Content uploaded by Lea Berrang-Ford
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Lea Berrang-Ford on Jun 02, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Food insecurity in Igloolik, Nunavut: An exploratory study
Food insecurity in Igloolik, Nunavut: An exploratory study
Food insecurity in Igloolik, Nunavut: An exploratory study
James Ford1, Lea Berrang Ford1, Celina Irngaut2, Kevin Qrunnut2
James Ford
James Ford1
1,
, Lea
Lea Berrang
Berrang Ford
Ford1,
1, Celina
Celina Irngaut
Irngaut2
2, Kevin
, Kevin Qrunnut
Qrunnut2
2
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
1. Introduction
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
The research program has been supported by ArcticNet , the Climat
The research program has been supported by ArcticNet, the Climate Change Impacts and
e Change Impacts and
Adaptation Program (CCIAP), and SSHRC. Thanks to community membe
Adaptation Program (CCIAP), and SSHRC. Thanks to communit y members in Igloolik who
rs in Igloolik who
were interviewed for this research.
were interviewed for this research.
References
References
References
Abstract
Food insecurity, or the inability of individuals and households to meet their nutritional
requirements in a culturally acceptable manner, is believed to be widespread among
Inuit communities in Northern Canada. This poster reports on a study conducted in
Igloolik, Nunavut, during summer 2007 to develop a baseline understanding of the
magnitude and prevalence of food insecurity in the community, identify high risk groups
and characterize conditions facilitating and constraining food security. Analysis of the
fifty structured surveys reveals a high prevalence of food insecurity. Females and those
obtaining most of their food from the store at highest risk. Lack of money, price of store
food and other commodities, and expense of hunting were identified as major
constraints to being food secure.
Abstract
Abstract
Food insecurity, or the inability of individuals and households
Food insecurity, or the inability of individuals and households to meet their nutritional
to meet their nutritional
requirements in a culturally acceptable manner, is believed to b
requirements in a culturally acceptable manner, is believed to be widespread among
e widespread among
Inuit communities in Northern Canada. This poster reports on a s
Inuit communities in Northern Canada. This poster reports on a study conducted in
tudy conducted in
Igloolik, Nunavut, during summer 2007 to develop a baseline unde
Igloolik, Nunavut, during summer 2007 to develop a baseline understanding of the
rstanding of the
magnitude and prevalence of food insecurity in the community, id
magnitude and prevalence of food insecurity in the community, identify high risk groups
entify high risk groups
and characterize conditions facilitating and constraining food s
and characterize conditions facilitating and constraining food security. Analysis of the
ecurity. Analysis of the
fifty structured surveys reveals a high prevalence of food insec
fifty structured surveys reveals a high prevalence of food insecurity. Females and those
urity. Females and those
obtaining most of their food from the store at highest risk. Lac
obtaining most of their food from the store at highest risk. Lack of money, price of store
k of money, price of store
food and other commodities, and expense of hunting were identifi
food and other commodities, and expense of hunting were identified as major
ed as major
constraints to being food secure.
constraints to being food secure.
1
1Dept. of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec,
Dept. of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2K6
H3A 2K6 james.ford@mcgill.ca
james.ford@mcgill.ca
2
2Hamlet of Igloolik, Igloolik, Nunavut
Hamlet of Igloolik, Igloolik, Nunavut
2. Objectives
2. Objectives
2. Objectives
4. Results
4. Results
4. Results 5. Discussion
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
Food security exists when
Food security exists when “
“people
people at all times can acquire
at all times can acquire
safe, nutritionally adequate, and culturally acceptable
safe, nutritionally adequate, and culturally acceptable
foods in a manner than maintains human dignity,
foods in a manner than maintains human dignity, ”
”
(
(VanEsterick
VanEsterick, 1999). Food
, 1999). Food in
insecurity occurs when food
security occurs when food
systems are stressed so that food is not accessible,
systems are stressed so that food is not accessible,
available, and/or of sufficient quality. Among Inuit
available, and/or of sufficient quality. Among Inuit
communities there is a high perseverance of food
communities there is a high perseverance of food
insecurity, greatly exceeding the Canadian average
insecurity, greatly exceeding the Canadian average
(
(Ledrou
Ledrou and
and Gervais
Gervais, 2005). Climate change poses new
, 2005). Climate change poses new
risks to
risks to Inuit food systems, which are believed to be
Inuit food systems, which are believed to be
vulnerable (ACIA, 2005).
vulnerable (ACIA, 2005).
