This volume contains papers solely from ATINER’s conferences that directly or indirectly relate to education policy. Most of the papers were presented at the annual international conference on Education. In general, education policy is defined as any systematic intervention to improve the practice of education at all levels. The word systematic is used to describe a process by which means and resources are used to achieve predetermined objectives (targets, goals). In this context, education policy is exercised by all the potential stakeholders of education. Of course, governments at all levels (federal, regional, local) play the most important role, but in many cases the effectiveness and the efficiency of such policies are best executed by other stakeholders of education provision such as teachers, parents, school administrators, students, community groups, employers, etc.
Policies should serve and be guided by specific visions, values, ethics, and common-good ideology. This is not more obvious than in the education process. Since ancient Greece, as it is mentioned in one of the papers in this volume, education has a vision and a mission. In ancient and democratic Athens, its mission was to educate the Athenian youth to become better citizens. This was so important that it was used in Socrates’ trial to convict him to death because his teachings were corrupting Athenian youth. In ancient Athens, education’s mission was to instill virtue in the hearts and minds of the
Athenian youth. What is virtue and how to achieve this was debated among philosophers, which in modern times would include all academics and practitioners. The latter were teaching the ancient youth in the gymnasium, the formal schools of ancient Athens, where the youth was taught music, literature, dance, natural sciences, etc. It seems that after 2,500 years, philosophers and educators are still debating the same issues. The mission and the vision of education are shaped by the values of a given society. These values are influenced by ideology, religion, culture, history, etc. They set the framework for the provision of education. Another way of looking at education policy is by simplifying it into problem-solution processes. Once a problem has been identified in the
education process (e.g. early school dropouts), the education policy-makers and
all the education stakeholders come up with the best solution possible. As
mentioned above, the best solution should be effective and efficient. Effective
means that the best solution gives the maximum results in the shortest time
Education Policy
2
possible (e.g. reducing by half the dropout rate next year), and this is achieved
with the least possible human and financial resources.
The papers compiled in this book relate to various issues of education
policy, at least as the editor of this book sees it and not necessarily the authors
of the individual papers, as described above. There are three types of papers.
First, six papers discuss issues that relate to education policy’s vision, mission,
values, common good, virtue, etc. These papers are presented in the first part of
this book. Second, there are a number of papers that describe the role of
stakeholders in implementing practical solutions to education policy
challenges. These are parents, teachers, local community groups of interests
(i.e. businesses), etc. Finally, there are three papers that address specific
policies such as uniforms in schools and the time required to complete a Ph.D.
degree. All the papers in this volume were written independently of each other
and by no means constitute a coherent whole. On the contrary, they are
patches, and it is left up to the reader to weave his/her own education policy
story. The following parts of this introduction are devoted to a very short
presentation of each of the papers contained in this book.
A word of warning is necessary. This book puts together papers that use
different approaches and methodologies. Also, it reflects the mission of
ATINER’s conferences, which is to bring together academics and researchers
from different countries in Athens, Greece. In this volume, the authors
represent a number of countries: USA, Lithuania, Germany, South Africa,
Latvia, Turkey, Slovenia and Australia. There is an academic cost for doing so,
but we hope that the benefit from different country experiences far outweighs
any sacrifices that might exist in the homogeneity of the rigor and standards of
research being presented here. There are many international journals and books
that serve these objectives, and the interested reader is advised to look there.
Here, the person who reads it will find an incomplete painting, and it is up to
the reader to apply the last brush stokes.
Education Policy Values
This part includes essays that in one way or another examine the values, the
ethics, the common good, etc. which shapes the provision of education and
therefore guides the formulation and the implementation of education policy
actions. In chapter two, David Diener discusses the context of the philosophy
of education. In particular, John Dewey’s understanding of philosophy of
education is explored. The author concludes with two implications by adopting
Dewey’s approach. The following chapter by Pat Williams-Boyd looks at the
issue of education and poverty. She examines the scheme of full-service
community schools, which is based on the fundamental idea of the common
good. The term “common good” is examined through the work of Moltmann,
Niebuhr, MacPherson and Rauschenbusch, briefly suggesting ethical outcomes,
a moral vision, an economic imperative, and hope and transcendence. In
chapter 4, the authors, Inga Mikutaviciene and Kestutis Pukelis, examine how
Education Policy: An Introduction
3
education can be used to improve living conditions and reduce social
inequalities. As the authors claim, one of the most important issues of policy is
the relationship between education and social inequalities. Lithuania is used as
a case study to demonstrate this linkage. In the next chapter, Lindell Smith
proposes a Structural Learning Experience which is a goal-oriented learning
experience. The paper emphasizes the ethical dimension of learning and in
designing new learning experiences. In Chapter six, Ivan November, Gregory
Alexander and Micheal M. Van Wyk explore the South African new education
system from the perspective of democratic citizenship. They question the
ability of principals and teachers to put the virtues of democracy into
educational practice. In the following chapter, Zenta Anspoka and Gunta
Siliņa-Jasjukevica investigates the relationship between culture and education.
