ArticlePDF Available

The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The authors present a theory of sexism formulated as ambivalence toward women and validate a corresponding measure, the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI). The ASI taps 2 positively correlated components of sexism that nevertheless represent opposite evaluative orientations toward women: sexist antipathy or Hostile Sexism (HS) and a subjectively positive (for sexist men) orientation toward women, Benevolent Sexism (BS). HS and BS are hypothesized to encompass 3 sources of male ambivalence: Paternalism, Gender Differentiation, and Heterosexuality. Six ASI studies on 2,250 respondents established convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. Overall ASI scores predict ambivalent attitudes toward women, the HS scale correlates with negative attitudes toward and stereotypes about women, and the BS scale (for nonstudent men only) correlates with positive attitudes and stereotypes about women. A copy of the ASI is provided, with scoring instructions, as a tool for further explorations of sexist ambivalence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... Benevolent sexism (BS) refers to an ostensibly positive but condescending attitude toward women, portraying them as needing protection and inherently different from men, thus limiting their roles in society (Glick & Fiske, 1996). Career growth refers to the advancement and progression in an individual's professional life, which includes the development of skills, taking on increased responsibilities, achieving promotions, and attaining overall career satisfaction. ...
... Additionally, because BS is often disguised as positive, it is difficult for victims to identify and resist. Witnessing or experiencing BS can lead to increased self-objectification and body shame in women (Glick & Fiske, 1996;Shepherd et al., 2011). When women are praised for their appearance rather than their abilities, they may start to internalize the belief that their value is primarily based on their looks, leading to body shame and a reduction in self-esteem (Shepherd et al., 2011;Franzoi, 2001). ...
... Specifically, BS can undermine self-esteem, a critical factor in determining how individuals perceive and respond to external circumstances. Individuals with low self-esteem are more susceptible to emotional distress and exhaustion, particularly when faced with negative outcomes that activate specific CAUs (Glick & Fiske, 1996;Rosenberg, 2016). Therefore, we propose the following: H6. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates how benevolent sexism impedes women’s career growth, focusing on the mediating roles of self-esteem and emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of career development strategies. Using a three-wave, time-lagged survey, data from 410 female employees across various industries in China were analyzed with SPSS 24.0 and Mplus 8.3. Results indicate that benevolent sexism negatively influences career growth via reduced self-esteem and increased emotional exhaustion. Moreover, career development strategies mitigate this adverse effect, weakening the relationship between benevolent sexism and career growth. Higher levels of career development strategies lessen the detrimental impact of benevolent sexism on women’s professional progress. These findings enrich Cognitive-Affective Personality System theory by clarifying the mechanisms through which benevolent sexism undermines career development. They also highlight the practical significance of adopting robust career strategies to promote workplace gender equality and offer empirical insights into the broader implications of benevolent sexism on women’s career advancement.
... Such paremias reinforce the belief that women are not sufficiently competent and thus need to be controlled by men. As Glick and Fiske (1996) affirm, this contributes to the perception of men as having the qualities needed to govern important social institutions while women are perceived as the inferior group resulting in a social justification for male structural power. ...
... Related to the stereotype of men as independent is the image of "true men" as heterosexual. In their Ambivalent Sexism Theory, Glick and Fiske (1996) indicate that Intimate Heterosexuality is a component of Benevolent Sexism. Intimate Heterosexuality is defined as the belief that a female romantic partner is essential for a man to be "complete". ...
Article
Proverbs remain an excellent channel for the propagation of gender stereotypes in that they are considered as age-old truths, making it easy for them to evoke a certain form of social normality through discourse. Whereas sexism in proverbs has been widely studied from the perspective of women, the same cannot be said for research on how masculinities promote gender discrimination. The current study seeks to critique androcentrism in proverbs by finding the connection between old arguments and new debates from the perspective of gendered social expectations regarding men. It investigates the sustenance of gender bias within the Spanish context using insights from Connell’s (1995) theory of masculinities and Discourse Analysis. By so doing I aim to address concerns of female subordination as well as challenges males face in contemporary times. The analysis of proverbs shows how societal expectations of masculinities and femininities work in tandem in sustaining the gender order.
... Ambivalent sexism theory (AST) contends that male dominance and heterosexual interdependence (both common across societies) create sexist ambivalence (Glick & Fiske, 1996). Male dominance fosters hostile sexism (HS), antagonism toward women exercising power. ...
... Heterosexual interdependence produces benevolent sexism (BS), a patronizing attitude idealizing women in traditional roles that support men. Despite their opposing affective tones, HS and BS represent complementary ideologies that reconcile men's power with intimate dependence on women (Glick & Fiske, 1996, 2001. Specifically, AST views BS as crucial to gain women's support for inequality by portraying women as benefiting from powerful men who protect and provide. ...
