Article

The past as prologue: The development of the ‘direct participation’ exception to civilian immunity

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

The ‘direct participation’ exception to the principle of distinction, found in Article 51(3) of Protocol I and Article 13(2) of Protocol II, embodies a long-recognized concept in the laws governing armed conflict. For centuries the broad notion that humanity demands the protection only of those citizens who are harmless has found expression in the rules and norms relating to war. This article traces the historical factors and trends which influenced the development of the ‘direct participation’ exception in its current form, revealing a tendency towards ‘humanizing’ the law in favour of civilians, notwithstanding their increased military value.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... 3 Para una historia del Derecho y el CAI se puede consultar el texto de Emily Camins (2008), The Past as Prologue: The Development of the 'Direct Participation' Exception to Civilian Immunity. en relación con los conflictos internacionales -tomando en cuenta el contexto situacional del conflicto-se espera que los actores se comporten socialmente de una determinada manera. ...
Article
Full-text available
En situaciones de conflicto armado interno existe un grupo de actores sociales cuyo comportamiento no corresponde al que los bandos en conflicto esperan. No se trata de la población civil considerada víctimadel enfrentamiento y tampoco población involucrada en uno de los bandos en lucha, se trata más bien de funcionarios que tienen que desarrollar tareas relacionadas a la administración estatal —como la educación— en territorios disputados por los contendientes. Este trabajo busca explorar la categoría de actor social silencioso en términos de su comportamiento, además de llamar la atención a la comunidad internacional que se ocupa de los conflictos sobre el actor silencioso. Para ello, el estudio se hacentrado en una institución universitaria durante el período de conflicto armado interno en el Perú (1980-2000). Se ha recurrido a la memoria y testimonio de los actores silenciosos, así como al uso de una perspectiva reflexiva para estudios de este tipo. Este trabajo propone usar la categoría de actor social silencioso caracterizado por el ejercicio de una agencia restringida, pero objeto de presiones constantes por parte de los contendientes enfrentados en el conflicto.
Chapter
This book seeks to clarify the legal concept of proportionality in international humanitarian law, as it applies during armed conflict. It is argued in the book that a refocus of the interpretation of the proportionality rule is warranted to enhance the protection of civilians. More precisely, this book seeks to dissect the origins of the rule, determine how its components must be interpreted and how it is to be applied in practice. The book considers practical situations that may arise in the conduct of military operations and searches for the limits international humanitarian law sets to commanders' assessments of proportionality during armed conflict. The book concludes that proportionality is an inherently subjective and imprecise yardstick that nonetheless serves to protect civilians during armed conflict.
Article
Despite the existence of a definition of civilian status in international humanitarian law (IHL), differences in the application of this definition – both in theory and in practice – continue to be observed. One of the contexts where these differences remain palpable (and do so for various fighting parties) is Afghanistan, a country where civilian harm has remained high for several years. This article explores the legal concepts of civilian and civilian population, including how they have been formed and interpreted and, ultimately, what protection they afford to persons who belong in these categories. The second part of the article brings these questions into the Afghan context, one that is complex and where cultural and religious implications should not be overlooked. Public statements, reports and codes of fighting parties in the country which touch upon civilian status are presented, followed by the civilian experience in Afghanistan, particularly focusing on the reported harm. Ultimately, it is proposed that despite the factual and contextual confusion, the existing legal rules and interpretations, when applied in good faith, suffice to ensure both that those who are civilians under IHL are protected and that the threats which some civilians’ behaviour might pose can be effectively addressed without a status change.
Book
Cambridge Core - Humanitarian Law - Military Necessity - by Nobuo Hayashi
Chapter
Over the past 150 years, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has been one of the main drivers of progressive development in international humanitarian law, whilst assuming various roles in the humanization of the laws of war. With select contributions from international experts, this book critically assesses the ICRC's unique influence in international norm creation. It provides a detailed analysis of the workings of the International Red Cross, Red Crescent Movement and ICRC by addressing the milestone achievements as well as the failures, shortcomings and controversies over time. Crucially, the contributions highlight the lessons to be learnt for future challenges in the development of international humanitarian law. This book will be of particular interest to scholars and students of international law, but also to practitioners working in the field of international humanitarian law at both governmental and non-governmental organizations.
Article
The purpose of this article is to examine the key elements of the legal framework in which naval mines are used both across the spectrum of conflict and during peacetime. The article will also consider the legal issues associated with the use of mines by States in international armed conflict, and address the distinct legal issues which arise in non-international armed conflict, where the emergence of an increasing presence of non-State armed groups has been a hallmark of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The obligations placed upon States in peacetime, and under the law of neutrality, when the use and presence of naval mines is a relevant factor will also be analyzed.
Article
This article analyzes the perceptions of armed groups regarding the concept of civilians in non-international armed conflicts, through their codes of conduct and other commitments. It intends to shed light on the implementation by these non-state actors of the very critical principle of distinction, the exact articulation of is hotly debated in non-international armed conflict. It thus presents the different approaches to the principle of distinction in non-international armed conflict: The specific-act approach, the membership approach, the functional non-privileged combatancy approach, and the direct participation in hostilities with extended temporal scope in light of the commitments and undertakings of various armed groups. It concludes with the findings made on the basis of the study of the commitments made by armed groups, underlying in particular the issues that remain problematic regarding the principle of distinction in non-international armed conflict, as well as the issues on which a consensus in conceivable.
