco de exclusão das particularidades das reações de luto geradas por diferentes tipos de perdas(Franco, 2010;Rando et al., 2012;Santos, 2017), provavelmente por ainda não terem sido suficientemente esclarecidos e estabelecidos os critérios sugeridos para o TLCP no DSM-V até aquele momento (APA, 2013). Nesta direção, o Manual de Classificação Internacional de Doenças (CID-11), na sua edição mais atual (WHO, 2019), também propôs o diagnóstico especial de transtorno do luto prolongado (TLP), atendendo, em partes, a estas controvérsias, uma vez que antecipou a possibilidade de diagnóstico, definindo que os sintomas deveriam estar presentes por um tempo mais curto (de no mínimo seis meses após a perda), possibilitando, dessa maneira, o direcionamento de cuidado especializado aos enlutados com mais brevidade. ...
Article
Abordar temas como morte, perdas e luto é uma tarefa complexa, embora estas sejam experiências que fazem parte da existência humana. O luto pode ser compreendido como uma resposta emocional do indivíduo diante da ruptura de um vínculo importante, que gera reações físicas, comportamentais e sociais. A presente revisão da literatura buscou refletir acerca dos avanços, dificuldades e limitações das abordagens científica e clínica. Para tanto, realizou-se uma análise crítica das compreensões acerca do luto, desafios para sua identificação e avaliação, assim como para a formação de profissionais da saúde que trabalham com enlutados. Ainda que se tenha observado progressos na abordagem do luto, ressalta-se a importância de novos estudos com o intuito de aprimorar intervenções direcionadas a esta população.
... Psychological and medical approaches have become standard and a source of vocabulary in research on grief (Bandini, 2015;Brinkmann, 2017;Pulkkinen, 2017). From these perspectives, grief is a psychological response to any significant loss or trauma and has been explored mainly in relation to the death of close relatives (Dyregrov & Dyregrov, 2013;Ener & Ray, 2017;Gross, 2016;Rando et al., 2012). Psychological and medical theories construct grief predominantly as an individual emotion and "problem" (Bandini, 2015;Lund, 2020), based on the assumption that there are "positive" and "negative" emotions, grief being the latter ("complicated grief disorder" and "persistent complex bereavement disorder" are included in DSM-5, the latest version). ...
Article
Full-text available
Although grief is common in children’s lives, it is under-researched and undertheorized. The aim of our study is to investigate children’s grief as a cultural activity that consists of repertoires of practices in institutional early childhood education and care (ECEC). ECEC is a central site where grief is learned and practiced. Taking a cultural-historical approach using ethnographically inspired research methods, we analyzed interaction in the contexts of separation, absence of a parent, and social exclusion. We focused on the moments of grief, demonstrating how children and adults organize their social encounters and interactional history, and engage in rich repertoires of practices. We discuss the conditions for recognizing grief in institutional ECEC.
... Acknowledging calls to clarify this difference from professionals (Rando et al., 2012), the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental sisorders, Fifth Edition (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) added persistent complex bereavement disorder as a condition for future study. The omission of the word grief is notable, avoiding pathologizing grief (Maciejewski et al., 2016). ...
Article
Purpose- The purpose of this paper is to give an overview of existing literature on post-traumatic growth (PTG), particularly in the ways that it relates to grief. Design/methodology/approach - This narrative literature review brings together 125 sources and presents them in a readable way. Findings - There is a great deal of evidence to suggest that PTG can come from grief. This is not always the case, however. Research limitations/implications - This review presents only a selection of the existing literature-the review is not systematic. However, this allows for a narrative to be crafted, to aid readability. Practical implications - Suggestions for future research are made throughout, and potential therapeutic applications are mentioned. Social implications - This paper discusses stigma, in the form of ''disenfranchised grief''. In this, social pressures and expectations affect how a person processes their grief psychologically. While movements to increase discourse and reduce stigma are on the rise, more is needed. Originality/value - This review guides readers through existing literature, providing a wide overview of the topic of PTG in grief.
