ArticlePDF Available

A method for detector description exchange among ROOT GEANT4 and GEANT3

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

GEANT3 and GEANT4 are the detector simulation software programs that are widely used in most nuclear and particle physics experiments. ROOT is a program for framework, data analysis, online and offline software. Detector description is an important function in all these programs. Due to different detector construction methods and respective detector data representative, it is difficult to exchange the detector data among them. A new method based on GDML is developed to automatically convert the detector data among ROOT, GEANT4 and GEANT3. Any existing detector geometry in one program can be mapped to the geometry in the other two programs. In the software development of an experiment, different applications can share and reuse the same detector description. The application of this method in the PHENIX experiment upgrade and PHENIX Forward Vertex Silicon detector design is introduced.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Chinese Physics C (HEP & NP) Vol. 32, No. 7, Jul., 2008
A method for detector description exchange among
ROOT GEANT4 and GEANT3*
YOU Zheng-Yun(cxm)1,2;1) LIANG Yu-Tie(ùc)1MAO Ya-Jun(kæ)1;2)
1 (School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
2 (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA)
Abstract GEANT3 and GEANT4 are the detector simulation software programs that are widely used in
most nuclear and particle physics experiments. ROOT is a program for framework, data analysis, online and
offline software. Detector description is an important function in all these programs. Due to different detector
construction methods and respective detector data representative, it is difficult to exchange the detector data
among them. A new method based on GDML is developed to automatically convert the detector data among
ROOT, GEANT4 and GEANT3. Any existing detector geometry in one program can be mapped to the
geometry in the other two programs. In the software development of an experiment, different applications can
share and reuse the same detector description. The application of this method in the PHENIX experiment
upgrade and PHENIX Forward Vertex Silicon detector design is introduced.
Key words detector description, GDML, GEANT3, GEANT4, ROOT
PACS 07.05.Tp, 07.05.Fb
1 Introduction
GEANT3[1], GEANT4[2] and ROOT[3] are soft-
ware programs that are widely used in nuclear
and particle physics experiments all over the world.
GEANT is a system of detector description and sim-
ulation tool that helps physicists to design and opti-
mize the detectors, develop and test the reconstruc-
tion and analysis programs, and interpret the exper-
iment data. The FORTRAN based GEANT3 was
developed by CERN from 1982 to 1994, and was
used in simulation programs of many experiments
like CDF, STAR and Pioneering High Energy Nuclear
Interaction eXperiment (PHENIX). The C++ based
GEANT4 with more powerful functions is developed
since 1999. ROOT is also developed by CERN to
meet the software requirement of the next generation
data analysis in experiments like the Large Hadron
Collider (LHC). With the development of object-
oriented technology, the C++ based ROOT is being
used for framework, online and offline software in all
major high energy and nuclear physics laboratories
around the world, to monitor, store and analyze data.
Detector description is one of the most impor-
tant tasks in simulation tools like GEANT. In Monte
Carlo calculations of GEANT, a detector should be
described precisely and closely enough to reality, so
as to better simulate the response of the detectors to
the experimental conditions. The geometrical struc-
ture and properties of all the components of detectors
must be specified in detail. The specifications are of-
ten provided through function calls in the language
of the software libraries being used (FORTRAN for
GEANT3 and C++ for GEANT4). The detector
data exchange between GEANT3 and GEANT4 is
difficult since they are based on different computer
languages. Usually codes need to be rewritten while
upgrading from GEANT3 to GEANT4. Rewriting
source code is not only a large amount of work for
complex detectors, but also difficult to keep consis-
tent in these two sets of description.
Detector description is also necessary in the re-
construction programs of online and offline software.
