Content uploaded by Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia
Content may be subject to copyright.
Introduction
Glassfrogs, anurans of the family Centrolenidae, have
received considerable attention during the last decade
(for a bibliographic review see Cisneros-Heredia and
McDiarmid, 2007). In particular, studies on the Glass-
frogs from the eastern slopes of the Andes and from the
Amazonian lowlands have revealed our lack of under-
standing of its diversity and distribution patterns (Cis-
neros-Heredia and McDiarmid, 2006a, 2006b, 2007;
Guayasamin et al., 2006; Cisneros-Heredia and Meza-
Ramos, 2007; Cisneros-Heredia et al., 2008). Herein we
present the rst country records of Hyalinobatrachium
iaspidiense from Ecuador and Peru that suggest a con-
tinuous distribution of this species across the Amazo-
nian basin.
Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense is among the most
distinctive species of centrolenids by having a particu-
lar dorsal pattern only shared with Hyalinobatrachium
mesai (Cisneros-Heredia and McDiarmid, 2007; Barrio-
Amoros and Brewer-Carias, 2008). Both species show
large lime-green dorsal blotches that turn white when
individuals are preserved (Ayarzagüena, 1992; Lescure
and Marty, 2000; Señaris and Ayarzagüena, 2005; D.F.
Cisneros-Heredia, R.W. McDiarmid, J.P. Caldwell and
G. Rivas, pers. obs.). These marks are a unique colour
arrangement of the dorsal parietal peritoneum of centro-
lenids (Cisneros-Heredia and McDiarmid, 2007). The
most conspicuous difference between Hyalinobatra-
chium iaspidiense and H. mesai are the green bones of
the latter vs. white bones in the former.
Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense was described based
on specimens collected at Quebrada Jaspe, state of
Bolivar, Guayana region of Venezuela (Ayarzagüena,
1992). Señaris and Ayarzagüena (2005) reported it from
Caño Colima on the slopes of Serranía de Imataca,
state of Bolivar, Venezuela. It has been reported as H.
nouraguense (a synonym, see below for details) in: four
localities in French Guiana (Lescure and Marty, 2000);
one in Guyana (Ernst, Rödel and Arjoon, 2005); four in
Suriname (Kok and Castroviejo-Fisher, 2008); and two
in Brazil (Cordeiro-Duarte et al., 2002; Caldwell and
Shepard, 2005). Thus, it has been reported so far only
from north-eastern areas of Amazonia.
Between 20th of May and 1st of June 2007 a male of
Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense (DHMECN 04033,
Museo Ecuatoriano de Ciencias Naturales, Quito,
Ecuador; Fig. 1) was collected from the locality of
Totoa Nai’qui, Cofán-Dureno territory, province
of Sucumbíos, Republic of Ecuador (0.03442° S,
76.75278º W, ca. 280 m above sea level) by Mario
Yánez-Muñoz and Angel Chimbo. It was found on the
leaf of a bush directly over the water surface in a ooded
forest. This record represents the rst country record of
this species from Ecuador. Yánez-Muñoz and Chimbo
(2007) reported this specimen as “Hyalinobatrachium
sp. A” and Yánez-Muñoz and Cisneros-Heredia
(2008) as “Hyalinobatrachium sp. N12”, commenting
that it was “apparently related or conspecic with
Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense”.
Herpetology Notes, volume 2: 49-52 (2009) (published online on 06 May 2009)
New country records of Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense (Amphibia,
Anura, Centrolenidae) from the Amazonian lowlands of Ecuador
and Peru
Mario Yánez-Muñoz1, Pedro Pérez-Peña2 and Diego Cisneros-Heredia*1,3,4
1 Museo Ecuatoriano de Ciencias Naturales, Sección Vertebra-
dos, División de Herpetología, calle Rumipamba No. 341 y
Ave. de Los Shyris, Quito, Ecuador.
2 Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana, calle Pevas
5ta Cuadra, Iquitos, Perú.
3 Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Colegio de Ciencias
Biológicas & Ambientales, calle Diego de Robles y Ave. In-
teroceánica, Campus Cumbayá, Edif. Maxwell, Casilla Postal
17-1200-841, Quito, Ecuador;
e-mail: diegofrancisco_cisneros@yahoo.com
4 King’s College London, Department of Geography, Strand,
London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
* corresponding author
Abstract. We report the rst records of Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense (Ayarzagüena, 1992) from Ecuador and Peru based on
voucher specimens collected in lowland Amazon rainforests. These are the westernmost records of this species and suggest a
continuous distribution across the entire Amazon basin.
Mario Yánez-Muñoz et al.
50
In November 2003 a female of Hyalinobatrachium
iaspidiense (MZUNAP 0517, Museo de Zoología,
Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional
de la Amazonía Peruana, Iquitos, Peru; Fig. 2) was
collected at the Lago Preto-Paredón on the frontier
between Peru and Brazil in the province of Ramón
Castilla, department of Loreto, Republic of Peru
(4.46157° S, 71.75133° W, ca. 95 m above sea level)
by Pedro Pérez-Peña. The individual was found on the
leave of a shrub ca. 1.2 m above the ground and about
50 m away from a small lagoon in terra rme forest
dominated by Lepidocaryum tenue and represents
the rst record of this species from Peru. Pérez et al.