The objectives of this research are to
The objectives of this research are to characterize
characterize the
the
prevalence and magnitude of food insecurity in Igloolik,
prevalence and magnitude of food insecurity in Igloolik,
Nunavut;
Nunavut; locate
locate high risk groups; and
high risk groups; and identify
identify and
and
characterize
characterize processes and conditions facilitating and
processes and conditions facilitating and
constraining food security.
constraining food security.
3. Methods and Analysis
3. Methods and Analysis
3. Methods and Analysis
Food security survey
Food security survey
Data were collected using a
Data were collected using a food security survey
food security survey, administered to 50
, administered to 50
participants
participants in 2007. The survey consisted of four main sections with 35
in 2007. The survey consisted of four main sections with 35
close
close-
-ended questions:
ended questions:
Section 1:
Section 1: Respondent characteristics
Respondent characteristics
Section 2:
Section 2: Nature of the Igloolik food system
Nature of the Igloolik food system
Section 3:
Section 3: Food availability in previous year
Food availability in previous year
Section 4:
Section 4: Food security assessment based on a modified version of the
Food security assessment based on a modified version of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture
U.S. Department of Agriculture’
’s Food Security Survey Module (USDA
s Food Security Survey Module (USDA
2007). Questions explored the conditions, experiences and behavi
2007). Questions explored the conditions, experiences and behaviours
ours
that characterize ranges of food insecurity and hunger severity
that characterize ranges of food insecurity and hunger severity
experienced over the past 12 months
experienced over the past 12 months
Analy sis
Analy sis
Responses to the food security questions in section four were
Responses to the food security questions in section four were categorized
categorized
according to severity of food insecurity following procedures ou
according to severity of food insecurity following procedures outlined by the
tlined by the
USDA and illustrated in Table 1. Following classification, chi
USDA and illustrated in Table 1. Following classification, chi-
-squared tests
squared tests
were conducted to assess variation in food security indicators b
were conducted to assess variation in food security indicators by respondent
y respondent
characteristics, using a significance level of 95%. Fischer
characteristics, using a significance level of 95%. Fischer’
’s exact probability
s exact probability
tests were utilized to detect associations where expected cell f
tests were utilized to detect associations where expected cell f requencies
requencies
violated chi
violated chi-
-squared assumptions. Unless otherwise marked, p
squared assumptions. Unless otherwise marked, p-
-values refer
values refer
to chi
to chi-
-squared analyses.
squared analyses.
i). There is a high prevalence of food insecurity in Igloolik:
i). There is a high prevalence of food insecurity in Igloolik: 36% of
36% of
respondents were classed as food secure,
respondents were classed as food secure, 64% as food insecure
64% as food insecure (Table 1)
(Table 1)
12 (24%)Reports of multiple indications of disrupted
eating patterns, reduced food intake, and loss
of weight
Very low food
security
20 (40%)Anxiousness over food sufficiency and
shortages and indication of reduced food
intake.
Low food
security
Food Insecure
12 (24%)One or two reported indications—typically of
anxiety over food sufficiency or shortage of
food in the house. Little or no indication of
changes in diets or food intake
Marginal food
security
6 (12%)No reported indications of food-access
problems or limitations
High food
security
Food Secure
CategoryLabel
Total (%) Igloolik
respondents
Detailed CategoriesGeneral
Category
Table 1: Food security categorization rules and Igloolik survey results
ii). Food insecurity is higher among females:
ii). Food insecurity is higher among females: Females were more likely to
Females were more likely to
be food insecure (p=0.054) (Fig. 1). Women were significantly mo
be food insecure (p=0.054) (Fig. 1). Women were significantly more likely than
re likely than
men to cut the size of their meals or skip meals (p=0.03), go hu
men to cut the size of their meals or skip meals (p=0.03), go hungry due to
ngry due to
lack of food (p=0.05), and not eat for a whole day (p=0.036).
lack of food (p=0.05), and not eat for a whole day (p=0.036).
