ArticlePublisher preview available

Narratives in Family Medicine: Tales of Transformation, Points of Breakthrough for Family Physicians

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Despite the advances in technology, information transmission and evidence-based medicine, the role of the patient's story is still a key to effective medical care. This paper examines the roles of narrative in medicine with particular emphasis on the narrative world of the primary care provider. The focus of this article is on the transforming power of stories and their use in clinical work, teaching, research, and in physicians' personal and professional lives. An organizing model is proposed that utilizes a combination of individual patient narratives, best evidence, and provider narratives. Projections for future threats to narrative medicine and future developments in the field are formulated. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Narratives in Family Medicine: Tales of Transformation,
Points of Breakthrough for Family Physicians
JEFFREY BORKAN, M.D.
SCHMUELREIS, M.D.
JACK MEDALIE, M.D.
Despite the advances in technology,
information transmission and evidence-
based medicine, the role of the patient's
story is still a key to effective medical care.
This paper examines the roles of narrative
in medicine with particular emphasis on the
narrative world of the primary care provider.
The focus of this article is on the
transforming power of stories and their use
in clinical
work,
teaching, research, and in
physicians'personal and professional lives.
An organizing model is proposed that
utilizes a combination of individual patient
narratives, best evidence, and provider
narratives. Projections for future threats to
narrative medicine and future developments
in the field are
formulated.
Fam Syst & Health 19:121-134, 2001
Jeffrey Borkan, M.D., Ph.D., Department of
Behavioral Sciences, Sackler Faculty of Medicine,
Room 907, Tel Aviv University, POB 39040, Tel Aviv,
Israel; 972-3-640-9858; borkan@shani.net.
Schmuel Reis, M.D., Department of Family
Medicine, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, The
Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Jack Medalie, M.D., MPH, Dorothy Jones
Weatherhead Professor Emeritus, Department of
Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University
School of Medicine, 11001 Cedar Road, Suite 306,
Cleveland, OH 44106-7136; (216) 368-2758;
junejackm@aol.com.
I
n our practices we experience endless life
dramas-sometimes as observer and
sometimes as active participant with our
patients. We are actors on the stage of
births,
deaths, and all that comes between.
However, how cognizant are we of our role?
How open to the narrative? The ideology
of family and patient-centered medicine
emphasizes the central role of narratives,
but have we utilized this in the past and do
we have a vision for the future? Here we
discuss the role of narratives in medical
practice, teaching and research, while
looking back on our own lives and forward
to future developments.
The focus in this article is on family
practitioners' narratives. We are moving
beyond aesthetics, i.e., the sense of beauty
and artistry in the stories themselves, to
examine their role and meanings-
particularly, how they can document
breakthroughs and transformations in
personal and professional development. This
paper describes an exercise in gathering
transformative stories from family
practitioners from around the
world
1
,
as well
as describing the role of stories in clinical
work, teaching, education, and personal
development. An attempt is also made to
project the direction of medical narratives
in the next decade.
1
These stories are collected in the book, Patients
and Doctors (Borkan, et al., 1999).
121
Families, Systems
&
Health, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2001 © FSH, Inc.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... What is more, the fact that the patient has the opportunity to share their story of illness may have a therapeutic effect (Haidet, Paterniti 2003;cf. Frank 1995;Borkan et al. 2001;Sharf, Vanderford 2003). With regards to doctors, patients' stories allow doctors to reflect on their practice (Davidoff 1996: 270), "(…) emphasis[ing] the importance of reflection in [their] learning and how [their] patient and self-care can be improved through regular practice, similar to other health provider skills" (Hatem, Rider 2004: 252). ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, a new generic development in the medical case report will be presented as a potential tool in a variety of medical contex ts. A case report describes new diseases or their novel aspects, and its new interactiv type additionally allows readers to comment on published cases and features patients’ first person narratives. This development may be a useful tool in medical English language courses, in medical training as well as in professional development. This way the paper systematises the knowledge on the application of medical case reports in general and re-evaluates their potential in strictly medical contexts.
... Shiny new rattles enticed: newly won bobbles of prestige, enticements of lifestyle, being paid to "perform" on the sparse commodities of care that can be measured, 16 "transformation" to a way of practicing that would finally garner respect, acceptance, and payment reform. [17][18][19][20][21][22] But we desperately tried to hold onto the ideal-the way of being that gives meaning to family physicians and value to patients and populations-that primary health care is a relationship to be nurtured, not just a commodity to be delivered and optimized, measured and incentivized, bought and sold. ...
