ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

summary: The manuscript features a brief discussion of the specific physical demands characteristic of rugby union football. This is followed by a rationale and description of the elements comprising the strength and conditioning program for rugby union football players at the elite level. Finally, a sample periodized strength training macrocycle for the training year is included. (C) 2004 National Strength and Conditioning Association
Content may be subject to copyright.
Physical Preparation
for Elite-Level Rugby
Union Football
Paul Gamble,CSCS
London Irish Rugby Football Club,Middlesex, United Kingdom
© National Strength and Conditioning Association
Volume 26, Number 4,pages 10–23
Keywords: rugby football; metabolic conditioning; strength
training; injury prevention; periodization
Introduction
Like American football, rugby foot-
ball is an intermittent collision
sport. As such, a crucial part of
strength and conditioning is developing
the levels of strength and hypertrophy of
muscle and connective tissue in order to
equip players to cope with the physical
rigors involved (6, 30). Maximal strength
and explosive power are major program
goals common to both American foot-
ball and rugby football.
Where the sports differ is that both
league and union codes of rugby football
are far more continuous in nature than
American football. Unlike American
football, play continues after the player
is tackled, only stopping when the ball
goes out of play, a technical infringe-
ment is made, or a penalty is committed.
Rugby union features considerably
higher work:rest ratios (8) than Ameri-
can football and therefore has a much
greater demand for metabolic condi-
tioning for the oxidative and glycolytic
energy systems.
As a result, strength and conditioning
coaches working with rugby football play-
ers face 2 additional challenges. The first
challenge is to provide appropriate meta-
bolic conditioning in the most time-effi-
cient manner. The second challenge is to
develop and maintain high levels of
strength and power while athletes are con-
currently performing high volumes of
metabolic training and team practices.
Strength Training Program
Design
From a performance perspective, pro-
gram design is driven by a desire to de-
velop athleticism via the use of coordi-
nated whole-body training movements
(16). Similarly, exercises are selected to
maximize carry-over of strength and
power gains from the gym to the play-
ing field (17). (Specific examples will be
given later in the text.) Accordingly,
strength training emphasizes sport-spe-
cific actions, rather than simply train-
ing single muscle groups in isolation
(15, 16).
Needs analyses of individual roles of
players within a rugby union team re-
veal that the different playing positions
lie on various points on the maximum
strength/speed-strength continuum.
Positional roles are divided into 2 broad
categories: forwards and backs. The
main distinction between the roles is
that the forwards are required to contest
possession at the restart phases, i.e.,
scrum and lineout. Rugby union has a
greater emphasis on restart set-pieces
than the league version of rugby foot-
ball, and as a result there is a greater dis-
parity between the roles and physical
demands of forward and back positions
in this version of the game (37). Fur-
ther, rugby union requires players to se-
cure or contest possession of the ball at
each tackle. Due to the emphasis on set-
pieces and contesting at the tackle area,
summary
The manuscript features a brief dis-
cussion of the specific physical de-
mands characteristic of rugby union
football. This is followed by a ratio-
nale and description of the ele-
ments comprising the strength and
conditioning program for rugby
union football players at the elite
level. Finally, a sample periodized
strength training macrocycle for the
training year is included.
10 August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
rugby union forwards have a greater re-
liance on maximal strength than their
counterparts in rugby league.
Given that set-piece phases distinguish
the roles and demands placed upon the
forward positions from those of the
backs, a brief description of the physical
work involved is necessary. In a scrum
each set of forwards combines to form a
single unit that engages with the oppos-
ing pack of forwards to contest a ball
rolled into the gap between the 2 oppos-
ing forward packs (29). Rugby union
rules stipulate that the ball must be
rolled along a line perpendicular to and
equidistant from the front rows of op-
posing forward packs. As a result there is
a greater effort to contest for the ball by
physically shoving the opposition pack
of forwards off the ball as it is fed into
the scrum (29).
The lineout is unique to rugby union and
serves to restart the game after the ball
goes out of play. This phase of play essen-
tially involves jumpers being lifted by
teammates to contest possession of a ball
thrown in from the sideline. The
lineout is a highly evolved process, with
forward positions increasingly being used
interchangeably as lifters or jumpers to
disguise where the ball is being thrown.
Based upon qualitative assessment of the
physical work involved in these aspects
of rugby, the predominant biomechani-
cal action is the simultaneous triple ex-
tension of hips, knees, and ankles, often
transmitting force through the shoul-
ders as the point of contact during colli-
sions with other players. This triple ex-
tension likewise characterizes the
high-force activities involved in contest-
ing and retaining possession in open
play and the high-power (high force/fast
movement speed) dynamic actions asso-
ciated with jumping and tackling. The
primary goal of the strength training
program therefore is to enhance strength
and power for this triple-extension
movement. The forward positions par-
ticularly have a need for both strength
(heavy load) training and explosive
power training that emphasizes this spe-
cific action.
The resistance training activities select-
ed are primarily “closed kinetic chain
(feet planted) multi-joint movements.
Players train exclusively with free
weights, using dumbbells in preference
to barbells where appropriate (16). The
principle lifts for all phases of the peri-
odized strength training program are the
high-force power lifts—squat, deadlift,
and bench press—and the explosive
Olympic-style lifts. Unilateral support
resistance exercises, such as lunge, step-
up, and split squat, are core exercises
that are performed throughout the
training year (16, 27). Additional exer-
cises to develop the muscle groups that
assist the prime mover musculature are
included to develop active joint stability.
Likewise, resistance training sessions are
incorporated to address areas typically
prone to injury position and to remedy
any preexisting muscular imbalances or
sites of previous injury (1).
Later in the periodized training plan,
specific resisted movements are intro-
duced with the aim of translating
strength and power gains developed in
the gym to game-related actions involved
in contact phases on the pitch (18).
Bungee ropes and harnesses are used to
provide resistance for specific rugby
movements. These include the engage on
the scrum machine and simulating clear-
ing opposing players from the tackle area
by hitting a rucking shield and tackling
by hitting tackle pads or teammates in
armored contact suits.
All strength training is conducted in a
circuit format to reduce the time taken
between exercises. This is a reflection of
both the need to train large numbers of
players in a restricted time and the high
local muscular endurance demands of
rugby match play. Rest periods between
consecutive exercises for similar muscle
groups are manipulated according to the
goal of the training cycle.
It has been established that strength,
power, and muscle mass gains are com-
promised by performing high-intensity
endurance training earlier in the day be-
fore strength training (24). These inter-
ference effects of concurrent strength
and endurance training are associated
with conflicting hormonal responses to
the 2 forms of training (24). Therefore,
strength training is performed first in
the day, before metabolic conditioning
or team practice sessions.
Injury Profiles of Match Play
There is a lack of recent comprehensive
injury studies in elite-level rugby union
since the advent of professionalism,
which appears to have engendered an in-
crease in injury (2). Differences have
been identified in injury rates and the
prevalence of different types of injury
between lower playing grade and higher
standard competition (2, 35). Hence,
data from amateur rugby has limited ap-
plication to the professional game in
England (26).
The majority of injuries arise from colli-
sion phases, termed tackle injuries (2,
12, 43). These injuries are distributed
fairly evenly between the tacklers and
the players being tackled (12, 43). The
majority of injuries occur during head-
on tackles, as a consequence of the high-
er collision forces involved (2, 12, 43).
Rugby league play shares the characteris-
tics of open play phases in rugby union
(i.e., carrying the ball and tackling). Data
taken from rugby league identify injuries
in open play as predominantly occurring
to the lower body (13), with upper-limb
(arm/shoulder) and head/neck injuries
being the next most common. The added
elements of contesting at the tackle area
(rucks and mauls) and scrummaging de-
manded of the forward positions pose an
increased hypothetical risk of head and
neck injuries (36). Data from interna-
tional rugby union players show the data
from rugby league to be fairly representa-
tive in terms of site of injury, with lower-
limb injuries being the most common,
11
August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
followed by head and neck injuries, with
upper-limb injuries the least common
(2). However, it appears that when
upper-limb injury does occur, it is more
likely to be severe (2). The most common
injuries classified as severe in terms of
weeks missed subsequent to injury are in-
juries to the knee (2).
