Content uploaded by Kevin C O'Leary
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kevin C O'Leary
Content may be subject to copyright.
S H O R T R E P O R T Open Access
Physical activity and quality of life in severely
obese individuals seeking bariatric surgery or
lifestyle intervention
Dale S Bond
1*
, Jessica L Unick
1
, John M Jakicic
2
, Sivamainthan Vithiananthan
3
, Jennifer Trautvetter
1
,
Kevin CO’Leary
1
and Rena R Wing
1
Abstract
Background: Given that bariatric surgery (BS) and lifestyle intervention (LI) represent two vastly different
approaches to treating severe obesity, there is growing interest in whether individuals who seek BS versus LI also
differ on weight-related behaviors. In the present study, we compared BS- and LI-seekers on physical activity (PA)
and sedentary behaviors (SB), and examined between-group differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL),
while controlling for PA.
Findings: A sample of 34 LI-seekers were matched with 34 BS-seekers on gender, age, BMI, and PA monitor-daily
wear time (age: 42.1±10.0 years; BMI: 45.6±6.5 kg/m
2
). PA and SB were assessed over a 7-day period via the
SenseWear Armband (SWA). HRQoL was measured using the SF-36, with scores standardized to a population
normal distribution (M=50, SD=10). Participants wore the SWA for 13.7±1.6 h/day. BS-seekers did not differ from
LI-seekers on average min/d over the wear period spent in SB (641±117.1 vs. 638.4±133.4, p=0.62) or light
(136.4±76.1 vs. 145.5±72.5, p=0.59) and moderate-to-vigorous (>1-min bouts=36.4±26.2 vs. 40.2±31.3, p=0.59;
≥10-min bouts=5.7±8.3 vs. 10.2±17.0, p=0.17) PA. BS-seekers reported significantly lower SF-36 physical functioning
(42.4±10.9 vs. 49.0±6.8, p=0.004) and physical component summary (43.9±10.1 vs. 48.9±7.0) scores versus LI-seekers.
BS-seeker group status was related to lower physical functioning (β=0.30, p=0.009), independent of gender, age,
BMI, and daily PA.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that seeking BS versus LI is not related to patterns of PA or SB, and that lower
subjective physical functioning is not associated with lower overall PA levels in BS-seekers.
Keywords: Bariatric surgery, Lifestyle intervention, Physical activity, Sedentary, Health-related quality of life,
Sensewear armband
Introduction
Two options for treating severe obesity are bariatric sur-
gery and lifestyle intervention. To achieve weight loss,
bariatric surgery procedures force modification of eating
behavior and alter appetite regulation via surgical re-
striction of food intake, inducing nutrient malabsorption,
and producing favorable changes in gut peptides/hor-
mones [1]. Conversely, the goal of lifestyle intervention,
a more conservative approach, is to promote voluntary
modification of eating and physical activity behaviors to
lose weight [2].
Given that bariatric surgery and lifestyle intervention
are substantially different approaches to weight loss,
there is a question of whether individuals who seek bar-
iatric surgery versus lifestyle interventions may also dif-
fer in important ways. Research has shown that bariatric
surgery-seekers, compared to lifestyle intervention-
seekers, are heavier, more often diagnosed with comor-
bidities, and report poorer health-related quality of life
(HRQoL) impairments [3-5]. However, it is less clear
whether these groups also differ on weight-related beha-
viors. Studies comparing eating behaviors of bariatric
* Correspondence: dbond@lifespan.org
1
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Miriam Hospital/Weight
Control and Diabetes Research Center, Warren Alpert Medical School of
Brown University, 196 Richmond Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2012 Bond et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Bond et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2012, 10:86
http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/86
surgery- and lifestyle intervention-seekers have produced
mixed findings [3,5]. To our knowledge, no study has
compared physical activity and sedentary behaviors in
these groups.
Our previous research using objective measures shows
that bariatric surgery-seekers have low physical activity
levels and spend 80% of their time in sedentary beha-
viors [6,7]. However, it is not known whether equally
overweight individuals seeking to lose weight via lifestyle
intervention have similar levels of physical activity and
sedentary behaviors. Thus, the primary aim of this study
was to compare objectively-measured daily time spent in
physical activity and sedentary behaviors between baria-
tric surgery- and lifestyle intervention-seekers. Addition-
ally, while previous research has found that lower
physical activity is associated with worse HRQoL in bar-
iatric surgery-seekers [8,9], this has not been shown in
lifestyle intervention-seekers. Thus, a secondary aim was
to examine HRQOL differences between these groups,
while controlling for physical activity, body mass index
(BMI) and demographics.
