ArticlePublisher preview available

Franz Brentano--Much Alive, Though Dead

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Discusses Franz Brentano's (1838-1917) works on various topics in psychology as well as concepts about the mind. For Brentano, experience revealed, not an inert context of sensations and their combination, but mental acts: sensations exist, but they are not per se mental. What is mental is the activity of seeing a color, smelling an odor, hearing a sound, etc. Brentano separated this active experiencing consciousness, for conceptual purposes largely (his overview tended in a holistic direction), into three aspects: (a) ideas or ideating, by which is meant largely sensing or imagining; (b) judging or judgment, which is not meant in an ethical or logical sense, but is perhaps closer to perception and attention; (c) feeling which develops out of a fundamental loving-hating axis as a point of departure. The author describes Brentano and the Würzberg School as one of the most influential systems of modern psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
504
AMERICAN
PSYCHOLOGIST
address
which
was a
"condensed summary"
of the
six-
year
study.
The
full
report
is now
available—Psychol.
Monogr.,
1962, 76(3, Whole
No.
S22).
FRANCES
K,
GRAHAM
University
of
Wisconsin
CLAIRE
B.
ERNHART
Washington University
ABEPP
Status
This
letter
is in
reference
to the
article "The
Meaning
of the
ABEPP
Diploma"
(Amer. Psy-
chologist, 1961,
16,
132-141)
and the
comment,
"ABEPP
Standard
Too
High?"
(Amer. Psychologist,
1961,
16,
6SS).
In
response
to the
Board
of
Trustees
of
ABEPP
who
state
that
"the
ABEPP
process
has not
caught
hold,"
I
propose
the
possibility
that
psycholo-
gists
do not
desire
ABEPP.
The
article
states
that
ABEPP
was
approved
by the APA
membership
in the
summer
of
1946
by a
vote
of
1,071
to 79. ... To
establish
an
independently
incorporated board involved
repealing
the
amendment
to the
bylaws,
which
was
approved
by the
membership
in
1947
by a
vote
of
1,663
to 30.
Thus,
by
two
general votes,
the
membership
of the APA
expressed
itself
overwhelmingly
in
favor
of
this
professional
under-
taking
(p.
132).
Where
the
vote becomes
an
expression
of APA
member-
ship
approval
is a
matter
that
the
reader
can
judge.
The
1945 Yearbook
of the APA
lists 1,012 members
and
3,161 associates
for a
total
of
4,185 members.
The
1946-7
Yearbook
was
primarily
an
address
book
with
no
breakdown
of the
number
of APA
members.
The
1948
APA
Directory indicates
that
there were
5,047
members,
listed
as
1,281 Fellows
and
3,766
As-
sociates.
It
appears that only
a
small percentage
of
the APA
membership voted
on the
issue
of
ABEPP
and
there
has
never
been
any
clear
endorsement from
the
majority
of the APA
membership.
To my
knowl-
edge,
there
has
never been
any
directive given
to use
the APA
Directory
or the
American Psychologist
to
publicize ABEPP.
At
this
time, there
are so
many
professional
groups
who
pass
upon
the
competency
of
their
members
or
prospective
members.
ABEPP
is
just another group. With
the
growth
of
state
licensing
or
certification
of
psychologists,
the
local grass-roots
group seems
to be a
very
adequate
judge
of
com-
petence.
The
recent survey
of the New
York State
Psychological Association indicates that
11% of
psy-
chologists
in
private
practice
are
ABEPP
diplomates.
It is
difficult
to
believe that incompetents comprise
the
majority.
There
is a
last
question
which concerns
me
greatly.
As
I
understand
the
latest revision
of the APA
bylaws,
it was to
clearly delineate
APA as a
scientific group
so
that
its
tax-exempt
status
was not
endangered.
The
article cited,
in
publicizing ABEPP, also makes
the
point
that
the
ABEPP board
was
established
as in-
dependently
incorporated
"to
provide
legal
protection
to
the APA and its financial
structure"
(p.
132). Now,
the
pages
of the
American Psychologist
and the APA
Directory
are
used
to
promote
ABEPP,
which
is,
under
tax
law,
a
special interest group.
I
believe this sort
of
action clouds
the
tax-exempt
status
of
APA.
MAX
ROSENBAUM
Eastchester,
New
York
Franz
Brentano—Much
Alive, Though Dead
Franz
Brentano
was
born
in
1838
and
died
in
1917.
His
major work, Psychology from
an
Empirical Stand-
point,
appeared
in
1874.
In
addition
to his
major
publication,
eight others
out of his
total
of 38
publica-
tions dealt directly with psychological material. These
included
a
paper
on the
doctrine
of
sensations,
three
articles
on
optical illusions,
and a
paper
on the
quality
of
tone.
In
1911
he
published
Von
der
Klassification
der
Psychologie
Phenomene,
considered
by
some
a
second volume
to his
Psychology from
an
Empirical
Standpoint.
It is
interesting
that
Sigmund Freud
at-
tended
some
of
Brentano's
lectures
as a
young man,
and
translated
J. S.
Mill into German
for
him.
In his
major work Brentano
was
primarily interested
in
presenting
a
systematic
picture,
an
overview,
of
psychology, with
the aim of
developing
one
approach
to the
whole,
to
replace
the
many that were then
current.
Thus
he
took
into
account
J. S.
Mill, Bain,
Fechner,
Lotze,
Helmholtz,
all of
whom
he
respected
despite
his
disagreement with their viewpoint
and
conclusions.
As
Boring comments, however,
it was
not an
experimental psychology.
Citing Wundt,
the first
volume
of
whose Physiological
Psychology
appeared
in
1873, Brentano
emphatically
disagreed
that
physiological psychology
is in
itself
equivalent
to a
science
of
psychology;
he
interpreted
Wundt's
meaning
as the
stressing
of a
methodological
approach only.
He did
argue, however, that psy-
chology
ought
to
become
a
science,
but one
that
should
not be
delimited
and
circumscribed
in the
sense
of
making physiological psychology equivalent
to it as
the
whole
of it qua
science.
Brentano
disputed,
too,
the
notion
that
empiricism
should justifiably
be
considered
a
monopoly,
as
then
fairly
widely established,
of the
sense
or
sensation psy-
chologists.
He
went back
to the
Greek, Aristotelian
use of the
term, reviving
the
concept
of
activity,
as
the
fundamental essence
of
empiricism.
In
this sense
is the oft
used quote
from
him:
"Experience
alone
in-
fluences
me
as a
mistress."
Article
This article explores a psychological tradition inspired by or originating from Franz Brentano and which played a vital role in the development of qualitative empirical psychology. This was the psychology of acts with a focus on the analysis of mental phenomena and a first-person perspective. Brentano’s psychology directly influenced the emergence of the main schools of European psychology in the first half of the 20th century: the Würzburg School, Gestalt psychology, phenomenological psychology, the Dorpat School, and the Lvov–Warsaw School. These schools cultivated a psychology of mind and consciousness par excellence, the theoretical and methodological assumptions of which effectively inhibited reductionist tendencies. The aim of this article, however, is not so much to reconstruct the historical achievements but rather to indicate their relevance for contemporary qualitative psychology, which can be seen in a broader perspective than simply as an alternative to quantitative research.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.