Of particular concern in rugby union is
the incidence of hyperflexion of the cer-
vical spine as the head is pushed down-
wards into the ground under the weight
of teammates and/or opponents, forcing
the chin down into the chest, as in the
case of a collapsed scrum, ruck, or maul
(36). This is the typical mechanism of
potentially the most debilitating or even
fatal injuries to which rugby union play-
ers are exposed (36).
Previous injury is shown to predispose
players at all levels to subsequent injury
in season (26, 35). This observation un-
derlines the importance of rehabilita-
tion and addressing previous injuries in
players’ physical preparation.
Injury Prevention/”Prehabili-
tation”:Exercise Selection
Lower Extremity
Injury prevention exercises include sta-
bility ball work to train the hamstrings
and hip extensors, which are particularly
prone to injury in running-intensive
sports. This training modality develops
strength, balance, and motor control in
a way that replicates the horizontal
forces and range of motion featured in
running (32, 39).
Ankle stability exercises to develop pro-
prioceptive sense and balance are also
included. Exercise selection aims to tar-
get the peroneal muscles, which provide
active joint stability for the ankle com-
plex (3). Exercises include calf raises
holding dumbbells as part of the player’s
strength training program in the gym
and supplementary functional training
using specialized apparatus, such as
ankle disks (3, 5).
Upper Body
As a consequence of its high degree of
mobility, the shoulder joint is reliant on
dynamic (i.e., muscular) stability (31).
This factor is of critical importance, as
the shoulder is the main point of contact
in all collision phases. Specifically, dur-
ing tackles, ruck cleans, and the engage
at scrum-time, the shoulders are subject-
ed to high-impact forces. Thus, injury
prevention for the upper body mainly
addresses the muscles of the rotator cuff
and the stabilizer muscles around the
scapula (41). A minimum of 1 workout
a week is dedicated solely to single-joint
auxiliary exercises to maintain the struc-
tural integrity of the shoulder complex.
These exercises comprise mainly raises
in various planes. Dumbbells, free
weights, curl bars, and resistance tubing
are used for resistance.
Neck
There is a commercially available har-
ness that allows free weights to be hung
from the head to allow specific training
of the neck musculature. Both isometric
(static hold) and dynamic actions are
performed. This helps to develop the ca-
pacity to resist forces acting to hyperflex
the cervical spine (36).
Metabolic Conditioning
A key feature that separates rugby foot-
ball from American football is the lack
of pause between each play, thereby in-
volving considerably greater energetic
demand, particularly in terms of oxida-
tive and glycolytic energy systems.
Specifically, the fact that play continues
after a tackle is made in rugby union
12 August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 1a
Off-season Cycle #1
Frequency: 4 x per week: 1 whole body;1 upper body;1 lower body; 1 assistance
Intensity: 8–12RM (all lifts)
Volume: 3–5 full load sets (exercises performed in circuit format)
Rest: Short rest (<60 seconds) between exercises; core stability work (~2 minutes)
between sets
Other Training: No other formal training performed in this period
Monday Tuesday
8RM, 3 sets 8RM, 3–4 sets
Parallel back squat
Dumbbell lunge
Back extensions
Dumbbell step-ups
Split squat
Single-leg calf raise
Bench press
One-arm dumbbell row
Bicep curls
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
Bent-over barbell row
Dumbbell upright row
Thursday Friday
10RM, 3–4 sets 12RM, 3–4 sets
Deadlift
Incline dumbbell bench press
Dumbbell lunge
Bent-over barbell row
Dips
Dumbbell step ups
Dumbbell upright row
Bent-over dumbbell raises
EZ Bar (straight-arm) pull-overs
Lateral dumbbell raises
Dumbbell bicep curls
EZ bar tricep extensions
Dumbbell front raises
Elastic tubing shoulder rotations
leads to multiple consecutive phases of
play, requiring a high level of metabolic
conditioning.
Conditioning drills that incorporate
skills and movements specific to the
sport are often used (25, 28, 33), with
the aim of simulating the movement
patterns and metabolic conditions en-
countered during a rugby game. Howev-
er, practically it is very difficult to design
drills to simulate the continuum of in-
tensities and movement patterns en-
countered during rugby match play. The
pace of the game and the amount of ball-
in-play time is directly influenced dur-
ing any given match by the environmen-
tal conditions and game plan of the
opposition. For example, in wet condi-
tions and playing against conservative
opposition, there will inevitably be
greater emphasis on the tactic of kicking
the ball out of play to gain territorial ad-
vantage with a view to contesting pos-
session at the subsequent lineout; hence,
there are far more stoppages and less
time with the ball in play. Therefore, it is
often spurious to model conditioning
on time-motion studies undertaken on
rugby union, given the variability inher-
ent in any given game and the competi-
tion studied.
A solution that circumvents the need for
structured conditioning drills is the use
of skill-based conditioning games. Con-
ditioning games are derived from ele-
ments of American football, netball,
soccer, and rugby league and are played
on customized playing areas with rule
modifications to ensure that players
must work continuously. Hereby, the
conditioning games are continuous and
require players to operate in the upper
range of work:relief ratios encountered
during match play. These are used in
conjunction with heart rate telemetry to
assess each player’s work-rate. Players
are assigned their own target heart rate
(HR) range (75–85% heart rate reserve)
and are instructed to operate in the
upper range of this zone. My observa-
tion and experience is that conditioning
games elicit intensity equivalent or su-
perior to traditional conditioning activi-
ties and provide considerably greater
total work time.
The games format requires players to
react to the movement of both team-
mates and opponents, as well as follow-
ing the ball. In this way, the condition-
ing games training mode incorporates
13
August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 1b
Off-season Cycle #2
Frequency: 5 x per week: 2 upper body;2 lower body; 1 assistance
Intensity: 8–12RM (all lifts)
Volume: 3–5 full load sets (exercises performed in circuit format)
Rest: Short rest (<60 seconds) between exercises; core stability work (~2 minutes) between sets
Other Training: No other formal training performed in this period
Monday Tuesday Wednesday
8RM, 3 sets 8RM, 3 sets 10RM, 3–4 sets
Parallel back squat
Dumbbell lunge
Romanian deadlift
Back extensions
Split squat
Single-leg calf raise
Bench press
Bent-over barbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Bench dips
Dumbbell upright row
Bent-over dumbbell raises
EZ bar pull-overs
Dumbbell front raises
Dumbbell bicep curls
EZ Bar tricep extensions
Lateral dumbbell raises
Elastic tubing shoulder rotations
Thursday Friday
12RM, 3 sets 12RM, 3 sets
Deadlift
Dumbbell lunge
Back extensions
Dumbbell step-ups
Split squat
Single-leg calf raise
Incline dumbbell bench press
Bent-over barbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dips
Dumbbell upright row
the changes in direction and velocity
and the “utility” movements (lateral and
backwards locomotion) that are featured
in match play. Exercise economy is
closely related to patterns of motor unit
recruitment, and, as such, improve-
ments are highly specific to the speeds
and power outputs at which athletes ha-
bitually train (22). It follows that the
skill-based conditioning games training
format should similarly enhance econo-
my for the range of sport-specific modes
of locomotion and the continuum of ve-
locities that are featured in match play.
Conditioning games may be the optimal
training mode available to promote
these adaptations.
As a result of the high degree of similari-
ty between conditioning games and
rugby match play, cardiorespiratory fit-
ness gains made in this training mode
are more likely to be reflected in terms of
match fitness” (9, 42). By training this
way in-season, reserve players are able to
maintain a level of match fitness despite
a lack of game time.
From a coaching standpoint there is
also a mental conditioning element.
The conditioning games encourage
players to adopt good habits, such as
remaining involved in play and keep-
ing unforced errors to a minimum
while fatigued. The capacity of indi-
vidual players to maintain high work
rates during conditioning games has
great relevance for the coaches, in
terms of criteria for selection. If the
HR records for a player show that he
persistently fails to motivate himself to
work sufficiently hard during condi-
tioning game sessions despite repeated
feedback, the coach will likely not risk
playing him in a match on the grounds
of poor work ethic. This is particularly
the case for the work-rate–oriented
forward positions, who are primarily
responsible for securing or contesting
possession at each tackle.
