The reactivity of the flame retardant and its decomposition temperature control the condensed-
phase action in bisphenol A polycarbonate/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene/polytetrafluoroethylene
(PC/ABSPTFE) blends. Thus, to increase charring in the condensed
phase of PC/ABSPTFE + aryl phosphate, two halogen-free flame retardants were synthesized:
3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexylbisphenol bis(diphenyl phosphate) (TMC-BDP) and bisphenol A
bis(diethyl phosphate) (BEP). Their performance is compared to bisphenol A bis(diphenyl
phosphate) (BDP) in PC/ABSPTFE blend. The comprehensive study was carried out using
thermogravimetry (TG); TG coupled with Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (TGFTIR);
the Underwriters Laboratory burning chamber (UL 94); limiting oxygen index
(LOI); cone calorimeter at different irradiations; tensile, bending and heat distortion temperature
tests; as well as rheological studies and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC).
With respect to pyrolysis, TMC-BDP works as well as BDP in the PC/ABSPTFE blend by
enhancing the cross-linking of PC, whereas BEP shows worse performance because it
prefers cross-linking with itself rather than with PC. As to its fire behavior, PC/ABSPTFE +
TMC-BDP presents results very similar to PC/ABSPTFE + BDP; the blend PC/ABSPTFE + BEP
shows lower flame inhibition and higher total heat evolved (THE). The UL 94 for the materials
with TMC-BDP and BDP improved from HB to V0 for specimens of 3.2 mm thickness
compared to PC/ABSPTFE and PC/ABSPTFE + BEP; the LOI increased from around 24% up to
around 28%, respectively. BEP works as the strongest plasticizer in PC/ABSPTFE, whereas
the blends with TMC-BDP and BDP present the same rheological properties. PC/ABSPTFE +
TMC-BDP exhibits the best mechanical properties among all flame-retarded blends.