Article

Differences in long-term fixation between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prostheses at ten to 12 years' follow-up: A single-blinded randomised controlled radiostereometric trial

Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, P.O. Box 9600, Postzone J-11-S 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
The Bone & Joint Journal (Impact Factor: 3.31). 10/2012; 94B(10). DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B10.28858

ABSTRACT

This single-blinded randomised controlled trial investigated whether one design of mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacement (TKR) has any advantage over a fixed-bearing (FB) design on long-term fixation as measured by radiostereometry. The amount of wear underneath the mobile bearing was also evaluated. A series of 42 knees was randomised to MB or FB tibial components with appropriate polyethylene inserts and followed for between ten and 12 years, or until the death of the patient. The polyethylene in the MB group was superior in that it was gamma-irradiated in inert gas and was calcium-stearate free; the polyethylene in the FB group was gamma-irradiated in air and contained calcium stearate. In theory this should be advantageous to the wear rate of the MB group. At final follow-up the overall mean migration was 0.75 mm (sd 0.76) in the MB group and 0.66 mm (sd 0.4) in the FB group, with the FB group demonstrating more posterior tilt and the MB group more internal rotation. In the FB group there was one revision for aseptic loosening, but none in the MB group. There were no significant differences in clinical or radiological scores. For the MB group, the mean linear wear rate on the under-surface was 0.026 mm/year (sd 0.014). This was significantly smaller than the wear rate of 0.11 mm/year (sd 0.06) in the MB between femur and polyethylene (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, even in a best-case setting the mobile bearings of this TKR design had no apparent advantage in terms of fixation over the FB knee prosthesis at ten to 12 years. The wear underneath the mobile bearing was small and is unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Edward R Valstar
  • Source
    • "In vivo, posterior condylar translation and tibial axial rotation in flexion have been shown to be similar in patients with MB-TKA and FB-TKA[26]. For function78910, radiological outcome[8,11]and quality of life[7]generally no significant differences between both types of TKA were reported, although one meta-analysis did find lower pain scores in MB-TKA[27]. Furthermore, there are indications of an interaction with age, as younger patients tended to show better outcomes for the MB-TKA[13]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: New insert types have been developed to improve clinical and functional outcome in mobile bearing (MB-TKA) and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty (FB-TKA). A prospective single blinded randomised controlled clinical trial was performed to evaluate 2 types of MB-TKA inserts and 2 types of FB-TKA inserts of the Genesis II prosthesis (Smith & Nephew) in 146 patients with 5-years follow-up. A significant difference (P=.042) between the MB-TKA inserts was found in KSS function scores, but clinical significance is expected to be limited. Goniometry, temporal gait parameters and QoL were similar in all groups. Survival was significantly better (P=.047) for FB-TKA. The comparable outcome and higher revision rate in MB-TKA indicate that FB-TKA may be preferential for the Genesis II implant system. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · The Journal of Arthroplasty
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Knee wear is commonly measured with the most recent radiograph based on the assumption that wear progresses at a constant rate. Changing patient activity or in vivo polyethylene deterioration are examples of factors that could cause wear rates to change over time. Using six or more radiographs on each of 251 knees over a mean 10-year follow-up, we determined the pattern of polyethylene wear. 92% of knees had linear wear with a mean wear rate of 0.09±0.12 mm/yr. Ten knees (4%) had late accelerated wear. Knees with accelerated wear and those with a wear rate of 0.15 mm/yr or greater had lower survivorship rates. We conclude that wear is linear with rare exceptions and that higher wear is correlated with failure.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2013 · The Journal of arthroplasty
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fixed bearing (FB) total knee replacement is a well established technique against which new techniques must be compared. Mobile bearing (MB) prostheses, in theory, reduce polyethylene wear but the literature is yet to provide evidence that they are superior in terms of function or long-term survivorship. In addition there has been no comparison of patella resurfacing on the outcome of either design. The aims of this randomised prospective study were firstly to determine whether a mobile bearing prosthesis produced better clinical outcome and range of motion at two year follow-up and secondly to assess the effect of patella resurfacing on the outcomes of both types of bearing design. Three hundred fifty-two patients were randomised into receiving either a PFC Sigma© cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasty either with a mobile bearing or a fixed bearing, with a sub-randomisation to either patella resurfacing or patella retention. All patients participated with standard clinical outcome measures and had their range of motion measured both pre-operatively and at follow-up. The mobile bearing TKR design had no impact on range of motion; Oxford Knee Score and American Knee Society knee and function scores when compared to its fixed bearing equivalent. At two year follow-up there was no difference between the PFC Sigma© fixed and mobile bearing designs. With no clinical difference between the cohorts, we cannot recommend one design over the other. Long term benefits, particularly with regards to polyethylene wear, may yet be demonstrated. Level of evidence - 1B.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2013 · The Knee
Show more