A reduced relative incidence of injury
has been reported among rugby league
14 August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 2
Hypertrophy #1 Cycle
Frequency: 4 x per week: 2(1) upper body;1(2) lower body; 1 assistance
Intensity: 8–12RM (all lifts)
Volume: 3–5 full load sets (exercises performed in circuit format)
Rest: Short rest (<60 seconds) between exercises;abdominal work (~2 minutes) between sets
Other Training:Metabolic conditioning performed five days a week
Strength training performed in the morning before conditioning or practice sessions
Week 1
Monday Tuesday
8RM, 5 sets 8RM, 5 sets
Bench press
Bent-over barbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Bicep curls
Dumbbell upright row
Parallel back squat
Dumbbell lunge
Romanian deadlift
Back extensions
Dumbbell step-ups
Split squat
Single-leg calf raise
Thursday Friday
12RM, 4 sets 10RM, 3 sets
Bent-over dumbbell raises
Lateral dumbbell raises
Dumbbell bicep curls
Dumbbell front raises
EZ bar tricep raises
Elastic tubing shoulder rotations
Incline dumbbell bench press
Bent-over barbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dips
Dumbbell upright row
Week 2
Monday Tuesday
8RM, 5 sets 8RM, 5 sets
Parallel back squat
Dumbbell lunge
Romanian deadlift
Back extensions
Dumbbell step-ups
Single-leg calf raise
Bench press
One-arm dumbbell row
Bicep curls
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
Bent-over barbell row
Dips
Dumbbell upright row
Thursday Friday
10RM, 3 sets 12RM, 4 sets
Deadlift
Dumbbell lunge
Back extensions
Dumbbell step-ups
Split squat
Single-leg calf raise
Bent-over dumbbell raises
EZ bar (straight-arm) pull-overs
Lateral dumbbell raises
Dumbbell bicep curls
Dumbbell front raises
EZ bar tricep raises
Elastic tubing shoulder rotations
Note:Week 2 frequency in parentheses.
players when performing conditioning
games, in comparison to traditional
conditioning activities (e.g., running
without a ball) (11). Injury rates adjust-
ed for the time engaged in a particular
mode of training for the duration of a
rugby league season revealed that the
majority of injuries were sustained dur-
ing traditional conditioning work with-
out a ball or skill element (11). In con-
trast, there is a low incidence of injury
reported when participating in skill-
based conditioning games. The underly-
ing reasons for the apparent decreased
occurrence of injury associated with
conditioning games remains to be clari-
fied. It may be that a mediating factor in
this decreased incidence of injury is im-
proved motor control when performing
sports movements, as opposed to run-
ning without a ball. Improved neuro-
muscular control is identified as helping
to guard against noncontact injuries
(32). Whatever the mechanism, the ben-
efits of less time away from the training
pitch due to injury will be readily obvi-
ous to the coach and athlete.
Plyometric Training
Plyometric training is introduced dur-
ing preseason on non–weight-training
days. Depth jumping is approached
with caution for players weighing more
than 100 kg, which tends to be the case
with forwards, particularly in rugby
union. It has therefore been recom-
mended that these players not exceed a
depth jump drop height of 18 inches (46
cm) (34). As training macrocycles
progress, plyometric exercises are intro-
duced into gym sessions prior to weight
training. The in-season progression in-
volves plyometric drills being “com-
plexed,” or alternated, with heavy whole
body powerlifts and Olympic-style lifts.
Jumping to intercept balls thrown into
the air is incorporated to increase con-
text specificity. The use of a mechanical
jump-and-reach measurement device to
gauge height jumped for instant feed-
back is helpful when performing jumps
and depth jumps to help maintain moti-
vation and effort.
15
August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 3
Strength #1 Cycle
Frequency: 4x per week; 2(1) upper body;1(2) lower body; 1 assistance
Intensity: 5–8RM multi-joint lifts; 8RM assistance lifts
Volume: 3–5 full load sets (exercises performed in circuit format),
Rest: Multi-joint lifts 2–3 minutes;assistance lifts 60 seconds; core work (~2 minutes) between sets
Other Training:Metabolic conditioning performed 4–5 days per week
Moderate intensity plyometrics and agility and quickness drills performed three days/week
Week 1
Monday Tuesday
6RM, 4–5 sets 8RM, 4–5 sets
Bench press
Barbell bench row
Bicep curls
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dumbbell upright row
Bent-over dumbbell raises
EZ bar (straight-arm) pull-overs
Lateral dumbbell raises
Dumbbell bicep curls
EZ bar tricep raises
Dumbbell front raises
Elastic tubing shoulder rotations
Thursday Friday
6RM, 4–5 sets 8RM, 4–5 sets
Push press
Parallel back squat
Dumbbell lunge
Romanian deadlift
Back extensions
Dumbbell step-ups
Single-leg calf raise
Incline dumbbell bench press
Bent-over barbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dips
Dumbbell upright row
Week 2
Monday Tuesday
5RM, 4–5 sets 8RM, 4 sets
Clean pull
Parallel back squat
Dumbbell lunge
Romanian deadlift
Back extensions
Single-leg calf raise
Bench press
Bent-over barbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Bicep curls
Dumbbell upright row
Thursday Friday
5RM, 5 sets 8RM, 4 sets
Split jerk
Deadlift
Dumbbell step-ups
Back extensions
Split squat
Single-leg calf raise
Bent-over dumbbell raises
EZ bar (straight-arm) pull-overs
Lateral dumbbell raises
Dumbbell bicep curls
EZ bar tricep raises
Dumbbell front raises
Elastic tubing shoulder rotations
Note:Week 2 frequency in parentheses.
Sprint Work
In the early phases of the periodized
plan (early to mid-preseason), technique
drills are performed to develop efficient
running mechanics. Likewise, bounding
(a variety of explosive cyclic stepping
and hopping actions) is implemented at
progressively increasing intensities, in
association with plyometric training.
Towards the end of the preseason phase,
resisted (sprinting uphill, towing sleds,
or running attached to bungee ropes)
and assisted (downhill running or towed
running) methods are introduced to de-
velop stride length and stride frequency,
respectively (7).
Core Stability
Rugby football requires a strong core
and good motor control to stabilize the
trunk and to maintain upright posture
while changing direction at speed. This
aspect is also important when being lift-
ed to contest possession at lineouts and
kickoffs. Strong core and lumbo-pelvic
stability are necessary for efficient trans-
fer of force from the ground up during
collision phases (tackling, cleaning
rucks, and scrummaging). These ele-
ments are similarly important for guard-
ing against injury (4, 32). The focus is
on Swiss ball work, using medicine balls
for added resistance as necessary. This
provides a labile surface, which demands
a coordinated response from the core
musculature to stabilize the athlete (40).
When performing abdominal work,
there is a tendency for anterior bias (i.e.,
focusing on the muscle groups that can
16 August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 4
Hypertrophy #2 Cycle (Preseason Weeks 5–6)
Frequency: 5 x per week: 2 upper body;2 lower body; 1 assistance
Intensity: 8–10RM (all lifts)
Volume: 3–5 full load sets (exercises performed in circuit format)
Rest: Short rest (<60 seconds) between exercises; core stability work (~2 minutes) between sets
Other Training:
Metabolic conditioning reduced to three days per week
Moderate intensity plyometrics and agility and quickness drills performed 2 days per week
Strength training performed in the morning before conditioning or practice sessions
Monday Tuesday Wednesday
Week 1, 8RM
Week 2, 6RM
5 sets
Week 1, 8RM
Week 2, 6RM
5 sets
Week 1, 10RM
Week 2, 8RM
4 sets
Clean pull
Parallel back squat
Dumbbell lunge
Back extensions
Split squat
Single-leg calf raise
Bench press
Barbell bench row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dips
Dumbbell upright row
Bent-over dumbbell raises
EZ bar pull-overs
Lateral dumbbell raises
Dumbbell bicep curls
Dumbbell front raises
EZ bar tricep extensions
Elastic tubing shoulder rotations
Thursday Friday
Week 1, 10RM
Week 2, 8RM
3–5 sets
Week 1, 10RM
Week 2, 8RM
3–5 sets
Deadlift
Split squat
Romanian deadlift
Back extensions
Dumbbell step-ups
Single-leg calf raise
Incline dumbbell bench press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dumbbell bicep curls
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
Bent-over barbell row
Bench dips
Dumbbell upright row
be seen in the mirror). To counter this
bias, there is a particular emphasis on
exercises for the transversus abdominus,
obliques, and lumbo-pelvic muscula-
ture. Exercises include curls on the ball,
bridging exercises, and lumbo-pelvic
support exercises.
