ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

It is pointed out that a complete resolution of the twin paradox demands that the travelling twin takes into account the gravitational effect upon the rate of time when he predicts the ageing of his brother. Two ways of making this prediction are presented. The first one is formally very simple. However, it involves an assumption that is not obvious when the travelling twin stipulates the distance of his brother. The second method makes use of Lagrangian dynamics in a uniformly accelerated reference frame. Then no such assumption is necessary.
INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Eur. J. Phys. 27 (2006) 885–889 doi:10.1088/0143-0807/27/4/019
The twin paradox in the theory of
relativity
ØGrøn
Oslo College, Department of Engineering, PO Box 4, St Olavs Pl., 0130 Oslo, Norway
and
Institute of Physics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1048 Blindern, 0216 Oslo, Norway
Received 9 January 2006
Published 30 May 2006
Online at stacks.iop.org/EJP/27/885
Abstract
It is pointed out that a complete resolution of the twin paradox demands that the
travelling twin takes into account the gravitational effect upon the rate of time
when he predicts the ageing of his brother. Two ways of making this prediction
are presented. The first one is formally very simple. However, it involves an
assumption that is not obvious when the travelling twin stipulates the distance
of his brother. The second method makes use of Lagrangian dynamics in a
uniformly accelerated reference frame. Then no such assumption is necessary.
1. Introduction
There exist more than three hundred articles about the twin paradox [18]. In the present
paper, I shall present two ways that the travelling twin can predict the ageing of his brother. As
far as I have found, none of these calculations have been presented before. They are interesting
because they are simple and exact. In both calculations, one has to take into account the effect
of gravity upon time. Hence, a complete resolution of the twin paradox involves the general
theory of relativity.
This is not so surprising. The formulation of the twin paradox makes use of the general
principle of relativity, which is not contained in the special theory of relativity. One says:
One twin, say Eartha, at rest on the Earth, predicts that her sister, Stella, is younger than
herself when they meet again after Stella’s travel, because of the kinematic time dilation. But
according to the general principle of relativity, Stella can consider herself as at rest during all
of the travel, and would then predict that Eartha is younger than herself when they meet again.
The twin paradox is the conflict between these predictions.
Hence, the twin paradox arises from using general relativity in its formulation and only
special relativity to calculate the ageing that each twin predicts for the other. In the present
paper, it will be shown how general relativity is involved in the solution of the twin paradox.
0143-0807/06/040885+05$30.00 c
2006 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK 885
886 ØGrøn
2. Elementary solution of the twin paradox
The star Alpha Proxima is L0=4 ly (light years) from the Sun. Stella travels with constant
velocity v=0.8cto Alpha Proxima and back. To simplify the calculation we assume
that the acceleration at the start, the turning point and the arrival is so large that these
brief periods of acceleration can be neglected. As measured by Eartha the travel time is
t =2L0/v =8ly/0.8c=10 years. Hence, Eartha predicts that she will be 10 years older
when she meets Stella after her travel, and that Stella will only be
τS=1v2/c2(2L0/v) =1(0.8c)2/c2·10 years =6 years (2.1)
older. According to Eartha, Stella has become 4 years younger than herself during the travel
due to the velocity-dependent time dilation.
Let us now see what Stella predicts. The general principle of relativity says that she
can consider herself as at rest and Eartha as the traveller during all of the time when they
are separated from each other. She observes that the Earth and Alpha Proxima travel with
the velocity v=0.8c. Then the distance between the Earth and Alpha Proxima is Lorentz
contracted, so the distance is L=L01v2/c2=4ly0.6=2.4 ly. Stella calculates that
the time Eartha uses forth and back is 2(L/v) =2(2.4/0.8)years =6 years. So Stella
predicts that she ages by 6 years during Eartha’s travel. This agrees with Eartha’s prediction.
Stella’s prediction of Eartha’s ageing remains. Due to the velocity-dependent time dilation
she finds that Eartha ages by 1v2/c2(2L/v) =0.6·6 years =3.6 years during her forth
and back travel, in contradiction to Eartha’s own prediction that she ages by 10 years. This
disagreement is just the twin paradox.
