ArticlePublisher preview available

Solitary Minds and Social Capital: Latent Inhibition, General Intellectual Functions and Social Network Size Predict Creative Achievements

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Successful creative accomplishment is influenced by both individual and social factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between these factors in 111 Central-Eastern European volunteers recruited from the community. Individual factors evaluated in this study included IQ, latent inhibition (LI), and schizotypal personality traits. In addition to these measures, the size of the primary social network (relatives and friends who know and personally contact each other) and the broader network (persons to whom Christmas cards are sent) were evaluated. Result revealed that the personality trait unusual experiences significantly predicted real-life creative achievements. However, when LI was taken into consideration, this relationship did not retain significance. Further independent predictors of creativity were IQ and, most importantly, primary but not broader social network size. These results suggest that decreased LI, higher intellect and stronger social support independently facilitate real-life creative accomplishment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Solitary Minds and Social Capital: Latent Inhibition, General Intellectual
Functions and Social Network Size Predict Creative Achievements
Szabolcs Ke´ri
University of Szeged, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Szeged
and National Psychiatry Center, Budapest, Hungary
Successful creative accomplishment is influenced by both individual and social factors. The aim of this study
was to investigate the relationship between these factors in 111 Central-Eastern European volunteers recruited
from the community. Individual factors evaluated in this study included IQ, latent inhibition (LI), and
schizotypal personality traits. In addition to these measures, the size of the primary social network (relatives
and friends who know and personally contact each other) and the broader network (persons to whom
Christmas cards are sent) were evaluated. Result revealed that the personality trait unusual experiences
significantly predicted real-life creative achievements. However, when LI was taken into consideration, this
relationship did not retain significance. Further independent predictors of creativity were IQ and, most
importantly, primary but not broader social network size. These results suggest that decreased LI, higher
intellect and stronger social support independently facilitate real-life creative accomplishment.
Keywords: creativity, latent inhibition, social network, personality, IQ
What are the predictors of creative accomplishment? Can cre-
ativity be conceptualized as an individual trait of solitary, clever,
and unusual minds or is it closely related to social networks? These
two ideas are often quoted as independent or mutually exclusive
hypotheses from the points of view of cognitive science, social
psychology and even psychopathology, and so far relatively little
empirical work has been done to compare these two hypotheses
against each other (Hennessey & Amabile, 2010; Runco, 2004).
Regarding individual differences in cognitive abilities, latent
inhibition (LI) and general intellectual functions (IQ) are often
considered as cornerstones of creativity (Carson, Higgins, & Pe-
terson, 2003; Eysenck, 1995; Silva, 2008; Sternberg & O’Hara,
1999). LI is a special ability of the nervous system to tune down
information that was previously experienced as irrelevant (Lubow,
1989). LI serves an important function in directing the focus of
attention away from irrelevant details, and thus facilitating con-
vergent thinking and goal-directed behavior. However, reduced LI
can expand the availability of stimuli and mental representations,
which may be essential to generate novel and original associations
and to intuitively gain insight into complex problems (Simonton,
1988). It has been shown that lower LI is associated with person-
ality traits such as openness to experience and extraversion (Pe-
terson & Carson, 2000; Peterson, Smith, & Carson, 2002), which
are marked predictors of divergent thinking and creativity (e.g.,
Feist, 1998; Furnham & Bachtiar, 2008; King, Walker, & Broyles,
1996; McCrae, 1987). Carson et al. (2003) demonstrated an in-
triguing interaction between LI and IQ in relation to creativity: the
highest eminent creative accomplishments were observed in per-
sons with low LI and high IQ. Additionally, persons with de-
creased LI seem to have a higher faith in their intuition to solve
various problems (Kaufman, 2009).
LI may provide a valid link between creativity and psychopa-
thology. Patients with acute schizophrenia and healthy individuals
with schizotypal personality traits display decreased LI
(Braunstein-Bercovitz, Rammsayer, Gibbons, & Lubow, 2002;
Lubow, 2005), and there is evidence that schizotypal traits, such as
unusual experiences, broadened conceptual categories and loos-
ened associations, are associated with creativity (Claridge, 1998;
Eysenck, 1995).
