ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

In this paper, a direct combinatorial proof is given of a result on permutation pairs originally due to Carlitz, Scoville, and Vaughan and later extended. It concerns showing that the series expansion of the reciprocal of a certain multiply exponential generating function has positive integer coefficients. The arguments may then be applied to related problems, one of which concerns the reciprocal of the exponential series for Fibonacci numbers.
Cent. Eur. J. Math. 10(2) 2012 797-806
DOI: 10.2478/s11533-012-0001-2
Central European Journal of
Mathematics
A combinatorial proof of a result for permutation pairs
Research Article
Toufik Mansour1, Mark Shattuck1
1 Mathematics Department, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
Received 27 April 2011; accepted 13 December 2011
Abstract:
In this paper, a direct combinatorial proof is given of a result on permutation pairs originally due to Carlitz, Scoville,
and Vaughan and later extended. It concerns showing that the series expansion of the reciprocal of a certain
multiply exponential generating function has positive integer coefficients. The arguments may then be applied to
related problems, one of which concerns the reciprocal of the exponential series for Fibonacci numbers.
MSC:
05A15, 05A05
Keywords:
Exponential generating function Combinatorial proof Permutations
©Versita Sp. z o.o.
1. Introduction
Let Nand Pdenote the sets of nonnegative and positive integers, respectively. Given an indeterminate q,
letnq=1+q+···+qn1ifnP,with0q=0.Letnq!=Qn
i=1iqifnP,with0q!=1.Put
fq(z)=
X
n=0(1)nzn
(nq!)dand 1
fq(z)=
X
n=0w(d)
n(q)zn
(nq!)d,(1)
whered>2isafixedpositiveinteger.Thegeneratingfunctionfq(z)isbothEulerianandmultiplyexponentialinthe
senseof[7,Section3.15].Uponreplacingzwithz/(1q)d,weseethat(1)mayalsoberewrittenintheform
gq(z)=
X
n=0(1)nzn
(q:q)d
nand 1
gq(z)=
X
n=0w(d)
n(q)zn
(q:q)d
n,(2)
E-mail:tmansour@univ.haifa.ac.il
E-mail:maarkons@excite.com
797
A combinatorial proof of a result for permutation pairs
where(a:q)n=(1a)(1qa)···(1qn1a)sothat(q:q)n=(1q)nnq!Inthispaper,weshowthatthecoefficients
w(d)
n(q)in(1),andhence(2),arepolynomialsinqwithpositiveintegercoefficientsbyadirectcombinatorialargument,
seeTheorem2.6. Thecaseq=1andd=2wasfirstshownbyCarlitz,Scoville,andVaughan[2]usingalgebraic
methods,andwaslaterextendedbyStanley[6],whoconsideredamoregeneralversionofthisresultrelatedtobinomial
posets.Seealso[3,4]foradditionalrelatedresults.
LetSndenotethesetofpermutationsof[n]={1,2,...,n}andletπ=π1π2···πnandρ=ρ1ρ2···ρnbetwomembers
ofSn.Ariseofπisapairπi,πi+1 withπi<πi+1;afallisapairπi,πi+1 withπi>πi+1.Thus,fori=1,2,...,n1,
thetwopairsπi,πi+1 andρi,ρi+1 areeitherbothrises(whichwewilldenoteRR),bothfalls(FF),thefirstisarise
andthesecondafall(RF),orthefirstisafallandthesecondarise(FR).LetTndenotethesubsetofSn×Snwhose
membersavoidRR(i.e.,anyoccurrenceofRRisforbidden).
In[2],itwasshownusingrecurrencesthatifthewnarethecoefficientsdeterminedby
X
n=0(1)nzn
n!n!!1=
X
n=0wnzn
n!n!,
thentheyarepositiveintegerswhichgivethecardinalityofTnforalln. Here,weprovideacombinatorialproofin
thesenseof[1]. Indeed,weshow,moregenerally,thatthecoefficientsw(2)
n(q)occurringin(1)ariseasdistribution
polynomialsforthestatisticonTnwhichrecordsthetotalnumberofinversionsoccurringinapermutationpair(π,ρ),
seeTheorem2.5.Takingq=1showsthatwngivesthecardinalityofTnforalln. Thisargumentmaythenbeextended
toprovideacombinatorialproofofthecomparableresultforpermutationd-tuples,seeTheorem2.6.