What has not yet been taken into account is the effect upon time of the gravitational field
that Stella experiences at the start, the turning point and the arrival. We assume that Stella
has constant proper acceleration, g, i.e. constant acceleration relative to her instantaneous
inertial rest frame, during these periods. Hence, she may be considered at rest in a uniformly
accelerated reference frame. In such a frame the line-element has the form
ds2=−
1+ gx
c22
c2dt2+dx2+dy2+dz2.(2.2)
The general physical interpretation of the line element in the case of a timelike spacetime
interval is that it represents the proper time interval dτas measured by a clock following a
worldline connecting two nearby events with coordinate separations (dt,dx, dy, dz), i.e.
ds2=−c2dτ2.(2.3)
For a clock at rest at the position x=hthis gives
τ =1+ gh
c2t. (2.4)
Stella chooses the coordinate system so that she is at the origin each time she accelerates,
i.e. each time she experiences a gravitational field. At the start and the arrival Eartha is at
a small distance from her. In the limit of infinite acceleration corresponding to vanishingly
short periods of acceleration, the periods with gravity at the start and arrival can be neglected.
Consider the start, for example. The fact that gh is finite in the limit g→∞is most
simply seen from the Galilean equation v2=2gh since the velocity is finite. The relativistic
formulae are more complicated, but lead to the same result. Furthermore tstart =v/g
vanishes as g→∞. Hence τstart vanishes at the start in this limit, and likewise at the arrival.
Note that this limit must be taken by Stella in order that she shall consider the same situation
The twin paradox in the theory of relativity 887
as Eartha, who reckoned with constant velocities all the way, neglecting the periods when
Stella had accelerated motion.
Let us now see how Stella can predict the ageing of Eartha when she experiences a
gravitational field at the turning point close to Alpha Proxima. The Earth with Eartha falls
freely upwards in the gravitational field she experiences. When the Earth stops and begins
to fall down it is at a height h=4 ly. Stella experiences the gravitational field for a time
t =2v/g. Hence, Stella calculates that Eartha ages by
τ =1+ gh
c2t =1+ gh
c22v
g
=
2v
g+2hv
c2.(2.5)
The first term vanishes in the limit g→∞. In this limit, Stella finds that Eartha ages by
τ =
2hv
c2=
2·4ly0.8c
c2=6.4 years (2.6)
during the time she changes from moving freely upwards with velocity vto falling downwards
with the same velocity.
Stella found that Eartha aged by 3.6 years during the forth and back travel. Hence the total
ageing of Eartha according to Stella is 10 years in agreement with Eartha’s own prediction.
3. Using relativistic Lagrangian dynamics in solving the twin paradox
We shall now see how Stella can calculate the ageing of Eartha during the time she experiences
a gravitational field when she is close to Alpha Proxima, without making the assumption that
the distance of Eartha from her can be put equal to 4 ly during the whole of this period.
Eartha is moving freely in the gravitational field experienced by Stella. The covariant
Lagrangian of Eartha, considered as a free particle with unit mass, is
L=1
2gµν ˙
xµ˙
xν(3.1)
where a dot denotes differentiation with respect to Eartha’s proper time. In the present case,
this leads to
L=−
1
21+ gx
c22
c2˙
t2+1
2˙
x2.(3.2)
Since the Lagrangian is independent of the time, the canonical momentum
pt=−
1+ gx
c22
c˙
t(3.3)
is a constant of motion. The four-velocity identity takes the form
1+ gx
c22
c2˙
t2+˙
x2=−c2.(3.4)
Inserting the expression for ptinto the four-velocity identity gives
p2
tc21+ gx
c22
=1+ gx
c22˙
x2(3.5)
or
dτ=
1+ gx
c2
p2
tc21+ gx
c22dx. (3.6)
888 ØGrøn
Eartha’s turning point is at x=h. Hence, the value of ptmay be determined from the
condition ˙
x=0forx=h. Using equation (3.4)thisgives
pt=c1+ gh
c2.(3.7)
Let x1be Eartha’s position in Stella’s coordinate system at the moment when Stella first
experiences the gravitational field. At this moment the Earth and Alpha Proxima move upwards
with a velocity vand a Lorentz contracted distance, x1=2.4 ly. During the slowing down
the distance of Eartha increases from x1=2.4lyto x2=h=4 ly. Integrating equation (3.5)
from x1to x2and inserting the value of pt, Stella finds that during this slowing down Eartha
ages by
τ12=
c
g1+ gx2
2
c22
1+ gx2
1
c22
.(3.8)
Taking the limit with infinite proper acceleration, Stella obtains
lim
g→∞
τ12=
1
cx2
2x2
1.(3.9)
Inserting x2=4 ly and x1=2.4 ly. Stella finds limg→∞ τ12=3.2 years. So Stella finds that
Eartha’s ageing as she changes her motion from upwards with velocity v=0.8cto downwards
with the same velocity is τEartha =2 limg→∞ τ12=6.4 years. Hence, Stella predicts a total
ageing of Eartha, 3.6 years + 6.4 years =10 years, again in agreement with the prediction
of Eartha herself.