Article
We retested core ambivalent sexism theory tenets and explored novel correlations with national outcomes in 62 nations. Replicating Glick et al., cross-national analyses supported (a) hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS) as cross-culturally recognizable, complementary ideologies associated with gender inequality; (b) women appearing to be influenced by, but also resisting men's HS and embracing BS to counter men's HS (outscoring men in some highly sexist nations). Novel cross-national comparisons showed (a) men's HS and both genders' BS correlated with fewer women in paid work, whereas only BS correlated with domestic labor inequity, (b) both HS and BS correlated with accepting intimate partner violence toward women. Finally, HS and BS correlated with generally dysfunctional national outcomes: antidemocratic tendencies, less productivity, more collective violence, and lower healthy lifespan for both genders. Results reinforce that BS harms women and suggest men also have a stake in reducing sexist ideologies.
... It occurs through jealous behaviors, lack of empathy with the partner and sexual submission regardless of the woman's desire (Silva and Zavala, 2020). Glick and Fiske (1996) suggest that sexism is shown through two general concepts represented by favorable and unfavorable attitudes towards women. In this sense, unfavorable behaviors are considered hostile sexism, which encompasses the classic and traditional form of sexism characterized by antipathy and negative stereotypes towards women. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Machismo is explained as the system of beliefs, attitudes and behaviors based on the polarization of the sexes and the superiority of the male gender. In the sexual sphere, it is the control that is exercised over a woman in relation to the expression of her sexuality under what is considered acceptable. Therefore, it is considered convenient to have instruments to measure this variable. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the psychometric characteristics of the sexual machismo scale (Ems-sexismo-12) in adults. Method: The methodology used was of an applied nature, with a non-experimental approach and instrumental design, applying the instrument to a sample made up of 530 adults (M=308 and F=222) aged between 18 and 65 years, obtained through non-probabilistic sampling by quotas of the districts of Piura. The content validity, confirmatory factor analysis (WLSMV estimator), internal consistency and reliability of the scale were evaluated. Results: The results showed content validity in the items (Aiken's V > .70). For its part, after the confirmatory factor analysis, a unidimensional structure was revealed with satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = .96; TLI = .95; RMSEA = .08; SRMR = .06). Likewise, reliability is evidenced with acceptable values (ω = .83). Conclusion: The EMS-12 scale proved to be a valid and reliable instrument for adults.
... The theory of statistical discrimination states that, in the absence of information about an individual, decision-makers rely on statistical information from the respective group of individuals (i.e., group averages) to attribute, for example, skills or performance. 12 Benevolent sexism, in comparison to hostile sexism, refers to evaluations of gender that seem subjectively positive but in reality can also lead to gender inequality (e.g., through the idea that women are delicate by nature and men should protect them;Glick & Fiske, 1996;Nguyen et al., 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
A growing body of literature explores whether and why female and male entrepreneurs differ in their access to equity financing. This trend has led to an increasing fragmentation of the research field, as many studies analyze various mechanisms and focus on a certain form of equity financing. To advance research on gender differences in equity financing, it is necessary to identify patterns and inconsistent findings in the literature related to these mechanisms. Therefore, we perform a systematic literature review to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on gender differences in the key forms of entrepreneurial equity financing (venture capital, angel investment, and equity crowdfunding). Based on 75 studies from 2001 to mid-2024, our review indicates that male entrepreneurs have an advantage in raising capital from venture capitalists and business angels, whereas female entrepreneurs are more successful in equity crowdfunding. These gender differences stem from a complex combination of mechanisms, which we categorize into four thematic dimensions that capture entrepreneurs’ characteristics, investors’ characteristics, the ventures’ characteristics and strategies, and contextual factors. We propose specific future research directions for each dimension, and discuss theoretical and methodological research opportunities that are applicable across dimensions to improve our understanding of gender differences in equity financing.
... Tomando como base las investigaciones sobre el racismo contemporáneo, los modelos explicativos del sexismo más recientes señalan una transformación del prejuicio desde actitudes hostiles y manifiestas hacia formas más sutiles y encubiertas, caracterizadas por la ambivalencia, en respuesta a las transformaciones que han afectado a las normas sociales modernas (Glick y Fiske, 2011 En esta línea, Glick y Fiske (1996) desarrollaron la Teoría del Sexismo Ambivalente. Sus valiosas aportaciones han resultado cruciales al proporcionar una base teórica que permite comprender y explicar de manera más profunda cómo el sexismo puede expresarse de formas aparentemente contradictorias. ...