Theq-binomialcoefficientn
kqisgivenby
n
kq=
nq!
kq!(nk)q!if 06k6n;
0otherwise.
Notethatthew(d)
n(q)in(1)satisfytherecurrence
n
X
k=0(1)kn
kd
qw(d)
nk(q)=0, n>1,(3)
withw(d)
0(q)=1,uponwriting1=fq(z)fq(z)1andcollectingcoefficients.
2. Main results
Firstassumed=2in(1). Wewillneedthefollowinglemma,whichresultsfromreplacingxwithqxintheq-binomial
theorem(see,e.g.,[7,p.162]), (1+x)(1+qx)···(1+qn1x)= n
X
k=0n
kqq(k2)xk,
andthenequatingthecoefficientsofxr.
Lemma 2.1.
Ifn>r>1,then X
{a1,a2,...,ar}⊆[n]qa1+a2+···+ar=q(r+1
2)n
rq.
798
T. Mansour, M. Shattuck
Recallthatthenumberofinversionsofamemberπ=π1π2···πnSn,denotedbyinv(π),isthenumberofordered
pairs(i,j)with16i<j6nandπi>πj.
Definition 2.2.
IfnP,thenlet an(q)= X
(π,ρ)Tnqinv(π,ρ),
witha0(q)=1,whereinv(π,ρ)=inv(π)+inv(ρ).
Definition 2.3.
Ifn>r>1, thenletB(r)
nSn×Snconsistofpermutationpairs(π, ρ)= (π1π2···πn,ρ1ρ2···ρn)satisfyingthe
followingthreeconditions:
(a)π1<π2<...<πr,
(b)ρ1<ρ2<...<ρr,and
(c)thepartialpermutationpair(πrπr+1···πn,ρrρr+1···ρn)avoidsRR.
Bydefinition,wehaveB(1)
n=TnandB(n+1)
n=.
WewillneedthefollowingresultconcerningthedistributionofinvontheB(r)
n.
Lemma 2.4.
Ifn>r>1,then X
(π,ρ)B(r)
nB(r+1)
nqinv(π,ρ)=n
r2qanr(q).(4)
Proof. Supposeπ=π1π2···πnandρ=ρ1ρ2···ρnarebothmembersofSn.Then(π,ρ)B(r)
nB(r+1)
nifandonlyif
(i)π1<π2<...<πr,
(ii)ρ1<ρ2<...<ρr,and
(iii)thepartialpermutationpair(πr+1···πn,ρr+1···πn)hasnooccurrencesofRR.
Weclaimthatthetotalinv-weightofallthemembersofSn×Snsatisfying(i)–(iii), isn
r2qanr(q). Toseethis,first
choosetwor-elementsubsetsof[n]independentlyandwritetheirelementsinincreasingordersoastoobtainthefirst
rpositionsofπandρ. Thecomplementsofthesetwosetsbothcontainnrelementsandcomprisethefinalnr
positionsofπandρ. Notethatthecomplementstogethermaybewrittenasanypermutationpairsatisfying(iii)and
thatoncethetwor-elementsubsetsarefixed,thetotalweightofallthepossiblepairssatisfying(iii)isanr(q),by
definition. Tocompletetheproof,itsufficestoshowthatn
rqaccountsforallpossiblechoicesregardingthefirstr
positionsofπ=π1π2···πn. Notethateachletterπi,16i6r,contributesπi1(i1)=πiiinversionssince
thereareexactlyi1letterssmallerthanπiandtoitsleft.Thus,thechoiceforthesepositionscontributes
X
{π1,...,πr}⊆[n]qPri=1(πii)=q(r+1
2)X
{π1,...,πr}⊆[n]qPri=1πi=n
rq,
asrequired,byLemma2.1.
Theorem 2.5.
Ifn>0,thenan(q)=w(2)
n(q).
799
A combinatorial proof of a result for permutation pairs
Proof. By(3)whend=2,weneedtoshowthatthean(q)satisfytherecurrence
an(q)= n
X
k=1(1)k+1n
k2qank(q), n>1.
ByLemma2.4andtelescoping,wehave
n
X
k=1(1)k+1n
k2qank(q)= n
X
k=1(1)k+1 X
(π,ρ)B(k)
nB(k+1)
nqinv(π,ρ)=X
(π,ρ)B(1)
nqinv(π,ρ)+(1)n+1 X
(π,ρ)B(n+1)
nqinv(π,ρ)=an(q),
whichcompletestheproof,sinceB(1)
n=TnandB(n+1)
n=.
