ArticlePublisher preview available

The Rorschach Extended Aggression Scores

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

The Extended Aggression Scores were developed to quantify the aggressive Rorschach imagery produced by violent Antisocial Personality Disordered (ASPD; American Psychiatric Association, 1980 ) offenders. Despite their histories of real world violence, these subjects produced few Aggressive Movement (AG; Exner, 1993 ) responses. Why didn’t violent children, adolescents, and adults produce more AG responses? Considering their expression of uncensored pleasurable affect when relating their aggressive acts during their interviews, conscious censoring ( Exner, 1993 ; Meloy, 1988 ) did not adequately explain the paucity of AG responses among sentenced adults. Why would they describe their violent acts with pride and bravado during an interview and subsequently censor AG on the Rorschach? Conscious censoring among the Conduct Disorder (CD) children and adolescents, who frequently produced sexual content, seemed an equally unlikely explanation ( Gacono, 1997 ). Earlier Rorschach research ( Holt & Havel, 1960 ; Rapaport, Gill, & Schafer, 1946 , 1968 ; Schafer, 1954 ) provided clues to understanding the discrepancies between Rorschach production and the interview/historical data. Direct or implicit aggressive content was thought to imply tensions of aggressive impulse ( Rapaport et al., 1946 \ 1968 ). Initial findings ( Gacono, 1988 , 1990 ; Heaven, 1988 ) suggested that the paucity of symbolized aggression, represented by AG movement, might be due, in part, to the ego-syntonic nature of aggression in ASPD and psychopathic subjects. The clinical logic was that AG symbolized tensions of ego-dystonic aggression when produced by violent, antisocial patients. In the absence of binding the aggressive impulse, the violent individual would, instead, act it out, thus vitiating the need to symbolize it. Existing data supported this hypothesis: Exner’ ;s (1995) character disordered sample produced lower AG frequencies than his adult nonpatients; violent children and adolescents produce lower AG frequencies than child and adolescent nonpatients; and the majority of the forensic subjects with known histories of violence produce less AG than nonpatients and the Gacono and Meloy clinical samples without histories of violence ( Gacono, 1997 ; Gacono & Meloy, 1994 ). Despite the paucity of AG responses in ASPD records, other aggression imagery was not absent. Rather, the presence of other potentially scoreable aggressive imagery (see Gacono, 1988 , 1990 , 1997 ) allowed for the development ( Gacono, 1988 ) and refinement ( Gacono & Meloy, 1994 ; Meloy & Gacono, 1992 ) of five additional scoring categories: Aggressive Content (AgC), Aggressive Past (AgPast), Aggressive Potential (AgPot), Aggressive Vulnerability (AgV), and Sado-Masochism (SM). Since their introduction ( Gacono, 1988 ), the Extended Aggression Scores have received considerable clinical interest and empirical study. As noted in the Rorschach Workshops’ Alumni Newsletter (2000) concerning the work of the Rorschach Research Council, “Another project on which there has been good progress is the special score for Aggressive Content (AgC). Council has reviewed the criteria and guidelines for its applications and has evaluated the literature concerning it .. . A more precise interpretation of AgC responses will probably hinge on findings for other variables .. .” (p. 13). Additionally, the ROR-SCAN Version 6 Rorschach Interpretive Scoring System ( Caracena, 2002 ) now includes AgC, AgPast, AgPot and SM.. What began as an attempt to expand the scoring of Rorschach aggressive imagery in CD and ASPD subjects, has evolved into a larger study of aggression on the Rorschach. In this article we present information concerning the reliability, psychometric properties, and construct validity of the scores and discuss their clinical meanings. We conclude that while AgPotential, AgVulnerability and Sado-masochism need additional research, the current research supports inclusion of the more frequently appearing AgContent and AgPast scores in the Comprehensive System.
Extended Rorschach Aggression ScoresCarl B. Gacono et al.
The Rorschach Extended Aggression Scores
Carl B. Gacono1, Lynne Bannatyne-Gacono2,
J. Reid Meloy3, and Matthew R. Baity4
1Private Practice, Austin, TX, 2Austin State Hospital, Austin, TX,
3University of California, San Diego, CA, 4University of Arkansas, all USA
The Extended Aggression Scores
The Extended Aggression Scores were developed to quantify the ag-
gressive Rorschach imagery produced by violent Antisocial Personality
Disordered (ASPD; American Psychiatric Association, 1980) offenders.
Despite their histories of real world violence, these subjects produced
few Aggressive Movement (AG; Exner, 1993) responses. Why didn’t vi-
olent children, adolescents, and adults produce more AG responses?
