Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review

Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
Orthopedic Clinics of North America (Impact Factor: 1.25). 11/2012; 43(5):e17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.07.004
Source: PubMed


Patient-specific instrumentation is a new technology that offers increased surgical accuracy, which could decrease outliers, increased efficiency, involving fewer steps and shorter surgical times, and has the potential for cost-effectiveness, if overall surgical volume can be increased and future revision rates can be decreased. As with all technology, further studies are necessary, but there is much interest in this technology as medicine enters the age of increased patient burden and an increased emphasis on efficiency.

24 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Custom cutting guides based on pre-operative imaging have been introduced for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the reliability of repeated placement of custom cutting guides by multiple surgeons in a group of patients undergoing TKA. Custom cutting guides (ShapeMatch®, Stryker Orthopaedics) were designed from pre-operative MRI scans. The treating surgeon placed each guide on the femur and tibia of each patient three times without pinning the block. The three-dimensional position and orientation of the guide was measured for each repetition using a computer navigation system. The surgeon was blinded to the navigation system display. Data from 24 patients and 6 surgeons were analyzed. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all measurement parameters were in the range 0.889-0.997 (excellent), and all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The range for femoral varus/valgus was 0.0-1.5°, with 96% of patients being within 0.5°. For femoral flexion/extension the range was 0.0-3.5° (92% within 2.5°). On the tibia, varus/valgus had a range of 0.0-1.0° (92% within 0.5°), and for slope the range was 0.0-3.5° (92% within 2.5°). The high degree of agreement indicated that intra-surgeon variation was minimal and that the technique is reliable.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2013 · Computer Aided Surgery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Trotz moderner Materialien und Operationstechniken wie der Navigation berichten aktuelle Studien nach wie vor über etwa 20% unzufriedene Patienten nach Implantation einer Knieprothese. Ein wesentlicher Lösungsansatz zur Verbesserung der funktionellen Ergebnisse ist die vermehrte Beachtung der individuellen Anatomie, um den komplexen Bewegungsablauf des Kniegelenks für jeden einzelnen Patienten natürlicher und passender wiederherzustellen.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) technology for the implantation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has a rising interest in the orthopaedic community. Data of PSI are controversially discussed. The hypothesis of this paper is that the radiological accuracy of CT-based PSI is similar to the one of navigated TKA published in the literature. Since 2010, all 301 consecutively performed PSI TKAs (GMK MyKnee©) were included in this study. The radiological assessment consisted in a preoperative and postoperative standard X-ray and long-standing X-ray. Changes from the planned to the definitively implanted component size were documented. Postoperative analysis included limb alignment and position of femoral and tibial components (for varus/valgus and flexion or tibial slope). The postoperative average hip-knee-ankle angle was 180.1° ± 2.0°. In the frontal plane a total of 12.4 % of outliers >3°, for the tibial components 4.1 % of outliers >3° and for the femoral components 4.8 % of outliers >3° were measured. A total of 12.3 % of outliers for posterior tibial slope and 9 % of outliers >3° for the femoral flexion were noted. 10.8 % of the 602 planned size components were adapted intraoperatively. Although it is still unknown which limb axis is the correct one for the best clinical result, a technology providing the aimed axis in a most precise way should be chosen. Comparing the outcome of the current study with the data from the literature, there does not seem to be any difference compared to computer-assisted surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2013 · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Show more