4. Conclusion
The formulation of the twin paradox involves the general theory of relativity by making use
of the general principle of relativity. It arises when the ‘travelling’ twin considers herself as at
rest during all parts of the travel, including the periods when she is accelerated, and predicts
that the Earthbound twin is younger than herself when they meet after the departure, making
use of the special relativistic kinematic time dilation, only.
Its solution is to recognize that the travelling twin must take the effect of gravity upon
time into account when she calculates the age of her sister. When the ‘travelling’ twin turns
around at Alpha Proxima she experiences a gravitational field directed away from her sister.
Hence, the Earthbound sister is higher up in this field than herself, and ages faster. This effect
is greater the stronger the gravitational field she experiences, so it cannot be neglected even in
the limit of a vanishing short period of acceleration, because the proper acceleration increases
towards infinity in this limit.
Although Eartha and Stella both consider themselves as at rest, they both predict that
Eartha ages by 10 years during their departure and Stella only 6 years. But they have totally
different explanations for this difference of age when they meet again. Eartha says that Stella
is younger than herself because of Stella’s slower ageing due to her great velocity. Stella,
on the other hand, says that Eartha is older than herself because she ages so fast when Stella
experiences a gravitational field close to Alpha Proxima. This illustrates a general property of
physical theories. The explanation that an observer gives of a phenomenon depends upon the
motion of the observer.
The twin paradox in the theory of relativity 889
References
[1] Marder L 1971 Time and the Space-Traveller (London: George Allen & Unwin)
[2] Møller C 1972 The Theory of Relativity 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press) section 8.17
[3] Fock V 1966 The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation 2nd edn (New York: Pergamon) section 62
[4] Unruh W G 1981 Parallax distance, time, and the twin ‘paradox’ Am.J.Phys.49 589–92
[5] Eriksen E and Grøn Ø 1990 Relativistic dynamics in uniformly accelerated reference frames with application to
the clock paradox Eur. J. Phys. 11 39–44
[6] Debs T A and Redhead M L G 1995 The twin ‘paradox’ and the conventionality of simultaneity Am. J. Phys.
64 384–92
[7] Nicoli´
c H 2000 The role of acceleration and locality in the twin paradox Found. Phys. Lett. 13 595–601
[8] Iorio L 2006 An analytical treatment of the Clock Paradox in the framework of the special and general theories
of relativity Found. Phys. Lett. 18 1–19
... Interestingly, recent studies associate aging to spaceflight with contradictory conclusions (Biolo et al., 2003;Cannavo et al., 2022;Garrett-Bakelman et al., 2019;Honda et al., 2012;Ma et al., 2015;Malhan et al., 2023;Nwanaji-Enwerem et al., 2020;Otsuka et al., 2019;2022;Wang, 1999), while some of the studies report an anti-aging impact of spaceflight, others observed progressive aging due to spaceflight. Whether the anti-aging impact of spaceflight correlates with the "twin paradox" (Gron, 2006) based on the theory of relativity coined by Albert Einstein, which proposes that an individual in Space ages slower compared to his/her biological twin on Earth, remains to be shown. Increased focus on Space exploration and the required lengthening of Space missions for Deep Space Planetary exploration, increases the need for a better understanding of Space mission-associated alterations on aging-related pathways with impact on the health status of humans in Space. ...
