ArticlePDF Available

Impact of 20-day strike in Polokwane Hospital (18 August - 6 September 2010)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Doctors' strikes have a negative effect on hospital performance indicators. Hospital mortality during such strikes is the most important indicator. To determine the effects of the 2010 strike on Polokwane Hospital. Information was collected from the Hospital Information System, Polokwane Hospital Casualty Department, wards and theatres. During the 20-day strike, a total of 262 patients were admitted to Polokwane Hospital, with 40 patients to the surgical department; 96 operations were performed in the hospital and 40 in the surgical department; and 50 deaths were reported in the hospital (8 deaths in the surgical department). During 20 days of a non-striking period in May 2010, there were 975 admissions to the hospital, with 125 to the surgical department. In the entire hospital, 340 operations were performed, and 79 in the surgical department. For this period, 61 deaths were reported in the hospital and 12 in the surgical department. The total number of patients admitted to the hospital and the surgical department during the strike was significantly lower than during a non-striking situation. Total mortality during the strike in Polokwane Hospital decreased, compared with the normal situation, but it increased when judged against emergency cases. However, when mortality was qualified by the number of admissions, it showed a significant increase. Strikes seriously and significantly affect service delivery.
Content may be subject to copyright.
RESEARCH
755 September 2012, Vol. 102, No. 9 SAMJ
Public health sector strikes have a negative effect on all of society,
with the poor suffering the most, especially when a health service
is paralysed. In-hospital mortality during doctors’ strikes appears to
be the key indicator in evaluating the consequences of such strikes
on service delivery. The literature reports decreased in-hospital
mortality during doctors’ strikes,
1-3
but an increased mortality
during hospital nurses’ strikes in the USA has been reported.
5
We
assessed the effect of a 20-day doctors’ strike in Polokwane Hospital,
Limpopo Province, during which the peripheral hospitals of
Limpopo Province were rendered almost non-functional, and only
the Polokwane Mankweng Hospital Complex (PMCH) provided
emergency services for the entire province. PMCH is a tertiary
institution receiving patients from Limpopo Province. In 2010, the
province had an estimated population of 5.5 million, of whom 90%
had no medical aid, therefore depending heavily on public hospitals
for healthcare.
Objectives
We studied the impact of a health professionals’ 20-day strike in
Polokwane Hospital, and compared performance indicators during
the strike with a non-striking period.
Methods
Data were collected during the 20-day strike (18 August 2010 - 6
September 2010) from the Hospital Information System (HIS),
Polokwane Hospital Casualty Department (PHCD), surgical wards
and theatres. Coomparison data for a non-striking period were
collected from HIS, PHCD, wards and theatres during a randomly
selected 20-day period in May 2010. Data included the performance
indicators referred to: admissions, operations and deaths.
Results
During the 20-day strike, 262 patients were admitted to Polokwane
Hospital and 40 patients to the surgical department. In the entire
hospital, 96 operations were done and 40 in the surgical department;
50 deaths were reported throughout the hospital and 8 deaths in the
surgical department. During the 20 days of a non-striking period
in May 2010, there were 975 admissions to the hospital and 125 to
the surgical department; 340 operations were done throughout the
hospital and 79 in the surgical department; 61 deaths were reported
throughout the hospital and 12 deaths in the surgical department
(Tables 1 and 2).
Discussion
Service delivery may be expected to be affected seriously and
deleteriously during health professional strikes. However, the
literature reports a lowering of mortality
1-3,6
or no change
4,7
when
doctors strike; but a 19.4% increase in mortality during hospital
striking periods by nurses in New York, USA, between 1984 and 2004
has been reported.
5
A review by Cunningham et al. spanning 1976 - 2003 reported that
mortality reduced or stayed the same.
1
In Israel in 1973, when doctors
went on strike for a month, mortality decreased by 50%. In 1976 in
Bogota, Columbia, when medical doctors went on strike for 52 days,
providing only emergency care for patients, the death rate dropped by
35%. In the same year, the Los Angeles County doctors’ strike resulted
in an 18% drop in mortality. As soon as the strike was over, the death
rate returned to its usual levels.