Letusnowassumed>2. Fortheremainingpartofthissection,wewillletσ=(σ1,σ2,...,σd)denotead-tupleof
permutationsof[n],whereσj=σj,1σj,2···σj,n foreachj[d]. Fixi[n1].Letusformawordw=w1w2···wdinthe
alphabet{R,F},wherewjisRorFdependingonwhetherσj,iσj,i+1 isariseorafallinthepermutationσjforeach
j[d].Wewillsaythatσcontainsthewordwifthewordwarisesasdescribedforsomeiandthatσavoidswifit
doesnot.
LetT(d)
nSd
ncomprisethosed-tuplesσ=(σ1,σ2,...,σd)ofpermutationswhichavoidRR···R(dtimes).Letusdenote
thesum,inv(σ1)+inv(σ2)+···+inv(σd),byinv(σ).Leta(d)
n(q)denotethedistributionpolynomialoverT(d)
nforthestatistic
whichrecordsinv(σ),i.e., a(d)
n(q)= X
σT(d)
nqinv(σ).
Theorem 2.6.
Ifn>0andd>2,thena(d)
n(q)=w(d)
n(q).
Proof. WeextendtheproofgivenaboveforTheorem2.5asfollows. Forn>r>1,letB(r)
n,d Sd
nconsistof
σ=(σ1,σ2,...,σd)satisfyingthefollowingconditions:
(i)σj,1<σj,2<...<σj,r foreachj[d],
(ii)thed-tupleofpartialpermutations(σ01,σ02,...,σ0d),whereinσ0j=σj,rσj,r+1···σj,n foreachj,avoidsRR···R.
Bydefinition,wehaveB(1)
n,d=T(d)
nandB(n+1)
n,d =.
Notethatσ=(σ1,σ2,...,σd)B(r)
n,dB(r+1)
n,d ifandonlyifcondition(i)aboveholdswith(ii)replacedbythecondition
thatthed-tuple(σ00
1,σ00
2,...,σ00
d),whereinσ00
j=σj,r+1σj,r+2···σj,n foreachj[d],avoidsRR···R.Reasoningasinthe
proofofLemma2.4showsthat X
σB(r)
n,dB(r+1)
n,dqinv(σ)=n
rd
qa(d)
nr(q), n>r>1.
ReasoningasintheproofofTheorem2.5thenshowsthat
a(d)
n(q)= n
X
k=1(1)k+1n
kd
qa(d)
nk(q), n>1,
whencew(d)
n(q)=a(d)
n(q)foralln>0,uponcomparisonwith(3).
Remark.
AnalgebraicproofofTheorem2.6whichmakesuseofseveralrecurrencesisgivenin[3].
800
T. Mansour, M. Shattuck
ByconsideringinsteadFF···F(dtimes),RF,orFR,oneobtainsthefollowingadditionalgeneralizationsoftheq=1
caseof(1),whichdonotseemtohavebeenpreviouslynoted.
Theorem 2.7.
Supposed>2andlet f
q(z)=
X
n=0(1)nqd(n
2)zn
(nq!)d.
Thenthecoefficientsu(d)
n(q)intheexpansion 1
f
q(z)=
X
n=0u(d)
n(q)zn
(nq!)d
arepolynomialsinqwithpositiveintegercoefficients.Furthermore,theyarethedistributionpolynomialsforinvonthe
subsetofd-tuplesofpermutationsof[n]whichavoidFF···F.
Proof. LetU(d)
nSd
ncomprisethosemembersσ=(σ1,σ2,...,σd)whichavoidFF···F. Definethepolynomial
b(d)
n(q)by b(d)
n(q)= X
σU(d)
nqinv(σ), n>1,
withb(d)
0(q)=1.Ifn>r>1,thenletC(r)
n,dSd
nconsistofσsatisfyingthefollowingconditions:
(i)σj,1>σj,2>...>σj,r foreachj[d],
(ii)thed-tupleofpartialpermutations(σ01,σ02,...,σ0d),whereinσ0j=σj,rσj,r+1···σj,n foreachj,avoidsFF···F.
Bydefinition,wehaveC(1)
n,d=U(d)
nandC(n+1)
n,d =.ReasoningasintheproofofLemma2.4shows
X
σC(r)
n,dC(r+1)
n,dqinv(σ)=qd(r2)n
rd
qb(d)
nr(q), n>r>1.