Article
Full-text available
Los y las profesionales de la educación constituyen uno de los ejes fundamentales para lograr el cambio hacia la igualdad efectiva. Las políticas desarrolladas en esta materia incluyen entre sus ejes de acción la eliminación de los estereotipos y prejuicios de género en los contextos educativos. Así, el análisis de la identificación con estereotipos tradicionales de género y la internalización de actitudes sexistas de los futuros profesionales, constituye un punto de partida para detectar elementos que pudieran obstaculizar el cambio y actuar en consecuencia. Con un carácter transversal y descriptivo, el objetivo de la presente investigación es examinar la identidad de género y las actitudes sexistas en una muestra de 136 estudiantes de las titulaciones de grado de Educación Infantil, Educación Primaria y Educación Social, de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Se ha empleado un cuestionario integrado por las escalas de Identidad Global de Género y de Detección de Sexismo en Adolescentes (DSA). En general, los resultados muestran una correspondencia estereotipada entre el sexo y la identidad de género sentida. Asimismo, se obtienen resultados similares en sexismo hostil y benévolo para ambos sexos. Sin embargo, el análisis de diferencias entre titulaciones revela que, mientras Educación infantil muestra puntuaciones superiores en identidad de género femenina en comparación con Educación Primaria, ocurre lo contrario cuando se trata de identidad de género masculina. Educación Social presenta puntuaciones inferiores en comparación con Educación Primaria para el sexismo hostil y benévolo, y con Educación Infantil solo para sexismo benévolo. Este estudio destaca la necesidad de incorporar medidas educativas en la enseñanza superior que contribuyan a garantizar la formación de los profesionales de la educación en materia de igualdad. En este sentido, los planes de estudio deberían incorporar de manera estructural y sistemática conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes asociados con la promoción de la igualdad de oportunidades, la inclusión y el respeto en los entornos educativos.
Article
Sexism is pervasive but often manifests as microaggressions against women, which are subtle, covert forms of gender discrimination. Thus, we developed the Women’s Microaggressions Scale (WoMenS) based on an existing theoretical taxonomy and content analysis of social media data. Two separate studies were conducted for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA supported an eight-factor, correlated structure and CFA supported a bifactor model, with eight specific factors and one general WoMenS factor. Overall, reliability and validity of the WoMenS were mostly supported in two samples. Specifically, the WoMenS subscales and body surveillance were positively correlated; the general WoMenS was positively correlated with anxiety, depression, body surveillance, and another measure of sexism but not life satisfaction. Furthermore, general WoMenS explained variance in anxiety and body surveillance above and beyond that explained by an existing sexism measure.
Article
Full-text available
The current study tests the implications of men’s and women’s gender-related attitudes for relationship quality and wellbeing. We apply ambivalent sexism theory to differentiate between attitudes that should have detrimental versus beneficial effects for relationships by promoting antagonism (hostile sexism) versus complimentary relational roles (benevolent sexism) between men and women. Actor-partner interdependence analyses of heterosexual couples participating in a nationally representative panel study (N = 755) revealed that men’s hostile sexism predicted greater relationship conflict and lower relationship satisfaction, which in turn were associated with greater psychological distress and lower wellbeing for both men and their women partners. In contrast, men’s benevolent sexism predicted lower relationship conflict and greater satisfaction, which in turn was associated with lower distress and greater wellbeing for men but not women partners. Women’s sexist attitudes had differential effects. Women’s hostile sexism predicted lower relationship conflict and greater satisfaction, which was associated with higher wellbeing for men partners. In contrast, women’s benevolent sexism predicted greater relationship conflict, which related to greater distress and lower wellbeing for women and men partners. These results highlight the importance of gender-related attitudes on relationship quality, which has important implications for wellbeing.
