ArticlePDF Available

Black bears forage on army cutworm moth aggregations in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico

Authors:

Abstract

Observamos osos negros (Ursus americanus) alimentándose de agregaciones de la mariposa (Euxoa auxiliaris) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) en felsenmeers (campos de rocas) subalpinos de las montañas Jemez de Nuevo México. Estas agregaciones sirven de alimento para el oso pardo (Ursus arctos horribilis) en el norte de las Montañas Rocosas de Wyoming y Montana. Sin embargo, no se había registrado el uso de estas agregaciones por los osos negros, ni se habían documentado estas agregaciones tan al sur en las Montañas Rocosas.
278 vol. 50, no. 2The Southwestern Naturalist
BLACK BEARS FORAGE ON ARMY CUTWORM MOTH AGGREGATIONS
IN THE JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO
J
ONATHAN
D. C
OOP
,* C
HARLES
D. H
IBNER
,A
ARON
J. M
ILLER
,
AND
G
REGORY
H. C
LARK
Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53706 (JDC)
Santa Fe Soil Survey, 1939 Warner Circle, Santa Fe, NM 87501 (CDH, AJM)
Charleston Soil Survey Office, 683 Castle Drive, Charleston, IL 61920 (GHC)
*Correspondent: jdcoop@wisc.edu
A
BSTRACT
We observed black bears (Ursus americanus) foraging on aggregations of army cut-
worm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in subalpine felsenmeers (block fields)
in the Jemez Mountains of New Mexico. Moth aggregations serve as food for grizzly bears (Ursus
arctos horribilis) in the northern Rocky Mountains of Wyoming and Montana. However, black bears
have not been reported to use these aggregations, nor have such aggregations been documented
to occur this far south in the Rocky Mountains.
R
ESUMEN
Observamos osos negros (Ursus americanus) alimenta´ndose de agregaciones de la
mariposa (Euxoa auxiliaris) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) en felsenmeers (campos de rocas) subalpi-
nos de las montan˜as Jemez de Nuevo Me´xico. Estas agregaciones sir ven de alimento para el oso
pardo (Ursus arctos horribilis) en el norte de las Montan˜as Rocosas de Wyoming y Montana. Sin
embargo, no se habı´a registrado el uso de estas agregaciones por los osos negros, ni se habı´an
documentado estas agregaciones tan al sur en las Montan˜as Rocosas.
Aggregations of army cutworm moths (Eux-
oa auxiliaris) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) are ex-
cavated from high-elevation talus slopes and
consumed by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribi-
lis) in the northern Rocky Mountains of the
USA (Chapman et al., 1955; Sumner and
Craighead, 1973; Servheen, 1983; Klaver et al.,
1986; Mattson et al., 1991; O’Brien and Lind-
zey, 1994; White et al., 1998a). Army cutworm
moths migrate in the spring from the Great
Plains to the alpine tundra of the mountains
and then return to the prairies in the fall
(Pruess, 1967; Burton et al., 1980; Kendall et
al., 1983). Moths spend the early summer for-
aging on nectar-rich alpine forbs at night (Ken-
dall et al., 1983) and roosting in dense aggre-
gations in the interstitia of talus slopes during
the day (O’Brien and Lindzey, 1994; White et
al., 1998b). Later in the summer, the moths en-
ter a period of dormancy whereby nocturnal
foraging ceases (Kendall et al., 1983; O’Brien
and Lindzey, 1994; White et al., 1998b) before
their return to the plains. Throughout the
summer months, moths are eaten by grizzly
bears, common ravens (Covus corax), Clark’s
nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), and rosy
finches (Leucosticte tephrocostis) (O’Brien and
Lindzey, 1994; White et al., 1998a). However,
to our knowledge, black bears (Ursus american-
us) have not been documented to forage on
these moth aggregations, nor has it been well
known how far south in the Rocky Mountains
such moth aggregations extend. Here we de-
scribe 3 observations of black bears foraging
on aggregations of army cutworm moths in the
Jemez Mountains of New Mexico.