To reconstruct the original tracks from the digital sig-
nal output, positions of the detecting units should be
known. Some more questions like “In which volume
is a given point?” and “Where is the boundary of a
volume?” should be answered. Mathematical calcu-
Received 21 September 2007
*Supported by NSFC (10675004, 10375002) and Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China
1) E-mail: youzy@hep.pku.edu.cn
2) E-mail: maoyj@hep.pku.edu.cn
572 — 575
No. 7 YOU Zheng-Yun et alµA method for detector description exchange among ROOT GEANT4 and GEANT3 573
lations to resolve the coordinate transformation and
boundary search of the units are usually defined by
the code developers. However, for complex detectors
with many levels of structure or detector units with
irregular shapes, this task becomes difficult. A new
ROOT geometry package[4] with geometrical mode-
ling capabilities has been developed in the ROOT
framework since its 3.14 version. The architecture of
this modeler is a combination between a GEANT-like
containment scheme and a normal constructive solid
geometry (CSG) binary tree at the level of shapes.
The ROOT geometry package helps developers to
construct complex detectors and provides many func-
tions to support geometry service in reconstruction
software.
In the software development of an experiment, de-
tector description is used in different applications like
simulation, reconstruction, visualization, alignment
and physics analysis. It is natural that only one set of
detector description should be shared and reused for
all applications so as to keep them consistent in an
experiment. One example is that the reconstruction
software processes both the simulation data and the
real data. The share of geometry between the simula-
tion and reconstruction software can reduce the sys-
tematic error that is brought by two sets of detector
description, so it is more reliable to compare the sim-
ulation data and the reconstruction data, especially
for complex detectors. However, in most experiments,
detector is described separately for each application.
Because of different construction methods and differ-
ent computer languages dependency, there is no effi-
cient way to exchange the detector description among
these software programs.
2 Detector description exchange with
GDML
GDML (Geometry Description Markup Langu-
age)[5] is an XML (eXtensible Markup Language)[6]
based detector description language, which is devel-
oped by CERN and is particularly for GEANT4. All
necessary information to describe a detector is pro-
vided through a set of “tags” and “attributes” that
are parsed and passes through the code that provides
the Monte Carlo function calls in the proper formats.
The GDML description files are human readable and
plaintext which is editable by any ordinary text edi-
tor. GDML is platform (Windows or Linux or other
operating systems) independent and language (FOR-
TRAN or C++ or other languages) independent; it
provides an efficient way to use a common source of
information for different programs so long as the cor-
responding interfaces are developed.
A method based on GDML is developed to man-
age the detector description data and exchange them
among different programs. We develop an interface
from GDML to ROOT geometry package and ex-
pand the functions of the GDML-GEANT4 interface
to support more complex shapes. The GDML files
can be read by GEANT4 to construct the detector
geometry for simulation, and at the same time, these
files can be read by ROOT to construct the detector
in ROOT for reconstruction, event display, analysis
and other ROOT-based applications. On the other
hand, the reverse conversion is also realized. For an
existing detector model that is already described with
GEANT4 or ROOT detector construction codes, the
GDML interfaces provide the functions to export the
detector data from GEANT4 or ROOT program to
GDML files, so as to reuse them in other programs.
GDML uses the XERCES-C++ parser and C++
code for producing the code syntax. The category
tags for parsing include:
(1) hnamespaceito set the fields where GDML is
used;
(2) hdefineito set values like constant, position
and rotation;
(3) hmaterialsito specify all medium and materi-
als used in detector;
(4) hsolidsito describe more than 20 kinds of basic
shapes and complex Boolean shapes;
(5) hstructureito build the whole detector with
tree structure, by connecting a volume with its shape,
material, children volumes and mother volume.
Each time a tag is read, the GDML-ROOT in-
terface calls the corresponding definition or construc-
tion function in ROOT. When the file is completely
read in, the whole detector is constructed in appli-
cation as ROOT objects at the same time. The
GDML-GEANT4 interface works in a similar way.
The GDML detector description is program indepen-
dent; those who prepare the description files do not
need to know the functions in GEANT4 or ROOT.
So long as the GDML description file is provided,
the interface can automatically construct the detec-
tor in GEANT4 or ROOT’s respective construction
method. Automatic conversion not only reduces by
large amount the work of developers, but also guar-
antees the consistency of detector description in dif-
ferent applications.