Article
This commentary examines what it might look like to be countercultural in the current era of health care change, and asks what we should hold onto and what we should let go of as we reinvent an ideal that gives meaning to family physicians and value to patients and populations - that primary health care is a relationship to be nurtured and supported, not just a commodity to be delivered and optimized, measured and incentivized, bought and sold.
... Per questo motivo, la scrittura riflessiva è utilizzata nei diversi gradi della formazione medica: di base (Marshall, O'Keefe, 1995;Shapiro, Lie, 2000;Hatem, Ferrara, 2001;DasGupta, Charon, 2004;Shapiro, et al., 2006;Charon, 2006), post base (Brady et al. 2002;Clandinin, Cave, 2008) e nella formazione permanente (Bolton, 1999;Borkan, et al., 2001;Scannell, 2002;Horowitz, et al., 2003;Sands, et al., 2008). Naturalmente, queste sono solo alcune delle esperienze di scrittura riflessiva citate nella letteratura medica internazionale. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper the evaluation of reflective practices in medical education is analyzed, paying special attention to undergraduate medical training. Firstly, some definitions of reflection are reported, showing how this practice is differently conceptualized within the field of medical education. Subsequently, some prompts, aimed at facilitating students’/professionals’ reflection through writing, are reported. The importance of discussing reflective writings with peers/teachers is highlighted, and the value of receiving feedback is emphasized. The role of technologies in sharing writings and in conveying feedback is described. Finally, some tools to assess students’ reflective writings are critically discussed.
Chapter
Family medicine began as a specialty dedicated to the holistic care of the whole patient in their family and community context. However, as health care in the United States has become increasingly technological and bureaucratic, family physicians and family medicine educators find it increasingly challenging to integrate the social dimensions of health into their practice and teaching. Professional organizations that evaluate graduate medical education increasingly recognize the need to expand the scope of medical training to address the social context of health. Family medicine residency programs are developing models for how to expand the curriculum in residency training to include social determinants of health, but few explicitly draw on anthropological frameworks. In this chapter, we present an example of how anthropology can collaborate with related fields, such as public health and social work, to contribute to innovative curricular development that supports active residency training in social determinants of health and health equity. We discuss the components of our curriculum, which was shaped by critical medical anthropological perspectives; challenges to implementation; and some lessons learned that might help other anthropologists engage with graduate medical education in the future.
Article
Full-text available
Niniejsza praca podejmuje tematykę narracyjnego charakteru medycznych opisów przypadku jako czynnika wpływającego na spójność tego gatunku specjalistycznego. W artykule zostanie pokazane, iż opisy przypadku składają się z ustalonej sekwencji poszczególnych tematycznych części, które odzwierciedlają elementy kanonicznej opowieści według W. Labova i J. Waletzkiego (1967). Owe komponenty narracyjne, poprzez swoisty sposób przedstawienia zarówno pacjenta, jak i kwestii medycznych, wspomagają kohezję tekstu. Dodatkowo zostanie zwrócona uwaga na obecność dwóch głosów – głosu medycyny i pośredniego głosu pacjenta. Analiza ta odwołuje się do badań narracyjnych, narracyjnego charakteru samego gatunku (G. Prince 1982) oraz koncepcji głosów w komunikacji medycznej E. G. Mishlera (1984), i została wykonana na przykładzie polskich opisów przypadku z dziedziny pediatrii.
Article
Evidence based medicine and narrative based medicine rarely meet, and they may conflict, 1 2 but in clinical care they are complementary.3–5 Some attempts to integrate the two approaches have not considered the doctor's story, which is often critical to understanding a case. 6 7 This paper tries to bridge gaps between a patient's and doctor's narratives and the evidence. It is the story of a patient in our practice (see box) who has produced written narratives about her illness and shared them with her family physician (SR). We use the narratives to decide on the best evidence based treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after corrected tetralogy of Fallot. We searched Medline between December 1999 and May 2000 with the keywords atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal), tetralogy of Fallot, atrial arrhythmia, anticoagulation, primary care, family medicine, general practice, and ambulatory medicine. We also searched http://www.goldenhour.co.il/ (an Israeli website that includes evidence based medicine). We found no important evidence on the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation plus tetralogy of Fallot. Our discussion is based on the evidence available on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation alone. Risk factors for thromboembolism in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation are cumulative.8–13 In patients without risk factors who are not treated for thromboembolism, the annual risk of stroke is about 1%. For patients at low risk of thromboembolism, aspirin or no drug is recommended. 8 11–14 The presence of one risk factor puts patients at moderate risk of thromboembolism (2-5% annual risk of stroke), and the treatment recommendation is aspirin or warfarin. Patients at high risk—with a 6-12% annual risk of stroke—should be given warfarin. Articles based in primary care lean towards less aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.15–18 #### Case history A 56 year old married …
Article
Full-text available