Altogether, these results suggest that at the individual level
creativity is associated with an ability to reach information that is
otherwise screened out. General intellectual functions and unusual
personality traits may facilitate the generation of original experi-
ences, ideas and novel associations. However, creativity is rarely
confined to solitary minds; all creative activities from the gener-
ation of new ideas and artistic objects to the acceptance and
appreciation of these products are basically social and are influ-
enced by group organization, personal relationship and support,
and cultural context (Amabile, 1996; Brass, 1995;
Csı´kszentmiha´lyi, 1990; Glaveanu, 2010; John-Steiner, 2005). In a
seminal report, Simonton (1975) collected information from 127
generations of European history and found that creative eminence
and development were affected by social factors ranging from the
availability of role models within the specific creative domain to
political instability. However, different categories of social rela-
tionships have a distinct effect on successful creative achievements
(Simonton, 1984, 1992). Within the family domain, positive role
models, nourishing environment, and traumatic events were
This article was published Online First January 17, 2011.
Szabolcs Ke´ri, Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Szeged,
Hungary, and National Psychiatry Center, Budapest, Hungary.
The study was supported by the Hungarian Research Fund (OTKA
NF72488). The author is indebted to Andrea Szaka´cs and Zsolt Halas for
assistance in data collection.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Szabolcs
Ke´ri, National Psychiatry Center, Balassa u. 6, 1083, Budapest, Hungary.
E-mail: szkeri@phys.szote.u-szeged.hu
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts © 2011 American Psychological Association
2011, Vol. 5, No. 3, 215–221 1931-3896/11/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0022000
215
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... Linking this idea with the consideration that leaky attention might attenuate latent inhibition, led to the prediction that creative people might show attenuated latent inhibition (Carson, 2011;2014;Eysenck, 1993Eysenck, , 1995. Several studies have revealed favourable evidence for this prediction, measuring creativity both through divergent thinking tasks (Fink et al., 2012) and self-reports of creative achievement (Carson et al., 2003;Kéri, 2011; however, see Burch et al., 2006;Holt et al., 2020). ...
... To test these hypotheses, we designed a study that assessed latent inhibition, divergent thinking, and the characteristics of testimonies in an eyewitness memory task (see Figure 1). As a starting point of the study, we hypothesized that individuals with higher creative performance, measured through the Alternative Uses Task-an established assessment of divergent thinking abilities (Guilford, 1967)-would exhibit attenuated latent inhibition, replicating previous findings (e.g., Carson et al., 2003;Kéri, 2011). ...
... A key feature of our experiment was the use of a new procedure for measuring latent inhibition, in which pre-exposure to the target stimulus was not accompanied by a masking task. In doing so, we were responding to criticisms raised by previous studies (Byrom et al., 2018), which have suggested that procedures with masked pre-exposure, such as those used in previous research on the relationship between latent inhibition and creativity (Carson et al., 2003;Kéri, 2011), may not have measured genuine latent inhibition effects, but rather other types of effects related to inattention, such as learned irrelevance (Le Pelley & Schmidt-Hansen, 2010). The presence of a masking task in these previous studies opens the possibility that the loss of attention to the target stimulus would not have occurred spontaneously as a direct, and exclusive, result of the non-reinforced pre-exposure. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Latent inhibition is a retardation in learning about a stimulus due to its prior exposure without explicit consequences. It has been suggested that individuals who tend to show less latent inhibition possess a "leaky" attentional style, finding it difficult to inhibit the processing of irrelevant information, which would manifest as an ability to generate uncommon and creative ideas. In the present study, we tested this hypothesis within a new framework—the field of eyewitness memory—by investigating whether the degree of attenuated latent inhibition is associated with the inclusion of more peripheral (seemingly irrelevant) information in testimonies about a witnessed event. In an experiment involving 116 university students, the LI Group was pre-exposed without masking to a target auditory stimulus without consequences, while the CTRL Group did not receive this pre-exposure. Subsequently, both groups engaged in a learning phase where they had to learn the association between the target stimulus and a novel outcome. A latent inhibition effect was observed, with participants in the LI Group showing retardation in learning this association compared to the CTRL Group. Additionally, all participants completed the Alternative Uses Task to assess divergent thinking and provided eyewitness testimonies based on the viewing of a video of a criminal event. We confirmed the known relationship between attenuated latent inhibition and creativity, finding that the lesser the latent inhibition exhibited, the higher the performance on the Alternative Uses Task. Moreover, we found that a lower degree of latent inhibition was associated with a higher number of peripheral details included in the testimonies. These results are discussed in terms of the leaky attention hypothesis, and an alternative explanation based on cognitive flexibility. According to this, individuals exhibiting attenuated latent inhibition may have an intact capacity to ignore irrelevant stimuli but would be highly efficient at rapidly redirecting their attention when changes occur.
... A látens gátlás érinti az emlékezeti folyamatokat és az asszociációk formálását is, az érzékelés szintjén pedig véd a túlterhelődéstől és így a dezintegrációtól. Pszichotikus állapotokban a csökkent látens gátlás miatt ez a védelem nem működik (Kéri, 2011). A látens gátlás alacsony szintje bizonyos körülmények között mentális betegségekre, más körülmények között pedig kreatív teljesítményekre hajlamosíthat. ...
