A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Journal of foionality and Social Psychology
1984.
Vol. 47. No 6. 1206-1217Copyright 1984 by ife
Psychological A norm
KM.
\K
The Influence of Affect on Categorization
Alice M. Isen and Kimberly A. Daubman
University of Maryland
Three studies and a pilot experiment showed that positive affect, induced in any
of three ways, influenced categorization of either of two types of stimuli—words
or colors. As reflected by performance on two types of tasks (rating and sorting),
people in whom positive affect had been induced tended to create and use
categories more inclusively than did subjects in a control condition. On one task,
they tended to group more stimuli together, and on the other task they tended to
rate more low-prototypic exemplars of a category as members of the category.
These results are interpreted in terms of an influence of affect on cognitive
organization or on processes that might influence cognitive organization. It is
suggested that borderline effects of negative affect on categorization, obtained in
two of the studies, might result from normal people's attempts to cope with
negative affect.
Recent research has suggested that positive
affect may have a pervasive effect on cognitive
processes. For example, a mild positive affec-
tive state has been shown to be capable of
serving as a retrieval cue for positive material
in memory, regardless of the affective state
the subject was in when the list was learned,
influencing such measures as the reaction
time for recall of positive words and the
subset of words likely to be recalled from a
memorized list (e.g., Isen, Shalker, Clark, &
Karp,
1978; Laird, Wagener, Halal, & Szegda,
1982;
Nasby & Yando, 1982; Teasdale &
Fogarty, 1979). Moreover, a mild positive
affective state of the kind likely to be expe-
rienced in everyday life has also been shown
to influence judgments of various kinds, de-
cision-making strategy, and willingness to take
risks (e.g., Isen & Means, 1983; Isen, Means,
Patrick, & Nowicki, 1982; Isen & Patrick,
1983;
Isen & Shalker, 1982; Isen et aL, 1978;
Johnson & Tversky, 1983).
These findings suggest that affect may in-
fluence not only memory but also cognitive
organization and consequences of this orga-
nization. One series of studies, for example,
investigated the influence of affective state on
memory, judgment, and evaluation. These
results indicated that when people had been
Requests for reprints should be sent to Alice M. Isen,
who is now at the Department of Psychology, University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106.
given a small free gift, they were more likely
to judge their consumer
goods
more favorably;
and these improved opinions were attributed
to affect-cued accessibility of positive material,
because results of a second study indicated
that positive feelings served to cue positive
material in memory (Isen et al., 1978). In
two other series of studies it was found that
mild positive affect influenced subjects' will-
ingness to take risks (Isen & Patrick, 1983)
and their estimates of the amount of risk
present at a given time—that is, their esti-
mates of the chances of certain events occur-
ring (Johnson & Tversky, 1983). There is
growing evidence, then, that positive affect
can influence cognitive processes, possibly
including cognitive organization
itself,
through
the ideas that are brought to mind by the
affective state.
Moreover, additional work has indicated
that not only cognitive content, but the very
strategies that subjects use in solving prob-
lems,
may be influenced by the presence of
positive feelings. In one series of studies,
subjects in whom good feelings had been
induced by placing them in especially com-
fortable surroundings, complete with refresh-
ments, were found to be more likely to use
an intuitive solution, or a heuristic, in solving
two different types of problems, a physics
timer-tape problem and a relative frequency
judgment (Isen et al., 1982). In addition,
subjects in whom positive affect had been
1206