(2006) and Pérez (2007) regarded this specimen as
“Hyalinobatrachium sp”.
Specimens DHMECN 04033 and MZUNAP 0517
show all diagnostic characteristics of Hyalinobatrachium
iaspidiense, including the dorsal coloration pattern,
white bones, transparent ventral parietal peritoneum and
most visceral peritonea covered by iridophores except
for the pericardium that is transparent; supporting their
specic identication.
These new records extend the known range of
Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense nearly 1900 km from
the nearest known locality, the municipality of President
Figueiredo (state of Amazonas, Brazil) and represent
the westernmost record of this species suggesting that
H. iaspidiense is widely distributed across the entire
Amazonian lowlands (Fig. 3).
Ernst et al. (2005) as well as Cisneros-Heredia
and McDiarmid (2007) suggested synonymy of
Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense and H. nouraguense
based on morphological characters. This hypothesis
was later supported by molecular data (Guayasamin
et al. 2007: Fig. 5 and 6) showing that almost no
differentiation between populations collected from
or near the respective type localities was evident. By
analysing the information presented by Ernst et al.
(2005), Cisneros-Heredia and McDiarmid (2007)
and Guayasamin et al. (2007) we treat both species
Figure 1. Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense (DHMECN 04033) from the Cofán-Dureno territory, province of Sucumbíos, Republic
of Ecuador.
New records of H. iaspidiense from Ecuador and Peru 51
as conspecics of H. iaspidiense Ayarzagüena, 1992.
Cisneros-Heredia and McDiarmid (2007) reported
that H. nouraguensis and H. iaspidiense differed in
the condition of iridophores over the pericardium, but
a closer inspection showed that these differences are
preservation artefacts rather than valid intraspecic
differences (Lescure and Marty, 2000; Señaris
and Ayarzagüena, 2005; G. Rivas pers. comm.; S.
Castroviejo-Fisher pers. comm.). Cisneros-Heredia and
McDiarmid (2007) hypothesized that species with large
dorsal blotches of iridophores form a monophyletic
group but were uncertain about the relationships of this
group regarding other Hyalinobatrachium. We agree
with this hypothesis and consider that H. iaspidiense
and H. mesai form a monophyletic group supported by
the synapomorphy of blotches of iridophores on the
dorsal parietal peritoneum.
Figure 2. Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense (MZUNAP 0517)
from Lago Preto-Paredón, department of Loreto, Republic of
Peru.
Figure 3. Map of northern South America showing the known localities of Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense based on the new
localities reported herein (closed symbols) and literature records (open symbols): (1) Quebrada Jaspe, (2) Caño Colima, (3)
mountain areas of Kaw, Monts Trinité, Courcibo, and Saut Arataye/Nouragues Reserve, (4) President Figueiredo, (5) lower River
Cristalino region, (6) Mabura Hill Forest Reserve, (7) Sipaliwini district, (8) Cofán-Dureno territory, (9) Lago Preto-Paredón.
Country codes: Venezuela = Ve; Colombia = Co; Ecuador = Ec; Peru = Pe; Guyana = Gu; Suriname = Su; French Guiana = FG;
Brazil = Br; Bolivia = Bo.
Acknowledgments. We are grateful to Roy W. McDiarmid,
Janalee Caldwell, Gilson Rivas, and Santiago Castroviejo-Fisher
for their helpful comments and discussions. We thank Pablo
Puertas, Richard Bodmer, Angel Chimbo, Corine Vriesendorp,
Sebastian Descanse, and Alvaro del Campo for eld and
laboratory assistance, Mark Bowler for taking the pictures;
and María Olga Borja for pre-reviewing the manuscript. M.
Yánez-Muñoz’s research was supported by the Field Museum
of Chicago through their Rapid Biological Inventories,
Environmental and Conservation Program coordinated by Corine
Vriesendorp, Debora Moskovits, and Randall Borman. P. Pérez-
Peña’s research was supported by Wildlife Conservation Society–
Peru. D. Cisneros-Heredia’s research was supported by Ma. E.
Heredia and L. Heredia, the Smithsonian Women’s Committee,
the 2002 Research Training Program at the National Museum
of Natural History-Smithsonian Institution, King’s College
London, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, the Russel E. Train
Education for Nature Program of the Word Wildlife Fund WWF,
and the ‘‘Fernando Ortíz-Crespo’’ Endangered Species Program
managed by EcoCiencia and Conservation International.
References
Ayarzagüena, J. (1992): Los Centrolenidos de la Guayana Vene-
zolana. Publ. Asoc. Amigos Doñana 1: 1–48.