Article
Owing to an unfortunate publisher's error some important corrections were not made to the final proofs. The following corrections apply: Page 856: in the quote from Grotius on the declaration of a public war, the words “a sovereign's” should be in square brackets (i.e. “upon all [a sovereign's] subjects”). Page 857: the discussion of Grotius’ distinction between ‘permissible’ actions and ‘right’ actions should begin “Grotius explicitly distinguished, however, between actions which were ‘permissible’ according to the law of nations …”. Page 868: in the discussion of Risley's analysis, the word “committed” does not require square brackets. Page 879: the final sentence should begin: “This approach, which effectively deprived those who were harmful or who ‘[took] part in the fighting’ …”. © 2010, International Committee of the Red Cross. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
New security threats, which have surfaced in the past few years, are seriously jeopardizing the relevance and implementation of international humanitarian law. This paper investigates the impact of the war on terror on the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law, examining in particular whether the practices of some States, notably the US, have led to the emergence of new rules in relation to the principle of distinction. For this it looks at the principle from two separate, yet correlated, perspectives: a targeting and a detention perspective.
Article
The protection of civilians and their property in war is an accepted norm of international law - even where the putatively "noncombatant" populace openly supports the immoral use of force by its military. NATO's Kosovo operation suggests, however, that the imposition of hardship on the sentient, adult "noncombatant" population through property loss can erode a society's appetite for malevolence. While civilians should not be targeted, a new paradigm for noncombatancy that allows the destruction of certain property currently protected by international law but not absolutely indispensable to civilian survival may well help shorten conflict and effect necessary societal change.
Article
William Shakespeare wrote during the Elizabethan Renaissance, a period of revived and intense interest in history. The Life of Henry the Fifth , written in 1599, one of Shakespeare’s histories, is a patriotic, epic portrayal of a phase in the bloody Hundred Years’ War (1337-1453) between England and France. It describes a medieval campaign led by a chivalrous and virtuous king, who could perhaps do wrong but not a great deal of wrong, and in which the few acting in a just cause defeat the many. In this play, Shakespeare relives past glories.
Article
Inequality in arms, indeed, significant disparity between belligerents, has become a prominent feature of various contemporary armed conflicts. Such asymmetries, albeit not at all a new phenomenon in the field of warfare, no longer constitute a random occurrence of singular battles. As a structural characteristic of modern-day warfare asymmetric conflict structures have repercussions on the application of fundamental principles of international humanitarian law. How, for example, can the concept of military necessity, commonly understood to justify the degree of force necessary to secure military defeat of the enemy, be reconciled with a constellation in which one side in the conflict is from the outset bereft of any chance of winning the conflict militarily? Moreover, military imbalances of this scope evidently carry incentives for the inferior party to level out its inferiority by circumventing accepted rules of warfare. This article attempts tentatively to assess the repercussions this could have on the principle of reciprocity, especially the risk of the instigation of a destabilizing dynamic of negative reciprocity which ultimately could lead to a gradual intensification of a mutual disregard of international humanitarian law.
Article
Continuous transformation of armed conflict since the adoption in 1864 of the first international humanitarian law treaty compels international humanitarian law to adapt accordingly. These adaptations, through either customary law or new multilateral treaties, always have been towards greater protection, greater reach. As for treaty practice, international humanitarian law historically has been substantially revised every twenty-five to thirty years. This article links those revisions to specific conflicts which laid bare deficiencies in the existing law. What follows is thus a chronicle of conflicts with their most critical humanitarian issues. From this emerges a picture of the changing face of armed conflict since the middle of the nineteenth century. The article also considers recent challenges to international humanitarian law and speculates on possible responses.
Article
Examines the IHL concept of direct participation by civilians in hostilities, with particular emphasis on the US experience with contractors and civilian employees. Predated the ICRC's Interpretive Guidance on the subject and was one of the papers informing the workings of the expert group.
Article
Non-combatants and air attack
  • Spaight
The problem of the revision of the law of war
  • Lauterpacht
Use of civilians as human shields: what legal and moral restrictions pertain to a war waged by a democratic state against terrorism?
  • Gross
The status of combatants and the question of guerrilla warfare
  • Draper
The legitimation of violence: a critical history of the laws of war
  • Chris Af
  • Roger Normand
International law: the annual address before the American Bar Association
  • Killowen
Air war and the law of war
  • Parks
Les pratiques de la guerre aérienne dans le conflit de 1914 et le droit des gens
  • Rolland
Legitimate objectives in air warfare
  • Spaight
Civilianizing the force: is the United States crossing the Rubicon?
  • Guillory
The history and evolution of the law of war prior to World War II
  • Noone
Tearing down the facade: a critical look at the current law on targeting the will of the enemy and air force doctrine
  • Meyer
The XXth International Conference of the Red Cross: results in the legal field
  • Pictet
So-called “unprivileged belligerency”: spies, guerrillas and saboteurs
  • Baxter
Book review: An International Law of Guerrilla Warfare: the Global Politics of Law-making
  • Levie