The goal of our research was to study the phenomenon of bullying within the school culture and, in combination with the factors that trigger aggression, and to construct a psychological model of its operation mechanism. To this end, we studied recent literature available in the field and decided to base our research on the Anthropic Theory of Set that stems from the Georgian school of psychology. According to this theory the basis for any psychological activity or action is an internal psychological mechanism – the set, which emerges as a result of interaction of three components. They are: presence of demand, presence of an object that can satisfy the demand and presence of instrumental possibilities (conditions) that make the satisfaction possible. We assumed that such dispositional sets formed the psychological mechanism for bullying. I.e. if the school culture did not allow the realization of aggression, the victimization would not occur, despite the presence of vulnerable risk-groups.
Hence, we assumed that despite the level of aggression, those schools that maintained a safe and secure culture would have lower levels of victimization, but the schools with an unsafe culture, would display high level of victimization.
To test our hypothesis, we applied three questionnaires. We studied levels of aggression by the Buss-Durkey Inventory, to study the school environment we applied the questionnaire that focuses on the emotional atmosphere in the classroom and school, developed by Alexandra Bochaver, et al. And we used the questionnaire by H. Mynard and S. Joseph to assess levels of victimization.
In all, 1422 students from 9th to 12th grades took part in the survey. We constructed a hierarchical regressive model, which allowed us to conclude that the basic variables of our model, in fact, explain 34 percent of victimization. Particularly, it was revealed that the variables of the educational environment and the levels of aggression in classrooms – or, rather, their combination– account for 73,02 percent of the total (34 percent) influence revealed through regression.
The most powerful factor that influences the scale of victimization is a combined variable of aggression and the type of the school culture – “threat”. Our survey demonstrated that the probability of turning into a victim (victimhood) is highest amongst those teenagers who sense threat in their school environment. However, the school culture that is based on maintaining communication rules and mutual respect – therefore, providing a sense of wellbeing to the students - the probability of the teenager to become a victim is lower.
Overall, the survey results showed that the negative school environment in combination with aggression is a predictor enhancing the practice of bullying, while a safe environment is a predictor lessening victimization.
Concurrently, the survey also revealed such predictors that are not connected with the school culture. They are parental’ employment, the size of the school, and others. With these variables, on the later stages of our survey, we assessed types of school culture, levels of victimization and studied the differences between their means. The differences of means between these variables revealed a remarkably interesting picture. Particularly, in terms of parental’ employment, when neither of the parents worked, or only mother worked, a small, but statistically significant predictor of victimization was identified. The comparison between school sizes yielded interesting results as well – the students felt most comfortable in the schools where the number of the students ranged between 300 and 800.
We believe the recommendations that will stem from these and other findings of our survey will be beneficial for the planning of secondary education policy in Georgia.