For some large nuclear and particle physics experi-
ments that have already run several years, the simula-
tion programs were usually developed with GEANT3.
Sometimes there is a requirement to upgrade the
simulation program to GEANT4. A method to use
the existing GEANT3-based detector description for
the GEANT4-based or ROOT-based application is
also found. GEANT3 has the functions to export
the whole detector information, including structures,
574 Chinese Physics C (HEP & NP) Vol. 32
shapes, materials and volumes to a zebra-format file,
or to import the detector information from a zebra
format file. With the function “g2root”, which is
provided in the new ROOT geometry package, the ze-
bra file that contains the existing GEANT3 detector
information can be converted to the ROOT geome-
try representative. The GDML-ROOT interface has
the ability to transform the ROOT representative to
the GDML file and then the GDML file can be read
through the GDML-GEANT4 interface to construct
the detector in GEANT4, in which the detector de-
scription keeps exactly the same as that in GEANT3.
The upgrading from GEANT3 to GEANT4 is easily
achieved without rewriting the detector construction
codes in GEANT4.
The chain to exchange the detector description
data among GEANT3, GEANT4, ROOT and GDML
is shown in Fig. 1. All conversions are automatically
realized. The existing geometry in one program can
be mapped to representative in other programs and
can be reused in different applications.
Fig. 1. Chain to exchange the detector descrip-
tion among GEANT3, GEANT4, ROOT and
GDML.
3 Applications in PHENIX experi-
ment
We first successfully used the GDML-based de-
tector description in the software of BES0ex-
periment, for the GEANT4-based simulation and
ROOT-based reconstruction, event display and data
analysis[7]. Here we introduce how this method is
used in PHENIX[8], which is a high energy physics
experiment running on RHIC (Relativistic Heavy Ion
Collider) at Brookhaven National Laboratory. The
physics goals of PHENIX experiment include the
study of the attributes of nuclear matter under ex-
treme hot and dense conditions and spin structure of
nucleon. PHENIX project began in 1993 and started
collecting data in 2001.
3.1 Simulation upgrade from GEANT3 to
GEANT4
During the early stage of the PHENIX software
development in the 1990s, GEANT3 was the most
popular simulation tool and was used for PHENIX
simulation program. With GEANT4 fully developed
and being used in many particle experiments in recent
years, there is an intention to upgrade the PHENIX
simulation tool from GEANT3 to GEANT4. The
conversion from the GEANT3-based detector descrip-
tion to the GEANT4-based simulation program is
first tested in the forward detectors of PHENIX.
In the forward direction, PHENIX has four sub-
detectors installed, namely, the Muon Tracker, the
Muon Identifier, the Magnet and the Muon Pis-
ton Calorimeter, and two sub-detectors in upgrade,
namely, the Forward Vertex Silicon detector and the
Nose Cone Calorimeter. The current PHENIX sim-
ulation program has these six sub-detectors with de-
scription in the GEANT3 detector construction func-
tions. With the chain shown in Fig. 1, all information
of the forward detector is exported to a zebra format
file, and then it is converted to ROOT description
and exported in GDML format. Fig. 2 shows the
PHENIX forward detector converted from GEANT3
description. The detector is displayed with ROOT
OpenGL graphic engine.
Fig. 2. The PHENIX Forward Detector dis-
played with ROOT OpenGL graphic engine.
In the GEANT4-based new simulation program,
the detector construction is easily realized by import-
ing the GDML file with the GDML-GEANT4 inter-
face. Names of all definitions, solids, logical volumes
and physical volumes are kept the same as those in
the GEANT3 program. Copy numbers of physical
volumes are also kept. It is convenient for the devel-
opers to use this information in the following steps
of simulation like digitization, in a similar way that
they once used in GEANT3. The detector descrip-
tion in the new GEANT4-based simulation program
also keeps exactly the same as the one in the old
GEANT3-based simulation program, which is guar-
anteed by the fully automatic conversion method.