Agility Training
There is a focus on ladder drills and low
hurdle work for developing quick feet.
This also has direct application for
movement in the lineout for the for-
ward positions. Slalom pole drills are
implemented to practice the skill of
spinning out of collisions to evade tack-
lers. All drills feature a ball and defend-
ers where possible and appropriate to
enhance context specificity (21). As
training advances, these drills are sup-
plemented by one-on-one attacker/de-
fender work with a tether joined by Vel-
cro or popper fasteners. The goal of the
attacker is to “wrong-foot” his oppo-
nent and thus break the tether bond;
the defender aims to shadow his partner
to keep the tether intact. This develops
motor control for the close quarter reac-
tive movements involved in evading
tacklers and puts the athlete into an op-
timal position to make a tackle when
defending.
Warm-up and Stretching
General warm-up (low-intensity aerobic
activity) should precede all training ses-
sions, as well as matches. For practice
sessions on the training pitch, this
warm-up will be in the form of submaxi-
mal running, generally including a ball-
handling element to maintain the play-
ers’ interest. For gym sessions,
ergometers such as rowing machines,
climbers, or Nordic skiers are ideal, as
they provide whole body activities. The
rationale for this general warm-up is
that it raises core and muscle tempera-
ture to decrease muscle viscosity, which
guards against muscle-tendon injury
(14, 20).
Ballistic stretching is now largely avoid-
ed, on the grounds that it can cause
musculotendinous damage and because
it evokes stretch reflexes and therefore
does not allow the muscle to relax (20).
Furthermore, there is growing evidence
that static stretching may be counter-
productive prior to matches and high-
intensity training sessions with a high
muscular power requirement. Similarly,
there is increasing data indicating that
static stretching leads to short-term im-
pairment of dynamic strength and
power output (44), and the injury pre-
vention effect that is supposed to occur
with static stretching appears to be ab-
sent. Likewise, there is recent evidence
that proprioceptive neuromuscular fa-
cilitation (PNF) stretching also has a
negative effect on dynamic performance
17
August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 5
Strength #2 Cycle (Preseason Weeks 7–8)
Frequency: 4 x per week: 1 whole body;1 upper body;1 lower body; 1 assistance
Intensity: 4–6RM multi-joint lifts;8RM assistance lifts
Volume: 3–5 full load sets (exercises performed in circuit format)
Rest: Multi-joint lifts 2–3 minutes,assistance lifts 60 seconds; abdominal work
(~2 minutes) between sets
Other Training: Metabolic conditioning two days per week to allow for more tactical
practice sessions
Moderate–high intensity plyometrics and agility and quickness drills performed 2
days per week before gym sessions
Resisted and assisted sprint training drills introduced
Rugby-specific resistance training exercises introduced
Strength training performed in the morning before conditioning or practice sessions
Monday Tuesday
Week 1, 5RM
Week 2, 4RM
4–5 sets
6RM
5 sets
Clean pull
Overhead full squat
Split jerk
Parallel back squat
Lunge
Romanian deadlift
Incline dumbbell bench press
Bent-over barbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
Back extensions with barbell
Dumbbell upright row
Single-leg calf raise
Thursday Friday
Week 1, 5RM
Week 2, 4RM
4–5 sets
8RM
5 sets
Power clean
Bench press
Push press
Deadlift
One-arm dumbbell row
Bent-over dumbbell raises
EZ bar pull-overs
Lateral dumbbell raises
Dumbbell bicep curls
Dumbbell front raises
EZ bar tricep raises
Elastic tubing shoulder rotations
capabilities, as evident from short-term
reductions in vertical jump height (44).
Given this, it appears prudent to avoid
both static and PNF stretching prior to
matches and training sessions that have
an emphasis on speed or power, as will
be the case for most training for rugby.
This would include sprint work, agility
and quickness drills, and plyometric
training, as well as explosive power
training (Olympic-style lifts or ballistic
resistance exercises) in the gym.
Static and PNF stretching does still have
its place in terms of flexibility training
for long term increases in joint range of
motion. These stretches are implement-
ed after strength training gym sessions
and during warm-down postmatch and
after training and practices. In addition,
gastrocnemius and soleus stretches are
incorporated for injury prevention, par-
ticularly for players presenting with calf
stiffness or plantar fasciitis (38), as is
common among athletes in running-
and jumping-intensive sports.
Dynamic stretches, such as walking
lunges, sprint technique drills, and re-
hearsals of sport-related actions at low to
moderate intensity are all advocated as
alternative specific warm-up modes to
prepare the athlete for competition and
speed/power training in a way that does
not hinder subsequent performance or
risk injury (10, 14). These stretches are
performed with increasing intensity as
warm-up advances, by way of progres-
sively warming up the athlete in readi-
ness for the match or training session.
Sample Periodized Plan
The example given is based on the Eng-
lish Premiership rugby union season
schedule. The competition calendar
runs from September to May, with for-
mal preseason training starting at the
beginning of July. The plan can be mod-
ified for application to rugby league
(which has a summer playing season) by
adjusting the timing of the respective
training cycles.
There are several disparate training
goals—specifically hypertrophy, strength
and explosive power, and injury preven-
tion—all of which must be addressed in
the course of the training plan. This is
achieved by planned variations in the
training program that systematically
shift the emphasis to promote different
training effects at different phases of the
training period. In addition, varying the
training at regular intervals prevents
plateaus in training adaptations.
All strength training is conducted in a
circuit format to address muscular en-
durance needs. Rest periods between
consecutive exercises for similar muscle
groups are manipulated according to
the goal of the training cycle. Intensity
guidelines are given as the repetition
maximum (RM) for the specified num-
ber of repetitions. Volume recommen-
dations are made for full load sets.
However, all gym sessions should be
preceded by a warm-up circuit with
75–80% resistance of the prescribed
RM load for each lift. Strength training
is performed first in the day, before
metabolic conditioning or other train-
ing (24)
Active Rest
This phase encompasses the 2 weeks fol-
lowing the final match of the season.
Players are encouraged to refrain from
formal strength training and metabolic
conditioning for the duration of the 2-
week period, with the exception of
recreational activities and light resis-
tance work.
