Article

Transcriptional burst frequency and burst size are equally modulated across the human genome

Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 10/2012; 109(43):17454-9. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213530109
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Gene expression occurs either as an episodic process, characterized by pulsatile bursts, or as a constitutive process, characterized by a Poisson-like accumulation of gene products. It is not clear which mode of gene expression (constitutive versus bursty) predominates across a genome or how transcriptional dynamics are influenced by genomic position and promoter sequence. Here, we use time-lapse fluorescence microscopy to analyze 8,000 individual human genomic loci and find that at virtually all loci, episodic bursting-as opposed to constitutive expression-is the predominant mode of expression. Quantitative analysis of the expression dynamics at these 8,000 loci indicates that both the frequency and size of the transcriptional bursts varies equally across the human genome, independent of promoter sequence. Strikingly, weaker expression loci modulate burst frequency to increase activity, whereas stronger expression loci modulate burst size to increase activity. Transcriptional activators such as trichostatin A (TSA) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) only modulate burst size and frequency along a constrained trend line governed by the promoter. In summary, transcriptional bursting dominates across the human genome, both burst frequency and burst size vary by chromosomal location, and transcriptional activators alter burst frequency and burst size, depending on the expression level of the locus.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Mike Simpson, Jun 30, 2014
  • Source
    • "A possible advantage of nuclear retention could involve robustness to noise generated by stochastic mRNA production (Battich et al., 2015;Singh and Bokes, 2012;Xiong et al., 2010). Transcription in a wide range of organisms, including mammals, has been shown to be a pulsatile process, consisting of stochastic bursts of production followed by periods of promoter quiescence (Figure 4A;Larson et al., 2011;Darzacq et al., 2007;Suter et al., 2011;Dar et al., 2012;Senecal et al., 2014). Bursty transcription can lead to profound variations in cellular mRNA content, a phenomenon termed gene expression noise. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: mRNA is thought to predominantly reside in the cytoplasm, where it is translated and eventually degraded. Although nuclear retention of mRNA has a regulatory potential, it is considered extremely rare in mammals. Here, to explore the extent of mRNA retention in metabolic tissues, we combine deep sequencing of nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA fractions with single-molecule transcript imaging in mouse beta cells, liver, and gut. We identify a wide range of protein-coding genes for which the levels of spliced polyadenylated mRNA are higher in the nucleus than in the cytoplasm. These include genes such as the transcription factor ChREBP, Nlrp6, Glucokinase, and Glucagon receptor. We demonstrate that nuclear retention of mRNA can efficiently buffer cytoplasmic transcript levels from noise that emanates from transcriptional bursts. Our study challenges the view that transcripts predominantly reside in the cytoplasm and reveals a role of the nucleus in dampening gene expression noise.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Cell Reports
  • Source
    • "To determine the mechanisms that might comprise the viral program, mathematical modeling of the HIV circuit was used to define the minimal core principles that could enable a fate-selection decision and allow the fate decision to be resilient to cellular relaxation. Previous singlecell studies had determined that HIV's long-terminal repeat (LTR) promoter, the virus's only promoter, is exceptionally noisy[36]; the dominant noise source is large, infrequent 'bursts' of transcription[37,38]such that the promoter can be modeled using a two-state 'random telegraph' model[38]. It was also known that LTR noise is amplified by positive feedback from HIV's Tat protein, which transactivates the LTR[39]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To preserve fitness in unpredictable, fluctuating environments, a range of biological systems probabilistically generate variant phenotypes—a process often referred to as ‘bet-hedging’, after the financial practice of diversifying assets to minimize risk in volatile markets. The molecular mechanisms enabling bet-hedging have remained elusive. Here, we review how HIV makes a bet-hedging decision between active replication and proviral latency, a long-lived dormant state that is the chief barrier to an HIV cure. The discovery of a virus-encoded bet-hedging circuit in HIV revealed an ancient evolutionary role for latency and identified core regulatory principles, such as feedback and stochastic ‘noise’, that enable cell-fate decisions. These core principles were later extended to fate selection in stem cells and cancer, exposed new therapeutic targets for HIV, and led to a potentially broad strategy of using ‘noise modulation’ to redirect cell fate.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Current Opinion in Cell Biology
  • Source
    • "Recent assays in single cells confirmed transcriptional bursting in many organisms (Golding et al, 2005; Chubb et al, 2006; Raj et al, 2006; Zenklusen et al, 2008). Although not all genes are transcribed in bursts (Zenklusen et al, 2008), bursting appears predominant in mammals (Suter et al, 2011; Dar et al, 2012; Bahar Halpern et al, 2015). The mechanisms causing bursts in eukaryotes are still elusive but most likely involve the interplay between transcription factors (Larson et al, 2013; Senecal et al, 2014), chromatin remodelers (Coulon et al, 2013; Voss & Hager, 2013), the formation of gene loops and pre-initiation complexes (Blake et al, 2003; Zenklusen et al, 2008), and transcription initiation and elongation (Jonkers et al, 2014; Stasevich et al, 2014). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mammalian transcription occurs stochastically in short bursts interspersed by silent intervals showing a refractory period. However, the underlying processes and consequences on fluctuations in gene products are poorly understood. Here, we use single allele time-lapse recordings in mouse cells to identify minimal models of promoter cycles, which inform on the number and durations of rate-limiting steps responsible for refractory periods. The structure of promoter cycles is gene specific and independent of genomic location. Typically, five rate-limiting steps underlie the silent periods of endogenous promoters, while minimal synthetic promoters exhibit only one. Strikingly, endogenous or synthetic promoters with TATA boxes show simplified two-state promoter cycles. Since transcriptional bursting constrains intrinsic noise depending on the number of promoter steps, this explains why TATA box genes display increased intrinsic noise genome-wide in mammals, as revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. These findings have implications for basic transcription biology and shed light on interpreting single-cell RNA-counting experiments. © 2015 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015 · Molecular Systems Biology
Show more