3.2 ROOT geometry for reconstruction
ROOT has been used in PHENIX since its early
version (v2.03). There was no geometry package in
ROOT at that time; most of the functions in geome-
try service of reconstruction were realized by the de-
velopers. Without the support from a detector mod-
eling system, the developers had to use approximate
description for some complex detectors and many ge-
ometry related functions required a lot of work. In
No. 7 YOU Zheng-Yun et alµA method for detector description exchange among ROOT GEANT4 and GEANT3 575
the latest version (v5.14) of ROOT that is used in
PHENIX software, implementation of the new geom-
etry package makes it convenient to develop geometry
service in a more precise and more efficient way.
From the detector description converted from
GEANT3, detector is already constructed in ROOT.
All that developers need to do is to retrieve the infor-
mation from this description and ROOT offers a lot of
useful functions to realize it. For example, boundary
searching is a main function that is used in recon-
struction to judge whether a point is inside one vol-
ume or not. As shown in Fig. 3, for a silicon sensor
sector in the disk of forward vertex sub-detector, the
previous method to judge its boundary was to define
the range of values on rand φdirections. However,
this is only approximate description since the actual
shape of the sensor is trapezoid. ROOT provides the
function “Contains” to judge any complex shape’s
boundary, which is more precise and is easier to use.
Defining coordinates transformation function is an-
other hard wok for developers, because tree structure
detector description usually creates a lot of levels of
coordinates. ROOT also provides a function to easily
transform the position of a point to any level of co-
ordinate in the detector tree. Another useful ROOT
function is volumes overlap checking, which helps to
find the description bugs that may lead to error de-
tector response in PHENIX simulation. By using the
ROOT geometry package, the geometry service de-
sign in reconstruction becomes easier, but more pre-
cise and more robust.
Fig. 3. Approximate boundary definition for a
silicon sensor trapezoid.
3.3 Optimization in new sub-detector design
The method of exchanging the detector descrip-
tion between GEANT and ROOT is especially use-
ful in the optimization of the design for a new sub-
detector. The Forward Vertex Silicon detector, as
is shown in Fig.4, is a new sub-detector to be in-
stalled on PHENIX for precise vertex measurement.
The structure of this sub-detector is under design and
changes frequently. There are different versions of
geometry of this sub-detector in simulation program.
But it is difficult for the reconstruction geometry ser-
vice to be updated and keep step with the changes all
the time. By converting the GEANT3 detector data
to ROOT, the reconstruction geometry service auto-
matically keeps consistent with the simulation with-
out modifying the source code. The source code only
works on “index” of detector units. All geometry in-
formation of the units, including position, rotation,
shape and material, are retrieved from the detector
description file using the index. Different versions of
detector design can exist at the same time so long as
correct version of detector file is designated as the in-
put of reconstruction geometry service. This method
makes it easy to optimize the detector design by com-
paring the detector performance after reconstruction.
Fig. 4. The vertex silicon detector design in PHENIX.
4 Summary
In nuclear and particle physics experiments, de-
tector description is used in many applications.
GDML is a very convenient and efficient tool for
describing and managing the geometry of complex de-
tectors. A method to exchange the detector descrip-
tion data among GEANT3, GEANT4 and ROOT is
realized, which reduces by a large amount the work
of the developers. This method provides an easy
way to share the detector description among differ-
ent software programs and helps the optimization of
the design for a new detector.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the collabora-
tion and cooperation of the Offline Software Group
of the PHENIX experiment, especially the PHENIX
Group in Los Alamos National Laboratory for work-
ing on the forward vertex detector upgrade.
