ArticlePublisher preview available

Bullying and Delinquency in Adolescence: Victims’ and Perpetrators’ Family and Peer Relations

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

This study investigated (a) the prevalence and co-occurrence of various victimisation and violence experiences among adolescents and examined (b) the quality of peer and family relationships of victims and perpetrators of bullying and violent delinquency. Self-report questionnaires were completed by 1107 Swiss adolescents (grades 7 and 9). Frequency of involvement in bully/victim problems and delinquency was used to classify pupils. Bullies and bully-victims were often also victims and/or perpetrators of violent delinquency. Sex and school type effects were found regarding involvement in bully/victim problems and delinquency. Pupils who were bullied reported lower peer acceptance than bullies and non-involved pupils. Bullies as well as perpetrators and victims of violent delinquency reported lower family support than non-involved adolescents. Implications for prevention and intervention are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Swiss Journal of Psychology 64 (1), 2005, 51–64
In adolescence the prevalence of antisocial behaviours
such as bullying or delinquency is many times higher than
in other developmental phases across the life span. More-
over, adolescents bear a high risk of becoming victims of
crime or peer aggression (Lewit & Baker, 1996). Both bul-
lying and delinquency have been frequently investigated
(Smith, Morita, Junger-Tas, Olweus, Catalano et al., 1999;
Stoff, Breiling, & Maser, 1997), but due to diverging re-
search traditions, most studies focus on either bullying or
delinquency. Moreover, in research on adolescent delin-
quency, the perspective of victims is often neglected. Our
study aimed first at investigating the co-occurrence of be-
ing a victim and/or perpetrator of bullying and/or delin-
quency. Our second goal was to compare adolescents who
are involved in bully/victim problems with perpetrators or
victims of violent delinquency regarding their family and
peer relationship problems.
Co-occurrence of Various
Antisocial Behaviours and
Victimisation Experiences
A developmental taxonomy of antisocial behaviours
(Moffitt, 1993) suggests not only that some adolescents
show a pattern of life-course persistent antisocial behav-
iour, but also that various forms of antisocial behaviour
co-occur within the same individuals. A few studies have
established that bullying and delinquent behaviour are
positively associated (e.g., Baldry & Farrington, 2000;
Lösel & Bliesener, 2003). Baldry and Farrington (2000)
suggested that bullying might be an early stage of a de-
velopmental sequence leading to delinquency. Studies
have shown that aggressive and bullying behaviour in
school are predictors of later gang membership (Holmes
Swiss J Psychol 64 (1), 2005, © by Verlag Hans Huber, Hogrefe AG, Bern
Original communication
Bullying and Delinquency
in Adolescence: Victims’ and
Perpetrators’ Family and
Peer Relations
Sonja Perren and Rainer Hornung
Department of Psychology, Social and Health Psychology, University of Zurich
This study investigated (a) the prevalence and co-occurrence of various victimisation and violence experiences
among adolescents and examined (b) the quality of peer and family relationships of victims and perpetrators of
bullying and violent delinquency. Self-report questionnaires were completed by 1107 Swiss adolescents (grades
7 and 9). Frequency of involvement in bully/victim problems and delinquency was used to classify pupils. Bul-
lies and bully-victims were often also victims and/or perpetrators of violent delinquency. Sex and school type
effects were found regarding involvement in bully/victim problems and delinquency. Pupils who were bullied
reported lower peer acceptance than bullies and non-involved pupils. Bullies as well as perpetrators and victims
of violent delinquency reported lower family support than non-involved adolescents. Implications for preven-
tion and intervention are discussed.
Keywords: Bullying, delinquency, victimisation, adolescence, peer acceptance, family support
DOI 10.1024/1421-0185.64.4.51
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... When considering the family unit as a whole, Perren and Hornung (2005) found that perpetrators of traditional bullying were more likely to report lower family support than uninvolved children. This trend was also visible for bully-victims, but statistical significance was not reached; effect sizes were not reported for either association, making it difficult to assess the strength of this association. ...