1-3
Available information suggests
that when doctors strike, mortality is reduced. This contradiction
to expectations might be cynically and inaccurately held against
the medical profession. Comprehensive analysis shows that when a
strike takes place, most emergency cases are attended by non-striking
personnel or by other institutions substituting for striking hospitals.
Elective procedures are deferred until the strike is over. Most cases
are treated outside the hospitals, by general practitioners and private
clinics. The mortality from elective surgical procedures, which are
Impact of 20-day strike in Polokwane Hospital
(18 August - 6 September 2010)
M M Z U Bhuiyan, A Machowski
Background. Doctors’ strikes have a negative effect on hospital
performance indicators. Hospital mortality during such strikes is
the most important indicator.
Objective. To determine the effects of the 2010 strike on
Polokwane Hospital.
Methods. Information was collected from the Hospital
Information System, Polokwane Hospital Casualty Department,
wards and theatres.
Results. During the 20-day strike, a total of 262 patients were
admitted to Polokwane Hospital, with 40 patients to the surgical
department; 96 operations were performed in the hospital and
40 in the surgical department; and 50 deaths were reported in the
hospital (8 deaths in the surgical department). During 20 days of a
non-striking period in May 2010, there were 975 admissions to the
hospital, with 125 to the surgical department. In the entire hospital,
340 operations were performed, and 79 in the surgical department.
For this period, 61 deaths were reported in the hospital and 12 in
the surgical department.
Conclusions. The total number of patients admitted to the hospital
and the surgical department during the strike was significantly
lower than during a non-striking situation. Total mortality during
the strike in Polokwane Hospital decreased, compared with the
normal situation, but it increased when judged against emergency
cases. However, when mortality was qualified by the number of
admissions, it showed a significant increase. Strikes seriously and
significantly affect service delivery.
S Afr Med J 2012;102(9):755-756. DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.6045
Department of General Surgery, Polokwane Mankweng Hospital Complex and
University of Limpopo, Polokwane
M M Z U Bhuiyan, FRCSG, MMed
A Machowski, MD, PhD
Corresponding author: M Bhuiyan (bhuiyanmirza@yahoo.com)
RESEARCH
756 September 2012, Vol. 102, No. 9 SAMJ
not performed during strikes, also reduces the figure. However, the
reduction of in-hospital mortality is compensated by an increased
patient death rate outside of the striking hospitals – in other
institutions or in patients’ homes. Reports reflect only in-hospital
mortality, and not total mortality of the entire population in the
striking areas. The reported mortality is represented by total number
of deaths, and is not qualified by the more appropriate numbers of
admissions.
The strike in Polokwane evidently lowered the quality of service
delivery; there was an overall reduction in the number of admissions
and operations in the hospital. During the strike, mortality reduced
but not proportionately to admissions, either in the surgical
department or the entire hospital. Hospital mortality during the
strike, when correlated with numbers of admissions, increased
threefold for the hospital as a whole and, in the surgical department,
mortality doubled. It is probable that further analysis of mortality
in the population outside the hospital would elucidate the true
reflection of actual mortality and hence the real consequences of a
health professionals strike in our population.
Conclusions
The total number of patients admitted to Polokwane Hospital and
the surgical department during the strike was significantly lower than
during non-striking circumstances. Total mortality during the strike
decreased in comparison with normal conditions, but increased when
judged by emergency cases. However, when mortality was qualified by
the number of admissions, a significant two- to threefold increase was
apparent. The strike seriously and significantly affected service delivery
(elective admissions and operations) in Polokwane Hospital. Every
effort must be made to avoid strikes in health services institutions.
Acknowledgements. We thank Mrs R Mavhungu (research assistant) for
her contribution to collecting data from theatres, and Mr T S Ntuli for his
contribution of statistical inferences.
References
1. CunninghamSA,MitchellK,NarayanKM,YusufS. Doctors’ strikes and mortality: a review. Soc Sci
Med 2008;67(11):1784-1788.
2. Ellencweig AY, Ginat-Israeli T. Eects of the Israel physicians’ strike on the treatment and outcome of
acute appendicitis in Jerusalem. Isr J Med Sci 1990;26(10):559-563.