Methods
Participants and procedures
Participants were 21–65 years of age, with a
BMI ≥35 kg/m
2
and no medical contraindications for
physical activity, who were seeking to lose weight via
bariatric surgery or lifestyle intervention. Participants
seeking bariatric surgery in the current study were ini-
tially recruited from local surgery clinics and patient
support groups to participate in a wider study investigat-
ing behavioral changes in this population. Lifestyle
intervention-seekers were recruited from the community
via internet and newspaper advertisements. Prior to
treatment, both groups completed questionnaires and
were given an activity monitor to wear for 7 consecutive
days. Study procedures were approved by The Miriam
Hospital institutional review board (Providence, RI,
USA).
Measures
Objective physical activity
The SenseWear Armband (SWA; BodyMedia, Pitts-
burgh, PA) simultaneously integrates motion data from a
biaxial accelerometer and physiological metrics from
multiple sensors to provide minute-by-minute estimates
of energy expenditure at different intensity levels. The
SWA has been shown to produce valid energy expend-
iture estimates when evaluated against indirect calorim-
etry and doubly labeled water [10,11]. For data to be
considered valid, participants had to wear the SWA for
≥8 h/d on 4 days. The intensity of activity for each mi-
nute of wear time was calculated and expressed using
metabolic equivalents (METs) to determine average daily
time (min/d) spent in sedentary (<1.5 METs) activities,
and light (1.5-2.9 METs), moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA:
≥3 METs; ≥1 and ≥10-min bouts), and total (≥1.5 METs)
PA.
HRQoL
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) is
a widely used and psychometrically sound HRQoL meas-
ure. Scores from 8 domains relating to physical (physical
function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health) and
mental (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, men-
tal health) health are individually weighted into physical
Table 1 Characteristics of severely obese participants seeking bariatric surgery or lifestyle intervention
Bariatric Surgery (N = 34) Lifestyle Intervention (N = 34) P
Age (yrs) 43.3 ± 9.4 40.9 ± 10.5 0.33
% Female 76.5 76.5 1.00
% Race 0.25
White 79.4 70.6
African-American 5.9 14.7
American Indian/Alaskan Native 2.9 0.0
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 2.9 0.0
Other 8.8 5.9
Don’t know 0.0 8.8
% Ethnicity 1.00
Non-Hispanic 91.2 91.2
Hispanic 8.8 8.8
BMI (kg/m
2
) 46.2 ± 7.8 45.0 ± 4.9 0.49
Weight (kg) 129.9 ± 27.6 127.7 ± 19.6 0.71
Note. Pvalues are based on independent samples t-tests for continuous variables and χ
2
tests for categorical variables. BMI = body mass index.
Bond et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2012, 10:86 Page 2 of 5
http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/86
(PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scales.
Scores are transformed to a 0–100 scale and standar-
dized to a population normal distribution (M = 50, SD =
10), with higher scores representing better HRQoL
[12,13].
Statistical Analysis
Analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (Ver-
sion 18.0, Chicago, IL). A sample of 34 lifestyle
intervention-seekers was matched with 34 bariatric sur-
gery-seekers, selected from a wider study database
(n = 130), on gender, age, BMI, and daily SWA wear
time. Independent t-tests examined group differences in
continuous variables. Chi-square analyses compared pro-
portions across categories. Linear regression examined
the association of group status (bariatric surgery- vs. life-
style intervention-seekers) with HRQoL, adjusting for
total physical activity min/d, BMI, age, and sex.
Results
Participants
As shown in Table 1, bariatric surgery-seekers and life-
style intervention-seekers did not differ significantly on
demographics or weight characteristics. Overall, partici-
pants on average were 42.1±10.0 years of age, mostly fe-
male (76.5%) and non-Hispanic White (75%), with
BMI=45.6±6.5 kg/m
2
and weight=128.8 ±23.8 kg.
Differences in PA and SB
Participants wore the SWA for 13.7±1.6h/day over a 7-day
period. Table 2 shows that bariatric surgery- and lifestyle
intervention-seekers did not differ in average daily min/d
spent performing sedentary behaviors and physical activ-
ity of different intensities (p’s>0.50).
Additionally, overall, the groups did not differ in aver-
age daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity minutes
accumulated in ≥10-min bouts across the 7-day wear
period (bariatric surgery-seeker: 5.7±8.3 vs. lifestyle inter-
vention-seeker: 10.2±7.1, p=0.17). However, a significantly
smaller proportion of bariatric surgery-seekers performed
at least one 10-min bout versus lifestyle intervention-
seekers (47.1%/n=16 vs. 82.4%/n=28, p=0.005). Among
these participants, the groups did not differ in the num-
ber (bariatric surgery-seeker: 5.8±3.4 vs. lifestyle inter-
vention-seeker: 6.8±9.4, p=0.68) or average duration
(bariatric surgery-seeker: 14.4±4.9 vs. lifestyle interven-
tion-seeker: 13.4±3.9, p=0.46) of bouts performed.