18 August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 6
Power Cycle (Preseason Weeks 9–11)
Frequency: 3 x per week
Intensity: 3–5RM (all lifts)
Volume: 3–5 full load sets (exercises performed in circuit format)
Rest: 3–4 minutes between exercises; core stability work (~2 minutes) between sets
Other Training: Strength training performed in the morning before conditioning or practice sessions
Monday Wednesday Friday
Week 1, 4RM
Week 2–3, 3RM
4–5 sets
80% Week 1, 4RM
80% Week 2&3, 3RM
3–5 sets
90% Week 1, 4RM
90% Week 2&3, 3RM
4–5 sets
Clean pull
Push press
Bench press
Deadlift
Barbell bench row
Split jerk
Parallel back squat
Romanian deadlift
Ballistic push-ups
One-arm dumbbell row
Power clean
Overhead full squat
Ballistic push-up
Resisted hip/knee drive
Alternate box hops
19
August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 7a
5-week schedule September–October
Tuesday Wednesday Friday
Weeks 1–2, 6RM
Weeks 3–4, 5RM
Week 5, 4RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 6RM
Weeks 3–4, 5RM
Week 5, 4RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 8RM
Weeks 3–5, 6RM
2–3 sets
Clean pull
Push press
Parallel back squat
Lunge
Romanian deadlift
Bench press
Barbell bench row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dumbbell bicep curls
Power clean (<6 reps)
Ballistic push-up
Resisted hip/knee drive
Incline dumbbell bench press
Dumbbell front raises
Resistance tubing shoulder rotations
Single-leg calf raise
Table 7b
5-week schedule October–November
Tuesday Wednesday Friday
Weeks 1–2, 6RM
Weeks 3–4, 5RM
Week 5, 4RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 8RM
Weeks 3–4, 6RM
Week 5, 5RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 8RM
Weeks 3–5, 6RM
2–3 sets
Power clean
Resisted hip/knee drive
Push press
Deadlift
Back extensions with barbell
Dumbbell step up
Incline dumbbell bench press
Bent-over barbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dips
Dumbbell upright row
Split jerk
Bench press
Overhead full squat
Bent-over dumbbell raises
Resistance tubing shoulder rotations
Dumbbell bicep curl
Table 7c
5-week schedule November–December
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
Weeks 1–2, 5RM
Weeks 3–4, 4RM
Week 5, 3RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 6RM
Weeks 3–4, 5RM
Week 5, 4RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 8RM
Weeks 3–5, 6RM
2–3 sets
Clean pull
Overhead squat
Split jerk
Parallel back squat
Split squat
Romanian deadlift
Bench press
Barbell bench row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dumbbell bicep curl
Dumbbell upright row
Push press
Ballistic push-up
Bent-over barbell row
EZ bar pull-overs
Dumbbell lateral raise
Resistance tubing shoulder rotations
Single-leg calf raise
20 August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 8a
6-week schedule January–February
Tuesday Wednesday Friday
Weeks 1–2, 6RM
Weeks 3–4, 5RM
Weeks 5–6, 4RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 6RM
Weeks 3–4, 5RM
Weeks 5–6, 4RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 8RM
Weeks 3-6, 6RM
2–3 sets
Clean pull
Push press
Parallel back squat
Alternate box hops
Romanian deadlift
Bench press
Barbell bench row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dumbbell bicep curls
Power clean (<6 repetitions)
Ballistic push-up
Resisted hip/knee drive
Dumbbell front raises
Resistance tubing shoulder rotations
Single-leg calf raise
Table 8b
6-week schedule October–November
Tuesday Wednesday Friday
Weeks 1–2, 6RM
Weeks 3–4, 5RM
Weeks 5–6, 4RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 8RM
Weeks 3–4, 6RM
Weeks 5–6, 5RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 8RM
Weeks 3–6, 6RM
2–3 sets
Power clean
Resisted hip/knee drive
Push press
Deadlift
Back extensions with barbell
Dumbbell step up
Incline dumbbell bench press
Bent-over barbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
One-arm dumbbell row
Dips
Dumbbell upright row
Split jerk
Bench press
Overhead full squat
Bent-over dumbbell raises
Resistance tubing shoulder rotations
Dumbbell bicep curl
Table 8c
6-week schedule November–December
Tuesday Wednesday Friday
Weeks 1–2, 5RM
Weeks 3–4, 4RM
Weeks 5–6, 3RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 6RM
Weeks 3–4, 5RM
Weeks 5–6, 4RM
3 sets
Weeks 1–2, 8RM
Weeks 3–6, 6RM
2-3 sets
Clean pull
Overhead squat
Split jerk
Resisted hip/knee drive
Parallel back squat
Romanian deadlift
Ballistic push-up
Bench press
One-arm dumbbell row
Standing dumbbell shoulder press
Dumbbell upright row
Push press
Incline dumbbell bench press
Dumbbell lateral raise
EZ bar pull-overs
Dumbbell bicep curl
Resistance tubing shoulder rotations
Single-leg calf raise
Off-season Cycle
The length of the off-season is dictated
by the teams progress in the end-of-sea-
son play-offs and participation in Euro-
pean cup competition semi-finals and fi-
nals. Thus, the off-season may last
anywhere from 2 weeks (if involved in a
play-off championship final) to 5 weeks
(if the team failed to qualify for either
championship or wild card play-offs and
is not involved in the final stages of Eu-
ropean competitions).
The off-season is a key opportunity for
strength training without the con-
straints and possible interference effects
of concurrent metabolic conditioning
and team practices. Injuries and existing
muscular imbalances are likewise ad-
dressed in this period.
Off-season strength training consists of
2 microcycles: an initial 4 d/wk micro-
cycle (Table 1a) and a 5 d/wk microcycle
(Table 1b) implemented in the 2 weeks
leading up to the beginning of preseason
practice. No other formal training is
performed in this period.
Hypertrophy #1 Cycle
(Preseason Weeks 1–2)
High training volume (3–5 full load sets)
is combined with moderate loads
(8–12RM) and short rest periods (<60
seconds between exercises). Exercises are
performed as a circuit to reduce the time
taken between consecutive exercises.
Core stability work is performed be-
tween each circuit to allow some active
recovery. The combination of load
scheme and elevated lactic acid levels re-
sulting from the short rest intervals is de-
signed to promote optimal testosterone
and growth hormone responses for lean
muscle growth, or hypertrophy (23).
Four sessions are performed in each of
the 2 weekly microcycles based around
an upper/lower body split routine, sup-
plemented by an assistance lifts (arms
and shoulder complex) workout (Table
2). Metabolic conditioning is performed
5 days a week in this period. As in the re-
mainder of the preseason, strength
training is performed in the morning be-
fore conditioning or practice sessions.
Strength #1 Cycle
(Preseason Weeks 3–4)
High volume (4–5 full load sets) is
maintained in this phase; the specific
number is at the discretion of the
strength coach on each training day.
Greater weight (5–8RM multi-joint
lifts) is lifted to promote greater
strength gains. Players continue to train
in a circuit format, but rest periods are
extended to allow 2 to 3 minutes be-
tween consecutive exercises with similar
muscle groups in multi-joint lift ses-
sions. The provision of more complete
recovery is designed to enable higher
loads to be lifted in later sets.
Four sessions per week are performed,
incorporating a split routine similar to
the previous phase, again including 1
workout dedicated to assistance lifts
(Table 3). Moderate intensity plyomet-
rics and agility and quickness drills are
introduced 3 days per week before gym
sessions. Metabolic conditioning is per-
formed 4 or 5 days a week. Strength
training is performed in the morning be-
fore conditioning or practice sessions.
Hypertrophy #2 Cycle
(Preseason Weeks 5–6)
This cycle includes the highest volumes
used in the preseason training period,
with 5 strength training sessions per-
formed each week (Table 4). A loading
scheme of 6RM (heavy days) and 8RM
(light days) is used for multi-joint lifts
(8RM for assistance lifts) in a circuit for-
mat with minimal rest (<60 seconds) be-
tween consecutive exercises.
The duration of metabolic conditioning
is tapered slightly. Likewise, plyometrics
and agility and quickness drills are limit-
ed in intensity and restricted to 2 days
per week on lower-body strength train-
ing days to accommodate the high vol-
umes of strength training.
Strength #2 Cycle
(Preseason Weeks 7–8)
Four training sessions are completed each
week in this phase: 1 combined whole-
body workout; 1 upper-body workout; 1
lower-body workout; and 1 assistance
workout (Table 5). Intensity increases to
4–5RM for multi-joint lifts (8RM for as-
sistance lifts), reflecting a shift towards
gains in maximum strength. Exercises
continue to be performed in circuit for-
mat, with rest intervals manipulated to
provide 2 to 3 minutes between consecu-
tive exercises with similar muscle groups
for multi-joint lifts.
Less metabolic conditioning is per-
formed to accommodate a greater num-
ber of tactical practice sessions. Resisted
and assisted sprint training drills are in-
troduced. Similarly, rugby-specific resis-
tance training exercises are introduced,
using bungee ropes for resistance. Mod-
erate- to high-intensity plyometrics and
agility drills are performed 2 days per
week before gym sessions.
21
August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Table 9
Inseason—Play-offs (May)
Tuesday Thursday
3–5 RM, 2–3 sets 4-6RM, 2–3 sets
Clean pull
Overhead squat
Push press
Bench press
One-arm dumbbell row
Power clean
Ballistic push-up
Split jerk
Romanian deadlift
Power Cycle
(Preseason Weeks 9–11)
This phase features the highest loads
used in the training cycle. There is a
focus on explosive lifts; these are per-
formed first in the workout when the
player is still fresh.
Three sessions are undertaken per week
(Table 6). Intensity is raised to 3–4RM
for all lifts, with players completing 4–5
full load sets at the discretion of the
strength coach each day. Assistance lift
days are eliminated during this phase.
Rest periods are extended to allow 3 to 4
minutes between exercises, with core
work (approximately 2 minutes dura-
tion) performed between sets.
High-intensity plyometrics training is
implemented twice weekly (Monday
and Friday) prior to gym sessions.
Strength training continues to be per-
formed in the morning before condi-
tioning or practice sessions.