On the afternoon of 19 August 2003, while
3 of us were working on the western slopes of
Redondo Mountain in the Valles Caldera Na-
tional Preserve, we saw a single adult black
bear within a large (ca. 10 ha) felsenmeer, at
an elevation of 3,250 m. Felsenmeers (German
for ‘‘sea of rocks,’’ also known as block fields)
are periglacial landforms composed of angular
blocks of frost-shattered bedrock. Because the
bear was upwind and involved in a noisy activ-
ity, it remained unaware of our presence and
we were able to observe it from within ca. 60
m. The bear was digging slowly among the
large rocks, flipping them over and aside in
what seemed to be a deliberate manner. As it
excavated, the bear prodded its snout in and
among the rocks, as though searching for or
consuming some food buried within the rock
June 2005 279Notes
F
IG
.1 A black bear (Ursus americanus) foraging on aggregations of army cutworm moths in a subalpine
(3,250 m) felsenmeer on Redondo Mountain, New Mexico.
field. The bear continued with this activity for
ca. 15 minutes after it was first noticed (Fig. 1).
Large groups of ravens were active in the area,
but were not foraging on the rocks at this time.
Over the next week, we observed 2 more ep-
isodes of activity on the felsenmeers of Redon-
do Mountain from a vantage point on a ridge
ca. 1 km distant that allowed us to survey a
much greater area. We spotted 2 bears on the
afternoon of 20 August. These bears were us-
ing the same felsenmeer as the single bear had
been using the day before, but were ca. 200 m
farther upslope. On the afternoon of 22 Au-
gust, we spotted 3 bears in this felsenmeer,
while a lone bear appeared to be foraging in
a separate felsenmeer ca. 1.5 km north.
Though the distance from which these obser-
vations were made precluded a more precise
determination of the activity of the bears, their
behavior was consistent with the foraging we
observed previously. Bears stayed within the
felsenmeers for the entirety of each
.
10-mi-
nute period of observation and were either sta-
tionary or moving slowly across the rock fields.
Large flocks of ravens were present in the vi-
cinity of the bears, but we were not able to
determine the nature of their activity on either
of these days.
On the morning of 23 August, one of us vis-
ited these felsenmeers. At both sites where we
had seen bears, army cutworm moths were ev-
ident in great numbers just beneath the sur-
face of the rocky debris. Frequently, scores of
moths could be found simply by displacing just
a few large rocks. The presence of dead moths
in various stages of degradation suggested that
moths had been using these sites for a long
time. Large, recent excavations of rocks were
numerous in both areas, and abundant bear
scats seemed to be comprised mostly or entire-
ly of the chitinous exoskeletons of the moths.
No bears were seen during this visit, but nu-
merous ravens, Clark’s nutcrackers, Audubon’s
warblers (Dendroica coronata), and a house wren
280 vol. 50, no. 2The Southwestern Naturalist
F
IG
.2 Dense aggregations of army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) just beneath the surface of the
felsenmeer, Redondo Mountain, New Mexico.
(Troglodytes aedon), were foraging among the
rocks.