3. Aro S, Hosia P. Eects of a doctors’ strike on primary care utilization in Varkaus, Finland. Scand J Prim
Health Care 1987;5(4):245-251.
4. Bukovsky I, Herman A, Sherman D, Schreyer P, Arieli S, Caspi E. Perinatal outcome following
physicians’ strike of 1983. Isr J Med Sci 1985;21(10):804-807.
5. Gruber J, SA Kleiner. Do Strikes Kill? Evidence from New York State. NBER Working Paper Series, Vol.
w15855. Cambridge MA, USA: NBER, March 2010.
6. Siegel-Itzkovich J. Doctors strike in Israel may be good for health. BMJ 2000;320(7249):1561.
7. Erceg M, Kujundzic-Tiljak M, Barbic-Erceg A, Coric T, Lang S. Physician`s strike and general
mortality: Croatia`s experience of 2003. Coll Antropol 2007;31(3):891-895.
Accepted 15 June 2012.
Table 1. Performance indicators during the 20-day strike, and 20-day non-strike in May 2010, in Polokwane Hospital, Limpopo
During 20-day
strike
During 20 days non-strike May 2010
(combined elective and emergency)
During 20 days non-strike May 2010
(emergency cases only)
Number of patients admitted to hospital 262 975 382
Number of patients admitted to surgical
department 40 125 73
Number of operations in entire hospital 96 340 177
Number of operations in surgical department 40 79 27
Number of deaths in entire hospital 50 61 30
Number of deaths in surgical department 8 12 7
Table 2. Performance indicators in Polokwane Hospital; comparison of non-striking period with strike period
Non-striking situation Comparison
Combined elective
and emergency Emergency only
Strike
(N)
Strike/non-striking situation
(combined elective and emergency)
Strike/non-striking
situation (emergency)
Number of patients admitted
to hospital
975 382 262 Reduced by 63% during strike Reduced by 31% during
strike
Number of patients admitted
to surgical department
125 73 40 Reduced by 68% during strike
(p 0.301)
Reduced by 45% during the
strike (p 0.298)
Number of operations in
entire hospital
340 177 96 Reduced by 72% during the strike
(p 0.595)
Reduced by 46% during the
strike (p 0.014)
Number of operations in
surgical department
79 27 40 Reduced by 49% during the strike
(p 0.001*)
Increased by 48% during the
strike (p 0.001)
Number of deaths in entire
hospital
61 30 50 Reduced by 18% during the strike
(p 0.001)
Increased by 67% during the
strike (p 0.001)
Number of deaths in surgical
department
12 7 8 Reduced by 33% during the strike
(p 0.079*)
Increased by 14% during the
strike (p 0.227*)
*Fisher’s exact test.
... Health worker strikes in low and middle-income countries Health worker strikes are experienced globally, but the effects have been argued to be worst in low and middleincome countries (LMICs) due to infrastructural and resource challenges, weak institutional arrangements, underdeveloped organizational ethics codes and practices, and lack of alternative available and affordable healthcare [1][2][3]. Strike actions range from merely halting work for a few hours or curtailing of non-critical services, to complete stoppage of work; with the latter usually reserved as the last resort [4][5][6]. A challenge in the health sector is that when health workers strike, there is potential to harm patients and the broader public. ...
... In any setting, strikes do not automatically impact on health outcomes such as mortality [19][20][21] or cause a total shut down of health service delivery [1,22]. Rather, the effects depend on the length of the strike, the specific strike actions adopted, responses by the management and the ability of affected populations to access alternative care [1,3,19,23]. In addition, in settings where healthcare provision under normal circumstances is particularly compromised, service provision or health outcomes may be minimally affected by health workers strikes; the norm cannot really get much worse [24]. ...