Article
Full-text available
p> The relevance of the theoretical conceptualization of children's grief is due to the high importance of psychological assistance to children in the situation of loss of a parent. The purpose of this article is to describe the main theoretical positions conceptualizing the idea of children's grief based on the analysis of psychological literature. Results. Theoretical analysis has shown that the problem of child grief in the literature is represented by the following 4 aspects: the impact of the loss of a parent on the mental health of a child; age-related features of child grief; the stages of child grief; ideas about normal and complicated child grief. The analysis of these aspects allowed us to conclude that throughout the history of the study of childhood grief, the position of researchers has changed from indicating an unambiguous connection between the loss of a parent in childhood and subsequent mental health disorders in adulthood to recognizing the influence of many factors on childhood grief that can help a child adapt to loss. The main theoretical provisions conceptualizing the problem of child grief at the present stage of its study are formulated as conclusions.</p
Chapter
Traumatic death involves a devastating combination of trauma and loss, presenting the mourner with traumatic bereavement. This is highly associated with a host of adverse sequelae, including serious risks to mental and physical health and impairments in functioning. At least for a period of time, its challenges create complicated mourning, itself associated with problematic consequences. Traumatic bereavement is of interest in mental health as it constitutes a major problem with worrisome repercussions. Strategies are available to intervene in traumatic bereavement to enable mastery of trauma, work through complicated mourning, and address the unique problems created by the trauma-loss combination.
Article
Full-text available
Resumo A Covid-19 provocou número elevado de perdas e mudanças nos processos de cuidado e despedida, fatores que podem dificultar a elaboração do luto. Objetivamos, assim, compreender as particularidades do luto no âmbito da Covid-19, ressaltando a importância da adaptação e da criação de estratégias voltadas ao cuidado da saúde mental nos processos de luto. O ensaio realiza um panorama teórico, indicando elementos presentes na pandemia com potencial para interferir no luto, e apresenta um levantamento de iniciativas adaptadas a tal contexto. A pandemia trouxe mudanças na forma de experienciar o morrer. Evidenciam-se iniciativas na tentativa de mitigar os efeitos emocionais, cognitivos e comportamentais. O momento convoca a repensar conceitos e (re)criar compreensões acerca da morte e do luto, ressaltando-se a importância da Rede de Saúde Mental, com o fortalecimento de ações de base sociocomunitária, reconhecimento de diferentes níveis de complexidade das demandas e acesso organizado à atenção especializada.
Article
Full-text available
This chapter begins with an evaluation of recent research that has accumulated about traumatic grief (TG) symptomatology. More specifically, the available evidence is reviewed to determine whether it satisfies requirements for the establishment of TG as a distinct clinical entity. Following this review, the authors discuss some advantages and disadvantages of developing standardized criteria for TG. Given their belief that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, they then describe the logic behind the consensus criteria for TG proposed by a panel of experts. Results of a preliminary test of the proposed criteria set for TG are reported, directions for their further refinement are discussed, and assessment tools for TG are presented. The authors conclude by proposing ways to distinguish between normal and TG reactions and by suggesting directions for future research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
Bereavement is a universal experience, and its association with excess morbidity and mortality is well established. Nevertheless, grief becomes a serious health concern for a relative few. For such individuals, intense grief persists, is distressing and disabling, and may meet criteria as a distinct mental disorder. At present, grief is not recognized as a mental disorder in the DSM-IV or ICD-10. The goal of this study was to determine the psychometric validity of criteria for prolonged grief disorder (PGD) to enhance the detection and potential treatment of bereaved individuals at heightened risk of persistent distress and dysfunction. A total of 291 bereaved respondents were interviewed three times, grouped as 0-6, 6-12, and 12-24 mo post-loss. Item response theory (IRT) analyses derived the most informative, unbiased PGD symptoms. Combinatoric analyses identified the most sensitive and specific PGD algorithm that was then tested to evaluate its psychometric validity. Criteria require reactions to a significant loss that involve the experience of yearning (e.g., physical or emotional suffering as a result of the desired, but unfulfilled, reunion with the deceased) and at least five of the following nine symptoms experienced at least daily or to a disabling degree: feeling emotionally numb, stunned, or that life is meaningless; experiencing mistrust; bitterness over the loss; difficulty accepting the loss; identity confusion; avoidance of the reality of the loss; or difficulty moving on with life. Symptoms must be present at sufficiently high levels at least six mo from the death and be associated with functional impairment. The criteria set for PGD appear able to identify bereaved persons at heightened risk for enduring distress and dysfunction. The results support the psychometric validity of the criteria for PGD that we propose for inclusion in DSM-V and ICD-11. Please see later in the article for Editors' Summary.
