A comparative study of protein synthesis in in vitro systems: From the prokaryotic reconstituted to the eukaryotic extract-based

New England Biolabs, 240 County Road, Ipswich, MA 01938, USA.
BMC Biotechnology (Impact Factor: 2.03). 02/2008; 8(1):58. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-8-58
Source: PubMed


Cell-free protein synthesis is not only a rapid and high throughput technology to obtain proteins from their genes, but also provides an in vitro platform to study protein translation and folding. A detailed comparison of in vitro protein synthesis in different cell-free systems may provide insights to their biological differences and guidelines for their applications.
Protein synthesis was investigated in vitro in a reconstituted prokaryotic system, a S30 extract-based system and a eukaryotic system. Compared to the S30 system, protein synthesis in the reconstituted system resulted in a reduced yield, and was more cold-sensitive. Supplementing the reconstituted system with fractions from a size-exclusion separation of the S30 extract significantly increased the yield and activity, to a level close to that of the S30 system. Though protein synthesis in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems showed no significant differences for eukaryotic reporter proteins, drastic differences were observed when an artificial fusion protein was synthesized in vitro. The prokaryotic systems failed to synthesize and correctly fold a significant amount of the full-length fusion protein, even when supplemented with the eukaryotic lysate. The active full-length fusion protein was synthesized only in the eukaryotic system.
The reconstituted bacterial system is sufficient but not efficient in protein synthesis. The S30 system by comparison contains additional cellular factors capable of enhancing protein translation and folding. The eukaryotic translation machinery may have evolved from its prokaryotic counterpart in order to translate more complex (difficult-to-translate) templates into active proteins.

Download full-text


Available from: PubMed Central · License: CC BY
    • "Inexpensive preparation and high expression yields enable it to be used broadly, including such challenging applications as industrial-scale production of pharmaceutical proteins (Zawada et al., 2011). However, in keeping with the differences in pro-and eukaryotic biology, the E. coli cell-free system often generates eukaryotic multidomain proteins in truncated or aggregated form (Hillebrecht and Chong, 2008). Therefore, solubility tags have been used to reduce product aggregation (Aceti et al., 2015; Ahn et al., 2011) and the incubation temperature is lowered (Terada et al., 2014) to increase the proportion of full-length products. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last half a century, a range of cell-free protein expression systems based on pro- and eukaryotic organisms havehas been developed and have found a range of applications, from structural biology to directed protein evolution. While it is generally accepted that significant differences in performance among systems exist, there is a paucity of systematic experimental studies supporting this notion. Here, we took advantage of the Species- Independent Translation Initiation sequence to express and characterise 88 N-terminallyterminaly GFP- tagged human cytosolic proteins of different sizes in E. coli, wheat germWheat Germ (WGE),), HeLa and Leishmania-based (LTE) cell-free systems. Using a combination of single- molecule fluorescence spectroscopy, SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis we assessedas assess the expression yields, the fraction of full- length translation product and its aggregation propensity for each of these systems. Our results demonstrate that the E. coli system has the highest expression yields. However, we observe that high expression levels are accompanied by production of truncated species— particularly pronounced in the case of proteins larger than 70 kDa. Furthermore, proteins produced in the E. coli system display high aggregation propensity, with only 10% of tested proteins being produced in predominantly monodispersed form. The WGE system was the most productive among eukaryotic systemssystem tested. Finally, HeLa and LTE show comparable protein yields that are considerably lower than the ones achieved in the E. coli and WGE systems. The protein products produced in the HeLa system display slightly higher integrity, while the LTE- produced proteins have the lowest aggregation propensity among the systems analysed. The high quality of HeLa- and LTE-produced proteins enable their analysis without purification and make them suitable for analysis of multi-domain eukaryotic proteins. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
    No preview · Article · Aug 2015 · Biotechnology and Bioengineering
  • Source
    • "Table 1 systematically compares the PURE system with a commercialized E. coli crude extract CFPS (the 5 PRIME RTS system). The ribosome concentration is ∼2.4 µM in the PURE system and ∼1.6 µM in the crude extract system, The PURE system's productivity as measured by the yield of active firefly luciferase is 3 fold lower [19] while its cost is ∼4 times higher per gram of protein produced than those of the crude extract system. Additionally, the PURE system's preparation procedure, which involves multiple column based purifications, is more labor and time consuming than the preparation of crude extract system. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cell-free RNA and protein synthesis (CFPS) is becoming increasingly used for protein production as yields increase and costs decrease. Advances in reconstituted CFPS systems such as the Protein synthesis Using Recombinant Elements (PURE) system offer new opportunities to tailor the reactions for specialized applications including in vitro protein evolution, protein microarrays, isotopic labeling, and incorporating unnatural amino acids. In this study, using firefly luciferase synthesis as a reporter system, we improved PURE system productivity up to 5 fold by adding or adjusting a variety of factors that affect transcription and translation, including Elongation factors (EF-Ts, EF-Tu, EF-G, and EF4), ribosome recycling factor (RRF), release factors (RF1, RF2, RF3), chaperones (GroEL/ES), BSA and tRNAs. The work provides a more efficient defined in vitro transcription and translation system and a deeper understanding of the factors that limit the whole system efficiency.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · PLoS ONE
  • Source
    • "Cell-free protein expression is a rapid and highthroughput technology used to express proteins from the genes of interest by involving cell-free lysate from an Escherichia coli cell, rabbit reticulocytes, or wheat germ as the protein translation machinery. Cell-free systems have been used extensively for studies on translational control and protein production (Laxminarayana et al., 2002; Szamecz et al., 2008) at mg per mL levels (Hillebrecht and Chong, 2008). It has several applications including proteomics, protein folding and amino acid functional studies. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The protective efficacy of oral delivery and intramuscular (i.m.) injection of a recombinant protein, rVP28 derived from white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and synthesized using wheat germ cell-free technology was investigated in kuruma shrimp (Marsupenaeus japonicus). Shrimps were administered with the unpurified rVP28 and challenged with WSSV. Expression of innate immune-related genes was examined in intestine, heart, and lymphoid organ at 1, 3 and 7 days after oral- administration. Shrimps received rVP28 protein through i.m. injection or oral route and then challenged with WSSV displayed higher survival (90 and 85.7%, respectively) compared to the respective control groups. A significant up-regulation (P<0.01) of innate immune-related genes, such as Rab7, penaeidin, lysozyme and crustin, was noticed in orally treated shrimps. Our results indicate that this recombinant protein could elevate immune responses and protection in kuruma shrimp and therefore would have potential utility against WSSV infection in shrimp aquaculture.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2014 · Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Show more