Notethatthereareanadditional1+2+···+(r1)=r2inversionsproducedbyeachcomponentofσC(r)
n,dC(r+1)
n,d
foratotal ofdr2inversionsin allsincethefirstrlettersofeachcomponentareindescendingorder,whencethe
additionalfactorofqd(r2)intheaboveformula.ReasoningasintheproofofTheorem2.5nowshowsthatb(d)
n(q)satisfies
thesamerecurrenceasu(d)
n(q)forn>1andhenceu(d)
n(q)=b(d)
n(q).
Theorem 2.8.
Let efq(z)=
X
n=0(1)nq(n
2)zn
(nq!)2.
Thenthecoefficientsvn(q)intheexpansion 1
efq(z)=
X
n=0vn(q)zn
(nq!)2
arepolynomialsinqwithpositiveintegercoefficients.Furthermore,theyarethedistributionpolynomialsforinvonthe
subsetoforderedpairsofpermutationsof[n]whichavoidRF(orFR).
Proof. ProceedasintheproofofTheorem2.5andthestepsleadinguptoit,makingtheappropriatemodifications,
themainonebeingtoDefinition2.3. There,condition(b)shouldnowbeρ1>ρ2>...> ρr,with RF replacing
RR incondition(c). NotealsoinLemma2.4thattherewouldbeafactorofq(r2)ontheright-handsideof(4)dueto
1+2+···+(r1)=r2additionalinversionsinthesecondcomponent.
801
A combinatorial proof of a result for permutation pairs
3. A further extension
Theorem2.5mayberefinedbyconsideringthenumberofoccurrencesofRRjointlywiththetotalnumberofinversions
withinanarbitrarymemberofSn×Sn.Moreprecisely,letr(π,ρ)denotethetotalnumberofoccurrencesofRRcontained
within(π,ρ)Sn×Snanddefinethedistributionpolynomialan(q,x)by
an(q,x)= X
(π,ρ)Sn×Snqinv(π,ρ)xr(π,ρ), n>1,
witha0(q,x)=1. Notethatan(q,0)=an(q). ThereasoningusedintheproofofLemma2.4andTheorem2.5above
maybeextendedtoshowthat n
X
k=0(1)k(1x)kn
k2qank(q,x)=xan(q,x), n>1.(5)
Wewillleavethedetailsoftheproofof(5)asanexercisefortheinterestedreader.Using(5),onethengets
1x+x
X
n=0an(q,x)zn
nq!nq!=fq(z(1x))
X
n=0an(q,x)zn
nq!nq!,
where fq(z)=
X
n=0(1)nzn
nq!nq!,
whichimpliesthefollowingresult.
Theorem 3.1.
Wehave
X
n=0an(q,x)zn
nq!nq!=1x
fq(z(1x))x.
Remark.
LangleyandRemmel[4,Theorem3.4]provideadifferentcombinatorialproofofthisresult,makinguseofasign-changing
involution.
Lettingx=0inTheorem3.1yieldsTheorem2.5.Takingthelimitasx1inTheorem3.1implies
X
n=0an(q,1) zn
nq!nq!=lim
x11x
fq(z(1x))x=lim
x11
zf0q(0)1=1
1z,
byL0Hôpital’srule,whichisinaccordwiththefactthatan(q,1)=nq!nq!.Weremarkthattheq=1caseofTheorem3.1
isgivenas(2.15)of[2].
802
T. Mansour, M. Shattuck
4. Some related results
Supposef(z)=cosz=P
n=0(1)nz2n/(2n)!Thenthecoefficientsofthereciprocal
f(z)1=secz=
X
n=0E2nz2n
(2n)!
arepositiveintegers whichenumerate,among otherthings(see, e.g.,[7]), thealternatingpermutationsoflength2n
(i.e.,π=π1π2···π2nS2nsuchthatπ1>π2<π3>π4<...>π2n),aresultattributedtoAndré.Inthissection,we
considertwofurtherexamplesinthisdirectioninwhichbothf(z)andf1(z)areexponentialgeneratingfunctions(egf’s)
withintegercoefficientsandsupplycombinatorialinterpretationsforthecoefficientsofthelatter,giventheformer.These
resultsmaythenbeq-generalizedbyargumentssimilartothoseofthesecondsectionabove.