... Two studies across 84 countries explored the topic of peer support, but focusing specifically on classmates, and found that children with high levels of support reported lower victimisation and lower perpetration of school bullying (Biswas et al., 2010;Murray-Harvey & Slee, 2010). This relationship has also been established between classmate acceptance and bullying: children who felt that they were not accepted by their classmates were more likely to report victimisation at school, whilst those who reported high levels of acceptance were more likely to be perpetrators at school (Perren & Hornung, 2005;Salmivalli et al., 1996). This could suggest that aggressive behaviours are reinforced by peers, whilst also being attractive characteristics. ...
... Some differences in age and gender have been noted when considering relationships with classmates. Firstly, younger children tend to perceive their peer relationships as more negative than their older counterparts (Perren & Hornung, 2005). This could be due to the amount of time that children have spent with their classmates, with younger children starting to establish hierarchies and friendships, whilst older children will often have been with the same children throughout much of their educational life; this may vary between countries and school systems, with the reported study being conducted in Switzerland. ...
Thesis
This thesis presents a mixed method exploration of different family factors and interpersonal relationships in relation to children’s bullying involvement at school, online, and within the home. Five studies are presented. The first is a scoping review on between-sibling bullying, offering an insight into a lesser-known type of bullying, with some consideration of how this may relate to peer bullying. Three studies utilise the Health and Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey, offering large-scale cross-national datasets: the first of these investigates the role of family structure and interpersonal relationships on peer bullying, and highlights a risk for children living in social care only; the second looks into sibling characteristics for peer bullying, but the effects of these negligible; the third focuses deeper into the vulnerability for children living in social care. The fifth and final study adopts a qualitative approach and explores bullying involvement for children living in foster care specifically. The findings from this thesis challenge the claims that family structure and sibling characteristics are directly related to peer bullying, and instead reinforce the importance of interpersonal relationships. This is particularly relevant for those living in foster care, who until now have been unheard in the bullying literature. Subsequently, this thesis provides an insight into the experiences of children in foster care, and has the potential to change the way that we support children in care.
... Additionally, bullies often seek to gain a higher status within their peer group through their aggressive behavior, which is more instrumental than emotional (Schwartz 2000). This desire for social dominance is often reinforced by peer acceptance, making it a significant factor in the continuation of bullying behaviors (Perren and Hornung 2005). ...
... Bully victims are described as having more anger and more difficulty controlling their anger than bullies (Georgiou and Stavrinides 2008). It is worth mentioning that bullies usually do not exhibit greater degrees of anxiety, depression, and withdrawal compared to those who are not involved in bullying (Menesini et al. 2009), and their aggression is not emotional, but instrumental, motivated by the desire to gain a high position in the peer group (Schwartz 2000), and research shows that persecutors have a greater level of acceptance from peers than victims of bullying (Perren and Hornung 2005). ...
Article
Full-text available
Bullying and cyberbullying significantly threaten the development and mental health of both victims and perpetrators. This study aimed to analyze the associations between socioeconomic characteristics, personal experiences of violence, perceived social support from peers, and acceptance of violence and (cyber)bullying perpetration. The study involved 1146 secondary school students, consisting of 698 females and 448 males, aged 13 to 16. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated using Poisson regression with robust variance. The results indicated that 12.32% of girls and 18.97% of boys reported engaging in bullying and/or cyberbullying. The likelihood of perpetration was lower among adolescents who had not experienced physical and/or sexual abuse before age 15, but higher among those in romantic relationships who had been victims of dating violence or had experienced (cyber)bullying victimization. Additionally, perceived social support from classmates was associated with a lower likelihood of becoming a perpetrator, whereas acceptance of violence was positively associated with (cyber)bullying perpetration. Preventing adolescents from becoming perpetrators of bullying and/or cyberbullying requires early intervention to prevent all forms of violence in childhood and adolescence, as well as bolstering personal and environmental resources by providing social support.
... On the other side, a lack of independence and the inability to address problems can negatively impact teenagers, making it harder for them to tolerate bullying. [20] According to a study, [5] having more friends protects against traditional and relational bullying. Another study [21] assessed that whereas older adolescents rely more on peer social support, younger children rely more on their parents and other authority figures for social support. ...