Article
Full-text available
Alterations in the circadian system are characteristic of aging on Earth. With the decline in physiological processes due to aging, several health concerns including vision loss, cardiovascular disorders, cognitive impairments, and muscle mass loss arise in elderly populations. Similar health risks are reported as "red flag" risks among astronauts during and after a long-term Space exploration journey. However, little is known about the common molecular alterations underlying terrestrial aging and space-related aging in astronauts, and controversial conclusions have been recently reported. In light of the regulatory role of the circadian clock in the maintenance of human health, we review here the overlapping role of the circadian clock both on aging on Earth and spaceflight with a focus on the four most affected systems: visual, cardiovascular, central nervous, and musculoskeletal systems. In this review, we briefly introduce the regulatory role of the circadian clock in specific cellular processes followed by alterations in those processes due to aging. We next summarize the known molecular alterations associated with spaceflight, highlighting involved clock-regulated genes in space flown Drosophila, nematodes, small mammals, and astronauts. Finally, we discuss common genes that are altered in terms of their expression due to aging on Earth and spaceflight. Altogether, the data elaborated in this review strengthen our hypothesis regarding the timely need to include circadian dysregulation as an emerging hallmark of aging on Earth and beyond.
... For a classical description of the twin paradox, see, for example, [42,79] (the literature on the twin paradox is huge, we will additionally point out only some articles [80,81,82,83,84,85,86], published at various times in this journal). The paradox dates back to Einstein's first paper on relativity [1]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
The special theory of relativity has fundamentally changed our views of space and time. The relativity of simultaneity in particular, and the theory of relativity as a whole, still presents significant difficulty for beginners in the theory. The difficulty stems from the fact that the usual presentation of special relativity is based on Newtonian concepts, which are relativized and change their meaning in the course of the presentation. A better pedagogical practice, in our opinion, would be to base the presentation from the very beginning on the four-dimensional formulation of Minkowski and thus remove from the theory all the paradoxical connotations that invariably accompany the usual presentation of special relativity.
... For a classical description of the twin paradox, see, for example, [42,79] (the literature on the twin paradox is huge, we will additionally point out only some articles [80,81,82,83,84,85,86], published at various times in this journal). The paradox dates back to Einstein's first paper on relativity [1]. ...
Article
The special theory of relativity has fundamentally changed our views of space and time. The relativity of simultaneity in particular, and the theory of relativity as a whole, still presents significant difficulty for beginners in the theory. The difficulty stems from the fact that the usual presentation of special relativity is based on Newtonian concepts, which are relativized and change their meaning in the course of the presentation. A better pedagogical practice, in our opinion, would be to base the presentation from the very beginning on the four-dimensional formulation of Minkowski and thus remove from the theory all the paradoxical connotations that invariably accompany the usual presentation of special relativity.
... However, we consider twin paradox in spacetime. Conclusion of this twin contradiction is: one who accelerate when they were away is youngest after reunion [2]. Eriksen and Grøn have thought of the more general scenario when each twins accelerate and found that the twin who has greatest acceleration is youngest after the travel.. [3] . ...
Preprint
Full-text available
The paper discusses this years Nobel Prize in physics for experiments of entanglement establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science in a much wider, including philosophical context legitimizing by the authority of the Nobel Prize a new scientific area out of classical quantum mechanics relevant to Pauli's particle paradigm of energy conservation and thus to the Standard model obeying it. One justifies the eventual future theory of quantum gravitation as belonging to the newly established quantum information science. Entanglement, involving non-Hermitian operators for its rigorous description, non-unitarity as well as nonlocal and superluminal physical signals spookily (by Einstein's flowery epithet) synchronizing and transferring some nonzero action at a distance, can be considered to be quantum gravity so that its local counterpart to be Einstein's gravitation according to general relativity therefore pioneering an alternative pathway to quantum gravitation different from the secondary quantization of the Standard model.