Inwhatfollows,ifw=w1w2··· denotesaword,thenamaximalsequenceofconsecutiveletterswiwi+1···wi+k1inw
suchthatwi<wi+1 <...<wi+k1willbecalledak-run.Runswillbesaidtobeevenorodddependingontheparity
ofk. Forexample,withinthewordw=12434385471[8]11,therearetwo1-runs(the5andthelast1),three2-runs
(34,38,and47),andone3-run(124).
LetFn,nN,denotetheFibonaccisequencedefinedbytherecurrenceFn=Fn1+Fn2ifn>2,withF0=0and
F1=1.OurfirstresultrevealsaconnectionbetweenFnandthepermutationsof[n]avoidingrunsofevenlength.
Theorem 4.1.
Let h(z)=1+X
n>1(1)nFnzn
n!.
Thenthecoefficientspnintheexpansion 1
h(z)=X
n>0pnzn
n!
arepositiveintegerswhichcountthepermutationsof[n]havingnoevenruns.
Proof. Forn>0, letDndenotethesetofpermutationsof[n]havingnoevenrunsandletdn=|Dn|. Toshow
dn=pnforalln,wemustshowthatdnsatisfies
dn=n
X
k=1(1)k1Fkn
kdnk, n>1.(6)
Todoso,fixk,16k6n,andformpermutationsof[n]byfirstselectingak-subsetSof[n],writingitselementsin
increasingorder,andthenwritingtheremainingnkelementsof[n]aftertheelementsofSaccordingtoapermutation
ρhavingnoevenruns. Firstnotethatifkisodd,thenn
kdnkcountsallthemembersofDnstartingwithak-runas
wellasallmembersofSnDnwhichstartwithanevenrunoflengthatleastk+1andcontainnootherevenruns.
Toseethis,notethattheformercaseoccurswhenthefirstletterofρissmallerthanthelargest(=last)elementofS,
whenceweobtainaninitialrunoflengthk,andthelattercaseoccurswhenthefirstletterofρexceedsthelargest
elementofS,whenceweobtainaninitialevenrunwithlengthexceedingk. Bysimilarreasoning,ifkiseven,then
n
kdnkcountsallmembersofDnstartingwitharunhavinglengthatleastk+1aswellasallmembersofSnDn
whichstartwithak-runandcontainnootherevenruns.
Tocompletetheproof,wewilluseacharacteristicfunctionargument. SupposeαSnDnstartswitha2m-runfor
somem,16m6bn/2c,andcontainsnootherevenruns.Thentheabovereasoningimpliesthatαiscounted
(F1+F3+···+F2m1)F2m=0
803
A combinatorial proof of a result for permutation pairs
timesbytherightsideof(6)sinceitiscountedF2i1timesinapositivewaybytheF2i1n
2i1dn2i+1 termforeach
i[m]andF2mtimes inanegativewaybytheF2mn
2mdn2mterm. Onthe otherhand, ifαDnstarts witha
(2m1)-runforsomem,thenαiscounted
F2m1(F2+F4+···+F2m2)=1
timebytherightsideof(6),byasimilarreasoning.Thus,allmembersofDn(andonlythey)arecountedonce,which
implies(6),asdesired.
Remark.
ThesequencepnoccursasA097597in[5],wherenomentionismadetotherelationinTheorem4.1ortotherecurrence(6).
Wenowconsidertheproblemofavoidingrunsofacertainfixedlengthormore.Suppose`>2isafixedintegerand
letλn,nN,denotethesequencedefinedby
λn=
1ifn0(mod`);
1ifn1(mod`);
0otherwise.
Wehavethefollowingresultconcerningtheegfoftheλn.
Theorem 4.2.
Let j(z)=X
n>0λnzn
n!.
Thenthecoefficientstnintheexpansion 1
j(z)=X
n>0tnzn
n!
arepositiveintegerswhichcountthepermutationsof[n]allofwhoserunsareoflengthlessthan`.
Proof. Letdndenotethenumberofpermutationsof[n]allofwhoserunsareoflengthlessthan`. Toshowthat
dn=tnforalln,wemustshowthatthednsatisfythefollowingrecurrencewhenn>1:
dn=n
1dn1n
`dn`+n
`+1dn`1n
2`dn2`+n
2`+1dn2`1··· (7)
Todoso,firstdefinethesetsA(r)
nfor16r6nby
A(r)
n=πSn:πstartswithani-runforsomei,r6i6r+`1,withallotherrunsoflengthatmost`1.