In-season/Regular Season
(September–April)
It is vital that resistance training is main-
tained in season to prevent significant
losses in strength and power. High loads
(80%1RM or 8RM) are implemented
2 d/wk for multi-joint lifts. This loading
scheme has been shown to maintain, or
even increase, strength levels in the
multi-joint lifts throughout the playing
season in American Football (19).
15-Week Schedule September–December.
Loads are varied according to an undu-
lating nonlinear periodized plan to
allow high weight to be lifted without
overloading the player. This phase con-
sists of three 5-week macrocycles, each
comprising microcycles of progressively
increasing intensity (Table 7a–c).
Late December. One week active rest is
given, comprising unstructured recre-
ational games and workouts.
18-Week Schedule January–April. An un-
dulating nonlinear periodized plan is
again used, working to a format similar
to the early season mesocycle. There is
some manipulation of selection and
order of exercises to offer variation in
the training stimulus (Table 8a–c).
Inseason/Play-offs (May). A peaking cycle
is implemented for the period leading
up to major competitions at the end of
the season. This cycle features very high
loads (3–6RM) and low volume (2–3
sets). There is a focus on multi-joint
lifts, with assistance exercises being
eliminated (Table 9).
References
1. Baechle T.R., R.W. Earle, and D. Wa-
then. Resistance training. In: Essentials
of Strength Training and Conditioning
(2nd ed.). T.R. Baechle and R.W.
Earle, eds. Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics, 2000. pp. 395–425.
2. Bathgate, A., J.P. Best, G. Craig, and M.
Jamieson. A prospective study of injuries
to elite Australian rugby union players.
Br. J. Sports Med. 36:265–269. 2002.
3. Bellew, J.W., and S. Dunn. Ankle re-
habilitation: A reintroduction of the
peroneus longus. Strength Cond. J.
24(4):61–63. 2002.
4. Cissik, J.M. Programming abdominal
training, part 1. Strength Cond. J.
24(1):9–15. 2002.
5. Cohen, S.B. Implementation of bal-
ance training in a gymnast’s condition-
ing program. Strength Cond. J. 24(2):
60–67. 2002.
6. Conroy, B., and R.W. Earle. Bone,
muscle, and connective tissue adapta-
tions to physical activity. In: Essentials
of Strength Training and Conditioning
(2nd ed.). T.R. Baechle and R.W.
Earle, eds. Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics, 2000. pp. 57–72.
7. Delecluse, C. Influence of strength
training on sprint running performance.
Sports Med. 24(3):147–156. 1997.
8. Deutsch, M.U., G.J. Maw, D. Jenkins,
and P. Reaburn. Heart rate, blood lac-
tate and kinematic data of elite colts
(under-19) rugby union players during
competition. J. Sports Sci. 16:561–570.
1998.
9. Durstine, J.L., and P.G. Davis. Speci-
ficity of training and testing. In: ACSM’s
Resource Manual for Guidelines for Exer-
cise Testing and Prescription (4th Ed). J.L.
Roitmanm ed. Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, 2001. pp 484–491.
10. Fredrick, G.A., and D.J. Szymanski.
Baseball (part 1): Dynamic flexibility.
Strength Cond. J. 23(1):21–30. 2001.
11. Gabbett, T.J. Training injuries in rugby
league: An evaluation of skill-based
conditioning games. J. Strength Cond.
Res. 16(2):236–241. 2002.
12. Garraway, W.M., A.J. Lee, D.A.D.
Macleod, J.W. Telfer, I.J. Deary, and
G.D. Murray. Factors influencing
tackle injuries in rugby union foot-
ball. Br. J. Sports Med. 33:37–41.
1999.
13. Gissane, C., D. Jennings, K. Kerr, and
J.A. White. A pooled data analysis of
injury incidence in rugby league foot-
ball. Sports Med. 32(3):211–216. 2002.
14. Hedrick, A. Dynamic flexibility training.
Strength Cond. J. 22(5):33–38. 2000.
15. Hedrick, A. Training for high-perfor-
mance collegiate ice hockey. Strength
Cond. J. 24(2):42–52. 2002.
16. Hedrick, A. Manipulating strength
and conditioning programs to improve
athleticism. Strength Cond. J. 24(4):
71–74. 2002.
17. Hedrick, A. Designing resistance train-
ing programs: A practical example.
Strength Cond. J. 24(6):7–15. 2002.
18. Hoffman, J., and E. Hamilton. Wall-
mounted sled training and testing for
football players. Strength Cond. J.
24(4):9–13. 2002.
19. Hoffman, J.R., and J. Kang. Strength
changes during an in-season resistance-
training program for football. J. Strength
Cond. Res. 17(1):109–114. 2003.
20. Holcomb, W.R. Stretching and warm-
up. In: Essentials of Strength Training and
Conditioning (2nd ed.). T.R. Baechle
and R.W. Earle, eds. Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics, 2000. pp. 321–342.
21. Ives, J.C., and G.A. Shelley. Psy-
chophysics in functional strength and
power training: Review and imple-
mentation framework. J. Strength
Cond. Res. 17(1):177–186. 2003.
22 August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
22. Jones, A.M., and H. Carter. The effect
of endurance training on parameters of
aerobic fitness. Sports Med. 29(6):
373–386. 2000.
23. Kraemer, W.J. Endocrine responses to
resistance exercise. In: Essentials of
Strength Training and Conditioning
(2nd ed.). T.R. Baechle and R.W.
Earle, eds. Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics, 2000. pp. 91–114.
24. Kraemer, W.J., J.F Patton, S.E. Gor-
don, E.A. Harman, M.R. Desch-
enes, K. Reynolds, R.U. Newton,
N.T. Triplett, and J.E. Dziados.
Compatibility of high-intensity
strength and endurance training on
hormonal and skeletal muscle adap-
tations. J. Appl. Physiol. 78(3):976–
989. 1995.
25. Lawson, E. Incorporating sport-specif-
ic drills into conditioning. In: High-
Performance Sports Conditioning. B.
Foran, ed. Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics, 2001. pp 215–266.
26. Lee, A.J., W.M. Garraway, and D.W.
Arneil. Influence of preseason training,
fitness, and existing injury on subse-
quent rugby injury. Br. J. Sports Med.
35:412–417. 2001.
27. McCurdy, K., and C. Conner. Unilat-
eral support training incorporating the
hip and knee. Strength Cond. J. 25(2):
45–51. 2003.
28. Meir, R., P. Colla, and C. Milligan.
Impact of the 10-meter rule change on
professional rugby league: Implications
for training. Strength Cond. J. 23(6):
42–46. 2001.
29. Milburn, P.D. Biomechanics of rugby
union scrummaging. Sports Med.
16(3):168–179. 1993.
30. Murlatsis, Z., and J. Langley. In-season
resistance training for high school foot-
ball. Strength Cond. J. 24(4):65–68.
2002.
31. Newton, R.U., J. Jones, W.J. Kraemer,
and H. Wardle. Strength and power
training in Australian Olympic swim-
mers. Strength Cond. J. 24(3):7–15.
2002.
34. Pettit, R.W., and E.R. Bryson. Train-
ing for women’s basketball: A biome-
chanical emphasis for preventing ante-
rior cruciate ligament injury. Strength
Cond. J. 24(5):20–29. 2002.
35. Plisk, S.S., and V. Gambetta. Tactical
metabolic training: Part 1. Strength
Cond. 19(2):44–53. 1997.
36. Potach, D.H., and D.A. Chu. Plyo-
metric training. In: Essentials of
Strength Training and Conditioning
(2nd ed.). T.R. Baechle and R.W.
Earle, eds. Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics, 2000. pp. 427–470.
37. Quarrie, K.L., J.C. Alsop, A.E.
Waller, Y.N. Bird, S.W. Marshall, and
D.J. Chalmers. The New Zealand
rugby injury and performance pro-
ject. VI. A prospective cohort study of
risk factors for injury in rugby union
football. Br. J. Sports Med. 35:157–
166. 2001.
38. Quarrie, K.L., R.C. Cantu, and D.J.
Chalmers. Rugby union injuries to the
cervical spine and spinal cord. Sports
Med. 32(10):633–653. 2002.
39. Quarrie, K.L., P. Handcock, A.E.
Waller, D.J. Chalmers, M.J. Toomey,
and B.D. Wilson. The New Zealand
rugby injury and performance pro-
ject. III. Anthropometric and physi-
cal performance characteristics of
players. Br. J. Sports Med. 29(4):263–
270. 1995.
