Landis, S. C. et al. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature 490, 187-191

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Nature (Impact Factor: 41.46). 10/2012; 490(7419):187-91. DOI: 10.1038/nature11556
Source: PubMed


The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress.

Download full-text


Available from: Oswald Steward
    • "all of their research-funding activities, the ODS and the NCCIH emphasize the application of appropriate and rigorous analytical methods to address the inherent variability of botanical raw materials and natural products,[43]in addition to requiring thorough and transparent reporting to optimize the reproducibility of DS research. This emphasis on research reproducibility and transparency has been recently highlighted for all NIH-funded research.[44,45]In addition to the AMRM and the BRC Programs and other research funding, the ODS accomplishes its mission to generate, evaluate , and disseminate DS knowledge through a number of complementary approaches. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mechanistic, clinical, and epidemiological research relevant to dietary supplements (DS) is supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The Office of Dietary Supplements and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health promote the development and appropriate use of rigorous and comprehensive DS analyses which are critical for research reproducibility, particularly when the investigational DS include chemically complex natural products with unclear mechanisms of action.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2016 · Drug Testing and Analysis
    • "The type of apparatus used must be carefully considered as mice behave differently in different designs of the same apparatus. For example, different designs of the Barnes maze result in different types of learning and memory [216] [217]. Finally, one must ensure that the behavioral measures represent the psychological construct that they are meant to measure. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Preclinical studies are essential for translation to disease treatments and effective use in clinical practice. An undue emphasis on single approaches to Alzheimer's disease (AD) appears to have retarded the pace of translation in the field, and there is much frustration in the public about the lack of an effective treatment. We critically reviewed past literature (1990-2014), analyzed numerous data, and discussed key issues at a consensus conference on Brain Ageing and Dementia to identify and overcome roadblocks in studies intended for translation. We highlight various factors that influence the translation of preclinical research and highlight specific preclinical strategies that have failed to demonstrate efficacy in clinical trials. The field has been hindered by the domination of the amyloid hypothesis in AD pathogenesis while the causative pathways in disease pathology are widely considered to be multifactorial. Understanding the causative events and mechanisms in the pathogenesis are equally important for translation. Greater efforts are necessary to fill in the gaps and overcome a variety of confounds in the generation, study design, testing, and evaluation of animal models and the application to future novel anti-dementia drug trials. A greater variety of potential disease mechanisms must be entertained to enhance progress.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2015 · Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD
  • Source
    • "Similar suggestions have been made for biological studies (Kozlov and Hurlbert, 2006; Verbitsky, 2013) and research in sports medicine and sports science (Hayen, 2006). It was recently noted that when a biological variation in response to some intervention was the variable of interest in the analysis of samples, considering the natural grouping of objects was essential (Landis et al., 2012). Therefore, the current study has three main goals: (i) to determine gender differences in start reaction times for four different 50 m stroke final events at six Swimming World Championships, (ii) to assess the effects of ignoring natural groupings at Swimming World Championships, and (iii) to evaluate the effects of the large sample size on statistical inferences when gender differences are examined with respect to start reaction times among elite swimmers at Swimming World Championships. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Four 50 meter male/female finals ‐ the freestyle, butterfly, breaststroke, and backstroke ‐ swum during individual events at the Swimming World Championships (SWCs) can be defined in four clusters. The aim of the present study was to use a single‐unit design structure, in which the swimmer was defined at only one scale, to evaluate gender differences in start reaction times among elite swimmers in 50 m events. The top six male and female swimmers in the finals of four swimming stroke final events in six SWCs were analyzed. An unpaired t‐test was used. The p‐values were evaluated using Neo‐Fisherian significance assessments (Hurlbert and Lombardi, 2012). For the freestyle, gender differences in the start reaction times were positively identified for five of the six SWCs. For the backstroke, gender differences in the start reaction times could be dismissed for five of the six SWCs. For both the butterfly and breaststroke, gender differences in the start reaction times yielded inconsistent statistical differences. Pooling all swimmers together (df = 286) showed that an overall gender difference in the start reaction times could be positively identified: p = 0.00004. The contrast between the gender differences in start reaction times between the freestyle and backstroke may be associated with different types of gender adaptations to swimming performances. When the natural groupings of swimming stroke final events were ignored, sacrificial pseudoreplication occurred, which may lead to erroneous statistical differences.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Journal of Human Kinetics
Show more