Preprint
Full-text available
The paper discusses the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics for experiments of entanglement “establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science” in a much wider, including philosophical context legitimizing by the authority of the Nobel Prize a new scientific area out of “classical” quantum mechanics relevant to Pauli’s “particle” paradigm of energy conservation and thus to the Standard model obeying it. One justifies the eventual future theory of quantum gravitation as belonging to the newly established quantum information science. Entanglement, involving non-Hermitian operators for its rigorous description, non-unitarity as well as nonlocal and superluminal physical signals “spookily” (by Einstein’s flowery epithet) synchronizing and transferring some nonzero action at a distance, can be considered to be quantum gravity so that its local counterpart to be Einstein’s gravitation according to general relativity therefore pioneering an alternative pathway to quantum gravitation different from the “secondary quantization” of the Standard model. So, the experiments of entanglement once they have been awarded by the Nobel Prize launch particularly the relevant theory of quantum gravitation grounded on “quantum information science” thus granted to be nonclassical quantum mechanics in the shared framework of the generalized quantum mechanics obeying rather quantum-information conservation than only energy conservation. The concept of “dark phase” of the universe naturally linked to the very well confirmed “dark matter” and “dark energy” and opposed to its “light phase” inherent to classical quantum mechanics and the Standard model obeys quantum-information conservation, after which reversible causality or the mutual transformation of energy and information are valid. The mythical Big Bang after which energy conservation holds universally is to be replaced by an omnipresent and omnitemporal medium of decoherence of the dark and nonlocal phase into the light and local phase. The former is only an integral image of the latter and borrowed in fact rather from religion than from science. Physical, methodological and proper philosophical conclusions follow from that paradigm shift heralded by the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics. For example, the scientific theory of thinking should originate from the dark phase of the universe, as well: probably only approximately modeled by neural networks physically belonging to the light phase thoroughly. A few crucial philosophical sequences follow from the break of Pauli’s paradigm: (1) the establishment of the “dark” phase of the universe as opposed to its “light” phase, only to which the Cartesian dichotomy of “body” and “mind” is valid; (2) quantum information conservation as relevant to the dark phase, furthermore generalizing energy conservation as to its light phase, productively allowing for physical entities to appear “ex nihilo”, i.e., from the dark phase, in which energy and time are yet inseparable from each other; (3) reversible causality as inherent to the dark phase; (4) the interpretation of gravitation only mathematically: as an interpretation of the incompleteness of finiteness to infinity, for example, following the Gödel dichotomy (“either contradiction or incompleteness”) about the relation of arithmetic to set theory; (5) the restriction of the concept of hierarchy only to the light phase; (6) the commensurability of both physical extremes of a quantum and the universe as a whole in the dark phase obeying quantum information conservation and akin to Nicholas of Cusa’s philosophical and theological worldview.
Article
Full-text available
Article
convention adopted by SRT in the context of the Twin Paradox; we place two spatially separated observers in the stationary and travelling frames and discuss the synchronization issues at the completion of the travels.
Article
Full-text available
La solución clásica de la paradoja de los gemelos está basada en que hay una asimetría entre sistemas de referencia acelerados e inerciales. Esta solución tradicional señala que únicamente el gemelo en la nave experimenta los efectos relativistas y, por lo tanto, envejece durante su viaje espacial menos que su hermano en la Tierra. En este artículo se ofrece una exégesis de la solución del propio Einstein, la cual no solo es diferente, sino que además brinda motivos para preguntar si él realmente pensaba que el gemelo en la nave envejece más lentamente.
Article
Full-text available
Two clocks are considered, performing hyperbolic motions with oppositely directed velocities and accelerations, relative to an inertial reference frame. Five different procedures are demonstrated of how an observer following one clock can predict the time of the other clock: (1) Lagrangian description; (2) covariant generalisation of Newton's second law; (3) by means of the invariant equation for uniformly accelerated motion; (4) using the generalised Lorentz factor for time dilation, valid in the presence of a gravitational field; and (5) making use of the description of an inertial observer.
