ArticlePDF Available

Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Despite the popular view that social predators live in groups because group hunting facilitates prey capture, the apparent tendency for hunting success to peak at small group sizes suggests that the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture. Few empirical studies, however, have tested for nonlinear relationships between hunting success and group size, and none have demonstrated why success trails off after peaking. Here, we use a unique dataset of observations of individually known wolves (Canis lupus) hunting elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park to show that the relationship between success and group size is indeed nonlinear and that individuals withholding effort (free riding) is why success does not increase across large group sizes. Beyond 4 wolves, hunting success leveled off, and individual performance (a measure of effort) decreased for reasons unrelated to interference from inept hunters, individual age, or size. But performance did drop faster among wolves with an incentive to hold back, i.e., nonbreeders with no dependent offspring, those performing dangerous predatory tasks, i.e., grab-bing and restraining prey, and those in groups of proficient hunters. These results suggest that decreasing performance was free riding and that was why success leveled off in groups with .4 wolves that had superficially appeared to be cooperating. This is the first direct evidence that nonlinear trends in group hunting success reflect a switch from cooperation to free riding. It also highlights how hunting success per se is unlikely to promote formation and maintenance of large groups.
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... The evolution of social behavior-behavior that affects the fitness of others-has been a focus of inquiry since the origins of evolutionary biology (1,2). Examples range from pairwise interactions such as food sharing (3), grooming (4), and contests over mating or food (5), to large-scale collective actions such as pack hunting (6), living bridges (7), biofilm formation (8), and fruiting body aggregation (9). Understanding how these behaviors evolve requires linking their costs and benefits-for those interacting and others in the population-to the long-term fate of genes involved. ...
... In this case, the aggregate effect on each individual's fitness depends linearly on the phenotypes of those involved. However, real-world social behavior is often nonlinear (6,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41). The effects of multiple actors may combine synergistically (more than the sum of separate contributions) (36), antisynergistically (less than the sum) (37,38), or may switch between synergistic and antisynergistic regimes (6,39,40). ...
... However, real-world social behavior is often nonlinear (6,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41). The effects of multiple actors may combine synergistically (more than the sum of separate contributions) (36), antisynergistically (less than the sum) (37,38), or may switch between synergistic and antisynergistic regimes (6,39,40). Nonlinear social evolution has consequences ranging from cancer treatment (42) and antibiotic resistance (43) to the origins of human society (41). ...
Article
Full-text available
Organisms from microbes to humans engage in a variety of social behaviors, which affect fitness in complex, often nonlinear ways. The question of how these behaviors evolve has consequences ranging from antibiotic resistance to human origins. However, evolution with nonlinear social interactions is challenging to model mathematically, especially in combination with spatial, group, and/or kin assortment. We derive a mathematical condition for natural selection with synergistic interactions among any number of individuals. This result applies to populations with arbitrary (but fixed) spatial or network structure, group subdivision, and/or mating patterns. In this condition, nonlinear fitness effects are ascribed to collectives, and weighted by a new measure of collective relatedness. For weak selection, this condition can be systematically evaluated by computing branch lengths of ancestral trees. We apply this condition to pairwise games between diploid relatives, and to dilemmas of collective help or harm among siblings and on spatial networks. Our work provides a rigorous basis for extending the notion of “actor”, in the study of social evolution, from individuals to collectives.
... Moreover, depredation behavior is highly context-dependent. In Yellowstone National Park (YNP) in the USA, hunting with other pack members is required to successfully take down large prey such as elk Cervus elaphus (MacNulty et al. 2012) or bison Bison bison . In southern Europe, wolves rely on smaller and more vulnerable prey, such as juvenile wild boar S. scrofa or roe deer Capreolus capreolus (Mattioli et al. 2004, 2011, Anceau et al. 2015, Imbert et al. 2016, Lagos and Bárcena 2018. ...
... This context should increase sheep profitability for wolves. In addition, the development of flock protection in France, especially of livestock guarding dogs (Landry et al. 2020, Meuret et al. 2020, should decrease sheep vulnerability and consequently should decrease depredation success of wolves with small or inexistent group hunting possibilities (MacNulty et al. 2012). To mimic this phenomenon, we could have modelled decreasing vulnerability of livestock over time by progressively reducing depredation risks and therefore culling risks of all wolves. ...