Contrasting these observations with pub-
lished studies of grizzly bear use of moth ag-
gregations in the Northern Rockies revealed
both similarities and differences. On Redondo
Mountain, moths were aggregating in felsen-
meers composed of blocky slabs of rock, rang-
ing in size from ca. 0.25 to 1.5 m in diameter,
derived from a densely welded volcanic tuff
the Tsirige member of the Bandelier Tuff
(Smith et al., 1970). These felsenmeers oc-
curred on steep (45 to 70%) slopes, with west-
ern to northwestern aspects ranging from 270
8
to 320
8
. Hence, in terms of rock size and slope
inclination, these sites were similar to moth ag-
gregation sites in talus slopes described by
O’Brien and Lindzey (1994) in Wyoming and
by White et al. (1998a) in Montana. Aspects
were somewhat more northerly than those re-
ported by these authors, though this distinc-
tion is relatively minor. Differences in the veg-
etation were much more pronounced. Moth
aggregations described by O’Brien and Lind-
zey (1994) and White et al. (1998a) occurred
in close proximity to alpine plant communi-
ties, where nectar-rich, animal-pollinated forbs
were generally quite abundant. Army cutworm
moths are thought to forage in alpine vegeta-
tion during the summer (Kendall et al., 1983;
White et al., 1998b) and consequently to in-
crease in body mass and lipid content (White
et al., 1998b) before fall migration to the Great
Plains. In contrast, there are no alpine plant
assemblages in the Jemez Mountains. Subal-
pine vegetation at the elevations at which the
moths were aggregating (between 3,150 and
3,250 m) on Redondo Mountain was com-
prised of coniferous forests and grasslands,
with seemingly lower abundances of nectar
sources. Moths aggregating on Redondo
Mountain might be foraging widely in these
June 2005 281Notes
plant communities to meet their energetic re-
quirements, or they might increase their use of
other nectar resources during migration.
Lastly, our observations raise questions re-
garding the extent of aggregations of army cut-
worm moths and their use by U. americanus
south of the range of U. arctos. Both might be
widespread but underreported, or might, in
fact, be uncommon occurrences. During the
spring of 2003, migrating populations army
cutworm moths were noted to be exceptionally
high throughout the southern Rocky Moun-
tain region (W. Cranshaw, pers. comm.). Per-
haps black bears only take advantage of this
resource during infrequent years of high moth
abundance.
We thank the Valles Caldera Trust staff and board
members for providing access and support for our
work on the preserve, and we commend their efforts
to foster a greater scientific understanding of this
remarkable area. Funding for JDC provided by an
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant
(DEB #0309347) and a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid-of-Re-
search. We also would like to thank J. T. Hogg and
R. Vinkey, who suggested publication of these obser-
vations. C. Jones and an anonymous reviewer provid-
ed helpful suggestions on the manuscript. H. Nalini
Morzaria-Luna assisted with translation of the ab-
stract.
L
ITERATURE
C
ITED
B
URTON
, R. L., K. J. S
ARKS
,
AND
D. C. P
ETERS
. 1980.
The army cutworm. Agriculture Experiment Sta-
tion, Division of Agriculture, Oklahoma State
University. Bulletin B749.
C
HAPMAN
, J. A., J. I. R
OMER
,
AND
J. S
TARK
. 1955. La-
dybird beetles and army cutworm adults as food
for grizzly bears in Montana. Ecology 36:156–158.
K
ENDALL
, D. M., P. G. K
EVAN
,
AND
D. L. L
A
F
ONTAINE
.
1983. Nocturnal flight activity of moths (Lepi-
doptera) in alpine tundra. Canadian Entomolo-
gist 113:607–614.
K
LAVER
, R. W., J. J. C
HAR
,D.B.R
OCKWELL
,H.R.
M
AYS
,
AND
C. F. A
VECEDO
. 1986. Grizzly bears, in-
sects, and people in the MacDonald Peak region,
Montana. In: G. P. Contreras and K. E. Evans,
compilers. Proceedings of a grizzly bear habitat
symposium. Missoula, Montana, 30 April–2 May
1985. United States Forest Service General Tech-
nical Report INT-207. Pages 205–211.
M
ATTSON
, D. J., C. M. G
ILLIN
,S.A.B
ENSON
,
AND
R.
R. K
NIGHT
. 1991. Bear feeding activity at alpine
insect aggregation sites in the Yellowstone ecosys-
tem. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:2430–2435
O’B
RIEN
,S.L.,
AND
F. G. L
INDZEY
. 1994. Grizzly bear
use of moth aggregation sites and summer ecol-
ogy of the army cutworm moth in the Absaroka
Mountains, Wyoming. Wyoming Cooperative Fish
and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Wyo-
ming, Laramie.
P
RUESS
, K. P. 1967. Migration of the army cutworm
Chorizagrotis auxiliaris (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
I. Evidence for a migration. Annals of the Ento-
mological Society of America 60:910–921.
