Epidemiology of a Mumps Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated Island Population and Use of a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine for Outbreak Control- Guam 2009-2010.

1.National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 2.Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, Atlanta, GA 3.Guam Department of Public Health and Social Services, Guam, USA 4.Guam Memorial Hospital, Guam, USA 5.Guam Department of Education, Guam, USA 6.Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, CDC, Atlanta, GA 7.Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC, Atlanta, GA.
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (Impact Factor: 2.72). 10/2012; 32(4). DOI: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318279f593
Source: PubMed


Despite high 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage, a large mumps outbreak occurred on the US Territory of Guam during 2009 to 2010, primarily in school-aged children.

We implemented active surveillance in April 2010 during the outbreak peak and characterized the outbreak epidemiology. We administered third doses of MMR vaccine to eligible students aged 9-14 years in 7 schools with the highest attack rates (ARs) between May 18, 2010, and May 21, 2010. Baseline surveys, follow-up surveys and case-reports were used to determine mumps ARs. Adverse events postvaccination were monitored.

Between December 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010, 505 mumps cases were reported. Self-reported Pohnpeians and Chuukese had the highest relative risks (54.7 and 19.7, respectively) and highest crowding indices (mean: 3.1 and 3.0 persons/bedroom, respectively). Among 287 (57%) school-aged case-patients, 270 (93%) had ≥2 MMR doses. A third MMR dose was administered to 1068 (33%) eligible students. Three-dose vaccinated students had an AR of 0.9/1000 compared with 2.4/1000 among students vaccinated with ≤2 doses >1 incubation period postintervention, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.67). No serious adverse events were reported.

This mumps outbreak occurred in a highly vaccinated population. The highest ARs occurred in ethnic minority populations with the highest household crowding indices. After the third dose MMR intervention in highly affected schools, 3-dose recipients had an AR 60% lower than students with ≤2 doses, but the difference was not statistically significant and the intervention occurred after the outbreak peaked. This outbreak may have persisted due to crowding at home and high student contact rates.

Download full-text


Available from: William Joseph Bellini, Feb 28, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This report is a compendium of all current recommendations for the prevention of measles, rubella, congenital rubella syndrome (CRS), and mumps. The report presents the recent revisions adopted by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on October 24, 2012, and also summarizes all existing ACIP recommendations that have been published previously during 1998-2011 (CDC. Measles, mumps, and rubella--vaccine use and strategies for elimination of measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome and control of mumps: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP]. MMWR 1998;47[No. RR-8]; CDC. Revised ACIP recommendation for avoiding pregnancy after receiving a rubellacontaining vaccine. MMWR 2001;50:1117; CDC. Updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP] for the control and elimination of mumps. MMWR 2006;55:629-30; and, CDC. Immunization of healthcare personnel: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 2011;60[No. RR-7]). Currently, ACIP recommends 2 doses of MMR vaccine routinely for children with the first dose administered at age 12 through 15 months and the second dose administered at age 4 through 6 years before school entry. Two doses are recommended for adults at high risk for exposure and transmission (e.g., students attending colleges or other post-high school educational institutions, healthcare personnel, and international travelers) and 1 dose for other adults aged >/=18 years. For prevention of rubella, 1 dose of MMR vaccine is recommended for persons aged >/=12 months. At the October 24, 2012 meeting, ACIP adopted the following revisions, which are published here for the first time. These included: * For acceptable evidence of immunity, removing documentation of physician diagnosed disease as an acceptable criterion for evidence of immunity for measles and mumps, and including laboratory confirmation of disease as a criterion for acceptable evidence of immunity for measles, rubella, and mumps. * For persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, expanding recommendations for vaccination to all persons aged >/=12 months with HIV infection who do not have evidence of current severe immunosuppression; recommending revaccination of persons with perinatal HIV infection who were vaccinated before establishment of effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) with 2 appropriately spaced doses of MMR vaccine once effective ART has been established; and changing the recommended timing of the 2 doses of MMR vaccine for HIV-infected persons to age 12 through 15 months and 4 through 6 years. * For measles postexposure prophylaxis, expanding recommendations for use of immune globulin administered intramuscularly (IGIM) to include infants aged birth to 6 months exposed to measles; increasing the recommended dose of IGIM for immunocompetent persons; and recommending use of immune globulin administered intravenously (IGIV) for severely immunocompromised persons and pregnant women without evidence of measles immunity who are exposed to measles. As a compendium of all current recommendations for the prevention of measles, rubella, congenital rubella syndrome (CRS), and mumps, the information in this report is intended for use by clinicians as baseline guidance for scheduling of vaccinations for these conditions and considerations regarding vaccination of special populations. ACIP recommendations are reviewed periodically and are revised as indicated when new information becomes available.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2013 · MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2009-2010, we investigated a mumps outbreak among a highly vaccinated Orthodox Jewish population in a village in Orange County (OC), New York, to identify risk factors associated with mumps transmission among persons with two doses of mumps-containing vaccine. Demographic and epidemiologic characteristics were collected on students in grades 6-12 in three schools. A mumps case was defined as a student, who self-reported parotitis, orchitis, jaw swelling, and/or a mumps-related complication or whose mumps illness was reported to the OC Health Department during September 1, 2009-January 18, 2010. Log-binomial regression analyses were conducted separately for boys and girls as they attended different schools and had different hours of study. Of the 2503 students with two documented doses of mumps-containing vaccine, 320 (13%) developed mumps. Risk of mumps increased with increasing number of mumps cases in the class [≥8versus ≤3 cases: boys aRR=3.1 (95% CI: 2.0-5.0); girls aRR=2.6 (95% CI: 1.6-4.1)] and household [>1 versus 0 cases: boys aRR=4.3 (95%CI: 3.7-5.6); girls aRR=10.1 (95%CI: 7.1-14.3)]. Age at first dose, time since last dose, time between first and second dose, school, class size, number of hours at school per week, and household size were not significantly associated with having mumps. Two doses of mumps-containing vaccine may not be as effective in outbreak settings with multiple, prolonged, and intense exposure. Additional studies are required to understand why such mumps outbreaks occur and how they can be prevented in the future.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2013 · The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is not recommended for mumps postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), data on its effectiveness are limited. During the 2009-2010 mumps outbreak in the northeastern United States, we assessed effectiveness of PEP with a third dose of MMR vaccine among contacts in Orthodox Jewish households who were given a third dose within 5 days of mumps onset in the household's index patient. We compared mumps attack rates between persons who received a third MMR dose during the first incubation period after onset in the index patient and 2-dose vaccinated persons who had not. Twenty-eight (11.7%) of 239 eligible household members received a third MMR dose as PEP. Mumps attack rates were 0% among third-dose recipients versus 5.2% among 2-dose recipients without PEP (p = 0.57). Although a third MMR dose administered as PEP did not have a significant effect, it may offer some benefits in specific outbreak contexts.
    Preview · Article · Sep 2013 · Emerging Infectious Diseases
Show more

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on ResearchGate. Read our cookies policy to learn more.