... In addition, in settings where healthcare provision under normal circumstances is particularly compromised, service provision or health outcomes may be minimally affected by health workers strikes; the norm cannot really get much worse [24]. Few studies have examined the experiences and impacts of strikes in LMICs, and globally most strike related studies have focused on the impact of strikes using mortality as a key indicator [3], or on the ethical issues emerging from strikes [1]. We are not aware of any published empirical studies that have explored responses and experiences of a strike from the perspectives of both frontline health managers and residents of local communities. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: While health worker strikes are experienced globally, the effects can be worst in countries with infrastructural and resource challenges, weak institutional arrangements, underdeveloped organizational ethics codes, and unaffordable alternative options for the poor. In Kenya, there have been a series of public health worker strikes in the post devolution period. We explored the perceptions and experiences of frontline health managers and community members of the 2017 prolonged health workers' strikes. Methods: We employed an embedded research approach in one county in the Kenyan Coast. We collected in-depth qualitative data through informal observations, reflective meetings, individual and group interviews and document reviews (n = 5), and analysed the data using a thematic approach. Individual interviews were held with frontline health managers (n = 26), and group interviews with community representatives (4 health facility committee member groups, and 4 broader community representative groups). Interviews were held during and immediately after the nurses' strike. Findings: In the face of major health facility and service closures and disruptions, frontline health managers enacted a range of strategies to keep key services open, but many strategies were piecemeal, inconsistent and difficult to sustain. Interviewees reported huge negative health and financial strike impacts on local communities, and especially the poor. There is limited evidence of improved health system preparedness to cope with any future strikes. Conclusion: Strikes cannot be seen in isolation of the prevailing policy and health systems context. The 2017 prolonged strikes highlight the underlying and longer-term frustration amongst public sector health workers in Kenya. The health system exhibited properties of complex adaptive systems that are interdependent and interactive. Reactive responses within the public system and the use of private healthcare led to limited continued activity through the strike, but were not sufficient to confer resilience to the shock of the prolonged strikes. To minimise the negative effects of strikes when they occur, careful monitoring and advanced planning is needed. Planning should aim to ensure that emergency and other essential services are maintained, threats between staff are minimized, health worker demands are reasonable, and that governments respect and honor agreements.
... Similar results are achieved by Salazar et al. (2001), which analyses an emergency department strike of a Spanish hospital. Ruiz et al. (2013) analyses a physicians' strike in England, while Bhuiyan and Machowski (2012) examines a strike in a South-Africa Hospital. Results confirm that hospital operations are severely disrupted during strikes, given a decrease in elective admissions and surgery. ...
... Results confirm that hospital operations are severely disrupted during strikes, given a decrease in elective admissions and surgery. Contradicting previous research, Bhuiyan and Machowski (2012) finds that hospital mortality during the strike, when correlated with numbers of admissions, increases threefold. ...
Article
Full-text available
Hospital strikes in the Portuguese National Health Service (NHS) are becoming increasingly frequent. This paper analyses the effect of different health professionals' strikes (physicians, nurses, and diagnostic and therapeutic technicians (DTT) ‐ DTT) on patient outcomes and hospital activity. Patient‐level data, comprising all NHS hospital admissions in mainland Portugal from 2012 to 2018, is used together with a comprehensive strike dataset with almost 130 protests. Data suggests that hospital operations are partially disrupted during strikes, with sharp reductions in surgical admissions (up to 54%) and a decline on both inpatient and outpatient care admissions. The model controls for hospital characteristics, time and regional fixed effects, and case‐mix changes. Results suggest a modest increase in hospital mortality limited for patients admitted during physicians' strikes, and a slight reduction in mortality for patients already at the hospital when a strike takes place. Increases in readmission rates and length of stay are also found. Results suggest that hospitals and legal minimum staffing levels defined during strikes are not flexible enough to accommodate sudden disruptions in staffing, regardless of hospital quality in periods without strikes.