Article
Full-text available
The efficiency of the management of predations on livestock by gray wolves (Canis lupus) through culling is under debate. Evaluating wolf culling efficiency requires to simultaneously analyze the effects of culling on the wolf population and the repercussions of these population changes on livestock predation. This protocol is technically difficult to implement in the field. To properly assess culling efficiency, we provided an integrated and flexible individual‐based model that simulated interactions between wolf population dynamics, predation behavior and culling management. We considered many social processes in wolves. We calibrated the model to match the Western Alps as a case study. By considering the prey community in this area and the opportunistic nature of wolf predation, we assumed that predation on livestock at the wolf territory level increased with pack's food needs. Under this assumption and considering livestock availability as high and livestock vulnerability as uniform in space and time, culling maintained wolf population size and predation risks at low levels. Contrary to what was expected, culling decreased the mean annual proportions of dispersing wolves in our simulations, by speeding settlement. This population‐level mechanism compensated for the high mortality and the pack instability caused by culling. Compensation was however dependent on the selectivity and the timing of culling. When executed before the natural mortality module in our model, the selective culling could undermine replacement of lost breeders and therefore decrease wolf population resilience to culling. Our model gives insights about culling effects in one specific simulated context, but we do not expect that our assumption about predation behavior necessarily holds in other ecological contexts and we therefore encourage further explorations of the model.
... Despite the limited available data, it is clear that for many predator species group hunting proved to be more beneficial then solitary hunting, even if not every member of the group participate in the pursuit. Evolution seems to have optimized the size of Figure 2. The overall probability of success for a certain hunting pack of wolves -elk encounter, depending on the size of the pack [25]. these hunting packs, because in the majority of cases, hunting pack size falls within the range of 3-10 ( Figure 2). ...
Preprint
We propose a bio-inspired, agent-based approach to describe the natural phenomenon of group chasing in both two and three dimensions. Using a set of local interaction rules we created a continuous-space and discrete-time model with time delay, external noise and limited acceleration. We implemented a unique collective chasing strategy, optimized its parameters and studied its properties when chasing a much faster, erratic escaper. We show that collective chasing strategies can significantly enhance the chasers' success rate. Our realistic approach handles group chasing within closed, soft boundaries - contrasting most of those published in the literature with periodic ones -- and resembles several properties of pursuits observed in nature, such as the emergent encircling or the escaper's zigzag motion.
... Archetti and Scheuring (2016) argue that, in the case of diffusible molecules, nonlinearities arise because the effect of biological molecules on cell fitness is typically a sigmoid function of their concentration due to threshold dosage effects or due to the cooperative binding of ligands (Cornish-Bowden 2012;Frank 2013;Zhang et al. 2013). In social interactions, nonlinearities arise when just a portion of the group is large enough to detect predators or take down difficult prey (Pulliam et al. 1982;MacNulty et al. 2011). Further empirical evidence for nonlinear public goods games can be found in Escherichia coli production of antibiotic resistance molecules and in the production of pyoverdine in Pseudomonas putida (Chuang et al. 2010;Becker et al. 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
In this article, I demonstrate two ways in which our major theories of the evolution of cooperation may fail to capture particular social phenomena. The first shortcoming of our current major theories stems from the possibility of mischaracterizing the cooperative problem in game theory. The second shortcoming of our current major theories is the insensitivity of these explanatory models to ecological and genomic context. As a case study to illustrate these points, I will use the cooperative interaction of a species of myxobacteria called Myxococcus xanthus. M. xanthus cooperate in many areas of their life cycle—in quorum sensing, social motility, fruiting body formation, and predation. I focus in particular on predation as we have not yet discovered an adequate explanation of how they sustain cooperative predation in the face of developmental cheats. In explaining why we have not, I draw generalizable conclusions that shed light on our use of simplified models to explain real-world behaviors in a variety of organisms.