ThenthecardinalityofA(r)
nisn
rdnr. Tosee this,note thatmembersofA(r)
nmaybeformedbyfirstselectingan
r-elementsubsetSof[n],writingtheelementsofSinincreasingorder,andthenarrangingthenrmembersof[n]S
aftertheelementsofSaccordingtoapermutationρcontainingnorunsoflength`ormore. Theresultingmemberof
A(r)
nwillstartwitharunoflengthrifthefirstletterofρissmallerthanthelargestelementofSandwillstartwitha
runwhoselengthisstrictlybetweenrandr+`otherwise.
Tocompletetheproof,weagainuseacharacteristicfunctionargument. SupposeπSn
r=1A(r)
nstartswithani-run,
wherei>`. If`doesnotdivideiandm=`bi/`c,thenπbelongstobothA(m)
nandA(m+1)
nandisthereforecountedonce
inanegativewaybythen
mdnmtermontherightsideof(7)aboveandonceinapositivewaybythen
m+1dnm1
804
T. Mansour, M. Shattuck
term(andsothesecontributionscancel). If`dividesi,thenπiscountedinapositivewaybythen
i`+1dni+`1term
andinanegativewaybythenidniterm.Thus,ifπSn
r=1A(r)
nstartswithani-runforsomei>`,thenπcontributes
zerotothealternatingsumontherightsideof(7). Ifπstartswithani-runforsomei<`,thenπiscountedonce
andonlybythefirstterm. Thus,therightsideof(7)givesthecardinalityofallthemembersofA(1)
nwhichstartwith
ani-runforsomei<`,whicharesynonymouswiththepermutationsof[n]allofwhoserunsareoflengthlessthan`.
Thisestablishes(7)andcompletestheproof.
Taking`=2inTheorem4.2givesj(z)=ezandthustheegfenumeratingthepermutationsof[n]avoidingallrunsof
lengthtwoormoreisj1(z)=ezasanticipatedsinceonlyπ=n(n1)···1ispermitted.If`=4inTheorem4.2,then
theegfwhichenumeratesallthepermutationsof[n]havingnorunsoflengthfourormoreisj1(z),where
j(z)=12ez+coszsinz.
Notethatfor`ingeneral,thefunctionj(z)maybeexpressedusing`th rootsofunity. Forexample,letting`=3in
Theorem4.2impliesthattheegfforthenumberofpermutationsof[n]whichavoidallrunsoflengththreeormoreis
j1(z),where j(z)=(1ω2)
3eωz+(1ω)
3eω2z
andwisaprimitivecuberootofunity.
Onecanprovideaq-generalizationofTheorem4.2.
Theorem 4.3.
Let jq(z)=X
n>0λnzn
nq!.
Thenthecoefficientstn(q)intheexpansion 1
jq(z)=X
n>0tn(q)zn
nq!
arepolynomialsinqwithpositiveintegercoefficients.Furthermore,theyarethedistributionpolynomialsforinvonthe
setofpermutationsof[n]allofwhoserunsareoflengthlessthan`.
Proof. Letdn(q)bethedistributionpolynomialfortheinvstatisticonthesetofpermutationsof[n]allofwhoseruns
areoflengthlessthan`.WefirstobservethatX
πA(r)
nqinv(π)=n
rqdnr(q),(8)
whereA(r)
nisasintheproofofTheorem4.2.Toshowthis,firstnotethatn
rqaccountsforboththechoiceofthesubsetS
comprisingthefirstrlettersofπ=π1π2···πnA(r)
naswellastheinversionsthattheycreatewithinπwiththeletters
in[n]S.Toseethis,letw=w1w2···wnbethebinarywordwherewi=0ifiSand1otherwise.Thenthenumber
ofinversionscausedbytheelementsofSwithinπisthesameasthenumberofinversionsofw,withn
rqthegenerating
functionforthenumberofinversionsinbinarywordsoflengthncontainingexactlyrzeros,see[7,Proposition1.3.17].
Sincednr(q)accountsfortheorderingofthefinalnrlettersofπoncetheelementsofShavebeenchosenaswell
astheinversionswithintheseletters,equation(8)follows.
Theproofof(7)nowappliesandshowsfurtherthat
dn(q)=n
1qdn1(q)n
`qdn`(q)+n
`+1qdn`1(q)···, n>1,
whichimpliestn(q)=dn(q)foralln,uponcomparingtherecurrences.