... A látens gátlás alacsony szintje bizonyos körülmények között mentális betegségekre, más körülmények között pedig kreatív teljesítményekre hajlamosíthat. Kéri (2011) azt találta, hogy a csökkent kognitív gátlás nagyon magas IQ-val kombinálva rendkívüli kreatív teljesítményt jósol. A szokatlan élmények szignifikánsan előjelzői a kreatív teljesítményeknek, bár van még számos lényeges faktor, amely szerepet játszik az alkotó gondolkodásban. ...
Article
Full-text available
A tanulmány a neurológiai alapú teljesítményzavarok, kiemelten az autizmus idegrendszeri fejlődési jellemzőinek a tehetségfejlődés szempontjából történő áttekintése. Az elemzés kiterjed az autizmus és intelligencia kapcsolatára a végrehajtó funkciók, a mintázatfelismerés, a szisztematizálás és a beszéd szerepének kiemelésével és a komplex fejlesztési eljárások hatásának bemutatására. Kiemelt kérdéskör a kreativitás, amely a neuroatipikus fejlődés esetén szintén eltér a szokásostól, és kapcsolatot mutat a pszichotikus állapotokkal. A feltárt összefüggések jelzik, hogy mely tényezők tekintetében van különös gondosságra szükség, amikor az atipikus idegrendszeri fejlődés kiemelkedő képességekkel és erős fejlődésre való törekvéssel párosul. A korai beavatkozás és a környezeti tényezők döntő szerepet játszhatnak a különleges képességnek tehetség irányú fejlődésében. Az autizmus jellemzői mentén a tehetséggondozás számára konkrét lehetőségeket ismertetünk.
... Specifically, individuals with higher HC scores sought more help and resources from others, which made it easier for them to achieve creative goals. Relevant to this, Kéri (2011) found a positive association between one's primary network size and creative achievements. Nonetheless, due to the limited prior research, no clear hypotheses can be proposed. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of the present study is to investigate the relationships between culture and creativity from the perspective of individualism and collectivism (I/C). Specifically, we compared cultural differences in I/C as well as creativity between two major economies, namely China and the US. We also examined how specific dimensions of I/C are associated with indices of creativity in these two cultural contexts. Four hundred and thirty-four Chinese college students and four hundred and seventy-eight US college students were recruited to complete a measure of I/C, a test of creative potentials, and a real-life creativity inventory. A four-dimensional I/C measure which assesses participants’ horizontal individualistic (HI), vertical individualistic (VI), horizontal collectivistic (HC), and vertical collectivistic (VC) tendencies was employed. The results showed significant differences in all of the I/C and creativity indices between the two countries. In addition, across the two cultural contexts, 1) HI, VI, and HC were all positively related to creativity to some extent; and 2) VC was negatively associated with creativity to some extent. Most importantly, culture-specific links between VI and creativity, HC and creativity, and VC and creativity were found in the Chinese and US samples. The findings were discussed from a culturally contextualized perspective.
Book
Full-text available
This much-needed book introduces readers to the related fields of expertise, creativity, and performance, exploring our understanding of the factors contributing to greatness in creative domains. Bringing together research from the fields of creativity and expertise, it provides fresh insights for newcomers and seasoned scholars alike with its approachable guide to the multidimensional complexities of expertise development. It transcends traditionally studied fields such as chess, sports, and music, instead exploring the intersection of expertise with creativity and the performing arts. Dedicated applied chapters cover eight fields, including mind-games, music, dance, creative writing, acting, art, and STEM. The book also examines the facilitators of creative performance, including aesthetic sensitivity, creativity, and mental imagery as well as the obstacles to performance such as burnout, procrastination, and gender-related challenges. The book concludes by engaging with pressing issues facing expertise, including the impact of AI. Student-friendly pedagogy is featured throughout, including 'Spotlight on...', 'Check it out...', and 'Consider this...' boxes to position material within context and engage students' learning. Whether revealing how an actor brings their part to life, how writers conjure up their storylines and vibrant characters, or what lies behind scientific invention, The Psychology of Creative Performance and Expertise offers a fascinating insight into the multifaceted journey towards achieving creative excellence. This is a valuable resource for final-year undergraduates, postgraduate students, and scholars across a range of disciplines, including expertise or skill acquisition, the psychology of performance, and creativity.
