Article

Geographic variation in epidural steroid injection use in medicare patients

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Center for Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Box 358740, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98127, USA.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 5.28). 08/2008; 90(8):1730-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00858
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The rates of epidural steroid injections have increased dramatically over time, with conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of epidural steroid injections for the treatment of various low-back pain disorders. Given the uncertainty about their role, we sought to evaluate the geographic variation in the use of epidural steroid injections for low back pain within the United States. We also sought to determine whether greater rates of epidural steroid injections are associated with lower rates of lumbar surgery.
We used the 2001 Medicare Physician Part-B claims to examine the geographic variation in the use of epidural steroid injections. Current Procedural Technology codes were used to identify the number of procedures performed as well as the percentage of injections that were fluoroscopically guided. Procedure rates were analyzed with use of several geographic indicators, including state, United States Census Bureau regions (Northeast, South, Midwest, and West), and health referral regions as defined by the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care.
In 2001, there was a 7.7-fold difference between the state with the lowest rate (Hawaii at 5.2 per 1000) and the state with the highest rate (Alabama at 39.9 per 1000). The variation among health referral regions, which are smaller in size, was even greater, with an 18.4-fold difference from 5.6 per 1000 in Honolulu, Hawaii, to 103.6 per 1000 in Palm Springs, California. Higher statewide rates of epidural steroid injections were associated with significantly higher rates of lumbar surgery (p = 0.001). In areas with high injection rates, a significantly higher percentage of patients who sought care for low back pain received injections (p < 0.001). In addition, in areas with high injection rates, a significantly higher percentage of patients who presented with low back pain received both injections and lumbar surgery within the same year (p < 0.001).
There is substantial geographic variation in the rates of epidural steroid injections within the United States. Southern states tend to have the highest procedure rates, whereas northeastern states have the lowest. Injection rates are positively correlated with lumbar surgery rates; therefore, epidural steroid injections do not appear to be substituting for lumbar surgeries or reducing overall rates of lumbar surgery.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Richard Deyo
  • Source
    • "Furthermore, a 50% higher mean number of epidural steroid injections (ESIs) were performed per patient in private practice compared with academic settings [7]. Friedly et al. [4] [5] [8] reported that for Medicare beneficiaries who received an ESI or facet injection from 1995 to 2000, the yearly mean ESI and facet injections performed was 2.5 procedures per patient, those patients who received ESI in the Veterans Administration system from 2001 to 2003 averaged a yearly mean of 1.9 procedures per patient, and that the mean ESI for Medicare beneficiaries who received an ESI in 2001 was 1.6 procedures per patient, with a range of 1 to 40 injections. They also noted that a very small percentage of physicians performed a large number of ESI. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several investigators have identified an explosive increase in spinal injection rates in the Veterans Administration and Medicare populations. Furthermore, utilization of spinal injection procedures appears to vary by geographic location, subspecialty, and practice setting. Medicare claims analysis has shown that a small percentage of physicians perform a disproportionately large number of injections. Although Medicare utilization has been well characterized, the utilization patterns for privately insured individuals are not clearly known.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2011 · The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society
  • Source
    • "MACLAREN JE, KAIN ZN: Development of a brief behavioral intervention for children's anxiety at anesthesia induction. Children's Heath Care; 2008, 37:196-209. 73. "

    Full-text · Article · Jun 2011 · Middle East journal of anaesthesiology
  • Source
    • "Previous studies [3,6] generally included patients aged 65 and older. We have studied all patients enrolled in Medicare who received interventional techniques [2]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (OIG-DHHS) issued a report which showed explosive growth and also raised questions of lack of medical necessity and/or indications for facet joint injection services in 2006.The purpose of the study was to determine trends of frequency and cost of facet joint interventions in managing spinal pain. This analysis was performed to determine trends of frequency and cost of facet jointInterventions in managing spinal pain, utilizing the annual 5% national sample of the Centers forMedicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for 1997, 2002, and 2006.Outcome measures included overall characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries receiving facet joint interventions, utilization of facet joint interventions by place of service, by specialty, reimbursement characteristics, and other variables. From 1997 to 2006, the number of patients receiving facet joint interventions per 100,000Medicare population increased 386%, facet joint visits increased 446%, and facet joint interventions increased 543%. The increases were higher in patients aged less than 65 years compared to those 65 or older with patients increasing 504% vs. 355%, visits increasing 587% vs. 404%, and services increasing 683% vs. 498%.Total expenditures for facet joint interventions in the Medicare population increased from over $229 million in 2002 to over $511 million in 2006, with an overall increase of 123%. In 2006, there was a 26.8-fold difference in utilization of facet joint intervention services in Florida compared to the state with the lowest utilization - Hawaii.There was an annual increase of 277.3% in the utilization of facet joint interventions by general physicians, whereas a 99.5% annual increase was seen for nurse practitioners (NPs) and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) from 2002 to 2006. Further, in Florida, 47% of facet joint interventions were performed by general physicians. The reported explosive growth of facet joint interventions in managing spinal pain in certain regions and by certain specialties may result in increased regulations and scrutiny with reduced access.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2010 · BMC Health Services Research
Show more