40. Ross, M.D. Gastrocnemius and soleus
muscle stretching for athletes with
plantar fasciitis. Strength Cond. J.
24(6):71–72. 2002.
41. Santana, J.C. Hamstrings of steel: Pre-
venting the pull, part II—Training the
triple threat.” Strength Cond. J.
23(1):18–20. 2001.
42. Vera-Garcia, F.J., S.G. Grenier, and
S.M. McGill. Abdominal muscle re-
sponse during curl-ups on both stable
and labile surfaces. Phys. Ther. 80(6):
565–569. 2000.
43. Wagner, P. A comprehensive approach
to shoulder complex maintenance.
Strength Cond. J. 25(3):65–70. 2003.
44. Wilmore, J.H., and D.L Costill. Phys-
iology of Sport and Exercise (2nd ed.).
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics,
1999.
45. Wilson, B.D., K.L. Quarrie, P.D. Mil-
burn, and D.J. Chalmers. The nature
and circumstances of tackle injuries in
rugby union. J. Sci. Med. in Sport.
2(2):153–162. 1999.
46. Young, W., and D.G. Behm. Should
static stretching be used during a
warm-up for strength and power activ-
ities. Strength Cond. J. 24(6):33–37.
2002.
Paul Gamble is currently completing a
PhD in Exercise Physiology at Brunel Uni-
versity, West London and is the Strength
and Conditioning Coach for London Irish
RFC.
23
August 2004 Strength and Conditioning Journal
Gamble
... Given that high levels of strength are required during contact situations, forwards should possess greater levels than backs (Gamble, 2004). High levels of strength are also advantageous for improving running velocity, changing directions and producing force in a static context (e.g. ...
... scrums and mauls) (Duthie et al., 2003). From a performance perspective, the majority of strength training should focus on the lower extremity, where simultaneous triple extension of the hips, knees and ankles will occur (Gamble, 2004). Moreover, exercise selection should maximize the carry-over of strength and power into sport specific actions rather than training single muscle groups in isolation (Gamble, 2004). ...
... From a performance perspective, the majority of strength training should focus on the lower extremity, where simultaneous triple extension of the hips, knees and ankles will occur (Gamble, 2004). Moreover, exercise selection should maximize the carry-over of strength and power into sport specific actions rather than training single muscle groups in isolation (Gamble, 2004). Exercise selection is primarily closed kinetic chain multi joint movements, with high force or high velocity contractions required (Hedrick, 2002). ...
Thesis
Limited research suggests that muscle adaptations may be enhanced through resistance training in a hypoxic environment. Altitude training has been integrated into athlete preparation strategies for the past five decades by elite athletes, with the goal of improving performance. Simulated altitude modalities allow athletes the ability to live low (sea level) and train high (completing training sessions at altitude) to enable, intermittent hypoxic exposure (IHE) training paradigm to optimize adaptation and performance. The first part of this thesis reviews the literature on different methods of hypoxic training and how this may be implemented into the sport of Rugby Union. Part two of the thesis includes an original investigation whereby 17 professional Rugby Union athletes (age [mean ± SD], 24 ± 3 years; body mass, 98.7 ± 12.8 kg, height; 188.9 ± 7.9 cm), performed 12 resistance training sessions over a three-week period. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: HYP (n=8) where resistance training sessions were performed in an environmental chamber with O 2 concentration maintained at ~14.4% (~3000m simulated altitude), or CON (n=9) identical resistance training sessions were performed without the simulated altitude (O 2 = 20.9%, at sea level). The research assessed pre and post-test measures of strength, power, endurance, speed and body composition. Analysis revealed a small positive effect for bench press (d = 0.24), weighted chin-up (d = 0.23) and bronco endurance tests (d =-0.21) in the HYP group when compared to the CON. In conclusion, resistance training in a hypoxic environmental chamber may lead to small improvements in upper body strength and endurance compared to the same training performed at sea-level. These findings are somewhat novel, given the short timeframe of the study and the elite population sampled. This study adds new practical information for athletes, coaches and practitioners on the effects of resistance training in a hypoxic environment on strength trained, professional team sport athletes.
... Biomechanical risk factors can also be associated with injuries that limit athletes' preparation and performance in certain type of sports [13]. In rugby union, however, due to the prevalence of injuries, chronic insecurity and vulnerability are prominent characteristics of players' daily lives [14,15]. Consequently, players will often decide to cover up, or play with, an injury to advance their career and when faced with forthcoming contract negotiations with their employers. ...
... Reaching solutions based on an innovative understanding of complex situations in high performance sport, multidisciplinary research is deemed essential [21]. Rugby union-based health-promotion research has largely focussed on injuries, particularly issues that have garnered media attention, such as concussion awareness [22], technique-related injuryprevention [23], risk factors [24] and injury impacts [14]. However, relatively few studies have specifically examined rugby union [25] drawing on OSH risk awareness and management factors from an overall health-and-wellbeing perspective. ...
Article
Full-text available
The intense, physical contact nature of rugby union often encourages the normalization of risk-taking behaviour resulting in a relatively high acceptance of risk. This study aims to explore safety culture in rugby union from an OSH perspective, with the purpose of assisting coaches and management in their decision-making processes to improve players’ health, welfare, and long-term well-being. In terms of data collection, this study involved semi-structured interviews with senior support staff (n = 15) in elite rugby union. Interview transcripts underwent inductive analysis prior to an abductive analysis that was guided by an established occupational-safety-and-health (OSH) framework. Rugby union players’ safety can be considered from two dimensions: management’s commitment to safety (i.e., safety prioritization, safety empowerment, and safety justice), players’ involvement in safety (i.e., safety prioritization, and trust in other players’ safety competence, and players’ safety concern for the opposition players). Within the themes identified, players’ attitude towards their opponents’ safety which has been rarely considered as a factor for injury prevention is also discussed in this study. If sport support staff (i.e., managers/coaches/medical) can become more involved in players’ performance-orientated training using OSH management processes to aid in their decision-making, their exists the capacity to benefit players’ safe return to play after injury rehabilitation. Meanwhile, directing the development of appropriate behavioural educational interventions to raise safety-awareness amongst players can improve their long-term health and well-being and provide them with the necessary safety and health information to support their own decision-making processes. As a multidisciplinary design, this study contributes new multidisciplinary insights that have the potential to advance managerial practices utilizing an OSH perspective, including decision-making supporting risk alleviation for safety and long-term health and wellbeing initiatives in competitive team sports.
... In this study, the subjects performed morning and afternoon training 5 days a week. The exercise protocol followed that described by Gamble et al. and Stenger et al. [20,21] and is presented in Figure S2. ...
Article
Full-text available
During the off-season, soccer players in Korea attend the winter training season (WTS) to build running stamina for the next season. For young soccer players, proper recovery time is needed to prevent injury or muscle damage. In this study, urinary metabolites in young players after 1, 5, and 10 days of the WTS were analyzed using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) combined with multivariate analysis to suggest appropriate recovery times for improving their soccer skills. After NMR analysis of the urine samples obtained from young players, 79 metabolites were identified, and each group (1, 5, or 10 days after WTS) was separated from the before the WTS group in the target profiling analysis using partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Of these, 15 metabolites, including 1-methylnicotinamide, 3-indoxylsulfate, galactarate, glutamate, glycerol, histamine, methylmalonate, maltose, N-phenylacetylglycine, trimethylamine, urea, 2-hydroxybutyrate, adenine, alanine, and lactate, were significantly different than those from before the WTS and were mainly involved in the urea, purine nucleotide, and glucose-alanine cycles. In this study, most selected metabolites increased 1 day after the WTS and then returned to normal levels. However, 4 metabolites, adenine, 2-hydroxybutyrate, alanine, and lactate, increased during the 5 days of recovery time following the WTS. Based on excess ammonia, adenine, and lactate levels in the urine, at least 5 days of recovery time can be considered appropriate.