Considering their expression of uncensored pleasurable affect when
relating their aggressive acts during their interviews, conscious censor-
ing (Exner, 1993; Meloy, 1988) did not adequately explain the paucity
of AG responses among sentenced adults. Why would they describe their
violent acts with pride and bravado during an interview and subse-
quently censor AG on the Rorschach? Conscious censoring among the
Conduct Disorder (CD) children and adolescents, who frequently pro-
duced sexual content, seemed an equally unlikely explanation (Gacono,
1997).
Earlier Rorschach research (Holt & Havel, 1960; Rapaport, Gill, &
Schafer, 1946, 1968; Schafer, 1954) provided clues to understanding the
discrepancies between Rorschach production and the interview/histor-
ical data. Direct or implicit aggressive content was thought to imply ten-
sions of aggressive impulse (Rapaport et al., 1946/1968). Initial findings
(Gacono, 1988, 1990; Heaven, 1988) suggested that the paucity of sym-
bolized aggression, represented by AG movement, might be due, in part,
to the ego-syntonic nature of aggression in ASPD and psychopathic sub-
Rorschachiana 27, 164–190
© 2005 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers
164
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... Rorschach clinicians may find that the specific setting where their practice takes place imposes variations on their interpretation strategies, including which variables are considered the most meaningful. Occasionally, this goes even further, as the interpretation associated with a specific variable may vary according to the type of clients being assessed (e.g., Gacono, Bannatyne-Gacono, Meloy, & Baity, 2005). This article focuses on issues and themes that are particularly relevant when assessing youth who were exposed to multiple traumatic events of an interpersonal nature during their childhood, as aftereffects of their trauma experiences are often reflected in their Rorschach responses. ...
... A wider range of codes to assess aggressive Rorschach imagery has been proposed by other authors. Two scoring systems in particular have prevailed: Gacono and Meloy's Extended Aggression Scores (Gacono et al., 2005;Meloy & Gacono, 1992) and Urist's negative interaction codes from the Mutuality of Autonomy Scale or MOAS (Urist, 1977). ...
Article
A history of complex trauma or exposure to multiple traumatic events of an interpersonal nature, such as abuse, neglect, and/or major attachment disruptions, is unfortunately common in youth referred for psychological assessment. The way these adolescents approach the Rorschach task and thematic contents they provide often reflect how such experiences have deeply affected their personality development. This article proposes a shift in perspective in the interpretation of protocols of adolescents who suffered complex trauma with reference to two aspects: (a) the diagnostic relevance of avoidant or emotionally constricted Rorschach protocols that may otherwise appear of little use, and (b) the importance of danger-related thematic contents reflecting the youth’s sense of threat, harm, and vulnerability. Regarding this last aspect, the article reintroduces the Preoccupation with Danger Index ( DI). Two cases are presented to illustrate the approach.
... Rorschach clinicians may find that the specific setting where their practice takes place imposes variations on their interpretation strategies, including which variables are considered the most meaningful. Occasionally, this goes even further, as the interpretation associated with a specific variable may vary according to the type of clients being assessed (e.g., Gacono, Bannatyne-Gacono, Meloy, & Baity, 2005). This article focuses on issues and themes that are particularly relevant when assessing youth who were exposed to multiple traumatic events of an interpersonal nature during their childhood, as aftereffects of their trauma experiences are often reflected in their Rorschach responses. ...
... A wider range of codes to assess aggressive Rorschach imagery has been proposed by other authors. Two scoring systems in particular have prevailed: Gacono and Meloy's Extended Aggression Scores (Gacono et al., 2005;Meloy & Gacono, 1992) and Urist's negative interaction codes from the Mutuality of Autonomy Scale or MOAS (Urist, 1977). ...
... CritCont2% adds the AGC and MAP scores. AGC is coded for content commonly perceived as dangerous, harmful, injurious, malevolent, or predatory and it has shown good interrater reliability and validity as a measure of preoccupations with aggressive or dangerous forces (Gacono et al., 2005). On average, AGC is about six times more common than AGM , suggesting it may help better predict feigning, particularly because it encompasses the evil content studied by others (e.g., Perry & Kinder 1992). ...
