Vitamin D supplementation in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease: A systematic review

Dermato-Endocrinology 04/2012; 4(2):118-27. DOI: 10.4161/derm.20014
Source: PubMed


Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a variety of skeletal, cardiometabolic, and immunologic co-morbidities that are present in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We performed a systematic review to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation, in the form of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol, on various health outcomes in early CKD. Seventeen clinical trials were identified, only two of which were randomized, placebo controlled trials. The majority of studies supplementing with > 2,000 IU/day of cholecalciferol achieved optimal vitamin D status, whereas studies supplementing with ergocalciferol were less consistent. Studies varied widely in their effects on lowering serum parathyroid hormone concentrations. Few studies investigated effects of vitamin D treatment on other clinical health indicators in early CKD. Rigorous studies are necessary to investigate optimal vitamin D dosing strategies in early CKD for the maintenance of adequate vitamin D status, management of secondary hyperparathyroidism and improvement of non-skeletal related clinical outcomes.

Download full-text


Available from: Haimanot Wasse
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are especially prone to vitamin D insufficiency. Narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) treatment increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in dermatological patients, and we studied whether it also improves vitamin D balance in CKD patients on haemodialysis. Fifteen dialysis patients (mean age 48.3 years) and 12 healthy subjects (mean age 43.6 years) received nine NB-UVB exposures on the upper body. Serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)(2)D were measured before and after the exposures. From skin biopsy specimen messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of CYP24A1 and CYP27B1, two enzymes needed for hydroxylation of vitamin D into its active metabolites, and of antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin, were examined. Before NB-UVB, mean serum 25(OH)D was 32.5 ± 10.2 nmol/L in the dialysis patients and 60.2 ± 18.0 nmol/L in the healthy subjects (P < 0.001). After eight NB-UVB exposures, serum 25(OH)D increased by 13.8 nmol/L (43%; P < 0.001) and serum 1,25(OH)(2)D by 3.3 pmol/L (27%; P = 0.002) in the dialysis patients. After NB-UVB exposures, CYP27B1 mRNA was increased (P = 0.04), whereas cathelicidin mRNA was decreased (P < 0.0001) compared to non-treated healthy subjects. One and 2 months after NB-UVB exposure, serum 25(OH)D was still 10% higher than initially in the dialysis patients. The present study shows that a short course of NB-UVB exposure increases significantly serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)(2)D in dialysis patients. The effect is, however, short lasting suggesting that the patients need cyclic NB-UVB exposure to maintain their improved vitamin D concentration.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2011 · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paradigm of human resource development has shifted to workplace learning and performance. An identification of global trends of workplace learning can help us to better connect with workplace learning stakeholders. Using a comprehensive search of 43 contemporary journal, magazine and newspaper articles, this paper reviews and synthesizes global trends in workplace learning in terms of the following five aspects: people/who, approach/how, time/when, place/where and thing/what. Consequently, five main trends are identified as follows: (1) Types of participants and facilitators are diversifying, (2) Emerging approach focus is practice-based systemic learning, (3) The flexibility of learning time has been increasing, (4) Learning by working and learning through systematic instruction at the workplace have been highly appraised, and (5) Workplace learning culture as well as practitioner's active engagement and motivation to learn have become key elements.
    No preview · Conference Paper · Jan 2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence that vitamin D reduces the risk of many types of disease is increasing exponentially. In 2011, 3,100 publications with "vitamin D" in the title or abstract were published, up from 2,606 in 2010, 1,303 in 2005, and 796 in 2000. A committee operating under the auspices of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the US National Academies reviewed the evidence for beneficial effects of vitamin D. Their report, issued at the end of 2010,(1) found what they considered to be strong evidence for only one health outcome: skeletal health. They considered beneficial evidence only from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused mainly on skeletal health. In contrast, to justify concern about higher vitamin D intake and serum 25(OH)D concentrations, they used data from nested case-control studies reporting U-shaped outcomes of prediagnostic serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] for cancer and all-cause mortality rates. They set the daily recommended intake of vitamin D at 600-800 IU for most children and adults and defined vitamin D sufficiency as a serum 25(OH)D level above 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/l). They also set a daily upper intake of 4,000 IU of vitamin D(3) and called for more RCTs to determine nonskeletal health effects. As of this writing, more than 130 journal publications have criticized the IOM report as being too conservative. One summarized the problems succinctly: "The IOM recommendations for vitamin D fail in a major way on logic, on science, and on effective public health guidance. Moreover, by failing to use a physiological referent, the IOM approach constitutes precisely the wrong model for development of nutritional policy."(2).
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2012 · Dermato-Endocrinology
Show more