S
ERVHEEN
, C. 1983. Grizzly bear food habits, move-
ments and habitat selection in the Mission Moun-
tains, Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management
47:1026–1035.
S
MITH
, R. L., R. A. B
AILEY
,
AND
C. S. R
OSS
. 1970. Geo-
logic map of the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico.
Miscellaneous Geological Investigations, Map I-
571. United States Geological Survey, Washing-
ton, D.C.
S
UMNER
, J.,
AND
J. J. C
RAIGHEAD
. 1973. Grizzly bear
habitat survey in the Scapegoat Wilderness, Mon-
tana. Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research
Unit, Missoula.
W
HITE
, D., J
R
., K. C. K
ENDALL
,
AND
H. D. P
ICTON
.
1998a. Grizzly bear feeding activity at alpine army
cutworm moth aggregation sites in northwest
Montana. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76:221–
227.
W
HITE
, D., J
R
., K. C. K
ENDALL
,
AND
H. D. P
ICTON
.
1998b. Seasonal occurrence, body composition,
and migration potential of army cutworm moths
in northwest Montana. Canadian Journal of Zo-
ology 76:835–842.
Submitted 20 January 2004. Accepted 24 August 2004.
Associate Editor was Cheri A. Jones.
... While bear diet composition shows substantial variation (Costello et al., 2016;Ditmer et al., 2016), most reported American black bear diets are dominated not by arthropods but by energy-rich fruits and seeds supplemented by herbaceous biomass (Fortin et al., 2013;Graber & White, 1983). While black bears do consume a variety of arthropods (Costello et al., 2016;Graber & White, 1983), in most studies arthropods constitute only a small pro- Graber and White (1983) and see Noyce et al. (1997), Coop et al. (2005), and Auger et al. (2004)). Some bear populations have also been documented consuming honeybees (Graber & White, 1983), potentially as bycatch during honey raids. ...
... (Onorato et al., 2003). While a single black bear was observed consuming army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) in subalpine habitat in New Mexico (Coop et al., 2005) and ant pupa have been recorded in 33% of bear scats in forested habitats in Utah (Auger et al., 2004), to the best of our knowledge, arthropods have not been documented as a comparably dominant dietary item for bears in this region. ...
Article
Full-text available
American black bears are considered dependent on high‐elevation forests or other montane habitats in the drylands of western North America. Black bear sign, including that of cubs, was observed throughout the summers of 2015, 2016, and 2018 along a perennial desert river in the Sonoran Desert of Arizona. We analyzed the contents of 21 black bear scats, collected from May to October of 2016 and 2018. Apache cicada nymphs (Diceroprocta apache) were the dominant food item, occurring in 90% of scats and comprising an average of 59% of scat contents. In the process of excavating these nymphs, bears created large areas of turned‐over soil, a form of ecosystem engineering with potential implications for soils, vegetation, and fluvial geomorphology. Given that species distributions are shaped by physiological and ecological contexts, as well as anthropogenic legacies, it is possible that black bears once occurred more commonly in desert riparian systems prior to widespread agricultural development, hunting, and dewatering. Although more research is necessary, we suggest that desert riparian systems may be an alternative habitat for black bears. Better understanding the diet and habitat breadth of American black bears is important in the context of increasing landscape fragmentation and militarization in the U.S.‐Mexican borderlands. American black bears are generally considered forest habitat dependent species. However, we report on black bears in a riparian system in the Sonoran Desert, with an unusual diet dominated by cicada nymphs. Our results suggest that much remains unknown about the ecologies of even a well‐studied species like American black bears.
... Sutherland, New Mexico State University Extension, personal communication), black bears (Ursus americanus) were seen feeding on miller moths in a subalpine rock field in the area. 11 This suggests that adults emerging in the West may migrate only short distances to nearby mountain ranges. ...