... These challenges and consequences have also resulted in health workers either absconding from duty [12] or in extreme circumstances resigning from the health profession [13] and opting for alternative professions [14]. During the 2014 Ebola epidemic, health workers in Liberia and Sierra Leone resorted to industrial actions due to poor pay, unsafe work conditions and death of their colleagues [15,16] further compromising efforts to respond to the epidemic [17]. The training and skilling of health workers is an enormous investment of resources (both financial and time) for many countries. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The COVID-19 pandemic presented a myriad of challenges for the health workforce around the world due to its escalating demand on service delivery. A motivated health workforce is critical to effectual emergency response and in some settings, incentivizing health workers motivates them and ensures continuity in the provision of health services. We describe health workforce experiences with incentives and dis-incentives during the COVID-19 response in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Senegal, Nigeria, and Uganda. Methods This is a multi-country qualitative research study involving four African countries namely: DRC, Nigeria, Senegal, and Uganda which assessed the workplace incentives instituted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Key informant interviews (n = 60) were conducted with staff at ministries of health, policy makers and health workers. Interviews were virtual using the telephone or Zoom. They were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. Themes were identified and quotes were used to support findings. Results Health worker incentives included (i) financial rewards in the form of allowances and salary increments. These motivated health workers, sustaining the health system and the health workers’ efforts during the COVID-19 response across the four countries. (ii) Non-financial incentives related to COVID-19 management such as provision of medicines/supplies, on the job trainings, medical care for health workers, social welfare including meals, transportation and housing, recognition, health insurance, psychosocial support, and supervision. Improvised determination and distribution of both financial and non-financial incentives were common across the countries. Dis-incentives included the lack of personal protective equipment, lack of transportation to health facilities during lockdown, long working hours, harassment by security forces and perceived unfairness in access to and inadequacy of financial incentives. Conclusion Although important for worker motivation, financial and non-financial incentives generated some dis-incentives because of the perceived unfairness in their provision. Financial and non-financial incentives deployed during health emergencies should preferably be pre-determined, equitably and transparently provided because when arbitrarily applied, these same financial and non-financial incentives can potentially become dis-incentives. Moreover, financial incentives are useful only as far as they are administered together with non-financial incentives such as supportive and well-resourced work environments. The potential negative impacts of interventions such as service delivery re-organization and lockdown within already weakened systems need to be anticipated and due precautions exercised to reduce dis-incentives during emergencies.
... The most recent strike action embarked on by the GRNMA and allied health professionals recently was from September 21 st to 23 rd , 2020 after negotiations with the Government (employer) for improved conditions of service yielded no results. As noted above, strike actions generally leads to a reduction in the number of people accessing healthcare services [10,18]. However, our understanding of the extent of disruption in access to a range of healthcare services is limited as majority of previous studies have tended to focus their attention on services rendered by a unit or department in hospital or health facility. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background As the largest professional group, nurses and midwives play instrumental roles in healthcare delivery, supporting the smooth administration and operation of the health system. Consequently, the withdrawal of nursing and midwifery services via strike action has direct and indirect detrimental effects on access to healthcare. Objective The current study examined the impact of strike action by nurses and midwives with respect to access to and use of health services. Method Data were collected retrospectively from a total of 181 health facilities from all the 16 administrative regions of Ghana, with the support of field officers. Because the strike lasted for 3 days, the data collection span three consecutive days before the strike, three days of the strike and three consecutive days after the strike. Data analysis was focused comparing the utilization of healthcare services before, during and after strike. Data were analysed and presented on the various healthcare services. This was done separately for the health facility type and the 16 administrative regions. Findings The results showed that; (1) the average number of patients or clients who accessed healthcare services reduced drastically during the strike period, compared with before the strike. Majority of the regions recorded more than 70% decrease in service use during the strike period; (2) the average number of patients or clients who accessed healthcare services after the strike increased by more than 100% across majority of the regions. Conclusion The study showed that strike action by nurses and midwives negatively affected access to and utilization of healthcare services.
... In general, studies on the change in mortality during healthcare worker strikes have not shown an increase of mortality associated with the strikes [2][3][4][5], except in isolated cases, compromised of mainly physician strikes, where indications of increased mortality have been suggested [2,11,12], particularly in children [2,12]. To our knowledge, few studies have investigated any change in mortality associated with non-physician HCW strikes [4,5,7], of which only one study described an increase in mortality during a nurse strike [7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study explored all-cause mortality of bacteraemia diagnosed during a 60-day non-physician healthcare worker strike in 2008. A significant change, with 5.0% (95% CI 1.2-8.7%, p<0.01) absolute risk increase, was seen in 90-day mortality during the strike (n=598) compared with the rest of the study period 2000-2015 (n=75 647).