... their efficient cooperative hunting, where the independent decision-making of each member can lead to the successful completion of the group's hunting task. This biocluster phenomenon has sparked significant interest in both the biology community [1][2][3] and the robotics community. Wolf-like cooperative hunting has gained popularity in robotics due to its potential applications in security and rescue scenarios [4,5], as well as in intelligent transportation systems [6] and military operations [7][8][9]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper considers the problem of autonomous cooperative hunting in an unknown dynamic environment, where a group of mobile agents collaborate to capture a moving target. Due to the decentralized decision-making nature of multi-agent systems and the presence of real-world constraints, it is a challenging task. To solve this problem, an artificial rule based hunting algorithm (AR-HA) is firstly developed based on the principles of attraction and repulsion with heading adjustment, and each agent is controlled by the designed rules. Then, to further enhance the stability of cooperative hunting, a self-learning algorithm based on Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic policy gradient (SL-TD3) is proposed. Each agent is governed by its own SL-TD3 controller and learns independently from its interaction with the environment, taking advantage of the reward function designed based on the control rules of AR-HA. Besides, in order to improve training efficiency, imitation learning is employed to initialize the actor network. Experiments on both virtual and real robots demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms for autonomous cooperative hunting.
... Wolves at YNP also might travel in larger groups in April, at least compared to the SNF, because they primarily hunt riskier prey . The main prey in YNP are elk (Cervus canadensis) and bison (Bison bison), and the optimum success of wolves killing elk is with at least 3-4 wolves (MacNulty et al. 2012) and for capturing bison about 11 wolves . ...
Article
Elucidating factors influencing home range size is fundamental to the ecology and management of wildlife species, particularly those of conservation concern, because they can provide insight into how species utilize and interact with their environment. Variation in home range size can be related to intraspecific competition and social organization, energetic requirements in relation to habitat productivity, allometric relationships, and population density. The Mexican Gray Wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) is an endangered subspecies of the Gray Wolf whose home range size has not yet been studied. We examined ecological and social drivers of home range size of 22 Mexican Wolf packs between 2017 and 2021 across 4 biological time frames: annual; denning; post-denning; and non-denning. We used a 95% Brownian Bridge Movement Model home range estimator and generalized linear mixed-effect models to assess these relationships. Home range size was inversely correlated with estimated ungulate biomass, which was the most influential driver of home range size at annual and post-denning time frames. Larger packs utilized larger ranges during denning and post-denning time frames, while packs with larger litters had smaller ranges during the denning season. Snow depth was inversely related to home range size during the non-denning season. Our results indicate that both ecological and social factors are important and seasonally dependent in driving Mexican Wolf home range size. Use of a multiscale approach in future home range studies could discern relevant factors for species during time frames of interest.
Article
Full-text available
The removal or addition of a predator in an ecosystem can trigger a trophic cascade, whereby the predator indirectly influences plants and/or abiotic processes via direct effects on its herbivore prey. A trophic cascade can operate through a density‐mediated indirect effect (DMIE), where the predator reduces herbivore density via predation, and/or through a trait‐mediated indirect effect (TMIE), where the predator induces an herbivore trait response that modifies the herbivore's effect on plants. Manipulative experiments suggest that TMIEs are an equivalent or more important driver of trophic cascades than are DMIEs. Whether this applies generally in nature is uncertain because few studies have directly compared the magnitudes of TMIEs and DMIEs on natural unmanipulated field patterns. A TMIE is often invoked to explain the textbook trophic cascade involving wolves (Canis lupus), elk (Cervus canadensis), and aspen (Populus tremuloides) in northern Yellowstone National Park. This hypothesis posits that wolves indirectly increase recruitment of young aspen into the overstory primarily through reduced elk browsing in response to spatial variation in wolf predation risk rather than through reduced elk population density. To test this hypothesis, we compared the effects of spatiotemporal variation in wolf predation risk and temporal variation in elk population density on unmanipulated patterns of browsing and recruitment of young aspen across 113 aspen stands over a 21‐year period (1999–2019) in northern Yellowstone National Park. Only 2 of 10 indices of wolf predation risk had statistically meaningful effects on browsing and recruitment of young aspen, and these effects were 8–28 times weaker than the effect of elk density. To the extent that temporal variation in elk density was attributable to wolf predation, our results suggest that the wolf–elk–aspen trophic cascade was primarily density‐mediated rather than trait‐mediated. This aligns with the alternative hypothesis that wolves and other actively hunting predators with broad habitat domains cause DMIEs to dominate whenever prey, such as elk, also have a broad habitat domain. For at least this type of predator–prey community, our study suggests that risk‐induced trait responses can be abstracted or ignored while still achieving an accurate understanding of trophic cascades.
