Evidence-Based Indications for Distraction Ankle Arthroplasty

Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Foot & Ankle International (Impact Factor: 1.51). 08/2012; 33(8):632-6. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0632
Source: PubMed


The purpose of this study was to review the literature to provide a comprehensive description of the Level of Evidence (LOE) available to support the operative technique of distraction ankle arthroplasty for the current generally accepted indications and make a grade of recommendation for each.
A comprehensive review of the literature was performed (November 2010 to January 2011) using the PubMed database. The abstracts from these searches were reviewed to isolate literature that described therapeutic studies investigating the results of distraction ankle arthroplasty. All articles were reviewed and assigned a classification (I-V) of Level of Evidence. An analysis of the literature reviewed was used to assign a Grade of Recommendation for each current generally accepted indication for distraction ankle arthroplasty.
There is insufficient evidence based literature (Grade I) to support or refute the procedure for either: post-traumatic ankle arthritis, arthritis associated with ligamentous instability, primary degenerative joint disease, chondrolysis, deformity associated with arthritis, osteochondral defects and congenital ankle abnormalities.
Inadequate evidence based literature exists to support or refute all currently accepted indications for distraction ankle arthroplasty and further high quality, scientific studies are needed upgrade to these recommendations.

Download full-text


Available from: S Robert Rozbruch, Oct 27, 2014
  • Source
    • "The report described good results, with a small amount of failures at short term follow-up. The Authors highlighted also the weak support by high quality trials (Smith et al. 2012). Nevertheless, the promising results make arthrodiastasis an interesting option for AOA (Table 1). "

    Preview · Article · Dec 2016
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tibiotalar arthritis in the young, active patient is a debilitating condition with limited treatment options. Bipolar tibiotalar fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation was conceived as a possible alternative to arthrodesis and arthroplasty. We reported our experience with bipolar ankle osteochondral allografts for the treatment of tibiotalar joint arthritis. Between 1999 and 2008, we performed bipolar ankle allografts in eighty-eight ankles (eighty-four patients). Eighty-six ankles (eighty-two patients) had a minimum follow-up duration of two years. The mean patient age was forty-four years and 52% of the patients were male. Evaluation included frequency and type of reoperations, the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, pain, function, and patient satisfaction. Radiographs were evaluated for graft healing, joint space narrowing, and graft collapse. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.3 years (range, two to eleven years). Thirty-six (42%) of the eighty-six ankles that had undergone allograft had further surgery since implantation. Of the eighty-six ankles, twenty-five ankles (29%) had undergone graft-related reoperations and were considered clinical failures (ten underwent revision allografts, seven underwent arthrodeses, six underwent conversions to total ankle arthroplasty, and two underwent below-the-knee amputations) and eleven ankles (13%) had had reoperations that were not necessarily related to the graft (e.g., implant removal, debridement, synovectomy, or distraction). Survivorship of the osteochondral allograft was 76% at five years and 44% at ten years. The mean Olerud-Molander Ankle Score was 61 points at the time of the latest follow-up. The majority of patients reported satisfaction (92%) with osteochondral allograft transplantation and less pain (85%) and improved function (83%) after the procedure. Transplantation of a fresh bipolar ankle osteochondral allograft for the treatment of tibiotalar arthritis resulted in acceptable outcomes in this difficult population, with most patients having improved objective and subjective outcome measures. Subjective satisfaction was high in spite of the 29% clinical failure rate. Osteochondral allograft failure did not limit further surgical options. We concluded that transplantation of a bipolar ankle allograft is a useful alternative in carefully selected patients with advanced tibiotalar arthritis. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2013 · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

  • No preview · Article · Aug 2013 · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Show more