Preprint
Full-text available
Background The COVID-19 pandemic presented a myriad of challenges for the health workforce around the world due to its escalating demand on service delivery. In some settings incentivizing health workers motivated them and ensured continuity in the provision of health services. We describe the incentive and dis-incentives and how these were experienced across the health workforce in the Republic Democratic of Congo (DRC), Senegal, Nigeria and Uganda during the COVID-19 response. The disincentives experienced by health care workers during the pandemic were documented. Methods A qualitative study of a multi-country research involving four African countries namely: - DRC, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda to assess their health system response to COVID-19. We conducted key informant interviews (n = 60) with staff at ministries of health, policy makers and health workers. Interviews were face to face and virtual using the telephone or zoom. They were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Themes were identified and quotes were used to support findings. Results Health worker incentives included (i) Financial rewards in the form of allowances and salary increments. These motivated health workers, sustaining the health system and the health workers’ efforts during the COVID-19 response across the four countries. (ii) Non- financial incentives related to COVID-19 management such as provision of medicines/supplies, on the job trainings, medical care for health workers, social welfare including meals, transportation and housing, recognition, health insurance, psychosocial support, and supervision. Improvised determination and distribution of both financial and non-financial incentives was common across the countries. Dis-incentives included the lack of personal protective equipment, lack of transportation to health facilities during lockdown, long working hours, harassment by security forces and perceived unfairness in access to and inadequacy of financial incentives. Conclusion Although important, financial incentives ended up being a dis-incentive because of the perceived unfairness in their implementation. Financial incentives should be preferably pre-determined, equitably and transparently provided during health emergencies because arbitrarily applied financial incentives become dis-incentives. Moreover financial incentives are useful only as far as they are administered together with non-financial incentives such as supportive and well-resourced work environments. The potential for interventions such as service delivery re-organizations and lock downs to negatively impact on health worker motivation needs to be anticipated and due precautions exercised to reduce dis-incentives during emergencies.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Strike action carried out by healthcare workers raises a range of ethical issues. Most fundamentally, as a strike is designed to disrupt, it has the potential to impact patient outcomes and healthcare delivery. This paper synthesises and analyses the empirical literature that details the impact of strike action on healthcare delivery. Methods: A systematic scoping review was utilised to examine the extent, range and nature of research activity. Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Bioethicsline, EconLit and Web of Science were searched, yielding 5644 results. Papers were included if they examined the impact that strike action had on healthcare delivery (i.e., admissions, presentations, waiting time). After screening, 43 papers met inclusion criteria. Results: Nineteen studies explored presentations to emergency or admissions to hospital. Both dropped dramatically when comparing non-strike to strike periods. Ten studies examined length of stay in hospital and waiting times. No clear relationship was found with strike action, with some studies showing that wait times decreased. Nine studies examined the impact of strike action in facilities that were not on strike, but were impacted by nearby strike action along with the impact that strike action had on treatment seeking. Hospitals dealing with these upstream impacts often saw increase in presentations at hospitals, but results relates to treatment seeking during strike action were mixed. Conclusion: Strike action can have a substantial impact on the delivery of healthcare, but this impact is not felt uniformly across services. While many services are disrupted, a number are not, with several studies reporting increased efficiency.