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND Bullying has a lasting effect on young, vulnerable minds, especially among school-aged youngsters. With the help of this study, we intended to examine how physical and dentofacial characteristics contribute to bullying among kids and how it affects their academic performance. METHODS This retrospective cross-sectional study consisted of a self-reported anonymous, pretested questionnaire divided into three major domains, with due institutional ethical clearance being obtained before the study’s commencement. RESULTS The study population consisted of 269 schoolchildren, with 49.8% being males and the majority (55.0%) residing in Ajman. Among the schoolchildren, 35.7% reported being victims of bullying. The majority of bully victims (27.1%) skipped school because of bullying. Additionally, 64.3% of the students had a nickname, primarily used by siblings, and approximately half of the bully victims disliked their nicknames. In terms of happiness, 45.0% of students were neither happy nor unhappy in classes, while 10.8% were very unhappy. Outside of school, 56.9% of participants were very happy, and only 1.1% were very unhappy. Most students (58.7%) did not believe that bullying harms their grades, while 19.7% believed it does. Furthermore, 71.7% of students did not experience bullying due to good grades or showing interest in schoolwork. CONCLUSION Based on results, physical and dentofacial features in bullying among schoolchildren and its impact on school performance, sociodemographic patterns, and factors associated with bullying victimization highlight the need for targeted interventions and preventive strategies to address this issue. Thus, can create a safe and supportive school environment that promotes the well-being and academic success of all schoolchildren.
... The development of social mindfulness depends on how adolescents interact with their friends and corresponding responses (Yan et al., 2022). However, the victims of bullying incidents normally have a low acceptance rate and poor peer relationships (Perren and Hornung, 2005) and have a lower tendency to express kind and help (Coulombe, 2021). Does that mean bullied experience would affect the development of their social mindfulness? ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To determine the relationship between school bullying victimization and social mindfulness and its mechanism in light of the interdependence and schema theories. Method The Chinese version of the Delaware Bullying Victimization Scale-student, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Self-Concept Clarity Scale and The Social Mindfulness Self-report Scale (SMSRS) were distributed to 553 middle school students. Results (1) The correlations of school bullying victimization with social mindfulness, self-concept clarity, and cognition reappraisal were statistically significant. (2) School bullying victimization had a significant effect on social mindfulness. (3) The simple mediating role of self-concept clarity and cognition reappraisal between school bullying victimization and social mindfulness were significant. (4) Self-concept clarity and cognition reappraisal played a chain mediating role between school bullying victimization and social mindfulness.
... Scholarship on youth RASB is premised on the belief that although not a homogeneous population, youth is a uniquely problematic period whereby many young people engage in aggressive, experimental, and oppositional behaviors (Arnett, 1999;K. K. Childs & Sullivan, 2013;Perren & Hornung, 2005;Sullivan et al., 2010), and are portrayed as suffering from a ''disorganization of their personal and familial lives'' (Kurtz et al., 1991, p. 310). A spectrum of RASB highlighted in existing research includes running away from home and becoming street-involved (Glowacz et al., 2020;Hail-Jares et al., 2021;Karabanow, 2003Karabanow, , 2008K. ...
Article
Full-text available
What do young people know about youth risky and antisocial behaviors (RASB) and what do they suggest could be done to address these behaviors? Although there is much literature on youth RASB, there has been little qualitative exploration of the question stated here. The current study aimed to broach the question and to fill the gap. The study contributes to extant literature by exploring types of RASB among youth, reasons for these behaviors, and possible ways to address them from the perspectives of young people in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). Constructivist and interpretive perspectives where reality is determined through the social processes of subjectivity and intersubjectivity informed the study. Eighteen young people aged 15 to 24 years participated in three focus group discussions (FGD), and data were analyzed thematically. The three main themes resulting from the process were: (1) a spectrum of behaviors, which comprised six types of behaviors; (2) constructed explanations, where participants identified five possible reasons for RASB; and (3) suggested interventions, which comprised three subthemes on interventions to address youth RASB. The findings and their implications for further research and for policy and practice are discussed.