Article
Full-text available
On the Ground •Army cutworms consumed cheatgrass to produce cheatgrass die-offs at low elevations in southwest Idaho in 2014. The larvae also consumed foliage and bark of native shrubs. •Army cutworm outbreaks seem to occur after many adult moths lay eggs in areas experiencing drought, which received late summer rain to germinate winter annuals, but little subsequent precipitation through the following winter. •Army cutworms hide in plain sight by feeding at night in winter and hiding in soil or under objects during the day. •A network of observers in the Intermountain West could help rangeland managers identify die-offs for reseeding with desirable species.
... Unfortunately, I have no quantitative data on food resources within individual territories to test this hypothesis.Collectively, all raven territories may experience poor food resources when compared to other localized areas, where there is an overabundance of food due to the large foraging areas of ravens. This is the pattern I observed from 2003, when there were outbreaks of both army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) at high elevations throughout the Rocky Mountains(Coop et al. 2005) and Mormon crickets (Anabrus simplex) at low elevations. The cutworm moth migration occurred at elevations greater than roughly 3000 m in the Teton Range (R. Jackson, Grand Teton National Park Lead Climbing Ranger, Pers comm.), which runs parallel to the western study area border, beginning in May. ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
For perhaps 30,000 years grizzly bears ranged throughout the mountains and riparian areas of what would eventually become the southwestern United States. But in a remarkably short 50-year period between 1860 and 1910 Anglo-Americans killed roughly 90% of the grizzly bears in 90% of the places they once lived. Most of the remaining grizzlies had been killed by the 1930s. This report provides a detailed account of natural history, relations with humans, and current and future prospects for grizzly bears of the Southwest, emphasizing the millennia prior to ascendance of Anglo-Americans. The report’s narrative is essentially chronological, starting with deep history spanning the late Pleistocene up through arrival of European colonists (Section 3.1); the period of Spanish and Mexican dominance (Section 3.2); and then the period of terminal grizzly bear extirpations that began with the political and military dominance of Anglo-Americans (Section 3.3). Section 4 examines current environmental conditions and related prospects for restoring grizzly bears to the Southwest. Section 5 completes the chronological arc by forecasting some of what the future might hold, with implications for both grizzly bears and humans. The background provided in Section 2 offers a synopsis of grizzly bear natural history as well as a summary of foods and habitats that were likely important to grizzlies. Throughout the Holocene there was a remarkable concentration of diverse high-quality bear foods in highlands of the Southwest, notably in an arc from the San Francisco Peaks of Arizona southeast along the Coconino Plateau and Mogollon Rim to a terminus in the White, Mogollon, and Black Range Mountains in New Mexico. Additional high-quality habitat existed in the Sacramento, San Juan, Jemez, and Sangre de Cristo Mountains of New Mexico and adjacent Colorado. Grizzlies in the Southwest survived remarkable extremes of climate and habitats for perhaps as long as 100,000 years. They also survived substantial variation in human-propagated impacts that culminated in the Crisis of 875-1425 C.E.—a period typified by episodic drought and the highest human population densities prior to recent times. In contrast to relatively benevolent attitudes among indigenous populations, there is little doubt that the terminal toll taken on grizzly bears by Anglo-Americans after 1850 C.E was driven largely by a uniquely lethal combination of intolerance and ecological dynamics entrained by the eradication or diminishment of native foods and the substitution of human foods, notably livestock, that catalyzed conflict. More positively, the analysis presented here of current habitat productivity, fragmentation, and remoteness—as well as regulations, laws, and human attitudes—reveals ample potential for restoration of grizzlies to the Southwest, including three candidate Restoration Area Complexes: the Mogollon, San Juan, and Sangre de Cristo, capable of supporting around 620, 425, and 280 grizzlies each. Major foreseeable challenges for those wishing to restore grizzly bears to these areas include sanitation of human facilities, management of livestock depredation, education of big game hunters, coordination of management, and fostering of accommodation among rural residents. Climate change promises to compound all of these challenges, although offset to an uncertain extent by prospective increases in human tolerance. But the evolutionary history of grizzly bears also provides grounds for optimism about prospective restoration. Grizzly bears have survived enormous environmental variation spanning hundreds of thousands of years, including many millennia in the Southwest. Grizzlies survived not only the inhospitable deeps of the Ice Ages in Asia and Beringia, but also the heat and drought of the Altithermal on this continent. It was only highly-lethal Anglo-Americans that drove them to extinction in the Southwest, which is why human attitudes—more than anything else—will likely determine prospects for restoring grizzly bears.