3. Food security is higher
3. Food security is higher
among those that hunt
among those that hunt
regularly:
regularly: Those who hunt
Those who hunt
regularly were more likely to
regularly were more likely to
be food secure than those
be food secure than those
who never hunt or hunt
who never hunt or hunt
occasionally. 86% of regular
occasionally. 86% of regular
hunters are food secure
hunters are food secure
compared to 30% of non
compared to 30% of non-
-
regular hunters (p=0.010)
regular hunters (p=0.010)
(Fig. 1). Those who regularly
(Fig. 1). Those who regularly
hunt were also significantly
hunt were also significantly
less likely (Fischer exact test)
less likely (Fischer exact test)
to have to cut or skip meals
to have to cut or skip meals
due to lack of food (p=0.012),
due to lack of food (p=0.012),
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Male
Female
Employed
Unemployed
Hunter
Regular
Occassional
Never
>1/2
≤1/2
Sex Job Hunting Traditional food
consumpt ion
Res pondent chara cteris tics
% Food insecure
Low Very low food secure
Fig. 2: Dimensions of food insecurity as they vary by respondent
characteristics, indicating percentage of respondents classified
as having a low food security and very low food security
eat less (p=0.027), or not eat for a whole day (p=0.036) compare
eat less (p=0.027), or not eat for a whole day (p=0.036) compared to non
d to non-
-
regular hunters. For example, no regular hunters reported not ea
regular hunters. For example, no regular hunters reported not eating for a
ting for a
whole day compared to 41% of non
whole day compared to 41% of non-
-regular hunters.
regular hunters.
iii). Prevalence of food insecurity is lower among those who con
iii). Prevalence of food insecurity is lower among those who con sume
sume
traditional foods:
traditional foods: Those who obtain >50% of their food from traditional
Those who obtain >50% of their food from traditional
sources were more likely to be food secure (p=0.032)(Fig. 1). No
sources were more likely to be food secure (p=0.032)(Fig. 1). No respondents
respondents
who obtained >50% of their food from traditional sources were cl
who obtained >50% of their food from traditional sources were cl assed as
assed as
‘
‘very low food security,
very low food security,’
’compared to 32% of those
compared to 32% of those
respondents who obtained
respondents who obtained ≤
≤50%. Consuming traditional
50%. Consuming traditional
foods is associated with
foods is associated with lower prevalence
lower prevalence of severe food
of severe food
insecurity. Respondents who consumed >50% of their food
insecurity. Respondents who consumed >50% of their food
from traditional sources were less likely to have cut or
from traditional sources were less likely to have cut or
skipped meals (p=0.02), have eaten less (p=0.04), or have
skipped meals (p=0.02), have eaten less (p=0.04), or have
not eaten for a whole day due to lack of food (p=0.06). None
not eaten for a whole day due to lack of food (p=0.06). None
of those who obtained >50% of their food from traditional
of those who obtained >50% of their food from traditional
sources reported going a whole day without eating in the
sources reported going a whole day without eating in the
last year, compared to 47% of those who eat half or less.
last year, compared to 47% of those who eat half or less.
iv). Food security differs by occupation: Those who hunt
Those who hunt
for a living are more likely to be food secure than those who
for a living are more likely to be food secure than those who
are employed or unemployed (p=0.008), with all
are employed or unemployed (p=0.008), with all
occupational hunters interviewed classified as food secure
occupational hunters interviewed classified as food secure
compared to 32% of those employed and 26% of
compared to 32% of those employed and 26% of
unemployed (Fig. 1). There are no significant differences in
unemployed (Fig. 1). There are no significant differences in
food security between the employed and unemployed.
food security between the employed and unemployed.
