Clinical Microsystems, part 2. Learning from micro practices about providing patients the care they want and need

Center for the Aging, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 09/2008; 34(8):445-52.
Source: PubMed


BACKGROUND: Usual medical care in the United States is frequently not a satisfying experience for either patients or primary care physicians. Whether primary care can be saved and its quality improved is a subject of national concern. An increasing number of physicians are using microsystem principles to radically redesign their practices. Small, independent practices-micro practices-are often able to incorporate into a few people the frontline attributes of successful microsystems such as clear leadership, patient focus, process improvement, performance patterns, and information technology. PATIENT FOCUS, PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, AND PERFORMANCE PATTERNS: An exemplary microsystem will (1) have as its primary purpose a focus on the patient-a commitment to meet all patient needs; (2) make fundamental to its work the study, measurement, and improvement ofcare-a commitment to process improvement; and (3) routinely measure its patterns of performance, "feed back" the data, and make changes based on the data. LESSONS FROM MICRO PRACTICES: The literature and experience with micro practices suggest that they (1) constitute an important group in which to demonstrate the value of microsystem thinking; (2) can become very effective clinical microsystems; (3) can reduce their overhead costs to half that of larger freestanding practices, enabling them to spend more time working with their patients; (4) can develop new tools and approaches without going through layers of clearance; and (5) need not reinvent the wheel. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported data demonstrate how micro practices are using patient focus, process improvement, performance patterns, and information technology to improve performance. Pati ents should be able to report that they receive "exactly the care they want and need exactly when and how they want and need it."

Download full-text


Available from: Paul B. Batalden
  • Source
    • "For the pilot project, it was required that there be a clearly documented plan to transform participating PCPs into PCMHs; however , the detail within the plan was left to the PCPs. One example of a transformational system, made available to PCPs, is the Ideal Medical Practice (IMP) model (Wasson et al., 2008). The IMP model focuses on the experience and perception of the patient, both in terms of care received and the patients' estimation of how they can manage their illness. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical homes and accountable care organizations have become the great hope for many health industry stakeholders and policy makers seeking to reconstitute fragmented healthcare delivery within a coordinated cost-conscious framework. The need to increase coordination has been evident to analysts for many years and, in the past, has resulted in developments such as capitation and disease management. The hope of these reforms is that through changes in risk/reward to providers or by layering in external programs to improve patient coordination the system will improve patient outcomes and reduce total cost. This article describes a pilot project to create a medical home that is built upon changing existing payment incentives but tying these incentives directly to the outcomes of care experienced by patients. It is at variance with most proposals to create medical homes in that it is self-funded, allowing rapid scaling, and is largely agnostic toward the precise practice pattern employed. Put succinctly, it encourages practice patterns that improve patient outcomes without dictating what they should be.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2010 · The Journal of ambulatory care management
  • Source
    • "There is so much to accomplish in the typical office visit. Sometimes in trying to manage a patient's diabetes, high blood pressure, medications,Wasson et al. (2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Institute for Healthcare Improvement has long supported the use of balanced measures to assess improvement among patients at both the individual and the population levels. Although biomedical outcomes and process measures have been widely accepted, patient-reported measures are still not in widespread use. The most common use of such measures is at the population level to gauge satisfaction with care long after it has been provided. This article examines barriers and solutions to including patient-reported measures at the point of care.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2009 · The Journal of ambulatory care management
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient experience of care is now a crucial parameter in assessing the quality of healthcare delivered in the United States. Continuity, patient-driven access to care, and being "known" by a provider or practice, particularly for patients with chronic diseases, have been shown to enhance patient satisfaction with care and health outcomes. Healthcare systems are challenged to effectively meet the wants and needs of patients by tailoring interventions based on each person's unique set factors-his or her strengths, preferences, and personal and social context. Creating care teams, a coordinated multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, enables a practice to take advantage of the skill sets represented and redesign care delivery with the patient and community as the focal point. This article describes the attributes of highly functioning care teams, how to measure them, and guidance on creating them. A case example illustrates how these ideas work in practice.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2009 · The Journal of ambulatory care management
Show more