Barrio-Amoros, C.L., Brewer-Carias, C. (2008): Herpetological
results of the 2002 expedition to Sarisariñama, a tepui in Ve-
nezuelan Guayana, with the description of ve new species.
Zootaxa 1942: 1–68.
Caldwell, J.P., Shepard, D.B. (2005): Frogs of the Lower Cristali-
no River Area. In: Amphibians and Reptiles of the Lower Cri-
stalino River Region of the Southern Amazon. Vitt, L.J., Cal-
dwell, J.P., Colli, G.R., França, F.G.R., Shepard, D.B., Eds.,
Norman, Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History.
Available online at: http://www.omnh.ou.edu/personnel/herpe-
tology/vitt/Cerrado/Cristalino/index.htm.
Cisneros-Heredia, D.F., McDiarmid, R.W. (2006a): A new species
of the genus Centrolene (Amphibia: Anura: Centrolenidae)
from Ecuador with comments on the taxonomy and biogeogra-
phy of glassfrogs. Zootaxa 1244: 1–32.
Cisneros-Heredia, D.F., McDiarmid, R.W. (2006b): Review of
the taxonomy and conservation status of the Ecuadorian glass-
frog Centrolenella puyoensis Flores & McDiarmid (Amphibia:
Anura: Centrolenidae). Zootaxa 1361: 21–31.
Cisneros-Heredia, D.F., McDiarmid, R.W. (2007): Revision of
the characters of Centrolenidae (Amphibia: Anura: Athespha-
tanura), with comments on its taxonomy and the description of
new taxa of glassfrogs. Zootaxa 1572: 1–82.
Cisneros-Heredia, D.F., Meza-Ramos, P. (2007): An enigmatic
new species of glassfrog (Amphibia: Anura: Centrolenidae)
from the Amazonian Andean slopes of Ecuador. Zootaxa 1485:
33–41.
Cisneros-Heredia, D.F., Venegas, P.J., Rada, M., Schulte, R.
(2008): A new species of Glassfrog (Anura, Centrolenidae)
from the Foothill Andean forests of Ecuador and Peru. Herpe-
tologica 64: 342–353.
Cordeiro-Duarte, A.C., Sanaiotti, T.M., Duarte, E.L.C., Pereira,
O. (2002): Geographic Distribution. Hyalinobatrachium nou-
raguensis. Herpetol. Rev. 33: 220.
Ernst, R., Rödel, M.-O., Arjoon, D. (2005): On the cutting edge–
The anuran fauna of the Mabura Hill Forest Reserve, Central
Guyana. Salamandra 41: 179–194.
Guayasamin, J.M., Bustamante, M.R., Almeida-Reinoso, D.,
Funk, W.C. (2006). Glass frogs (Centrolenidae) of Yanayacu
Biological Station, Ecuador, with the description of a new spe-
cies and comments on centrolenid systematics. Zool. J. Linn.
Soc. 147: 489–513.
Guayasamin, J.M., Castroviejo-Fisher, S., Ayarzagüena, J., Tru-
eb, L., Vilà, C. (2008): Phylogenetic relationships of glassfrogs
(Centrolenidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes.
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48: 574–595.
Kok, P.J.R., Castroviejo-Fisher, S. (2008): Glassfrogs (Anura:
Centrolenidae) of Kaieteur National Park, Guyana, with notes
on the distribution and taxonomy of some species of the family
in the Guiana Shield. Zootaxa 1680: 25–53.
Lescure, M., Marty, C. (2000): Atlas des Amphibiens de Guyane.
Patrimoines Naturels, 45: 1–388.
Pérez, P.E. (2007) Finding frogs in the Peruvian Amazon. Wild-
life Conservation 2007: 14.
Pérez, P.E., Bodmer, R.E., Puertas, P.E. (2006): Anuros y Sauri-
os del Interuvio Yavarí–Tahuayo y su Comparación con las
Áreas Naturales Protegidas en la Región Loreto, Perú. Iquitos,
Manejo de Fauna silvestre en Amazonia y Latinoamérica.
Señaris, J.C., Ayarzagüena, J. (2005): Revisión taxonómica de la
Familia Centrolenidae (Amphibia; Anura) de Venezuela. Se-
villa, Publicaciones del Comité Español del Programa Hombre
y Biosfera – Red IberoMaB de la UNESCO.
Yánez-Muñoz, M.H., Chimbo, A. (2007): Anbios y Reptiles,
In: Ecuador: Territorio Cofan Dureno, p. 96–99. Borman, R.,
Vriesendorp, C., Alverson, W.S., Moskovits, D.K., Stotz, D.F.,
del Campo, A., Eds., Chicago, The Field Museum, Rapid Bio-
logical Inventories Report 19.
Yánez-Muñoz, M.H., Cisneros-Heredia, D.F. (2008): Notes on
Geographic Distribution: Amphibia, Anura, Centrolenidae:
Cochranella orejuela, rst country records from Ecuador.
CheckList 4: 50–54.
Mario Yánez-Muñoz et al.
52
Accepted by Sebastian Steinfartz