References
1 CERN Program Library Long Write up W5013. CERN,
1993
2 Agostinelli S et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2003, 506:
250
3 Brun R, Rademakers F. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 1997,
389: 81
4 Brun R et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2003, 502: 676
5 Chytracek R et al. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 2007, 53:
2892(Part 2)
6 http://www.w3.org/XML/
7 YOU Z Y et al. Using GDML for Detector Description in
BES0Experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, to be pub-
lished
8 Adcox K et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2003, 499: 469
... The inclusive Monte Carlo (MC) sample and signal MC sample simulated data samples produced with a geant4-based [37] software package, which includes the geometric description of the BESIII detector [38][39][40] and the detector response, are used to determine detection JHEP04(2025)061 efficiencies and to estimate the background contributions. The simulation models the beam energy spread and initial state radiation in the e + e − annihilations with the generator kkmc [41,42]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A bstract Based on a data sample of (10087 ± 44) × 10 ⁶ J / ψ events taken with the BESIII detector, we search for the flavor-changing neutral current charmonium decay J / ψ → D ⁰ μ ⁺ μ − + c.c. . No significant signal above the background is observed, and the upper limit on its branching fraction is set to be ℬ( J / ψ → D ⁰ μ ⁺ μ − + c.c.) < 1.1 × 10 − 7 at the 90% confidence level. This marks the first search for a flavor-changing neutral current charmonium decay involving muons in the final state.
... The inclusive Monte Carlo (MC) sample and signal MC sample simulated data samples produced with a geant4-based [37] software package, which includes the geometric description of the BESIII detector [38][39][40] and the detector response, are used to determine detection efficiencies and to estimate the background contributions. The simulation models the beam energy spread and initial state radiation in the e + e − annihilations with the generator kkmc [41,42]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Based on a data sample of (10087±44)×106(10087 \pm 44) \times 10^6 J/ψJ/\psi events taken with the BESIII detector, we search for the flavor-changing neutral current charmonium decay J/ψD0μ+μ+c.c.J/\psi \to D^{0} \mu^{+} \mu^{-} + \text{c.c.}. No significant signal above the background is observed, and the upper limit on its branching fraction is set to be B(J/ψD0μ+μ+c.c.)<1.1×107\mathcal{B}(J/\psi \to D^{0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} + \text{c.c.} ) < 1.1 \times 10^{-7} at the 90% confidence level. This marks the first search for a flavor-changing neutral current charmonium decay involving muons in the final state.
... Simulated data samples, generated with a geant4based [35] Monte Carlo (MC) package [36] that includes the geometric description of the BESIII detector [37][38][39] and the detector response, are utilized to determine detection efficiencies and to estimate backgrounds. The simulation models the beam energy spread and initial state radiation in e + e − annihilations with the generator kkmc [40,41]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Using (2712.4±14.3)×106(2712.4\pm14.3)\times10^{6} ψ(3686)\psi(3686) events collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider, the decay ηcγγ\eta_c\to\gamma\gamma in J/ψγηcJ/\psi\to\gamma\eta_c is observed for the first time. We determine the product branching fraction B(J/ψγηc)×B(ηcγγ)=(5.23±0.26stat.±0.30syst.)×106\mathcal{B}(J/\psi\to\gamma\eta_c)\times\mathcal{B}(\eta_c\to\gamma\gamma)=(5.23\pm0.26_{\rm{stat.}}\pm0.30_{\rm{syst.}})\times10^{-6}. This result is well consistent with the LQCD calculation (5.34±0.16)×106(5.34\pm0.16)\times10^{-6} from HPQCD in 2023. By using the world-average values of B(J/ψγηc)\mathcal{B}(J/\psi\to\gamma\eta_c) and the total decay width of ηc\eta_c, the partial decay width Γ(ηcγγ)\Gamma(\eta_c\to\gamma\gamma) is determined to be (11.30±0.56stat.±0.66syst.±1.14ref.) keV(11.30\pm0.56_{\rm{stat.}}\pm0.66_{\rm{syst.}}\pm1.14_{\rm{ref.}})~\rm{keV}, which deviates from the corresponding world-average value by 3.4σ3.4\sigma.