805
A combinatorial proof of a result for permutation pairs
WealsohavethefollowingextensionofTheorem4.1.
Theorem 4.4.
Let hq(z)=1+X
n>1(1)nFnzn
nq!.
Thenthecoefficientspn(q)intheexpansion 1
hq(z)=X
n>0pn(q)zn
nq!
arepolynomialsinqwithpositiveintegercoefficients.Furthermore,theyarethedistributionpolynomialsforinvonthe
setofpermutationsof[n]havingnoevenruns.
Proof. Ifdn(q)denotesthedistributionpolynomialfortheinvstatisticonthesetofpermutationsof[n]havingno
evenruns,thenwemustshowthatdn(q)satisfiestherecurrence
dn(q)= n
X
k=1(1)k1Fkn
kqdnk(q), n>1.(9)
Todo so,we generalizetheproofof (6). Observeinitially thatthe firstparagraphintheproof of(6)carriesover
withn
kdnkreplacedbyn
kqdnk(q);notethatn
kqarisesforthesamereasonthatitdidintheproofof(8)above.
Equation(9)nowfollowsfromthesameargumentusedinthesecondparagraphoftheproofof(6).
References
[1]BenjaminA.T.,QuinnJ.J.,ProofsthatReallyCount,DolcianiMath.Exp.,27,MathematicalAssociationofAmerica,
Washington,2003
[2]CarlitzL.,ScovilleR.,VaughanT.,Enumerationofpairsofpermutations,DiscreteMath.,1976,14(3),215–239
[3]FedouJ.-M.,RawlingsD.,Statisticsonpairsofpermutations,DiscreteMath.,1995,143(1-3),31–45
[4]LangleyT.M.,RemmelJ.B.,Enumerationofm-tuplesofpermutationsandanewclassofpowerbasesforthespace
ofsymmetricfunctions,Adv.inAppliedMath.,2006,36(1),30–66
[5]SloaneN.J.,TheOn-LineEncyclopediaofIntegerSequences,http://oeis.org
[6]StanleyR.P.,Binomialposets,Möbiusinversion,andpermutationenumeration,J.CombinatorialTheorySer.A,1976,
20(3),336–356
[7]StanleyR.P.,EnumerativeCombinatorics,Vol.1,CambridgeStud.Adv.Math.,49,CambridgeUniversityPress,Cam-
bridge,1997
806
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
We all recognize 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13,... but what about 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 9, 12, 8, 10, 5, 15,...? If you come across a number sequence and want to know if it has been studied before, there is only one place to look, the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (or OEIS). Now in its 49th year, the OEIS contains over 220,000 sequences and 20,000 new entries are added each year. This article will briefly describe the OEIS and its history. It will also discuss some sequences generated by recurrences that are less familiar than Fibonacci's, due to Greg Back and Mihai Caragiu, Reed Kelly, Jonathan Ayres, Dion Gijswijt, and Jan Ritsema van Eck.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (or OEIS) is a database of some 130000 number sequences. It is freely available on the Web (http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/) and is widely used. There are several ways in which it benefits research: 1 It serves as a dictionary, to tell the user what is known about a particular sequence. There are hundreds of papers which thank the OEIS for assistance in this way. 1 The associated Sequence Fans mailing list is a worldwide network which has evolved into a powerful machine for tackling new problems. 1 As a direct source of new theorems, when a sequence arises in two different contexts. 1 As a source of new research, when one sees a sequence in the OEIS that cries out to be analyzed. The 40-year history of the OEIS recapitulates the story of modern computing, from punched cards to the internet. The talk will be illustrated with numerous examples, emphasizing new sequences that have arrived in the past few months. Many open problems will be mentioned. Because of the profusion of books and journals, volunteers play an important role in maintaining the database. If you come across an interesting number sequence in a book, journal or web site, please send it and the reference to the OEIS. (You do not need to be the author of the sequence to do this.) There is a web site for sending in ”Comments” or ”New sequences”. Several new features have been added to the OEIS in the past year. Thanks to the work of Russ Cox, searches are now performed at high speed, and thanks to the work of Debby Swayne, there is a button which displays plots of each sequence. Finally, a ”listen” button enables one to hear the sequence played on a musical instrument (try Recamáan’s sequence A005132!).