Article
Full-text available
We investigated how scores from the Rorschach task and self-reports of psychotic-like disturbance distinguish individuals attempting to appear insane (i.e., feigning) from patients with psychotic disturbances or nonpatient controls. We also evaluated whether Rorschach scores provide incremental validity over self-reported symptoms. The study used 50 nonpatients asked to feign (F; age M = 19.5, SD = 1.5), 88 incarcerated forensic inpatients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity or incompetent to stand trial (P; age M = 40.8, SD = 13.5), and 47 standard nonpatient controls (S; age M = 19.8, SD = 2.2). Participants responded to the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS), the Magical Ideation Scale (MIS), and the Perceptual Aberration Scale (PAS). We compared each pair of groups (i.e., F vs. P, P vs. S, and F vs. S) with separate predetermined hypotheses addressing the multimethod assessment of feigning or psychosis and ran logistic regressions including Rorschach and self-reported scores to predict group membership (e.g., F vs. P). Primary analyses found validity for Critical Contents and a revised version of it, the Thought and Perception Composite (TP-Comp), a variable we call Breaking the Card Boundary (BCB), and self-reported symptoms. In supplementary analyses, we document validity for subcomponents of TP-Comp alone and in combination with BCB. We also found it was easier to feign self-reported symptoms than R-PAS assessed characteristics and that R-PAS variables had incremental validity over self-reports on the MIS-PAS. Finally, we note limitations and suggest future paths, such as evaluating the generalizability of the results when considering attempts to feign severe mental illness on the trauma spectrum and creating a feigning composite using cross-validated logistic regression equations.
... Supplemental systems have included object relations(Blatt & Lerner, 1983;Fisher & Cleveland, 1958;Kwawer, 1980), defenses(Cooper, Perry, & Arnow, 1988;, developmental psychopathology(Urist, 1977), dependency(Bornstein & Masling, 2005;Masling et al., 1967), trauma(Armstrong & Loewenstein, 1990), aggressive drive derivatives(Gacono & Meloy, 1994;Gacono, Gacono, Meloy, & Baity, 2008; Gacono & Smith, in press), and thought organization(Athey, 1974;Meloy & Singer, 1991). Also seeBornstein and Masling (2005),Kissen (1986),Kwawer, Lerner, Lerner, and Sugarman (1980),Lerner and Lerner (1988), andLerner (1991). ...
... The test consists of ten differently coloured boards: black and white, colourful (dark + red), and coloured boards. The purpose of the test is to determine the projection of thought processes and personality traits on indefinite objects, which have the form of ink stains of various colours and shapes [72,[79][80][81][82][83]. After presenting the board, the tested person is asked the question, "What could it be, what is it like?" ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper evaluates the impact of the forest environment on aggressive manifestations in adolescents. A remedial educative programme was performed with 68 teenagers from institutions with substitute social care with diagnoses F 30.0 (affective disorders) and F 91.0 (family-related behavioural disorders), aged 12–16 years. Adolescents observed patterns of prosocial behaviour in forest animals (wolves, wild boars, deer, bees, ants, squirrels and birds), based on the fact that processes and interactions in nature are analogous to proceedings and bonds in human society. The methodology is based on qualitative and quantitative research. Projective tests (Rorschach Test, Hand Test, Thematic Apperception Test) were used as a diagnostic tool for aggressive manifestations before and after forest therapies based on Shinrin-yoku, wilderness therapy, observational learning and forest pedagogy. Probands underwent 16 therapies lasting for two hours each. The experimental intervention has a statistically significant effect on the decreased final values relating to psychopathology, irritability, restlessness, emotional instability, egocentrism, relativity, and negativism. Forest animals demonstrated to these adolescents ways of communication, cooperation, adaptability, and care for others, i.e., characteristics without which no community can work.
... As an example, Aggressive Content (AGC; Gacono, Bannatyne-Gacono, Meloy & Baity, 2005;Gacono & Meloy, 1994;Meyer et al., 2011) is coded when the respondent sees in the blot a content that is commonly perceived as potentially dangerous, hurtful, malevolent, and/or destructive or communicates such characteristics in other ways, for example by using adjectives such as "scary" or "mean." From the perspective of the behavioral foundation of AGC interpretations, seeing percepts like dangerous snakes, guns, tornados or demons, in poorly structured stimuli like the Rorschach inkblots are, suggests that the respondent attributes potentially harmful or dangerous characteristics to any information he or she is exposed to in his or her real-life environment. ...
Article
We introduce the concept of “neurobiological foundation” of Rorschach interpretations as an extension of the concept of behavioral representation as a foundation for interpretation of R‐PAS variables. Here, we propose that if there is a parallelism between the mental, verbal and perceptual behaviors occurring within the microcosm of the Rorschach task and those occurring in the external environment [behavioral foundation], then the same brain regions engaged by the test‐taker when producing of a given code, should be engaged also when reproducing, in the external environment, the same psychological processes underlying that specific Rorschach code [neurobiological foundation]. To investigate this concept, we used archival, fMRI data and tested whether producing Oral Dependency Language (ODL) responses would associate with increased activation in brain regions associated with dependency‐related, psychological processes. Results from a sample of 21 non‐clinical volunteers partially confirmed our hypothesis, providing some support to the neurobiological foundation of the ODL code.