... In the design of an event display software, three basic elements are necessary, detector geometry, event data, visualization and control of them through GUI (Graphical User Interface). For applications such as simulation, calibration, reconstruction and event display, SNiPER provides a common Event Data Model [9] for data I/O and a consistent Detector Description for all applications where geometry service [10,11] is used. ...
Preprint
An event display software SERENA has been designed for the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO). The software has been developed in the JUNO offline software system and is based on the ROOT display package EVE. It provides an essential tool to display detector and event data for better understanding of the processes in the detectors. The software has been widely used in JUNO detector optimization, simulation, reconstruction and physics study.
... Simulated samples generated with geant4-based [32] Monte Carlo (MC) software, which includes the geometric description of the BESIII detector and the detector response performance [28,33,34], are used to determine detection efficiencies and to estimate potential background contributions. The simulation describes the beam energy spread and the initial state radiation (ISR) in the e + e − annihilations with the generator kkmc [35,36]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A bstract Using e ⁺ e − annihilation data sets corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb − 1 , collected with the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies between 4.600 and 4.699 GeV, we report the first measurements of the absolute branching fractions B(Λc+pKL0) \mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to p{K}_L^0\right) B Λ c + → p K L 0 = (1.67 ± 0.06 ± 0.04)%, B(Λc+pKL0π+π) \mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to p{K}_L^0{\pi}^{+}{\pi}^{-}\right) B Λ c + → p K L 0 π + π − = (1.69 ± 0.10 ± 0.05)%, and B(Λc+pKL0π0) \mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to p{K}_L^0{\pi}^0\right) B Λ c + → p K L 0 π 0 = (2.02 ± 0.13 ± 0.05)%, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. Combining with the known branching fractions of Λc+pKS0 {\Lambda}_c^{+}\to p{K}_S^0 Λ c + → p K S 0 , Λc+pKS0π+π {\Lambda}_c^{+}\to p{K}_S^0{\pi}^{+}{\pi}^{-} Λ c + → p K S 0 π + π − , and Λc+pKS0π0 {\Lambda}_c^{+}\to p{K}_S^0{\pi}^0 Λ c + → p K S 0 π 0 , we present the first measurements of the KS0 {K}_S^0 K S 0 - KL0 {K}_L^0 K L 0 asymmetries R(Λc+,KS,L0X)=B(Λc+KS0X)B(Λc+KL0X)B(Λc+KS0X)+B(Λc+KL0X) R\left({\Lambda}_c^{+},{K}_{S,L}^0X\right)=\frac{\mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to {K}_S^0X\right)-\mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to {K}_L^0X\right)}{\mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to {K}_S^0X\right)+\mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to {K}_L^0X\right)} R Λ c + K S , L 0 X = B Λ c + → K S 0 X − B Λ c + → K L 0 X B Λ c + → K S 0 X + B Λ c + → K L 0 X in charmed baryon decays: R(Λc+,pKS,L0)=0.025±0.031 R\left({\Lambda}_c^{+},p{K}_{S,L}^0\right)=-0.025\pm 0.031 R Λ c + p K S , L 0 = − 0.025 ± 0.031 , R(Λc+,pKS,L0π+π)=0.027±0.048 R\left({\Lambda}_c^{+},p{K}_{S,L}^0{\pi}^{+}{\pi}^{-}\right)=-0.027\pm 0.048 R Λ c + p K S , L 0 π + π − = − 0.027 ± 0.048 and R(Λc+,pKS,L0π0)=0.015±0.046 R\left({\Lambda}_c^{+},p{K}_{S,L}^0{\pi}^0\right)=-0.015\pm 0.046 R Λ c + p K S , L 0 π 0 = − 0.015 ± 0.046 . No significant asymmetries with statistical significance are observed.
