Introduction. Zoonoses have been controlled in high-income countries, while low- and middle-income countries make efforts with strategies that reduce the burden of the disease. Health interventions (human, animal and environmental) contribute to building trust, community commitment and intersectoral collaboration, and strengthen the capacity of health systems to respond to zoonoses. Objective. Analyze comparatively the national initiatives against zoonoses, according to the income (IMF) of the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. Methods A search was made of national initiatives against zoonoses in high, medium-high, medium-low and low-income countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. A comparative matrix was built and analyzed, identifying the characteristics and content of national initiatives. The monitoring of the events and the measures executed by country was analyzed according to their income. Results The ranking of 19 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean according to their income is: high, 1 ;, medium high, 12; medium low, 5, and low, 1. The initiatives were classified into: manuals, 2; programs, 9; laws, 1; norms, 3; regulations, 1; several, 1, and information not available, 2. The common objective is to establish actions against zoonoses, developed to reduce morbidity and mortality, strengthen epidemiological surveillance, strengthen national capacity, develop institutional mechanisms and generate synergies. The monitored events were classified as: viral, 8; bacterial, 8; parasitic, 7; bite by poisonous animals, 2, and responsible animal ownership, 2. Countries, regardless of income, include five measures: promotion, prevention, diagnosis, monitoring and control. Conclusion. The programs have the largest proportion, which include activities to control zoonoses, their analysis and research. Due to geographical position, climatic variety and biological diversity, surveillance focuses on rabies, leptospirosis and toxoplasmosis. The actions of cooperation, intersectoriality and transversality implemented from the state instances, according to competence, and society, contribute with the objectives set out in the initiatives against the zoonoses.