Article
Full-text available
Negatively valued masculinity (M^A–)) and femininity (F^A–)) personality scales were developed to supplement the positively valued Masculinity (M^A+)) and Femininity (F^A+)) scales of J. T. Spence and R. L. Helmreich"s (1978) Personal Attributes Questionnaire. (M^A–)) consisted of traits that had been judged to be (a) more typical of males than females, (b) undesirable in both sexes, and (c) agentic or instrumental in content. Two (F^A–)) scales were developed, both containing stereotypically feminine, undesirable traits, one set of traits referring to communionlike characteristics and the other to verbal passive–aggressive qualities. In 220 male and 363 female undergraduates significant sex differences in the predicted direction were found on all scales. In both sexes, low and nonsignificant correlations were found between parallel positive and negative scales, but highly significant negative correlations were found between positive and negative cross-sex scales. Findings provide additional evidence for the multidimensionality of masculinity and femininity. Scores on a self-esteem measure were positively correlated with M^A+) and F^A+), uncorrelated with M^A–), and negatively correlated with the F^A–) scales. Different patterns were associated with 2 types of problem behaviors. Neuroticism was most highly correlated (negatively) with M^A+), and acting out behavior was most strongly correlated (positively) with M^A–). (14 ref)
Article
Full-text available
Evaluative processes refer to the operations by which organisms discriminate threatening from nurturant environments. Low activation of positive and negative evaluative processes by a stimulus reflects neutrality, whereas high activation of such processes reflects maximal conflict. Attitudes, an important class of manifestations of evaluative processes, have traditionally been conceptualized as falling along a bipolar dimension, and the positive and negative evaluative processes underlying attitudes have been conceptualized as being reciprocally activated, making the bipolar rating scale the measure of choice. Research is reviewed suggesting that this bipolar dimension is insufficient to portray comprehensively positive and negative evaluative processes and that the question is not whether such processes are reciprocally activated but under what conditions they are reciprocally, nonreciprocally, or independently activated. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
The abstract for this document is available on CSA Illumina.To view the Abstract, click the Abstract button above the document title.
Article
Stereotypic conceptions of gender may be structured, as has typically been assumed, in terms of the general concepts of “man” and “woman.” Alternatively, people may view males and females in terms of subtypes that offer more specific and detailed information. Three studies were conducted to assess the degree to which these general and specific concepts represent different levels of categorization, and to describe the content of each conceptual category. These three studies provided no evidence that the general stereotypes and a variety of subtypes differ in their richness, as assessed by number of associations generated by subjects to each concept; the results thus cast doubt on the validity of a hierarchical model. Additional analyses suggest (1) that there is considerable overlap among some of the common categories, and (2) that subtypes of males and females differ in homogeneity and in their resemblance to the more general categories. Implications for understanding the structure and process of gender s...
Article
In an experiment in which male and female respondents evaluated the social category of women or men on several types of measures, analysis of respondents' attitudes toward the sexes and of the evaluative content of their beliefs established that they evaluated women more favorably than men. In addition, analysis of respondents' emotional reactions toward women and men did not yield evidence of negativity toward women at the emotional level. Nor did it appear that respondents' very positive evaluations of women masked ambivalence toward them. This research, therefore, provides strong evidence that women are evaluated quite favorably—in fact, more favorably than men.
Article
A scale designed to tap into a new type of gender prejudice, called neosexist beliefs, is proposed. Two studies investigating antecedents and consequences of neosexism were conducted. In the first study, a predictive model was tested with a sample of 130 male students. It was found, according to hypotheses, that considerations of collective interest (CI) and old-fashioned sexism had an impact on neosexism. However, only the latter and CI triggered opposition to affirmative action (AA). The second study evaluated the effects of CI and neosexism among a sample of 149 male workers employed in a firm where an exhaustive AA program was implemented. For example, it was found that support for the program in place and evaluations of women's qualifications were influenced both by neosexism and by CI. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Article
Attitude theory is used to provide a conceptual analysis of how attitudes toward men and women relate to gender stereotypes. Consistent with this analysis, attitudes toward the sexes related positively to the evaluative meaning of the corresponding gender stereo-types. In addition, attitudes and stereotypes about women were extremely favorable - in fact, more favorable than those about men. The findings also demonstrated that the Attitudes Toward Women Scale assesses attitudes toward equal rights for women not attitudes toward women, and therefore did not relate to the evaluative meaning of subjects' stereotypes about women.
Article
In contemporary research, attitudes toward women appear to be more positive than those toward men in samples of US and Canadian university students, and the evaluative content of the female stereotype is more favorable than the evaluative content of the male stereotype. These research findings on attitudes and stereotypes are compared with the findings of Goldberg-paradigm experiments on judgments of women's and men's competence, which are commonly thought to reflect people's attitudes and stereotypes. Although research on competence judgments has not shown a pervasive tendency to devalue women's work, it has demonstrated prejudice against women in masculine domains (e.g. male-dominated jobs, male-stereotypic behavior). This targeted form of prejudice is consistent with the generally more favorable evaluation of women than men obtained in attitude and stereotype studies because this positive evaluation derives primarily from the ascription to women of nice, nurturant, communal characteristics, which people think qualify individuals for the domestic role as well as for low-status, low-paying female-dominated jobs. Women's experiences of gender discrimination and feminist protests concerning a contemporary backlash against women reflect women's inroads into traditionally masculine arenas, especially their efforts to gain access to high-status, high-paying male-dominated jobs, which are thought to require characteristics stereotypically ascribed to men.