Comments on the article by J. Borkan, S. Reis, and J. Medalie (see record 2008-06034-001) which advocated for a narrative approach in family medicine. Borkan and colleagues presented a refreshing and practical approach for healing and living and the assessment of quality of care. Examine your own life. It is quickly apparent that reason is not the director of our dramas. It is the interconnected stories of our lives that lead. From this perspective, our role as healers is to highlight helpful aspects of those many stories and to reweave the body's story into a healthier web. Borkan and colleagues have a model for doing just that. They call it MENCH, Mindful Evidentiary Narrative Centered Healthcare. MENCH calls for the integration of clinician and patient narratives with the best evidence from patient data and research. This commentary proposes an enhancement to this already rich construct. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
The reviewer states that this is indeed a practical manual and a first of its kind. John Launer, a London-based general practitioner trained in family therapy at the famed Tavistock Clinic, is proposing, very convincingly, an innovation: the marriage of primary care, family therapy, and narrative approaches in the social sciences with a practice, teaching, and theory of Narrative-based Primary Care. Accordingly, the book is divided into 3 sections: practice, teaching, and theory. Each section can be read separately and in any order the reader chooses, yet the emphasis is on practice, which is indeed first. Each chapter is written simply, sharply, and in a very practical manner. The chapter starts with a short introduction, a "key ideas" box, and a "points to consider" box, and ends with practical exercises, a short reading, and references. The text is resplendent with examples, all resonating with real primary care experience, only a fraction of which is the author's, with the rest of it that of his learners (which include nurses, health visitors, dentists, pharmacists, and more). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
Practicing therapy with those living in "deep illness" is presented as entering relationships based on storytelling. As an aid to listening to the stories of the ill, three narrative skeletons, each underlying a certain type of story, are described, with the necessity of each type of story emphasized. This essay suggests how just listening to these stories is a professional role, how changes in the ill person's life can result from storytelling, and how to nurture these changes while still honoring each type of story. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
listening, along with seeing and touching, is one of the primary sources of information about the world / as a data collection tool, the interview represents an attempt to "standardize" listening in the interest of scientific knowing / details the Long Interview as an example of a semistructured in-depth interview approach to collecting data in primary care research and illustrates the approach using a pain research project we used the Long Interview, a specific depth interview technique, to listen to six family physician–patient pairs from a small suburban community in north central Connecticut / the goal was to identify and compare their understandings and experiences of pain / demonstrate the "doing" of this Long Interview, illustrating each step with the pain research outlined above / briefly review the types of strategies for interviewing and then contrast the interview with other kinds of communication (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
( This reprinted article originally appeared in Science, 1977, Vol 196[4286], 129–236. The following abstract of the original article appeared in PA, Vol 59:1423. ) Although it seems that acceptance of the medical model by psychiatry would finally end confusion about its goals, methods, and outcomes, the present article argues that current crises in both psychiatry and medicine as a whole stem from their adherence to a model of disease that is no longer adequate for the work and responsibilities of either field. It is noted that psychiatrists have responded to their crisis by endorsing 2 apparently contradictory positions, one that would exclude psychiatry from the field of medicine and one that would strictly adhere to the medical model and limit the work of psychiatry to behavioral disorders of an organic nature. Characteristics of the dominant biomedical model of disease are identified, and historical origins and limitations of this reductionistic view are examined. A biopsychosocial model is proposed that would encompass all factors related to both illness and patienthood. Implications for teaching and health care delivery are considered.
Article
Practicing family physicians often find family systems theory and the biopsychosocial model attractive, but have difficulties applying them in a busy office practice. Two family physicians in a four-person group practice were identified as "exemplars" at managing daily office practice. A collaborative, qualitative methodology was used to explore their strategy. A series of semistructured key informant interviews with the two physicians and the head nurse identified themes later clarified using ethnoscience interviewing techniques. The resultant clinical encounter typology and decision-making taxonomy were evaluated using participant observation and key informant review. The final results were compared with the literature on physician-patient relationships. Three clinical encounter types were identified. "Routines" were simple, single, and brief visits in which a contractual style and the biomedical model were used. "Ceremonies" were linked rituals that invoked a covenantal style. "Dramas" were a series of visits concerning situations of conflict and emotion and included psychosocial problems. The family was often convened for dramas. Determination of the presenting concern, the trigger for coming, the patient request, the illness prototype, and the type of communication allowed recognition of the clinical encounter type. Identifying a clinical encounter as a routine, ceremony, or drama may help family physicians integrate family systems concepts into their busy office practices. These findings have numerous implications for future research, clinical practice, and teaching.