Chapter
Creativity is usually seen as a good thing, but why? The Creativity Advantage first offers an overview of creativity studies with an emphasis on the little-discussed benefits of being creative. These include how creativity can lead to self-insight, help people heal, forge connections with others, inspire drive, and enable people to leave behind a meaningful legacy. Written in an engaging style and illustrated with interesting anecdotal material, this book offers a new perspective on creativity scholarship that can serve as an introduction to the field for newcomers or as a way to encourage new avenues for research.
Chapter
The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Emotions provides a state-of-the-art review of research on the role of emotions in creativity. This volume presents the insights and perspectives of sixty creativity scholars from thirteen countries who span multiple disciplines, including developmental, social, and personality psychology; industrial and organizational psychology; neuroscience; education; art therapy, and sociology. It discusses affective processes – emotion states, traits, and emotion abilities – in relation to the creative process, person, and product, as well as two major contexts for expression of creativity: school, and work. It is a go-to source for scholars who need to enhance their understanding of a specific topic relating to creativity and emotion, and it provides students and researchers with a comprehensive introduction to creativity and emotion broadly.
Article
Full-text available
Although many psychologists have expressed an interest in the phenomenon of creativity, psychological research on this topic did not rapidly, expand until after J. P. Guilford claimed in his 1950 APA presidential address, that this topic deserved far more attention than it was then receiving. This article reviews the progress psychologists have mane in understanding creativity, since Guilford's call to arms. Research progress has taken place on 4 fronts: the cognitive processes involved in the creative act, the distinctive characteristics of the creative person, the development non manifestation of creativity across the individual life span, and the social environments most strongly associated with creative activity. Although some important questions remain unanswered, psychologists now know more than ever before about how individuals achieve this special and significant form of optimal human functioning.
Article
Full-text available
In this article, we attempt to distinguish between the properties of moderator and mediator variables at a number of levels. First, we seek to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating, both conceptually and strategically, the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ. We then go beyond this largely pedagogical function and delineate the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena, including control and stress, attitudes, and personality traits. We also provide a specific compendium of analytic procedures appropriate for making the most effective use of the moderator and mediator distinction, both separately and in terms of a broader causal system that includes both moderators and mediators. (46 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
This paper examines social network size in contemporary Western society based on the exchange of Christmas cards. Maximum network size averaged 153.5 individuals, with a mean network size of 124.9 for those individuals explicitly contacted; these values are remarkably close to the group size of 150 predicted for humans on the basis of the size of their neocortex. Age, household type, and the relationship to the individual influence network structure, although the proportion of kin remained relatively constant at around 21%. Frequency of contact between network members was primarily determined by two classes of variable: passive factors (distance, work colleague, overseas) and active factors (emotional closeness, genetic relatedness). Controlling for the influence of passive factors on contact rates allowed the hierarchical structure of human social groups to be delimited. These findings suggest that there may be cognitive constraints on network size.
Article
The central theme of this title presents a challenging and controversial view of psychosis-that the features of psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia actually lie on a continuum with, and form part of, normal behavior and experience. The dispositional or “schizotypal” traits associated with psychotic disorders, while increasing one’s chances for mental illness, also lead to positive outcomes such as enhanced creativity or spiritual experience. Each aspect of this theme is supported by extensive experimental and clinical evidence, questioning the conventional medical wisdom that treats psychotic illness in the narrow context of neurological disease. The result is an authoritative and provocative overview of an important topic in psychological research and clinical practice.
Article
This book offers rare and fascinating glimpses into the dynamic alliances from which some of our most important scholarly ideas, scientific theories, and art forms are born. It shows the creative process unfolding in the intimate relationships of Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, Henry Miller and Anais Nin, Marie and Pierre Curie, Martha Graham and Erick Hawkins, and Georgia O'Keeffe and Alfred Stieglitz; the productive partnerships of Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, Albert Einstein and Marcel Grossmann, Aaron Copland and Leonard Bernstein, and Freeman Dyson and Richard Feynman; the familial collaborations of Thomas and Heinrich Mann, Hubert and Stuart Dreyfus, and Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson and Mary Catherine Bateson; and the larger ensembles of The Guarneri String Quartet, Lee Strasburg, Harold Clurman and The Group Theater, and such feminist groups as The Stone Center and the authors of Women's Ways of Knowing. Many of these collaborators complemented each other, meshing different backgrounds and forms into fresh styles, while others completely transformed their fields. This book offers a unique cultural and historical perspective on the creative process and a compelling depiction of the associations that nurtured our most talented artists and thinkers. By delving into these complex collaborations, the book illustrates that the mind-rather than thriving on solitude-is clearly dependent upon the reflection, renewal, and trust inherent in sustained human relationships.