Differences in HRQoL
Bariatric surgery-seekers reported lower scores on the
physical function domain and the PCS, compared to life-
style intervention-seekers (p’s<0.05) (Table 2). In regres-
sion analyses, bariatric surgery-seeker group status was
associated with lower physical function scores (β=0.30,
p=0.009), independent of gender, age, BMI, and total PA
Table 2 Comparison of time spent performing activities of varying intensity and reported health-related quality of life
between severely obese participants seeking bariatric surgery or lifestyle intervention
Bariatric Surgery (N = 34) Lifestyle Intervention (N = 34) P
Activity intensity (METs)
Sedentary (min/d) 641.0 ± 117.7 638.4 ± 133.4 0.62
Light (min/d) 136.4 ± 76.1 145.5 ± 72.5 0.59
Moderate-to-vigorous (min/d) 36.4 ± 26.2 40.2 ± 31.3 0.59
Total physical activity (min/d) 172.8 ± 94.3 185.7 ± 94.1 0.58
Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36)
Physical function 42.4 ± 10.9 49.0 ± 6.8 0.004
Role-physical 46.7 ± 11.1 49.0 ± 10.7 0.39
Bodily pain 50.6 ± 7.6 52.8 ± 7.1 0.22
General health 41.8± 9.6 42.3 ± 8.6 0.83
Physical component summary 43.9 ± 10.1 48.9 ± 7.0 0.02
Vitality 46.2 ± 10.0 47.0 ± 10.1 0.12
Social functioning 46.6 ± 8.6 47.6 ± 10.3 0.73
Role-emotional 49.1± 10.1 48.2 ± 12.1 0.52
Mental health 49.5± 9.0 48.1 ± 10.0 0.54
Mental component summary 49.1 ± 9.3 47.2 ± 11.3 0.44
Note. Pvalues are based on independent t-tests. Values are presented as mean ± standard devia tion. METs = metabolic equivalents. Activity intensity (METs)
thresholds = sedentary (<1.5 METs), light (1.5-2.9 METs), moderate-to- vigorous (≥3 METS), and total physical activity (≥1.5 METs). SF-36 scores are standardized to a
population normal distribution with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 to provide context for reported degree of health-related quality of life
impairment [12].
Bond et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2012, 10:86 Page 3 of 5
http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/86
min/d [Model R
2
=0.20, F(5, 67)=3.1, p=0.02]. The SF-36
PCS model was not significant.
Discussion
Given that bariatric surgery is the most aggressive ap-
proach for treating severe obesity, there is interest in
whether individuals who seek bariatric surgery engage in
less favorable weight-control behaviors than those who
opt for a less aggressive lifestyle intervention approach.
However, previous research in this area has been limited
to eating behaviors [3,5].
The current study compared daily time spent in phys-
ical activity and sedentary behaviors among individuals
seeking bariatric surgery versus lifestyle intervention. We
found that these groups exhibited a remarkably similar
profile characterized by high levels of sedentary behavior
and infrequent engagement in structured or bout-related
moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Overall, bariatric
surgery- and lifestyle intervention-seekers engaged in
similar low levels of bout-related moderate-to-vigorous
physical activity; however, a greater proportion of lifestyle
intervention-seekers actually performed this type of ac-
tivity. Future studies are needed to investigate possible
barriers to bout-related moderate-to-vigorous physical
activity in bariatric surgery-seekers (e.g., low motivation,
confidence, fear of injury, etc.) that may account for this
difference [14].
We also compared bariatric surgery- and lifestyle
intervention-seekers on HRQoL. Similar to previous
studies [4,5], bariatric surgery-seekers reported lower
physical HRQoL than lifestyle intervention-seekers.
Interestingly, however, this difference occurred despite
the groups having similar body weight and physical ac-
tivity levels. While reasons for this difference are not en-
tirely clear, one possibility may be that lower perceived
physical functioning is a primary reason why severely
obese individuals opt for bariatric surgery, a more ag-
gressive treatment modality, over lifestyle intervention, a
more conservative treatment modality. It is also possible
that this finding is due in part to differences between the
groups on actual or perceived health indicators (e.g.,
duration of severe obesity, severity of weight-related
comorbidities) that were not directly measured.
Importantly, the above finding also suggests that lower
subjective physical functioning in bariatric surgery-
seekers is not a barrier to PA. This discordance between
subjective and objective physical functioning in bariatric
surgery-seekers was also shown in another recent study,
where 41 % of bariatric surgery-seekers reported having
walking limitations yet did not demonstrate limitations
during an objective walking test [9].
