Article

Community-Researcher Partnerships at NIAID HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Sites: Insights for Evaluation and Enhancement

Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, USA.
Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action 09/2012; 6(3):311-20. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0034
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Community engagement has been a cornerstone of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)'s HIV/AIDS clinical trials programs since 1990. Stakeholders now consider this critical to success, hence the impetus to develop evaluation approaches.
The purpose was to assess the extent to which community advisory boards (CABs) at HIV/AIDS trials sites are being integrated into research activities.
CABs and research staff (RS) at NIAID research sites were surveyed for how each viewed (a) the frequency of activities indicative of community involvement, (b) the means for identifying, prioritizing, and supporting CAB needs, and (c) mission and operational challenges.
Overall, CABs and RS share similar views about the frequency of community involvement activities. Cluster analysis reveals three groups of sites based on activity frequency ratings, including a group notable for CAB-RS discordance.
Assessing differences between community and researcher perceptions about the frequency of and challenges posed by specific engagement activities may prove useful in developing evaluation tools for assessing community engagement in collaborative research settings.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: William Michael Trochim, Jan 23, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This special issue in the journal Progress in Community Health Partnerships (PCHP) stems from growing encouragement for community engagement in federally funded research, increasingly involving community stakeholders in developing models of care delivery that incorporate the unique cultural, social, demographic, economic, and resource needs of their communities. The idea for this issue was initially articulated at a February 2010 National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Community Engagement (CE) Key Function Committee Meeting. We also conducted a PubMed search in May 2012 which showed a consistent and increasing incorporation of the community engagement concepts into the work of biomedical and translational scientists; similarly, Doug Brugge recently commented on a SCOPUS literature search, also noting an increase in scholarship related to community-based participatory research. PubMed Citation Search for Key Concepts Despite growing interest in translational research, the publication of conceptual and empirical work documenting the diversity of community-academic partnerships and assessing the impact of community engaged (CE) research on the health of communities continues to lag. Our goals for this special issue were to fill this gap and to provide a snapshot of the state of the science. All 14 articles represent engagement between academic and community partners that serve to augment the research goal of discovering new knowledge and advance the science of community engagement by applying knowledge successfully to improve population health outcomes. While appreciating the role social context plays in health outcomes and the research process, the authors share hands-on tools for community engaged research and evaluation, many through links on the PCHP website. In addition to the clarity of writing and scientific merit, selection for this compendium drew from the NIH's CTSA intention to "transform the local, regional and national environment for clinical and translational science, thereby increasing the efficiency and speed of clinical and translational research." In particular, utilizing research to build synergistic relationships with a wide range of stakeholders, to facilitate cooperation across institutions and practice settings, and to improve public health for diverse communities. The CTSA experience with community engagement in this special issue provides readers the opportunity to assess ongoing progress in scholarship about community engagement and community engagement in research. However, this special issue includes few articles co-authored by community partners, which suggests slower than ideal progress toward achieving clarity on how CE contributes to translational research as mediating relationships between science and society. This lacunae motivates work on another special issue of this journal planned for 2013. The selected articles reflect the various stages or levels in which academic medical centers engage community stakeholders, develop the infrastructure to support them, maintain strong relationships with communities and ongoing community-engaged research activities, effectively coordinate with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-supported Prevention Research Centers (PRC), and actively participate in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) confederation of Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs). CE studies described in this issue include: Hayes and colleagues provide lessons learned in developing four PBRNs mobilizing professional communities to develop and pursue research agendas shaped by immediate public health and public health system issues. Main and her colleagues share their experience in developing a pilot grant program to foster community engagement in research. Ford and colleagues recount a train-the-trainer educational program designed to improve minority understanding of clinical trials and increase participation for a population that endures a disparate cancer disease burden. Additionally, Marriott and colleagues introduce research to communities through health fairs; they use technology to provide participants immediate personal feedback while producing community health assessments, demonstrating multiple benefits derivable from involving community members as researchers and participants. Jones identifies points of convergence between community-defined health needs and state health data, as well as an approach to structuring a pilot program that translates specific community interests into institutional priorities. This contemporary collection of studies makes clear that the increased attention to developing research intending to directly improve both the clinical and public health outcomes requires both an awareness of unique local resources and relationships, as well as a shift in the clinical research paradigm focus from individual patients to the population at large. Contributors to this special...
    No preview · Article · Sep 2012 · Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action

  • No preview · Article · Jan 2014 · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Worldwide, more than 40% of the population is at risk from dengue and recent estimates suggest that up to 390 million dengue infections are acquired every year. The Eliminate Dengue (ED) Program is investigating the use of Wolbachia-infected, transmission-compromised, mosquitoes to reduce dengue transmission. Previous introductions of genetically-modified strategies for dengue vector control have generated controversy internationally by inadequately engaging host communities. Community Engagement (CE) was a key component of the ED Program’s initial open release trials in Queensland Australia. Their approach to CE was perceived as effective by the ED team’s senior leadership, members of its CE team, and by its funders, but if and why this was the case was unclear. We conducted a qualitative case study of the ED Program’s approach to CE to identify and critically examine its components, and to explain whether and how these efforts contributed to the support received by stakeholders.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2015 · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Show more