Article
Full-text available
Determining a patient's aggressivity is a function of assessing multiple factors, including personality vulnerabilities, past behaviors, and potential future circumstances. Evaluating the nature and predominance of aggressive drive, impulse control, affect lability, inhibitory mechanisms, cognitive deficits, and conscious and unconscious attitudes (e.g.
Article
Full-text available
Psychopathy is an essential construct in forensic mental health. While male psychopathy and aggression has been thoroughly studied, less is known about this relationship with female psychopathy. In this article, the relationship between female psychopathy (Psychopathy Checklist-Revised [PCL-R] total, factor, and facet scores) and the Rorschach Aggression indices (Aggressive Movement [AG], Aggressive Content [AgC], Aggressive Past [AgPast], Aggressive Potential [AgPot], Sadomasochistic Aggression [SM]) were examined. Rorschach Aggression indices between female psychopathic (PCL-R total score ≥ 30; N = 84) and non-psychopathic female offenders (PCL-R total score ≤ 24; N = 39) were also compared. PCL-R total score was significantly correlated (p <.05) with AgC, AgPast, AgPot, and SM and there were also significant correlations between the Aggression scores and PCL-R Factor/facet scores. The female psychopaths produced more AgC, AgPast, and AgPot responses than the non-psychopathic females. Rorschach aggression indices supported theory and suggested that the violence in psychopathic women stems from their identification with aggression and pervasive feelings of entitlement. Psychopathic women evidenced higher levels of these variables than the non-psychopathic offenders. The results add to the link between aggression and psychopathy as well as a better understanding of aggression in female offenders.
Article
Les individus qui présentent un trouble de la personnalité limite (TPL) ou antisociale (TPA) sont enclins à commettre des passages à l’acte en raison d’une difficulté à contrôler leurs pulsions (Bateman, Fonagy, 2016). L’objectif de cette étude est de comparer l’élaboration psychique de l’agressivité chez 16 hommes présentant un TPL, 17 hommes présentant un TPA et 13 hommes de la population générale. L’élaboration de l’agressivité est évaluée à partir des indices d’agressivité présents dans les protocoles de Rorschach. Selon les résultats, les participants TPA et TPL présentent un besoin de maîtrise de l’autre et une identification à l’agresseur. Les participants avec un TPA présentent une agressivité retournée contre soi et un besoin de dominer l’objet de manière agressive. Ces résultats permettent une meilleure compréhension de la gestion de l’agressivité de ces hommes.
Article
Full-text available
La psicopatía ha sido un tema que ha atraído la atención de los profesionales en el ámbito de la salud mental desde la antigüedad. El comportamiento agresivo e impulsivo, las dificultades para relacionarse con otros y la transgresión de normas suelen ser unos de los principales indicadores de la presencia de este trastorno en los individuos. La Psychopathy Checklist-Revision (PCL-R) se había conocido como el instrumento comúnmente empleado para el diagnóstico de esta grave alteración de la personalidad; sin embargo, en los últimos años se ha sugerido el uso de técnicas proyectivas debido a la distorsión que los propios evaluados pueden hacer de los test psicométricos. El objetivo de la presente investigación será explorar en la literatura científica reciente los estudios publicados en población psicopática en la cual se haya empleado el test de Rorschach, para sintetizar los resultados y conclusiones alcanzadas.