... Simulated samples generated with geant4-based [32] Monte Carlo (MC) software, which includes the geometric description of the BESIII detector and the detector response performance [28,33,34], are used to determine detection efficiencies and to estimate potential background contributions. The simulation describes the beam energy spread and the initial state radiation (ISR) in the e + e − annihilations with the generator kkmc [35,36]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Using e+ee^+e^- annihilation data sets corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb1\text{fb}^{-1}, collected with the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies between 4.600 and 4.699 GeV, we report the first measurements of the absolute branching fractions B(Λc+pKL0)=(1.67±0.06±0.04)%\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to pK_{L}^{0})=(1.67 \pm 0.06 \pm 0. 04)\%, B(Λc+pKL0π+π)=(1.69±0.10±0.05)%\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to pK_{L}^{0}\pi^+\pi^-)=(1.69 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.05)\%, and B(Λc+pKL0π0)=(2.02±0.13±0.05)%\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to pK_{L}^{0}\pi^0)=(2.02 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.05)\%, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. Combining with the known branching fractions of Λc+pKS0\Lambda_c^+ \to pK_{S}^{0}, Λc+pKS0π+π\Lambda_c^+ \to pK_{S}^{0}\pi^+\pi^-, and Λc+pKS0π0\Lambda_c^+ \to pK_{S}^{0}\pi^0, we present the first measurements of the KS0K_{S}^{0}-KL0K_{L}^{0} asymmetries R(Λc+,KS,L0X)=B(Λc+KS0X)B(Λc+KL0X)B(Λc+KS0X)+B(Λc+KL0X)R(\Lambda_c^+, K_{S,L}^0X) = \frac{\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+ \to K_{S}^{0} X) - \mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+ \to K_{L}^{0} X)}{\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+ \to K_{S}^{0} X) + \mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+ \to K_{L}^{0} X)} in charmed baryon decays: R(Λc+,pKS,L0)=0.025±0.031R(\Lambda_c^+, pK_{S,L}^0) = -0.025 \pm 0.031, R(Λc+,pKS,L0π+π)=0.027±0.048R(\Lambda_c^+, pK_{S,L}^0\pi^+\pi^-) = -0.027 \pm 0.048, and R(Λc+,pKS,L0π0)=0.015±0.046R(\Lambda_c^+, pK_{S,L}^0\pi^0) =-0.015 \pm 0.046. No significant asymmetries within the uncertainties are observed.
Article
The Taishan Antineutrino Observatory (TAO) is a satellite experiment of the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory, located near the Taishan nuclear power plant (NPP). The TAO aims to measure the energy spectrum of reactor antineutrinos with unprecedented precision, which would benefit both reactor neutrino physics and the nuclear database. A detector geometry and event visualization system was developed for the TAO. The software was based on ROOT packages and embedded in the TAO offline software framework. This provided an intuitive tool for visualizing the detector geometry, tuning the reconstruction algorithm, understanding neutrino physics, and monitoring the operation of reactors at NPP. Further applications of the visualization system in the experimental operation of TAO and its future development are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Using a sample of ( 10087 ± 44 ) × 10 6 J / ψ events collected by the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider, we search for the decay X ( 1870 ) → K + K − η via the J / ψ → ω K + K − η process for the first time. No significant X ( 1870 ) signal is observed. The upper limit on the branching fraction of the decay J / ψ → ω X ( 1870 ) → ω K + K − η is determined to be 9.55 × 10 − 7 at the 90% confidence level. In addition, the branching faction B ( J / ψ → ω K + K − η ) is measured to be ( 3.33 ± 0.02 ( stat ) ± 0.12 ( syst ) ) × 10 − 4 . Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Article
DD4hep serves as a generic detector description toolkit recommended for offline software development in next-generation high-energy physics (HEP) experiments. Conversely, Filmbox (FBX) stands out as a widely used 3D modeling file format within the 3D software industry. In this paper, we introduce a novel method that can automatically convert complex HEP detector geometries from DD4hep description into 3D models in the FBX format. The feasibility of this method was demonstrated by its application to the DD4hep description of the Compact Linear Collider detector and several sub-detectors of the super Tau-Charm facility and circular electron-positron collider experiments. The automatic DD4hep–FBX detector conversion interface provides convenience for further development of applications, such as detector design, simulation, visualization, data monitoring, and outreach, in HEP experiments.