Article
This paper measures the effects of disruptions to healthcare quality at birth on early child health outcomes in Kenya. To identify impacts, we exploit variation in the timing and location of health-worker strikes at individual hospitals across the country between 1999 and 2014. Using data from Demographic Health Surveys, we find that children born during strikes are more likely to suffer a neonatal death. We find similar results using separate data collected in two informal settlements in Nairobi located near hospitals with frequent strikes. These results show that interruptions to healthcare quality can have large immediate health impacts, and suggests that status quo hospital care provides positive benefits. We also find suggestive evidence of reductions in later health investments, measured by vaccine take-up, among those who survive. This study provides the first rigorous evidence on the consequences of health-worker strikes, a frequent but understudied phenomenon in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: This study sough to evaluate the impact of healthcare strike action on patient mortality. Data sources: EMBASE, PubMed CINAHL, BIOETHICSLINE, EconLit, WEB OF SCIENCE and Grey literature were searched up to December 2021. Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis was utilised. Data collection/extraction: Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare mortality rate during-strike versus pre or post strike, with meta-regression employed to identify factors that might influence the potential impact of strike action. Studies were included if they were observational studies that examined in-hospital/clinic or population mortality during a strike period compared to a control period where there was no strike action. Principal findings: Seventeen studies examined mortality; 14 examined in-hospital mortality, three examined population mortality. In-hospital studies represented 768,918 admissions and 7,191 deaths during strike action and 1,034,437 admissions and 12,676 deaths during control periods. The pooled relative risk (RR) of in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ during strike action vs. non-strike periods (RR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.63, 1.31], p = .598). Meta-regression also showed that mortality RR was not significantly impacted by country (p = 0.98), profession on strike (p = .32 for multiple professions, p = 0.80 for nurses),the duration of the strike (p = 0.26) or whether multiple facilities were on strike (p = 0.55). Only three studies that examined population mortality met the inclusion criteria, therefore further analysis was not conducted. However it is noteworthy that none of these studies reported a significant increase in population mortality attributable to strike action. Conclusions: Based on the data available, this review did not find any evidence that strike action has any significant impact on in-hospital patient mortality.
Article
Full-text available
Since the last 100 years, physicians from many countries have been taking collective action. However, the media, civic groups, and the government have denounced them as inhuman and unethical. This study comprehensively analyzed the background and results of physicians’ collective actions that occurred in countries around the world, and reviewed the issues surrounding them. Among 314 cases in 70 countries discussed in the literature, 180 cases in 65 countries were analyzed. Of these 180 cases, 111 (61.7%) were successful, indicating that collective action has brought favorable results to physicians. Furthermore, 177 out of 301 requirements brought favorable results (58.8%). The main reason for collective actions was ‘improvement of working conditions’, which includes improving the medical and the reimbursement systems, adjusting working hours and wages, increasing manpower, supporting medical research, and improving other working environment and conditions. This study is significant because it provides statistical data on the causes and results of collective actions taken by physicians in countries around the world.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the study was to establish whether the physicians' strike, which took place in Croatia in 2003, had an impact on the mortality of the population. Mortality data from the National Bureau of Statistics relating to the strike period (15 January - 14 February 2003) were selected and compared with the previous and subsequent periods of the same duration in 2001, 2002 and 2004. Of the 52,575 deaths in 2003, Croatia recorded 4,682 (8.9%, 95% Confidence interval 8.4-9.4) in the strike period from the 15th of January to the 14th of February 2003 or 1.1 deaths per 1000. No deviations of the 15th of January to the 14th of February period's share of the death total in relation to other observation periods were noted. It is impossible to associate the strike based on the figures shown in this paper with either an increase or decrease in population mortality.
Article
Concerns over the impacts of hospital strikes on patient welfare led to substantial delay in the ability of hospitals to unionize. Once allowed, hospitals unionized rapidly and now represent one of the largest union sectors of the U.S. economy. Were the original fears of harmful hospital strikes realized as a result? In this paper we analyze the effects of nurses’ strikes in hospitals on patient outcomes. We utilize a unique dataset collected on nurses’ strikes over the 1984 to 2004 period in New York State, and match these strikes to a restricted use hospital discharge database which provides information on treatment intensity, patient mortality and hospital readmission. Controlling for hospital specific heterogeneity, patient demographics and disease severity, the results show that nurses’ strikes increase in-hospital mortality by 19.4% and 30-day readmission by 6.5% for patients admitted during a strike, with little change in patient demographics, disease severity or treatment intensity. This study provides some of the first analytical evidence on the effects of health care strikes on patients, and suggests that hospitals functioning during nurses’ strikes are doing so at a lower quality of patient care.