Book
Full-text available
Mathematics is the science of patterns, and mathematicians attempt to understand these patterns and discover new ones using a variety of tools. in Proofs That Really Count, award-winning math professors Arthur Benjamin and Jennifer Quinn demonstrate that many number patterns, even very complex ones, can be understood by simple counting arguments. The arguments primarily take one of two forms: - A counting question is posed and answered in two different ways. Since both answers solve the same question they must be equal. -Two different sets are described, counted, and a correspondence found between them. One-to-one correspondences guarantee sets of the same size. Almost one-to-one correspondences take error terms into account. Even many-to-one correspondences are utilized. The book explores more than 200 identities throughout the text and exercises, frequently emphasizing numbers not often thought of as numbers that count: Fibonacci Numbers, Lucas Numbers, Continued Fractions, and Harmonic Numbers, to name a few. Numerous hints and references are given for all chapter exercises and many chapters end with a list of identities in need of combinatorial proof. The extensive appendix of identities will be a valuable resource. This book should appeal to readers of all levels, from high school math students to professional mathematicians. © 2003 by The Mathematical Association of America (Incorporated).
Article
Let π = (a1, a2, …, an), ϱ = (b1, b2, …, bn) be two permutations of . A rise of π is pair ai, ai+1 with ai < ai+1; a fall is a pair ai, ai+1 with ai > ai+1. Thus, for i = 1, 2, …, n − 1, the two pairs ai, ai+1; bi, bi+1 are either both rises, both falls, the first a rise and the second a fall or the first a fall and the second a rise. These possibilities are denoted by RR, FF, RF, FR. The paper is concerned with the enumeration of pairs π, p with a given number of RR, FF, RF, FR. In particular if ωn denotes the number of pairs with RR forbidden, it is proved that , . More precisely if ω(n, k) denotes the number of pairs π, p with exactly k occurences of RR(or FF, RF, FR) then .
Article
This book is the first of a two-volume basic introduction to enumerative combinatorics at a level suitable for graduate students and research mathematicians. It concentrates on the theory and application of generating functions, a fundamental tool in enumerative combinatorics. The book covers those parts of enumerative combinatorics of greatest applicability to other areas of mathematics. The four chapters are devoted to an introduction to enumeration (suitable for advanced undergraduates), sieve methods (including the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion), partially ordered sets, and rational generating functions. There are a large number of exercises, almost all with solutions, which greatly augment the text and provide entry into many areas not covered directly. Graduate students and research mathematicians who wish to apply combinatorics to their work will find this an authoritative reference.
Article
In this paper, we continue a long line of research which shows that many generating function identities for various permutation statistics arise from well known symmetric function identities by applying certain ring homomorphisms on the ring of symmetric functions. This idea was first introduced in a 1993 paper of Brenti who used it to show that the generating functions of permutations of the symmetric group Sn by descents and excedances could be derived in such a manner. In this paper, we define certain (q,t)-analogues of Brenti's homomorphism that lead to generating functions for statistics on m-tuples of permutations. Our results generalize previous work of generating functions for permutations statistics due to Carlitz, Stanley, and Fedou and Rawlings. We also introduce some new bases of symmetric functions which are necessary to extend Brenti's results on generating functions for permutations by excedances to m-tuples of permutations. Finally, we study the image of our homomorphisms on analogues of the q-basis of symmetric functions studied by Ram and King and Wybourne to describe the irreducible characters of the Hecke algebras of type A.
Article
A unified method is presented for enumerating permutations of sets and multisets with various conditions on their descents, inversions, etc. We first prove several formal identities involving Möbius functions associated with binomial posets. We then show that for certain binomial posets these Möbius functions are related to problems in permutation enumeration. Thus, for instance, we can explain “why” the exponential generating function for alternating permutations has the simple form . We can also clarify the reason for the ubiquitous appearance of ex in connection with permutations of sets, and of ξ(s) in connection with permutations of multisets.
Article
Carlitz et al. (1976) were the first to consider statistics on pairs of permutations. Their primary achievement was to count permutation pairs (unrestricted) by common rises. We extend their work by giving recurrence relationships for permutation pairs (unrestricted and restricted) by common rises, inversion number of each, and a new statistic we call the common rise index. The generating functions that arise are expressed in terms of relatives of Jackson's basic Bessel functions. We also indicate how our results for permutation pairs extend to k-tuples of permutations.
  • R P Stanley
R. P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, (1997).