Chapter
Analysis of Amphibian and Reptile DietsAnalysis of Mammal DietsAnalysis of Bird DietsAnalysis of Fish DietsThe Benefits of Insects for Wildlife Survival and ReproductionHow Insects Avoid Becoming Food for WildlifeSummaryReferences and Additional Reading
Chapter
Insects and Wildlife: Arthropods and their Relationships with Wild Vertebrate Animals provides a comprehensive overview of the interrelationships of insects and wildlife. It serves as an introduction to insects and other arthropods for wildlife management and other vertebrate biology students, and emphasizes the importance of insects to wild vertebrate animals. The book emphasizes how insects exert important influences on wildlife habitat suitability and wildlife population sustainability, including their direct and indirect effects on wildlife health. Among the important topics covered are: the importance of insects as food items for vertebrate animals; the role of arthropods as determinants of ecosystem health and productivity; the ability of arthropods to transmit disease-causing agents; an overview of representative disease-causing agents transmitted by arthropods; arthropods as pests and parasites of vertebrates; the hazards to wildlife associated with using using pesticides to protect against insect damage; insect management using techniques other than pesticides; the importance of insect conservation and how insects influence wildlife conservation.
Article
Full-text available
A blacklight trap was established at 3790 m in 1978 and at 3505 m, 3657 m, 3790 m, and 3810 m, in 1979, on the alpine tundra in Colorado. Weekly catches from 6 July to 4 August 1978, and 26 June to 14 September 1979, resulted in ca. 3500 individuals of over 48 species of moths. These results establish that a greater diversity of moths exists and greater nocturnal flight activity occurs than was previously supposed for alpine tundra communities. The implications for pollination and insect foraging are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) consume army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) from late June through mid-September at alpine moth aggregation sites in Glacier National Park, Montana. To better understand the importance of army cutworm moths to grizzly bears, we determined the sex and age classes and minimum numbers of grizzly bears foraging at known alpine moth aggregation sites, and documented the timing and use patterns of grizzly bears foraging in these areas. A minimum of 36 grizzly bears were observed 106 times feeding at 6 of 9 known moth aggregation sites from late June through mid-September in 1992-1995; no bears were observed on moth sites in 1993. Bears fed on moth aggregations disproportionately more at elevations >2561 m, on slopes between 31° and 45°, and on southwest-facing aspects. Lone adult grizzly bears appeared to be underrepresented and subadults overrepresented at moth sites. Moths are highly digestible; all parts are digested except for the exoskeleton. We propose that army cutworm moths are an important, high-quality, preferred summer and early-fall food for grizzly bears in Glacier National Park. We do not present any data that demonstrate an increase in the importance of moths when other foods fail.
Article
Full-text available
Bears (Ursidae) were observed from fixed-wing aircraft on or near alpine talus in the Shoshone National Forest between 15 June and 15 September in 1981–1989. Bears fed on insect aggregations at 6 known and 12 suspected alpine talus sites, disproportionately more at elevations > 3350 m, on slopes > 30°, and on south- and west-facing aspects. While at these sites, bears almost exclusively ate invertebrates, typically army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris). Subadult grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) appeared to be underrepresented at the sites, and proportionate representation of adult females with young appeared to decrease between 15 June and 15 September. Overall, observations of bears at these sites increased between 1981 and 1989. We suggest that alpine insect aggregations are an important food source for bears in the Shoshone National Forest, especially in the absence of high-quality foraging alternatives in July and August of most years.