Article
A paradoxical pattern has been suggested in the literature on doctors' strikes: when health workers go on strike, mortality stays level or decreases. We performed a review of the literature during the past forty years to assess this paradox. We used PubMed, EconLit and Jstor to locate all peer-reviewed English-language articles presenting data analysis on mortality associated with doctors' strikes. We identified 156 articles, seven of which met our search criteria. The articles analyzed five strikes around the world, all between 1976 and 2003. The strikes lasted between nine days and seventeen weeks. All reported that mortality either stayed the same or decreased during, and in some cases, after the strike. None found that mortality increased during the weeks of the strikes compared to other time periods. The paradoxical finding that physician strikes are associated with reduced mortality may be explained by several factors. Most importantly, elective surgeries are curtailed during strikes. Further, hospitals often re-assign scarce staff and emergency care was available during all of the strikes. Finally, none of the strikes may have lasted long enough to assess the effects of long-term reduced access to a physician. Nonetheless, the literature suggests that reductions in mortality may result from these strikes.
Article
We sought to determine whether a prolonged physicians' strike causes changes in the delivery of health care and in the behavior of health care seekers? We compared appendectomy patients during the 1983 physicians' strike in Israel and during a control period in 1984, by analyzing the records of 171 patients in two Jerusalem hospitals. Patients had similar demographic characteristics and disease manifestation, but differed in their health care seeking behavior. The 1983 patients tended to postpone their first contact with the health system and frequently failed to present themselves for a follow-up visit after discharge. Control group patients were more likely to receive preoperative antibiotics and less likely to develop postoperative fever than the strike group patients. The findings confirmed that the differences between the strike and control groups were caused by administrative barriers resulting from the strike rather than by differences in actual medical treatment.
Article
Changes in out-patient medical care utilization at the health centre of Varkaus were studied during the Finnish doctors' strike in spring, 1984. In this urban and semi-urban area, about 80% of the out-patient medical services to the population are provided by the municipal health centre. Visits to the physicians decreased by 70% during the strike, and for urgent visits the decrease was 55%. The private sector compensated only a very small share of this "deficit". Of the common urgent illnesses the relative decrease was greatest for "cold" and ill-defined "abdominal pains". Open wounds were treated normally although there was some indication that the wounds treated were more serious than normally. The post-strike increase in visits suggests an increase in unmet needs. For all face-to-face encounters the increase was eight per cent, but for low back pain, urinary infection and hypertension the observed post-strike rates were more than 40% higher than expected by pre-strike rates. A marked reduction in various other activities of the health centre, such as telephone calls and home visits, was observed. The present study gave no evidence of harmful effects of the strike. This was the impression of the health care personnel, too. There were no public claims of reduced access to care or its delay. The distress among patients or other experiences of the population were, however, not measured. The strike was fairly short and any conclusions concerning the effects of a more prolonged or extensive strike on health care are unwarranted.
Article
Organized public medical services were profoundly disturbed during the 4 months of the physicians' strike in 1983. An unknown proportion of patients were referred to private services, but only a minority of them attended the alternative centers. The findings during the strike and the following 6 months were compared with those of the year 1982. The incidence of high-risk cases and of multiple and premature deliveries were unchanged. There was a significant rise (P less than 0.01) in the rate of cesarean sections during the strike, 10.8%, compared with 7.8% in 1982. Also, a significant reduction in instrumental deliveries and labor inductions was observed during the strike and for 4 months afterwards. There was no change in the perinatal mortality (total and corrected) or in Apgar scores. This indicates that good perinatal results were achieved despite drastic disturbances in organized perinatal care.
Article
Industrial action by doctors in Israel seems to be good for their patients'health. Death rateshave dropped considerably in most of the country since physicians in public hospitals implementeda programme of sanctions three months ago, according to a survey of burial societies. The Israel Medical Association began the action on 9 March to protest against the treasury's proposed imposition of a new four year wage contract for doctors. Since then, hundreds of thousands of visits to outpatient clinics have been cancelled or postponed along with tens of thousands of elective operations. Public hospitals, which provide the vast majority of secondary and tertiary medical care, have kept their emergency rooms, dialysis units, oncology departments, obstetric and …