Training Practices and Ergogenic Aids Used by Male Bodybuilders

Article · September 2012with1,310 Reads
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318271272a · Source: PubMed
Bodybuilding involves performing a series of poses on stage where the competitor is judged on aesthetic muscular appearance. The purpose of this study was to describe training practices and ergogenic aids used by competitive bodybuilders, and to determine whether training practices comply with current recommendations for muscular hypertrophy. A web-based survey was completed by 127 competitive male bodybuilders. The results showed that during the off-season phase of training (OFF), the majority of respondents performed 3-6 sets per exercise (95.3%), 7-12 repetition maximum (RM) per set (77.0%) and 61-120 s recovery between sets and exercises (68.6%). However, training practices changed 6-weeks prior to competition (PRE), where there was an increased number of respondents who reported undertaking 3-4 sets per exercise at the expense of 5-6 sets per exercise (P < 0.001); an increase in the number reporting 10-15RM per set from 7-9RM per set (P < 0.001); and an increase in the number reporting 30-60 s versus 61-180 s recovery between sets and exercises (P < 0.001). Anabolic steroid use was high among respondents competing in amateur competitions (56 out of 73 respondents), while dietary supplementation was used by all respondents. The findings of this study demonstrate that competitive bodybuilders comply with current resistance exercise recommendations for muscular hypertrophy; however these changed prior to competition during which there is a reduction in volume and intensity. This alteration, in addition to an increase in aerobic exercise volume is purportedly used to increase muscle definition. However, these practices may increase the risk of muscle mass loss in natural compared to amateur bodybuilders who reportedly use drugs known to preserve muscle mass.
1. Philosophical constructions 2. Research collaborations 3. A way out to our research 4. Partners connections
Our goal is to compare traditional RM sets (4x5 @ 85% 1RM) to accumulating repetitions in singles (4x5 @ 85% 1RM clustered by 1 repetition) on gains in strength (1RM), power (GymAware), velocity (G…" [more]
April 2013 · The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness · Impact Factor: 0.97
    Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the respiratory muscle and lung function measures of bodybuilders (BB) and endurance athletes (EA). Methods: Forty-two male subjects (22 BB and 20 EA) aged 20-35 years underwent respiratory muscle strength measurements (MIP and MEP), lung function testing (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%, IC, ERV, FRC, RV, and TLC), hydrostatic weighing and VO2max testing.... [Show full abstract]
    March 2012 · Journal of sports science & medicine · Impact Factor: 1.03
      This study investigated the effect of a high-volume compared to a low-volume resistance training session on maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP). Twenty male subjects with resistance training experience (6.2 ± 3.2 y), in a crossover trial, completed two resistance training protocols (high-volume: 5 sets per exercise; low-volume: 2 sets per exercise) and a... [Show full abstract]
      August 2012 · Journal of Sports Sciences · Impact Factor: 2.25
        Abstract In this study, we examined the validity of a novel subjective scale for assessing resistance-exercise effort. Seventeen male bodybuilders performed five sets of 10 repetitions at 70% of one-repetition maximum, for the bench press and squat. At the completion of each set, participants quantified their effort via the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and novel... [Show full abstract]
        October 2014 · The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness · Impact Factor: 0.97
          Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine whether a high--volume compared to a low--volume whole--body resistance exercise session acutely impairs lung function. Methods: Fifteen competitive male bodybuilders (age 27.4 ± 5.4 y; body mass 89.7 ± 12.8 kg; stature 177.9 ± 4.8 cm), in a crossover trial, completed two resistance training protocols (high--volume: 5 sets per exercise;... [Show full abstract]
          Discover more