Article

Removal of user fees for caesareans and under-fives in northern Sudan: A review of policy implementation and effectiveness

Immpact, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. .
International Journal of Health Planning and Management (Impact Factor: 0.97). 03/2013; 28(1). DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2146
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

In 2008, the Government of Sudan launched a policy of free curative care for under-fives and caesareans. This paper presents the findings of a review of this policy, on the basis of research conducted in five focal states of northern Sudan in 2010. Policy implementation was assessed using four research tools: key informant interviews, exit interviews, a facility survey, and analysis of facility finances and the cost of the package of care.
The findings point to important weaknesses in implementation, such as unclear specification of the exact target group and package of care and inadequate funding. Despite this, service utilisation appears to have responded, at least in the short term. The findings also highlight the urgent need for improved access to basic health care and financial protection against health care costs in northern Sudan (for those with and without national health insurance membership).
This review contributes to the growing literature on the selective removal of user fees for priority services. It indicates the range of challenges to effective implementation (strategic, financial and organisational). Some of these are particular to Sudan, but many are shared, and indicate important lessons for improving access to and quality of care for women and children in Africa.
Copyright

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sophie Witter, Feb 10, 2014
    • "We conducted interviews with women who gave birth, their husbands or their relatives who accompanied them to the hospital when they were about to leave the health facility. The interviews were conducted using a structured questionnaire that was used in Sudan for a similar survey [8]. This questionnaire was adapted to the Moroccan context and then tested at a maternity hospital before being implemented in the different study sites. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The Free Deliveries and Caesarean Policy (FDCP) entitles all women in Morocco to deliver free of charge within public hospitals. This paper estimates assesses the policy's effectiveness by analysing household expenditures related to childbirth, by delivery type and quintile. Methods: Structured exit survey of 973 women in 6 provinces at 5 provincial hospitals, 1 regional hospital, 2 university hospitals, and 3 primary health centers with maternity units. Results: Households reported spending a median of US$ 60 US in total for costs inside and outside of hospitals. Women requiring caesareans payed more than women with normal deliveries (p <0.0001). The median cost was US$45 for a normal delivery, US$50 for a complicated delivery and US$60 for a caesarean section. The prescription given upon exiting the hospital comprised 62% of the total costs. 88% of women from the poorest quintiles faced catastrophic expenditures. The women's perception of their hospital stay and the FDCP policy was overwhelmingly positive, but differences were noted at the various sites. Conclusion: The policy has been largely but not fully effective in removing financial barriers for delivery care in Morocco. More progress should also be made on increasing awareness of the policy and on easing the financial burden, which is still borne by households with lower incomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2015 · Tropical Medicine & International Health
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The importance of complexity in health care policy-making and interventions, as well as research and evaluation is now widely acknowledged, but conceptual confusion reigns and few applications of complexity concepts in research design have been published. Taking user fee exemption policies as an entry point, we explore the methodological consequences of 'complexity' for health policy research and evaluation. We first discuss the difference between simple, complicated and complex and introduce key concepts of complex adaptive systems theory. We then apply these to fee exemption policies. We describe how the FEMHealth research project attempts to address the challenges of complexity in its evaluation of fee exemption policies for maternal care. We present how the development of a programme theory for fee exemption policies was used to structure the overall design. This allowed for structured discussions on the hypotheses held by the researchers and helped to structure, integrate and monitor the sub-studies. We then show how the choice of data collection methods and tools for each sub-study was informed by the overall design. Applying key concepts from complexity theory proved useful in broadening our view on fee exemption policies and in developing the overall research design. However, we encountered a number of challenges, including maintaining adaptiveness of the design during the evaluation, and ensuring cohesion in the disciplinary diversity of the research teams. Whether the programme theory can fulfil its claimed potential to help making sense of the findings is yet to be tested. Experience from other studies allows for some moderate optimism. However, the biggest challenge complexity throws at health system researchers may be to deal with the unknown unknowns and the consequence that complex issues can only be understood in retrospect. From a complexity theory point of view, only plausible explanations can be developed, not predictive theories. Yet here, theory-driven approaches may help.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2013 · BMC Health Services Research
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: User fee removal policies have been extensively evaluated in relation to their impact on access to care, but rarely, and mostly poorly, in relation to their impact on household out-of-pocket (OOP) spending. This paucity of evidence is surprising given that reduction in household economic burden is an explicit aim for such policies. Our study assessed the equity impact on household OOP spending for facility-based delivery of the user fee reduction policy implemented in Burkina Faso since 2007 (i.e. subsidised price set at 900 Communauté Financière Africaine francs (CFA) for all, but free for the poorest). Taking into account the challenges linked to implementing exemption policies, we aimed to test the hypothesis that the user fee reduction policy had favoured the least poor more than the poor. We used data from six consecutive rounds (2006-2011) of a household survey conducted in the Nouna Health District. Primary outcomes are the proportion of households being fully exempted (the poorest 20 % according to the policy) and the actual level of household OOP spending on facility-based delivery. The estimation of the effects relied on a Heckman selection model. This allowed us to estimate changes in OOP spending across socio-economic strata given changes in service utilisation produced by the policy. A total of 2,316 women reported a delivery between 2006 and 2011. Average household OOP spending decreased from 3,827 CFA in 2006 to 1,523 in 2011, without significant differences across socio-economic strata, neither in terms of households being fully exempted from payment nor in terms of the amount paid. Payment remained regressive and substantially higher than the stipulated 900 CFA. The Burkinabè policy led to a significant and sustained reduction in household OOP health spending across all socio-economic groups, but failed to properly target the poorest by ensuring a progressive payment system.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014 · The European Journal of Health Economics
Show more