Article

When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species

Unité de Biométrie et Intelligence Artificielle, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 875, BP 27 F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 10/2008; 105(37):13936-40. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805265105
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Threatened species become increasingly difficult to detect as their populations decline. Managers of such cryptic threatened species face several dilemmas: if they are not sure the species is present, should they continue to manage for that species or invest the limited resources in surveying? We find optimal solutions to this problem using a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process and rules of thumb derived from an analytical approximation. We discover that managing a protected area for a cryptic threatened species can be optimal even if we are not sure the species is present. The more threatened and valuable the species is, relative to the costs of management, the more likely we are to manage this species without determining its continued persistence by using surveys. If a species remains unseen, our belief in the persistence of the species declines to a point where the optimal strategy is to shift resources from saving the species to surveying for it. Finally, when surveys lead to a sufficiently low belief that the species is extant, we surrender resources to other conservation actions. We illustrate our findings with a case study using parameters based on the critically endangered Sumatran tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae), and we generate rules of thumb on how to allocate conservation effort for any cryptic species. Using Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes in conservation science, we determine the conditions under which it is better to abandon management for that species because our belief that it continues to exist is too low.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Iadine Chadès
  • Source
    • "Here we represent partial observability with a distribution b t of resource states at each time, where b t (x) denotes the probability or " belief " that the resource state is x at time t. This distribution, which often is referred to as a belief state (Kaelbling et al., 1998), changes over time as actions are taken, the resource responds, and monitoring data are collected and used to update resource status (Regan et al., 2011;Chadès et al., 2008Chadès et al., , 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adaptive management is an approach for simultaneously managing and learning about natural resources, by acknowledging uncertainty and seeking to reduce it through the process of management itself. Adaptive decision making can be applied to pressing issues in conservation biology such as species reintroduction, disease and invasive species control, and habitat restoration, as well as to management of natural resources in general. After briefly outlining a framework and process for adaptive management, we focus on an overview of the key technical issues related to problem framing and the ability of resource managers to learn from their experience. These technical issues include the treatment of uncertainty and its propagation over time; nonstationarity in long-term environmental trends; the applicability of adaptive management across scales; requirements for models and management alternatives that promote learning; the value of the information produced with adaptive management; the challenge to management of uncertainty and surprise; and institutional (social) learning. To accommodate these and other challenges that are now coming into focus, the learning-based approach of adaptive management will need to be adjusted and expanded in the future.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2016 · Biological Conservation
  • Source
    • "However, richness is not useful to evaluate the composition of species within communities, as it is impossible to describe the species that were not observed. Is a threatened species present at a site (Chad es et al. 2008)? Has the guild of grassland or forest obligates responded after management (e.g. "

    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • Source
    • "defines the optimal policy for a sequential decision making problem while taking into account uncertain state transitions and partially observable states. This makes POMDPs applicable to diverse application domains such as robotics [2], elder care [3], tiger conservation [4], and wireless networking [5]. However, versatility comes with a price, the computational complexity of finite-horizon POMDPs is PSPACE-complete [6] in the worst case. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper investigates manipulation of multiple unknown objects in a crowded environment. Because of incomplete knowledge due to unknown objects and occlusions in visual observations, object observations are imperfect and action success is uncertain, making planning challenging. We model the problem as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP), which allows a general reward based optimization objective and takes uncertainty in temporal evolution and partial observations into account. In addition to occlusion dependent observation and action success probabilities, our POMDP model also automatically adapts object specific action success probabilities. To cope with the changing system dynamics and performance constraints, we present a new online POMDP method based on particle filtering that produces compact policies. The approach is validated both in simulation and in physical experiments in a scenario of moving dirty dishes into a dishwasher. The results indicate that: 1) a greedy heuristic manipulation approach is not sufficient, multi-object manipulation requires multi-step POMDP planning, and 2) on-line planning is beneficial since it allows the adaptation of the system dynamics model based on actual experience.
    Preview · Article · Apr 2015 · Artificial Intelligence
Show more