Article
Full-text available
Geant4 is a toolkit for simulating the passage of particles through matter. It includes a complete range of functionality including tracking, geometry, physics models and hits. The physics processes offered cover a comprehensive range, including electromagnetic, hadronic and optical processes, a large set of long-lived particles, materials and elements, over a wide energy range starting, in some cases, from 250 eV and extending in others to the TeV energy range. It has been designed and constructed to expose the physics models utilised, to handle complex geometries, and to enable its easy adaptation for optimal use in different sets of applications. The toolkit is the result of a worldwide collaboration of physicists and software engineers. It has been created exploiting software engineering and object-oriented technology and implemented in the C++ programming language. It has been used in applications in particle physics, nuclear physics, accelerator design, space engineering and medical physics.
Article
Full-text available
The Geometry Description Markup Language (GDML) is a specialized XML-based language designed as an application-independent persistent format for describing the geometries of detectors associated with physics measurements. It serves to implement "geometry trees" which correspond to the hierarchy of volumes a detector geometry can be composed of, and to allow to identify the position of individual solids, as well as to describe the materials they are made of. Being pure XML, GDML can be universally used, and in particular it can be considered as the format for interchanging geometries among different applications. In this paper we will present the current status of the development of GDML. After having discussed the contents of the latest GDML schema, which is the basic definition of the format, we will concentrate on the GDML processors. We will present the latest implementation of the GDML "writers" as well as "readers" for either Geant4 , or ROOT ,
Article
The ROOT system in an Object Oriented framework for large scale data analysis. ROOT written in C++, contains, among others, an efficient hierarchical OO database, a C++ interpreter, advanced statistical analysis (multi-dimensional histogramming, fitting, minimization, cluster finding algorithms) and visualization tools. The user interacts with ROOT via a graphical user interface, the command line or batch scripts. The command and scripting language is C++ (using the interpreter) and large scripts can be compiled and dynamically linked in. The OO database design has been optimized for parallel access (reading as well as writing) by multiple processes.
Article
The new ROOT (in: Proceeding of AIHENP’96, Lausanne, September 1996; http://root.cern.ch/) geometry package is a tool designed for building, browsing, tracking and visualizing a detector geometry. The code works standalone with respect to any tracking Monte-Carlo engine; therefore, it does not contain any constraints related to physics. However, the package defines a number of hooks in order to ease-up tracking, allowing user-defined objects to be attached to the basic architectural structures or superimposed on top of them. The modeling functionality was designed to optimize particle transport through complex geometries and it is accessible in an easy and transparent way. The package is currently under development and new features will be implemented, but the basic functionality has already been extensively tested on several detector geometries. The final goal is to be able to use the same geometry for several purposes, such as tracking, reconstruction or visualization, taking advantage of the ROOT features related to bookkeeping, I/O, histograming, browsing and graphical interfaces.
Article
The PHENIX detector is designed to perform a broad study of A–A, p–A, and p–p collisions to investigate nuclear matter under extreme conditions. A wide variety of probes, sensitive to all timescales, are used to study systematic variations with species and energy as well as to measure the spin structure of the nucleon. Designing for the needs of the heavy-ion and polarized-proton programs has produced a detector with unparalleled capabilities. PHENIX measures electron and muon pairs, photons, and hadrons with excellent energy and momentum resolution. The detector consists of a large number of subsystems that are discussed in other papers in this volume. The overall design parameters of the detector are presented.
Program Library Long Write up W5013
Program Library Long Write up W5013. CERN, 1993
  • R Brun
  • F Rademakers
Brun R, Rademakers F. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 1997, 389: 81
  • K Adcox
Adcox K et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2003, 499: 469
  • S Agostinelli
Agostinelli S et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2003, 506: 250
  • R Brun
Brun R et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2003, 502: 676