Article
Full-text available
Indirect evidence is presented to support the conclusion that the army cutworm, Chorizagrotis auxiliaris (Grote), migrates from the Great Plains to the Rocky Mountains during the spring and the same individuals return to the Plains in the fall. Spring activity occurs progressively later from east to west, the delay being greater than that caused by emergence but commensurate with flight potential of the moth. Flight is predominately from east to west and a constant turnover of moths occurs at all locations on the Plains. Seasonal occurrence in the mountains coincides with the period of inactivity on the Plains, during which fat reserves increase. Summer survival is unlikely on the Plains and little or no reproduction occurs in the mountains. Fall populations on the Plains are correlated with oversummering populations in the mountains but not with populations at any location on the Plains the preceding spring.
Article
Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) consume adult army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) from late June through mid-September on alpine talus slopes in Glacier National Park (GNP), Montana. As part of a study carried out to better understand the ecological interactions between grizzly bears and army cutworm moths in CNP, we studied temporal abundance patterns, body mass and composition, and migration potential of moths collected from alpine moth aggregation sites throughout the summer of 1994 and 1995. Army cutworm moths arrived in the alpine zone of GNP in late June or early July and departed by late August or early September. While moths were in the alpine zone, their body mass and moisture, lipid, and gross energy contents markedly increased and crude protein decreased. The absence of moths from the alpine zone coincided with the presence of moths on the Great Plains. Using published estimates of the cost of transport in flying animals, we calculated that an army cutworm moth flying in late summer through still air could fly 140 km using body lipid reserves alone.
Article
The food habits, movements, and habitat selection of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) were studied in the Mission Mountains, Montana from 1976 through 1979. Important foods by season were: spring-graminoids and carrion; summer-forbs, ferns, and graminoids; and autumn-tree and shrub fruits, insects, and graminoids. Home range was measured for 6 radio-collared grizzly bears. Adult males had larger home range sizes ( $\overline{x}=1,402\text{km}^{2}$ ) than females ( $\overline{x}=285\text{km}^{2}$ ). Home ranges of all age- and sex classes overlapped and there was no evidence of territorial behavior. Home range overlap of 3 female grizzly bears was least in spring and greatest in autumn, and was related to seasonal changes in resource distribution. Density averaged 1 bear/49 km2 within the 780-km2 study area. Grizzly bears were seasonal altitudinal migrants in the Mission Mountains. Areas used more (P < 0.05) than expected were riparian zones and wet seeps in spring, wet seeps and alpine slabrock in summer, and riparian zones, wet seeps, wet meadows, and alpine slabrock in autumn.
Article
Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) consume army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) from late June through mid-September at alpine moth aggregation sites in Glacier National Park, Montana. To better understand the importance of army cutworm moths to grizzly bears, we determined the sex and age classes and minimum numbers of grizzly bears foraging at known alpine moth aggregation sites, and documented the timing and use patterns of grizzly bears foraging in these areas. A minimum of 36 grizzly bears were observed 106 times feeding at 6 of 9 known moth aggregation sites from late June through mid-September in 1992-1995; no bears were observed on moth sites in 1993. Bears fed on moth aggregations disproportionately more at elevations >2561 m, on slopes between 31° and 45°, and on southwest-facing aspects. Lone adult grizzly bears appeared to be underrepresented and subadults overrepresented at moth sites. Moths are highly digestible; all parts are digested except for the exoskeleton. We propose that army c...
Article
Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) consume adult army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) from late June through mid-September on alpine talus slopes in Glacier National Park (GNP), Montana. As part of a study carried out to better understand the ecological interactions between grizzly bears and army cutworm moths in GNP, we studied temporal abundance patterns, body mass and composition, and migration potential of moths collected from alpine moth aggregation sites throughout the summer of 1994 and 1995. Army cutworm moths arrived in the alpine zone of GNP in late June or early July and departed by late August or early September. While moths were in the alpine zone, their body mass and moisture, lipid, and gross energy contents markedly increased and crude protein decreased. The absence of moths from the alpine zone coincided with the presence of moths on the Great Plains. Using published estimates of the cost of transport in flying animals, we calculated that an army cutworm moth flying in late summer through still air could fly 140 km using body lipid reserves alone.