... The game of rugby requires players to tolerate and generate forces to propel their own and additional external weight loads. It is thus fair to regard muscular strength and power as important performance predictors (Posthumus & Durandt 2009) as well as intrinsic risk factors associated with injury prevention (Gamble 2004). Whilst strength doesn't have a set definition or unit of measure, it is an attribute of force and power (Bohannon 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Considering the injury incidence rate (IR) associated with elite-level rugby, measures to reduce players’ injury risk are important. Establishing scientifically sound, pre-season musculoskeletal screening protocols forms part of injury prevention strategies. Objective: To determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of the flexibility and strength tests included in the Sport Science Lab® (SSL) screening protocol. Methods: We determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of 11 flexibility and nine strength tests. Twenty-four injury-free, elite, adult ( 18 years), male rugby players were screened by two raters on two occasions. To establish intrarater and interrater reliability, Gwet’s AC1, AC2 and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used for the analysis of binary, ordinal and continuous variables, respectively. Statistical significance was set at 95%. Results: Flexibility tests which require lineal measurement had at least substantial interrater (ICC = 0.70–0.96) and intrarater reliability (ICC = 0.89–0.97). Most of the flexibility tests with binary outcomes attained almost perfect interrater and intrarater reliability (Gwet’s AC1 = 0.8–0.97). All strength tests attained at least substantial interrater (Gwet’s AC2 = 0.73–0.96) and intrarater (Gwet’s AC2 = 0.67–0.97) reliability. Conclusion: The level of interrater and intrarater reliability of most of the flexibility and strength tests investigated supports their use to quantify various aspects of neuromusculoskeletal qualities and possible intrinsic risk factors amongst elite rugby players. Clinical implications: Establishing the reliability of tests, is one step to support the inclusion thereof in official screening protocols. Results of our study, verify the reliability of the simple, clinically friendly strength and flexibility tests included and therefore support their use as preparticipation screening tools for rugby players. Further investigation as to the association thereof to athletes’ injury risk and performance is warranted.
... The administrative control is to reduce the potential for harm and/or adverse health effects by providing people with appropriate training (Health and Safety Authority, 2017). Rugby training equipped players with high levels of strength, power, and the appropriate metabolic conditioning to perform in the most time-efficient manner (Gamble, 2004). Coaches and strength-and-conditioning experts were there to ensure players had the capacity to reduce the harm in performance. ...
... Indeed, athletes are unlikely to have access to the equipment required to perform key exercises for developing or maintaining maximal strength (multijoint resistance exercises such as squats and deadlifts) (35) at sufficiently heavy loads (≥75% 1-repetition maximum) (36). For optimal performance and injury prevention, Rugby Union athletes are expected to possess high levels of strength and power whilst engaging in high metabolic training volumes and rugby-specific sessions (37) and re-building these attributes before competitive matches resume will be crucial. Most respondents indicated they completed at least three training sessions per week however no information was gathered as to the nature of these sessions and as such, the ability of the respondents to offset muscle disuse wasting cannot be predicted. ...
Article
Full-text available
The global outbreak of COVID-19 has led to governments and local authorities implementing nationwide lockdowns in an attempt to encourage social distancing and minimize the spread of the virus. Only essential businesses have been able to remain open, with non-essential businesses and activities either closing or restricting services. With no group training sessions allowed, canceled matches, an inability to work and the closure of eating establishments, Rugby Union players have experienced disruption to their daily lives. Two surveys were distributed among Rugby Union athletes to explore (1) the influence of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on Rugby Union players' nutrition and training habits and (2) how nutrition habits in New Zealand Rugby Union players change after lockdown restrictions were lifted. In total, 258 respondents completed Survey 1 (84.1% male, 26.4% professional/semi-professional). Of the respondents, 58% indicated they lived with family during lockdown. Total food intake was reported to be higher in 36% of respondents. Fruit and vegetable intake was lower (17%) and packaged/convenience food intake higher (26%) in a minority of respondents. In total, 106 respondents completed Survey 2 (84.9% male, 34.0% professional/semi-professional). Of the respondents, 72% prepared and 67% purchased their own food. Less than half of respondents consumed high-protein food more than twice daily either during or following lockdown. Compared to during lockdown, motivation to train and exercise was greater in 58% of respondents following lockdown. Dieticians and nutritionists within clubs provided most of the nutrition knowledge to athletes however other unreliable sources were identified, such as social media and family members. The ongoing pandemic has presented significant challenges for athletes concerning training and nutrition habits and the current study provides some insight into these. Coaches and performance staff should ensure athletes receive appropriate nutritional and training support whilst being aware of the unique demands the individuals' may face.
Chapter
The aim of the study was to demonstrate a relation between a selected sexual dimorphism ratio, i.e. Digit Ratio (hereinafter referred to as „2D:4D”) and a body structure and physical fitness of Rugby Sevens players. It is claimed that low level of (2D:4D) ratio co-occurs with a high sporting level of a person in a variety of sporting disciplines. Thirty Rugby Sevens of high sporting level took part in the research. The participants of the study included National Senior Team Players, U-19 Polish National Junior Team and KS Tytan Gniezno players who are champions of Greater Poland. The values of 2D:4D ratio for right and left hands were established and height and weight of the participants were measured. Moreover, body compositions of the players were estimated using BIA method. Selected anaerobic fitness tests were also conducted. Photocells were used to measure the running velocity on the five-metre and 20-metre sections. Tendo Weight Lifting Analyser was used to measure power output of lower limbs. Additionally, hand grip strength was measured with a hand grip dynamometer. All the results which were obtained were analysed statistically. The results of the analysis of the material gathered revealed that the team players of particular groups had varied body builds, especially as far as muscle mass and fatty tissue are concerned. However, mean values of exercise stress test indicated similar fitness levels. In certain cases it has been observed that there is high correlation coefficient between the value of dimorphism ratios (2D:4D) and the other values of the body structure and the described fitness elements. Despite not being statistically significant, they can indicate certain trends. The diversity of the level and character of the relation between the variables described has also been noted, which, in the case of similar fitness level, may indicate its being caused by different factors.
Chapter
The purpose of this paper was to analyse the level of motor abilities in terms of strength abilities among the players of premier league for rugby union in Poland as well as defining the relationship between the level of the strength abilities and the sports level of the team. Research material covered 79 players from three teams representing differential sports level which were selected from the Polish rugby premier league. The research included performing antropometric measurements, barbell squat maximal force and power output measurements, having been conducted with the use of Tendo Weightlifting Analyser. It was indicated that the teams placed higher in the premier league were the ones with higher mean body mass of the players, which could have contributed to their scoring higher also in strength ability tests. Moreover, it was confirmed that the forwards have significantly higher body mass than the backs. It appears that the most significant element in training rugby players is the possibility of obtaining high maximal power output of lower limbs, in its both, relative and non-relative aspect as well as force understood in the same context (relative and non-relative one).
Article
Increasing strength levels in an individual is generally not a difficult task. It is important as a strength coach to place a priority on designing conditioning programs that strive to develop the best athlete possible rather than simply developing maximal strength. There are a number of adaptations discussed that can be used to deviate from simply being concerned about increasing strength and instead attempt to focus on improving athletic performance. Because the goal of training should be to develop the best athlete possible and not simply the strongest athlete possible, it is advantageous to integrate these adaptations at appropriate times into the training program.
Article
Objectives: To assess injury patterns and incidence in the Australian Wallabies rugby union players from 1994 to 2000. To compare these patterns and rates with those seen at other levels of play, and to see how they have changed since the beginning of the professional era. Methods: Prospective data were recorded from 1994 to 2000. All injuries to Australian Wallabies rugby union players were recorded by the team doctor. An injury was defined as one that forced a player to either leave the field or miss a subsequent game. Results: A total of 143 injuries were recorded from 91 matches. The overall injury rate was 69/1000 player hours of game play. The injury rates in the periods before (1994–1995) and after (1996–2000) the start of the professional era were 47/1000 player hours and 74/1000 player hours respectively. The lock was the most injured forward, and the number 10 the most injured back. Most injuries were soft tissue, closed injuries (55%), with the head being the most commonly injured region (25.1%). The phase of play responsible for most injuries was the tackle (58.7%). Injuries were more likely to occur in the second half of the game, specifically the third quarter (40%). The vast majority of injuries were acute (90%), with the remainder being either chronic or recurrent. Conclusions: Injury rate increases at higher levels of play in rugby union. Injury rates have increased in the professional era. Most injuries are now seen in the third quarter of the game, a finding that may reflect new substitution laws. There is a need for standardised collection of injury data in rugby union.