•
•The prevalence of food insecurity in Igloolik is cause for conce
The prevalence of food insecurity in Igloolik is cause for concern
rn
Food studies indicate severe outcomes for poorly nourished peopl
Food studies indicate severe outcomes for poorly nourished people
e (
(Che
Che
and Chen, 2005).
and Chen, 2005).
•
•Traditional food consumption appears to strengthen food security
Traditional food consumption appears to strengthen food security
Traditional foods, in many instances, are economically more acce
Traditional foods, in many instances, are economically more acce ssible than
ssible than
store
store-
-bought foods and more available than nutritious store foods. The
bought foods and more available than nutritious store foods. The
health benefits of consuming traditional foods are widely acknow
health benefits of consuming traditional foods are widely acknowledged in
ledged in
the scientific literature (
the scientific literature (VanOos tdam
VanOostdam, 2005).
, 2005).
Interviews were undertaken with 50 Iglulingmiut, many of which were conducted at
summer hunting camps
•
•Food security is lower among females
Food security is lower among females
A number of explanations for gendered differences are evident, i
A number of explanations for gendered differences are evident, i ncluding
ncluding
lower traditional food consumption among females. Females in the
lower traditional food consumption among females. Females in the study
study
also described cutting or skipping meals to ensure other family
also described cutting or skipping meals to ensure other family members,
members,
particularly children, had access to sufficient food. Females al
particularly children, had access to sufficient food. Females al so noted
so noted
hunting less than males and are therefore more dependent on sour
hunting less than males and are therefore more dependent on sources of
ces of
traditional food from outside the household, exposing them to ch
traditional food from outside the household, exposing them to ch anges or
anges or
stresses in intra
stresses in intra-
-household food sharing networks. Anecdotal evidence
household food sharing networks. Anecdotal evidence
suggests that intra
suggests that intra-
-household sharing (important for females in the survey)
household sharing (important for females in the survey)
is the first to suffer at times of reduced food availability, as
is the first to suffer at times of reduced food availability, as was experienced
was experienced
in fall 2006 (see other Ford et al. poster)
in fall 2006 (see other Ford et al. poster)
Traditional foods are important for a healthy diet
ACIA (2005). Arctic Climate Impacts Assessment, Cambridge Univer
ACIA (2005). Arctic Climate Impacts Assessment , Cambridge University Pres s, Cambridge,
sity Press, Cambridge,
UK.
UK.
Che
Che J, Chen J. (2005). Food insecurity in Canadian households. Heal
J, Chen J. (2005). Food insecurity in Canadian households. Heal th Reports,12(4):1
th Reports,12(4):1-
-12.
12.
Ledrou
Ledrou I,
I, Gervais
Gervais J. (2005). Food Insecurit y. Stats Canada 2005, Catalogue # 8 2
J. (2005). Food Insecurity. St ats Canada 2005, Catalogue # 82 -
-003
003-
-XIE.
XIE.
USDA. (2007). Food Security in t he United States: Conditions and
USDA. (2007). Food Security in t he United States: Conditions and Trends. Available from:
Trends. Available from:
http://
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing /FoodSecurity/trends.htm
www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/FoodSecurity/tr ends.htm
VanEsterik
VanEsterik P. (1999). Right to foo d; right to feed; right to be fed. The i
P. (1999). Right to food; right to feed; right to be fed. The i ntersection of
ntersection of
women
women’
’s rights and the right to food. A gric. and Human Values, 16(225
s rights and the right to food. A gric. and Human Values, 16(225 -
-232).
232).
VanOostdam
VanOostdam J, et al (2005). Human healt h implications of environmental con
J, et al (2005). Human health implications of environmental contaminants in
taminants in
Arctic Canada: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 351:1
Arctic Canada: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 351:165
65-
-246.
246.
Hunting – an important activity and source of nutritious food for Inuit communities