Article
Full-text available
Taking into account both normative and psychosocial objectives, the authors have been interested in examining whether psychological aspects of gender, phases in the adult life cycle, and realities of socioeconomic status are differentially reflected in the themes created on the Rorschach test. Rorschach contents have been interpreted in relation to numerous aspects of personality functioning, including interests, preoccupations, concerns, underlying conflicts, and self and object representations. The noncritical use of interpretation from the symbolic point of view has been specially troublesome. In their study the authors will interpret some contents as direct expressions of the individual or group experience (Mayman, 1977). Doing so, the authors think we shall get closer to what Weiner called a representative interpretation (Lerner, 1991). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Elements of response style were examined among three groups of chronic, psychotic, forensic patients: paranoid schizophrenics(N = 89); undifferentiated-disorganized schizophrenics ( N = 38), and schizoaffective patients(N = 53). Forensic patients with elevated MMPI-2 L Scales produced increased percentages of Pure Form (F%) on the Rorschach. A similar relationship occurred when the Rorschach was used as the independent measure. Schizoaffective patients reported more psychotic symptoms on the MMPI-2 and lower F% (Rorschach) than both schizophrenic groups. Although undifferentiated schizophrenics evidenced the most psychopathology on the Rorschach (impaired reality testing and perceptual accuracy disturbance), all three groups produced lower than expected frequencies for Rorschach variables commonly associated with thought disorder and poor reality testing (Exner, 1995b). The clinical importance of using the MMPI-2 and Rorschach in tandem with forensic psychiatric patients is discussed. Our empirical findings suggest the need for forensic evaluators to consider the important relationship between psychiatric diagnosis and response style (defensiveness, denial, illness chronicity, medications, and concurrent Axis II psychopathology) when interpreting often constricted psychological testing protocols in chronic forensic patient populations. (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Article
This chapter presents analytic methods for matched studies with multiple risk factors of interest. We consider matched sample designs of two types, prospective (cohort or randomized) and retrospective (case-control) studies. We discuss direct and indirect parametric modeling of matched sample data and then focus on conditional logistic regression in matched case-control studies. Next, we describe the general case for matched samples including polytomous outcomes. An illustration of matched sample case-control analysis is presented. A problem solving section appears at the end of the chapter.
Article
A literature review yields a surprisingly small number of nonpatient studies focusing on three widely used assessment tools: the WAIS-R, Rorschach, and MMPI-2. In this study, 123 nonpatient adults residing in central California were administered these three instruments. We performed intercoder reliability statistics on 52 of the 123 Rorschach records. WAIS-R and MMPI-2 results are similar to current standardization data for these instruments, whereas many of the Rorschach variables are quite different from those published in the manual for the Comprehensive System (Exner, 1995). We discuss these findings and offer recommendations for further normative research.
Article
The Rorschach is one of the most widely used, openly accepted, and frequently requested tests in forensic psychology practice (Piotrowski, 1996; Meloy, 1991; Weiner, Exner, & Sciara, 1996). Well-trained psychologists with a sophisticated understanding of the individual, psychological constructs, base rates, and conditional probabilities, derive information from the Rorschach beyond what is available from diagnosis, self-report, and interview. The Rorschach helps us describe the complex interaction among psychological, biological, environmental and behavioral domains (Viglione & Perry, 1991). Despite its favorable status in both clinical and forensic settings and a substantial body of literature attesting to its reliability and validity (Weiner, 1996), the Rorschach has been targeted for attack by a small group of “academic” psychologists. Rather than science, the rhetoric and tactics of these detractors has been likened to “advocacy” or politics (Weiner, 2001, p. 7). This bias against the Rorschach is not new. It has existed since the 1920s among American academic psychology departments, despite the research in support of the Rorschach. As a result of this attack, biased articles find their way into publication and eventually into the courtroom. While they do little to promote scientific study (Meyer, 2000) and provide little useful information to the trier of fact, they do present another avenue for challenge when opposing attorneys search for weaknesses in psychological testimony. Forensic psychologists need to prepare for this additional challenge. In this article we summarize some key issues that can aid in defending the Rorschach.
Article
This study compared judicially committed sex offenders on several Rorschach variables, using archival assessment data from the California Department of Mental Health files. The subjects were 150 mentally ill male offenders who were past or current supervisees of the California Department of Mental Health's "Conditional Release Programs (CONREP)." The sex offenders were divided into two groups: Sex Offenders Against Minors (SOAMs) (N = 61) and Rapists of Adults ("Rapists") (N = 29). The control group consisted of a randomly selected group of CONREP nonsex offenders (NSOs) (N = 60), none of whom had any history of sexual offense. The Rorschach variables examined in this study were drawn from the Comprehensive Scoring System for the Rorschach (Exner, 1986) and the special aggression scores of Gacono and Meloy (Gacono, 1988, 1990; Meloy & Gacono, 1994). Hypotheses were based upon a review of the clinical and assessment literature on the personality traits of sex offenders. Comparisons were made in the following areas: coping resources (AdjD), narcissism (Fr+rF), painful introspection (V), damaged sense of self (MOR), social isolation (Isolate/R), interpersonal need (T), immature dependency needs (Fd), aggression (AG, AgC, AgPast, AgPot), object relatedness (H: (H) +Hd+(Hd)), affective avoidance (Afr), cognitive slippage (Wsum6), and conventionality (P). For the nominal Rorschach variables between-group comparisons were made using a Chi Square analysis, while ordinal variables were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis H Test. Tests were considered significant if p