Chapter
This book brings together contributions to the Fourth Artificial Life Workshop, held at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the summer of 1994. July 6-8, 1994 · The Massachusetts Institute of Technology The field of artificial life has recently emerged through the interaction of research in biology, physics, parallel computing, artificial intelligence, and complex adaptive systems. The goal is to understand, through synthetic experiments, the organizational principles underlying the dynamics (usually the nonlinear dynamics) of living systems. This book brings together contributions to the Fourth Artificial Life Workshop, held at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the summer of 1994. Topics include: Self-organization and emergent functionality • Definitions of life • Origin of life • Self-reproduction • Computer viruses • Synthesis of "the living state." • Evolution and population genetics • Coevolution and ecological dynamics • Growth, development, and differentiation • Organization and behavior of social and colonial organisms • Animal behavior • Global and local ecosystems and their intersections • Autonomous agents (mobile robots and software agents) • Collective intelligence ("swarm" intelligence) • Theoretical biology • Philosophical issues in A-life (from ontology to ethics) • Formalisms and tools for A-life research • Guidelines and safeguards for the practice of A-life. Bradford Books imprint
Chapter
Since the development of game theory, the analysis of animal behaviour using the theories of economics has become a growing field of biological research in which models of games and markets play an important role. Studies of sexual selection, interspecific mutualism and intraspecific cooperation show that individuals exchange commodities to their mutual benefit; the exchange values of commodities are a source of conflict, and behavioural mechanisms such as partner choice and contest between competitors determines the composition of trading pairs or groups. These 'biological markets' can be examined to gain a better understanding of the underlying principles of evolutionary ecology. In this volume scientists from different disciplines combine insights from economics, evolutionary biology and the social sciences to look at comparative aspects of economic behaviour in humans and other animals. Aimed primarily at evolutionary biologists and anthropologists, it will also appeal to psychologists and economists interested in an evolutionary approach.
Article
THE FIRST REAL BEGINNING to our understanding of wolf social ecology came from wolf 2204 on 23 May 1972. State depredation control trapper Lawrence Waino, of Duluth, Minnesota, had caught this female wolf 112 km ( 67 mi) south of where L. D. Mech had radio-collared her in the Superior National Forest 2 years earlier. A young lone wolf, nomadic over 100 km2 (40 mi2) during the 9 months Mech had been able to keep track of her, she had then disappeared until Waino caught her. From her nipples it was apparent that she had just been nursing pups. "This was the puzzle piece I needed," stated Mech. "I had already radio-tracked lone wolves long distances, and I had observed pack members splitting off and dispersing. My hunch was that the next step was for loners to find a new area and a mate, settle down, produce pups, and start their own pack. Wolf 2204 had done just that."
Article
Wild Wolves (Canis lupus) that had produced pups in earlier years but were not currently pregnant, and ovariectomized captive Wolves, dug dens during and after the whelping season even though they produced no pups. These observations suggest that den digging is not a function of pregnancy or of ovarian estrogen or progesterone. We hypothesize that increasing prolactin in spring elicits or mediates den-digging behavior.
Article
We studied interactions of reintroduced wolves (Canis lupus) with bison (Bison bison) in Yellowstone National Park. Only 2 of 41 wolves in this study had been exposed to bison before their translocation. Wolves were more successful killing elk (Cervus elaphus) than bison, and elk were more abundant than bison, so elk were the primary prey of wolves. Except for a lone emaciated bison calf killed by 8 1-year-old wolves 21 days after their release, the 1st documented kill occurred 25 months after wolves were released. Fourteen bison kills were documented from April 1995 through March 1999. All kills were made in late winter when bison were vulnerable because of poor condition or of bison that were injured or young. Wolves learned to kill bison and killed more bison where elk were absent or scarce. We predict that wolves that have learned to kill bison will kill them more regularly, at least in spring. The results of this study indicate how adaptable wolves are at killing prey species new to them.
Article
The predator-prey aspects of four cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) groups were studied in Nairobi National Park, Kenya, from October, 1966, through February, 1967. Hunt:kill ratios were applied to direct observation data of 157 hunts and 30 kills. Hunting success apparently varied with habitat-type, prey species, sex and age-classes of prey, herd size, cheetah group size, and the cheetah's or group's hunting experience. Cheetah kills appeared to be other than a random sample of prey populations. There was differential selection in prey of females and juveniles.