They examine Latvia and conclude that reform of the curriculum is necessary
in relation to the teachers’ ability to implement it. The last chapter of this part
by Getahun Y Abraham looks at the Curriculum Reform and Life Orientation
Education in South Africa from an historical perspective.
Education Policy and its Stakeholders
This part includes papers that account for the role of education policy
stakeholders, such as parents, teachers, administrators, local community
organizations and of courses all the levels of government. Chapter nine,
authored by Rebecca Bardwell, selects a sample of twenty persons who hire
and work with K-12 students, called secondary stakeholders. The study
identifies the skills, capacities and attitudes necessary to hire an individual and
a guide for the school educators to prepare students for work. The authors
come up with a number of suggestions and policy recommendations for 21st
century skills. In the next chapter, Gurhan Can examines guidance and
counselling services in the Turkish Education System. The study addresses the
development and current situation of counselling and focuses on qualitative
and quantitative problems of counselling. Identification of problems and
proposed solutions is the core of any education policy process. In Chapter
eleven, Zdenek Friedmann and Bohumira Lazarova also examine counselling
services. The paper presents preliminary results of an extensive research
project conducted at the Faculty of Education Masaryk University in Brno,
focused on education of children with special educational needs. The authors
utilize quantitative and qualitative approaches, and they present particular
outcomes of three case studies of selected primary school children. The cases
mentioned were observed in the course of two years in cooperation with school
psychologists. The next chapter is again from Turkey, and the stakeholders
examined are the mothers. Fulya Temel and Zeynep Kurtulmus investigate and
compare the effects of individual and group mother education programs on
empathy levels. The mother education program included speaking, listening,
emotion recognition, expression of children emotions, communication and
empathy skills, the prevention of children negative behaviors, child discipline,
Education Policy
4
the relationships among siblings, etc. The authors find a positive impact in the
development of mothers’ empathy skills. The last chapter of this part considers
teacher-parent cooperation in providing education in Slovenia. Barbara Steh
and Jana Kalin use a representative sample from Slovenean urban and rural
primary schools, which include 467 teachers and 1690 parents. The results
provide some basic findings, show orientations and essential points of conflict
for consideration and forming decisions which will make optimal co-operation
possible and prove to be of maximum benefit to all concerned.
Education Policy Cases
This part includes three papers on specific policy cases. Chapter 14
examines the role of uniforms in Turkish Schools. In Turkey, since 1928, all
public elementary schools have a standardized mandatory uniform policy. The
author, Filiz Meseci-Giorgetti, reviews the role of uniforms in the relevant
literature and examines the positive and negative aspects of it. In this study,
teacher’s perceptions regarding the functions of mandatory school uniform
policy in elementary schools in Turkey are analyzed by utilizing a qualitative
research method. Interviews were used to collect the data. The data was
analyzed by using thematic techniques. The findings revealed that teachers
have positive perceptions regarding the mandatory school uniform policy. The
next chapter looks at another important education policy case, i.e. the time
required to finish a Ph.D. The author Ayse Bilgin, uses the Ph.D. program in
statistics at Macquarie University in Australia and come up with suggestions
on how to shorten completion times. The final paper (chapter 16) explores
teacher training in Turkey. The authors, Tulin Guler, Arif Yilmaz and Eda
Kargi, claim that student teaching courses are important for pre-service
teachers, as it gives them an opportunity to gain a sense of the profession and
experience the joys and challenges of teaching. With a student teaching
practicum, pre-service teachers have the opportunity to implement the
theoretical knowledge they gain through method courses into practice. The
results of the study shed light on how to prepare a better course with which to
help the preparation of pre-service teachers for the profession as well as to assist the
in-service teachers in better guiding the student teachers under their supervision.
Conclusions
This book assembled a number of papers presented at various ATINER
conferences, primarily on education in 2009 and 2010. The common dominator
of all these papers is the editor’s claim that they can be considered
contributions to education policy research. They are grouped into three parts
that deal with the various aspects of education policy making. It is hoped that
this volume will be useful to both academics and practitioners of education
policy.