Article
Full-text available
Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (LST) occurs commonly in critical care units, yet little is known about the family experience with this process. The purpose of this study was to understand the lived experience of families participating in the process of withdrawal of LST from a family member with an unexpected, life-threatening illness or injury. A hermeneutic phenomenological approach was used as nineteen families were interviewed and observed. Within and across family analyses were conducted. Methodological rigor was established and redundancy was achieved. The categories that evolved from the data included: this happens to other families, time to understand the severity of the illness or injury, time to see if health would be restored, riding a roller coaster, family readiness: willingness to consider withdrawal of LST as a possible option, one step at a time, family readiness: time to make a decision, the family will go on, and waiting for a miracle. The family experience participating in the process of withdrawal of LST happened for families "in their own time." The results of this study have important implications for clinical practice and future research.
Article
The empirical testing of diagnostic criteria for Complicated Grief (CG) by autonomous investigators is a welcome development. Cross-validation studies are essential to an impartial evaluation of diagnostic criteria for CG proposed for inclusion in the DSM-V. Nevertheless, the review of evidence to confirm or disconfirm the diagnostic validity of the proposed CG criteria requires a fair, unbiased, and relevant examination of the data. It is our view that Hogan, Worden, and Schmidt's (2003-2004) “An Empirical Study of the Complicated Grief Disorder Criteria” (see Table 1) fails to meet these standards. Hogan et al. test for the independence between: a) separation distress and traumatic distress symptoms, b) CG and depressive symptoms, c) CG symptoms and presumably “normal” symptoms of grief. Testing for the independence of these constructs is a red herring. Issues central to the validity and reliability of a CG diagnosis should focus on the ability of the symptoms to identify the small number of bereaved persons with enduring and acutely distressing grief that is associated with significant dysfunction. Despite asking the wrong questions, the basic results remain consistent with claims that we have made all along (e.g., that CG symptoms are unidimensional; that more than half the variance in CG symptoms cannot be explained by depressive symptoms; that CG symptoms distinguish themselves from normal grief symptoms with respect to their intensity and chronicity and the prediction of morbidity). There is little doubt of the need for more empirical work to evaluate the reliability, validity, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic efficiency of criteria proposed for CG. It is our hope that the call will be heard by investigators who will test issues relevant to the creation of a sound CG diagnosis.
Article
To examine the frequency of surrogate decisions for in-hospital do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and the timing of DNR order entry for surrogate decisions. Retrospective cohort study. Large, urban, public hospital. Hospitalized adults aged 65 and older over a 3-year period (1/1/2004-12/31/2006) with a DNR order during their hospital stay. Electronic chart review provided data on frequency of surrogate decisions, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, and timing of DNR orders. Of 668 patients, the ordering physician indicated that the DNR decision was made with the patient in 191 cases (28.9%), the surrogate in 389 (58.2%), and both in 88 (13.2%). Patients who required a surrogate were more likely to be in the intensive care unit (62.2% vs 39.8%, P<.001) but did not differ according to demographic characteristics. By hospital Day 3, 77.6% of patient decisions, 61.9% of surrogate decisions, and 58.0% of shared decisions had been made. In multivariable models, the number of days from admission to DNR order was higher for surrogate (odds ratio (OR)=1.97, P<.001) and shared decisions (OR=1.48, P=.009) than for patient decisions. The adjusted hazard ratio for hospital death was higher for patients with surrogate than patient decisions (2.61, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.56-4.36). Patients whose DNR orders were written on Day 6 or later were twice as likely to die in the hospital (OR=2.20, 95% CI=1.45-3.36) than patients with earlier DNR orders. For patients who have a DNR order entered during their hospital stay, order entry occurs later when a surrogate is involved. Surrogate decision-making may take longer because of the greater ethical, emotional, or communication complexity of making decisions with surrogates than with patients.
Article
Bereavement is a severe stressor that typically incites painful and debilitating symptoms of acute grief that commonly progresses to restoration of a satisfactory, if changed, life. Normally, grief does not need clinical intervention. However, sometimes acute grief can gain a foothold and become a chronic debilitating condition called complicated grief. Moreover, the stress caused by bereavement, like other stressors, can increase the likelihood of onset or worsening of other physical or mental disorders. Hence, some bereaved people need to be diagnosed and treated. A clinician evaluating a bereaved person is at risk for both over-and under-diagnosis, either pathologizing a normal condition or neglecting to treat an impairing disorder. The authors of DSM IV focused primarily on the problem of over-diagnosis, and omitted complicated grief because of insufficient evidence. We revisit bereavement considerations in light of new research findings. This article focuses primarily on a discussion of possible inclusion of a new diagnosis and dimensional assessment of complicated grief. We also discuss modifications in the bereavement V code and refinement of bereavement exclusions in major depression and other disorders.