Article
Full-text available
We study the role of acceleration in the twin paradox. From the coordinate transformation that relates an accelerated and an inertial observer we find that, from the point of view of the accelerated observer, the rate of the differential lapses of time depends not only on the relative velocity, but also on the product of the acceleration and the distance between the observers. However, this result does not have a direct operational interpretation because an observer at a certain position can measure only physical quantities that are defined at the same position. For local measurements, the asymmetry between the two observers can be attributed to the fact that noninertial coordinate systems, contrary to inertial coordinate systems, can be correctly interpreted only locally.
Article
Full-text available
In this paper we treat the so called clock paradox in an analytical way by assuming that a constant and uniform force F of finite magnitude acts continuously on the moving clock along the direction of its motion assumed to be rectilinear (in space). No inertial motion steps are considered. The rest clock is denoted as (1), the to and fro moving clock is (2), the inertial frame in which (1) is at rest in its origin and (2) is seen moving is I and, finally, the accelerated frame in which (2) is at rest in its origin and (1) moves forward and backward is A. We deal with the following questions: (1) What is the effect of the finite force acting on (2) on the proper time interval Deltatau(2) measured by the two clocks when they reunite? Does a differential aging between the two clocks occur, as it happens when inertial motion and infinite values of the accelerating force is considered? The special theory of relativity is used in order to describe the hyperbolic (in spacetime) motion of (2) in the frame I. (II) Is this effect an absolute one, i.e., does the accelerated observer A comoving with (2) obtain the same results as that obtained by the observer in I, both qualitatively and quantitatively, as it is expected? We use the general theory of relativity in order to answer this question. It turns out that DeltatauI = DeltatauA for both the clocks, Deltatau(2) does depend on g = F/m, and = Deltatau(2)/Deltatau(1) = (radic1 – beta2atanhbetaj)/beta < 1.="" in="" it="" ;="">V/c and V is the velocity acquired by (2) when the force is inverted.
Article
In this paper we treat the so called clock paradox in an analytical way by assuming that a constant and uniform force F of finite magnitude acts continuously on the moving clock along the direction of its motion assumed to be rectilinear (in space). No inertial motion steps are considered. The rest clock is denoted as (1), the to and fro moving clock is (2), the inertial frame in which (1) is at rest in its origin and (2) is seen moving is I and, finally, the accelerated frame in which (2) is at rest in its origin and (1) moves forward and backward is A. We deal with the following questions: (1) What is the effect of the finite force acting on (2) on the proper time interval Δτ(2)measured by the two clocks when they reunite? Does a differential aging between the two clocks occur, as it happens when inertial motion and infinite values of the accelerating force is considered? The special theory of relativity is used in order to describe the hyperbolic (in spacetime) motion of (2) in the frame I. (II) Is this effect an absolute one, i.e., does the accelerated observer A comoving with (2) obtain the same results as that obtained by the observer in I, both qualitatively and quantitatively, as it is expected? We use the general theory of relativity in order to answer this question. It turns out that ΔτI = ΔτA for both the clocks, Δτ(2)does depend on g = F/m, and = Δτ(2)/Δτ(1) = (√1 − β2atanhβj)/β < 1. In it ; = V/c and V is the velocity acquired by (2) when the force is inverted.
Article
A new approach to understanding the twin paradox, based on the conventionality of simultaneity, is presented and illustrated. The canonical version of the twin paradox is discussed with reference to its historical origins and the standard explanations given for the differential aging of the twins. It is shown that these are merely specific examples of an infinite class of possible accounts, none of which is privileged. The bounds of this class are given a novel geometrical interpretation. Nonstandard versions of the twin paradox are discussed, and the conventionality of the simultaneity approach is generalized. The role of accelerated reference frames in explaining the twins' aging is also critically examined. The application of the conventionality of simultaneity to the twin paradox hopefully provides a way to settle the often discussed issue of the twins' differential aging.
Article
An extension to all space-time points of the definition of time and of distance for any observer, accelerating or not, by means of a parallax viewing of events is undertaken. The twin ''paradox'' is analyzed in terms of this definition, and it is shown that during the period of acceleration, the accelerated observer sees the other traveler recede and go backward in ''time.'' This motion completely reconciles the calculations both observers make regarding the reading of each other's clocks when they meet again.
  • L Marder
Marder L 1971 Time and the Space-Traveller (London: George Allen & Unwin)