Study strengths include use of an objective physical ac-
tivity measure and matching of lifestyle intervention and
bariatric surgery participants on potential confounding
variables. This study also has certain limitations includ-
ing relatively small sample size, non-random assignment
of participants, and exclusion of participants with med-
ical contraindications for physical activity, that may limit
generalizability to all severely obese individuals.
In summary, to our knowledge, this is the first study
to compare severely obese individuals seeking bariatric
surgery or lifestyle intervention on patterns of physical
activity and sedentary behaviors. We found that these
groups engaged in similar levels of physical activity and
sedentary behaviors, and that lower subjective physical
functioning among bariatric surgery-seekers was not
associated with lower overall physical activity levels. The
results suggest that similar prescriptions can be used to
increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behav-
ior in severely obese individuals seeking bariatric surgery
or lifestyle intervention. Further research is needed to
determine whether interventions can produce similar
physical activity and sedentary behavior changes in these
groups.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
DSB, JLU, JMJ and RRW conceived of the design of the study and
contributed to analysis and interpretation of the data. SV, JT, and KO
contributed to data acquisition and analysis of data. DB drafted the
manuscript and all authors assisted in revising it critically for important
intellectual content. All authors gave final approval of the version to be
published.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by grants from the National Institute of Diabetes
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01 DK08348-04) and the National Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute (5 T32 HL076134-04). Appreciation is expressed to
the following surgeons who contributed patients to this study: G. Dean
Roye, MD, Beth A. Ryder MD, Department of Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical
School of Brown University, Providence, RI; and Dieter Pohl, MD, Jeannine
Giovanni, MD, Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence RI.
Author details
1
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Miriam Hospital/Weight
Control and Diabetes Research Center, Warren Alpert Medical School of
Brown University, 196 Richmond Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
2
Department of Health and Physical Activity, Physical Activity and Weight
Management Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
3
Department of Surgery, The Miriam Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School
of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Received: 18 May 2012 Accepted: 16 July 2012
Published: 28 July 2012
References
1. Blackburn GL, Hutter MM, Harvey AM, et al:Expert panel on weight loss
surgery: executive report update. Obesity 2009, 17:842–862.
2. Bond DS, Wing RR: Behavioral interventions for the treatment of obesity
in women with or at risk of cardiovascular disease. Current Cardiovascular
Risk Reports 2009, 3:219–225.
3. Ronchi A, Marinari GM, Sukkar SG, Scopinaro N, Adami GF: Behavioral
characteristics of severely obese patients seeking bariatric surgery: cross-
sectional study with alimentary interview. Behav Med 2008, 33:145–150.
4. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Williams GR: Health-related quality of life varies
among obese subgroups. Obes Res 2002, 10:748–756.
Bond et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2012, 10:86 Page 4 of 5
http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/86
5. Stout AL, Applegate KL, Friedman KE, Grant JP, Musante GJ: Psychological
correlates of obese patients seeking surgical or residential weight loss
treatment. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007, 3:369–375.
6. Bond DS, Jakicic JM, Unick JL, et al:Pre- to postoperative physical activity
changes in bariatric surgery patients: self report vs. objective measures.
Obesity 2010, 18:2395–2397.
7. Bond DS, Unick JL, Jakicic JM, et al:Objective assessment of time spent
being sedentary in bariatric surgery candidates. Obes Surg 2011,
21:811–814.
8. Bond DS, Phelan S, Wolfe LG, et al:Becoming physically active after
bariatric surgery is associated with improved weight loss and
health-related quality of life. Obesity 2009, 17:78–83.
9. King WC, Engel SG, Elder KA, et al:Walking capacity of bariatric surgery
candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2012, 8:48–59.
10. Jakicic JM, Marcus M, Gallagher KI, et al:Evaluation of the SenseWear Pro
Armband to assess energy expenditure during exercise. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 2004, 36:897–904.
11. Johannsen DL, Calabro MA, Stewart J, Franke W, Rood JC, Welk GJ:
Accuracy of armband monitors for measuring daily energy expenditure
in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42:2134–2140.
12. Ware JE, Kosinski M: SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a
manual for users of version 1. second editionth edition. Lincoln, RI:
QualityMetric, Inc; 2001.
13. Ware JE: SF-36 Health Survey update. Spine 2000, 25:3130–3139.
14. Wouters EJ, Larsen JK, Zijlstra H, van Ramshorst B, Geenen R: Physical
activity after surgery for severe obesity: the role of exercise cognitions.
Obes Surg 2011, 21:1894–1899.
doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-86
Cite this article as: Bond et al.:Physical activity and quality of life in
severely obese individuals seeking bariatric surgery or lifestyle
intervention. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2012 10:86.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
and take full advantage of:
• Convenient online submission
• Thorough peer review
• No space constraints or color figure charges
• Immediate publication on acceptance
• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
• Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit
Bond et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2012, 10:86 Page 5 of 5
http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/86