... These findings are consistent with previous research findings (Alivernini & Lucidi, 2011;Ben-Zur, 2003;Eliot et al., 2010;Gadermann et al., 2015;Gempp & Gonz alez-Carrasco, 2021;Newland et al., 2015;Oberle et al., 2011;Suldo & Huebner, 2006; and with our hypothesis that a sense of peer belonging and the perception of a supportive school environment would have a positive impact on academic self-efficacy and life satisfaction, and a negative impact on victimization, leading to the conclusion that enhancing the quality of relations at school could be crucial for improving individuals adjustment to school and life. As previously mentioned, victimization is a widespread problem in schools in many countries, affecting on average about 31% of adolescents (Biswas et al., 2020), and it is well known that victims of bullying are more likely at risk to develop school and social adjustment problems in the present and future life ( Hospel, 2013; Haynie et al., 2001;Menesini & Salmivalli, 2017;Mundy et al., 2017;Nakamoto & Schwartz, 2010;Perren & Hornung, 2005). Having confirmation that we can intervene in aspects such as sense of peer belonging to reduce the risk of being bullied can be supportive to teachers, educators and directors who are responsible for protecting students and promoting their well-being. ...
Article
Full-text available
Several factors influence adolescents’ life satisfaction. At school, peer relatedness and school supportiveness, as well as individual self-perceptions such as academic self-efficacy, promote life satisfaction. Yet school is a context within which risks such as victimization can occur. The aim of this study was to test a model of relations of school factors predicting life satisfaction. We tested the mediator effects of victimization and academic self-efficacy between school supportiveness and peer belonging and life satisfaction. Participants were 2200 6th and 7th grades children attending middle school in Southern Switzerland. Data have been collected with the Middle Years Development Instrument questionnaire. Results showed that the sense of peer belonging and a supportive school environment have a positive effect on children academic self-efficacy and life satisfaction, and reduce the probability of victimization. Victimization, in turn, negatively affects life satisfaction and academic self-efficacy, while academic self-efficacy has a positive effect on life satisfaction.
... Prosocial behavior's importance comes from considering it a key to positive adolescents' development because engaging in prosocial activities is linked to favorable outcomes like wellbeing, greater academic performance, increased confidence, desirable personal traits, beside better ways to cope (Padilla-Walker & Carlo, 2014). Moreover, compared to other age groups, anti-social behaviors like substance misuse, vandalism, hostility, and sexual behaviors are more common during adolescence; prosocial behavior serves as an effective factor that prevents these behaviors (Perren & Hornung, 2005). ...
Article
Full-text available
The study aimed to investigate the role of religiosity and empathy in elucidating prosocial behavior's development in light of peers' relationships among Muslim adolescents in Jordan through testing a proposed model that represents the relationship among variables. The study sample consisted of 380 first- and second-year students at the University of Jordan during the academic year 2023-2024 who were selected using a simple random sampling technique. The results revealed that religiosity and empathy predicted prosocial behavior. Peers' relationships were predicted by both religiosity and empathy, which in turn predicted prosocial behaviors.
Article
Full-text available
The study aimed to investigate the relationship between the Engagement with (Peers, and at University) and Prosocial behavior of first - and second-year students in the University of Jordan whose number was (19267) students. The sample of the study consisted of (439) students who were selected using simple random sample method. This study was based on the correlational descriptive methodology. Three questionnaires were used to measure Engagement with (Peers, University) and prosocial behavior since they were suitable for the nature of the study. The results revealed that the level of Engagement with, (Peers) and (prosocial behavior) was high; with means scores of (4.13) and (3.73) respectively, while Engagement at university came at a medium level with mean score of (3.5), The results revealed that there is a correlation between Engagement with (Peers, University) and Prosocial behavior the correlation coefficient was (0.199) and (0.328) at (0.05).
