Regional Variation in the Denial of Reimbursement for Bone Mineral Density Testing Among US Medicare Beneficiaries

Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Journal of Clinical Densitometry (Impact Factor: 2.03). 10/2008; 11(4):568-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.07.004
Source: PubMed


Although the Bone Mass Measurement Act outlines the indications for central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing for US Medicare beneficiaries, the specifics regarding the appropriate ICD-9 codes to use for covered indications have not been specified by Medicare and are sometimes ambiguous. We describe the extent to which DXA reimbursement was denied by gender and age of beneficiary, ICD-9 code submitted, time since previous DXA, whether the scan was performed in the physician's office and local Medicare carrier. Using Medicare administrative claims data from 1999 to 2005, we studied a 5% national sample of beneficiaries age > or =65 yr with part A+B coverage who were not health maintenance organization enrollees. We identified central DXA claims and evaluated the relationship between the factors listed above and reimbursement for central DXA (CPT code 76075). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent relationship between DXA reimbursement, ICD-9 diagnosis code, and Medicare carrier. For persons who had no DXA in 1999 or 2000 and who had 1 in 2001 or 2002, the proportion of DXA claims denied was 5.3% for women and 9.1% for men. For repeat DXAs performed within 23 mo, the proportion denied was approximately 19% and did not differ by sex. Reimbursement varied by more than 6-fold according to the ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted. For repeat DXAs performed at <23 mo, the proportion of claims denied ranged from 2% to 43%, depending on Medicare carrier. Denial of Medicare reimbursement for DXA varies significantly by sex, time since previous DXA, ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted, place of service (office vs facility), and local Medicare carrier. Greater guidance and transparency in coding policies are needed to ensure that DXA as a covered service is reimbursed for Medicare beneficiaries with the appropriate indications.

Download full-text


Available from: Robert S Matthews
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper proposes a multiresolution coarse-to-fine algorithm to align images. By using a hierarchical strategy, we can improve the execution speed and iterative convergence properties. Our optimization procedure uses the standard Levenberg-Marquardt method and the gradient of the image with respect to the alignment parameters to solve the general registration problem. Our algorithm is applied to align images undergoing affine, perspective and bilinear transformations. In the experiments, we show that our registration algorithm generates precise registration parameters
    Preview · Conference Paper · Jan 1998
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using national Medicare data from 1999-2006, we evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). After adjusting for potentially confounding factors, travel distance was strongly associated with DXA testing. Rural residents were most strongly dependent on the availability of DXAs performed in physician offices. Medicare reimbursement for DXAs performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices) decreased in 2007. With declining reimbursement, some DXA providers may cease providing this service, which would increase travel distance for some people. The impact of travel distance on access to DXA is unclear. Using national Medicare data, we identified claims for DXA to evaluate trends in the number and locations of DXAs performed. Travel distance was the distance from beneficiaries' residence and the nearest DXA provider. Binomial regression evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of DXA. In 2006, 2.9 million DXAs were performed, a 103% increase since 1999. In 2005-2006, 8.0% of persons were tested at non-facility sites versus 4.2% at facility sites. The remainder (88%) had no DXA. Persons traveling 5-9, 10-24, 25-39, and 40-54, and > or = 55 miles were less likely to receive DXA (adjusted risk ratios = 0.92, 0.79, 0.43, 0.32, and 0.26, respectively, < 5 miles referent). Rural residents were more dependent than urban residents on the availability of DXA from non-facility providers. Approximately two-thirds of DXAs in 2005-2006 were performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices). Rural residents would have preferentially reduced access to DXA if there were fewer non-facility sites.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2008 · Osteoporosis International
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis is a growing problem worldwide, with the greatest burden resulting from fractures. Currently available are several treatment options that are effective in reducing fracture risk. Patient adherence to these medications is required for benefit to be seen. Yet, similar to other chronic asymptomatic diseases, adherence to osteoporosis therapies is poor. The reasons for suboptimal adherence are multiple but include fear of possible side effects, dosing requirements, and an unwillingness to take a medication for a 'silent' disease. Poor adherence leads to reduced effectiveness, increased morbidity, and increased medical costs. Efforts to improve adherence to osteoporosis treatments are ongoing. The first obstacle in improving adherence to osteoporosis treatments is determining causes of poor adherence. Despite several identifiable causes, improving adherence is difficult. Passive patient education with printed information alone does not appear very effective. Physician-patient interaction, including discussion of bone mineral density results, discussion of osteoporosis medication benefits, and feedback of treatment effects, may be more effective. Improved patient education, better tolerated and less frequently dosed medications, and more healthcare provider-patient interaction may improve adherence and lead to greater fracture reduction.
    Preview · Article · May 2009 · Current opinion in rheumatology
Show more