Article
Full-text available
School bullying is a severe social problem that has an unfavorable impact on students development and behavior. Based on family education and students memory of having been bullied or witnessed bullying, this work established a mathematical model for analyzing school bullying dynamics. By employing the Caputo fractional derivative, the model incorporates students’ memory in the interactional patterns of bullying, which provides for improved emulation of the impacts of previous episodes on future behaviors. An Adams-Bashforth method numerical scheme is presented, offering a robust approach for scenario simulations under the Caputo fractional operator. Scenario simulations shows the impact of family education on the prevalence and dynamics of school bullying. It is noticed that the behavior of students who lack and with family education and not involving bullying under different values of fractional order. The trajectory changes with the fractional order, suggesting that the system’s sensitivity to initial conditions or recent changes decreases as fractional order reduce from the normal dynamics (integer order). Essentially, a lower fractional order makes the system less reactive to short-term fluctuations and more stable.
Article
Full-text available
A developmental model of antisocial behavior is outlined. Recent findings are reviewed that concern the etiology and course of antisocial behavior from early childhood through adolescence. Evidence is presented in support of the hypothesis that the route to chronic delinquency is marked by a reliable developmental sequence of experiences. As a first step, ineffective parenting practices are viewed as determinants for childhood conduct disorders. The general model also takes into account the contextual variables that influence the family interaction process. As a second step, the conduct-disordered behaviors lead to academic failure and peer rejection. These dual failures lead, in turn, to increased risk for depressed mood and involvement in a deviant peer group. This third step usually occurs during later childhood and early adolescence. It is assumed that children following this developmental sequence are at high risk for engaging in chronic delinquent behavior. Finally, implications for prevention and intervention are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The occurrence of bullying, victimization, and aggressive victimization was documented in a sample of 5th graders. Bullies comprised about 14% of the sample, whereas aggressive victims and victims comprised, respectively, 5% and 18%. Bullying and aggressive victimization was positively related to youngsters' emotionality and activity and negatively related to peer popularity. Although proactive and reactive aggression was related to bullying scores within the group of bullies, only proactive aggression was related to within-group popularity for bullies. Having friends and being liked by one's peers were protective factors against victimization, although the latter was more powerful than the former. Suggestions for future research, school policy, and intervention are made.
Article
It is claimed that many incidences of children running away from home and residential care involve issues around violence, bullying and child abuse and neglect. Surveys show that between 14 and 20% of children run away from home for at least one night and that 2% run away 10 times or more from home or a care setting. The potential reasons for running away are discussed together with the increased possibility for further victimization, delinquency and criminal behaviour. Four ‘streetwork projects’ that provide information and support to young runaways in the UK are described and their limitations discussed. It is proposed that counselling should be a part of intervention with street children and that trained counsellors/psychotherapists should be available free to these young people with social and emotional difficulties outside the usual health/social service provision.
Article
Risk and promotive effects were investigated as predictors of persistent serious delinquency in male participants of the Pittsburgh Youth Study (R. Loeber, D. P. Farrington, M. Stouthamer-Loeber, & W. B. van Kammen, 1998), living in different neighborhoods. Participants were studied over ages 13-19 years for the oldest sample and 7-13 years for the youngest sample. Risk and promotive effects were studied in 6 domains: child behavior, child attitudes, school and leisure activities, peer behaviors, family functioning, and demographics. Regression models improved when promotive effects were included with risk effects in predicting persistent serious delinquency. Disadvantaged neighborhoods, compared with better neighborhoods, had a higher prevalence of risk effects and a lower prevalence of promotive effects. However, predictive relations between risk and promotive effects and persistent serious delinquency were linear and similar across neighborhood socioeconomic status.
Article
This research aimed to analyse the personal characteristics and parental styles of bullies and delinquents, and to establish which factors were related to the bully/delinquent group and which were related to only bullies or only delinquents. A self-report questionnaire on bullying and delinquency was completed by 113 girls and 125 boys aged 11-14 in a middle school in Rome. Bullying and delinquency were more common among boys than among girls. Bullying did not vary significantly with age, but delinquency increased with age. Bullying and delinquency were especially related for boys and for older students. Only bullies were younger, while only delinquents were older, suggesting that bullying might be an early stage on a developmental sequence leading to delinquency. Only bullies and only delinquents had different parenting correlates; only bullies had authoritarian parents and disagreed with their parents, whereas only delinquents had conflictual and low supportive parents. This suggested that bullying and delinquency are not merely different behavioural manifestations of the same underlying construct. Parent training interventions might prevent both bullying and delinquency.