Globalisation and development: The relevance of classical "dependency" theory for the world today

International Social Science Journal 10/2011; 61(202):467 - 488. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01786.x


The International Social Science Journal, founded by UNESCO in 1949, is published quarterly in six language editions: English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese and Russian. Three decades ago, on the pages of this journal, the Swiss sociologist Volker Bornschier (1980), in a summary of path-breaking empirical investigations, which vindicated much of the thinking of the social sciences from Latin America, critical of the dependency relations of the global ‘South’ from the developed ‘North’, broke a long-standing taboo in the social sciences of the developed countries by predicting that the effects of multinational corporations on economic growth and social inequality in their host countries are not entirely positive. In the 103 countries, statistically investigated by Bornschier in the period 1960-1977, the short-term effect of fresh foreign direct investment for economic growth was found to be significantly positive; but the long-term effect of multinational corporations, especially in the poorer countries of Africa, Asian and Latin America, was significantly negative. Three decades of neo-liberalism ever since, of course, were characterized by the return to the old and up to the 1970s dominant belief that open markets, foreign direct investment, and non-intervention by governments are the ideal and only receipt for long-term stable economic growth and full employment. Is Bornschier’s message still valid, three decades later, in the middle of the biggest world economic recession since the 1930s? The aim of this article is to show the basic validity of the then research design and research question with the data of today. Should we in the global “North”, most seriously affected by the current crisis, finally learn the lessons offered by the experience of the periphery (i.e. the majority of the countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Oceania) and the semi-periphery (i.e. the countries which are positioned between the periphery and core countries, like China, India, and Mexico) in earlier periods of development in the world economy? And should especially Europe begin to study the experiences of Latin America and should it finally learn that dependence indeed has a critical impact on the overall long-term development trends of a nation and that it tends towards the polarization of social relations, which we now witness all over Europe? Now that dependency and penetration by the multinational corporations have risen in Europe to staggering proportions, as we will demonstrate in this article? The rediscovery of the radical ‘dependency’ perspective means a fundamental break with the existing dominant thinking on the subject during the current crisis in the global economy. The logic of European Union policy making, especially, is still geared towards the ‘internal market’ and the four ‘big’ freedoms of trade, capital, services and investment (Tausch, Ghymers, 2007).

Download full-text


Available from: Arno Tausch, Feb 27, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: This article looks at the long-term, structural determinants of environmental and public health performance in the world system. Methods: In multiple standard ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models, we tested the effects of 26 standard predictor variables, including the 'four freedoms' of goods, capital, labour and services, on the following indicators of sustainable development and public health: avoiding net trade of ecological footprint global hectare (gha) per person; avoiding high carbon emissions per million US dollars GDP; avoiding high CO2 per capita (gha/cap); avoiding high ecological footprint per capita; avoiding becoming victim of natural disasters; a good performance on the Environmental Performance Index (EPI); a good performance on the Happy Life Years (HLYs) scale; and a good performance on the Happy Planet Index (HPI). Results: Our research showed that the apprehensions of quantitative research, critical of neo-liberal globalization, are fully vindicated by the significant negative environmental and public health effects of the foreign savings rate. High foreign savings are indeed a driver of global footprint, and are a blockade against a satisfactory HPI performance. The new international division of labour is one of the prime drivers of high CO2 per capita emissions. Multinational Corporation (MNC) penetration, the master variable of most quantitative dependency theories, blocks EPI and several other socially important processes. Worker remittances have a significant positive effect on the HPI, and HLYs. Conclusion: We re-analysed the solid macro-political and macro-sociological evidence on a global scale, published in the world's leading peer-reviewed social science, ecological and public health journals, which seem to indicate that there are contradictions between unfettered globalization and unconstrained world economic openness and sustainable development and public health development. We suggest that there seems to be a strong interaction between 'transnational capitalist penetration' and 'environmental and public health degradation'. Global policy-making finally should dare to take the globalization-critical organizations of 'civil society' seriously. This conclusion not only holds for the countries of the developed "West", but also, increasingly, for the growing democracy and civil society movements around the globe, in countries as diverse as Brazil, Russia, China, or ever larger parts of the Muslim world.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2013 · International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM)
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper shows the relationship between regime and dependency theories. Its central argument is that international regimes primarily serve the accumulation interests of metropolitan capitalism, and hence perpetuate dependency. Using the case of the apparel industry in sub-Saharan Africa, it brings to the fore both the dependency and struggle in international regimes that mainstream regime theory masks. The paper concludes that, in its struggle to embed industry, Africa will need to clearly interpret the parameters of a more complex international political economy than that described in the classic dependency literature of the 1970s, and respond to them with cleverness and alacrity.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2014 · Review of African Political Economy
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The “welfare hammock” - who didn’t hear already such arguments? Although the ILO in its recent "ILO World Social Protection Report 2014/2015" has clearly pointed out that social protection plays an important role in the realization of the human right to social security for all, for the reduction of poverty and inequality and that it supports inclusive growth, there is a never-ending debate about supposedly too generous social protection expenditures, especially in Europe. The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, has recently taken up these arguments, by claiming that the European Union accounts for only seven percent of the world population, but at the same time it consumes more than 40 percent of global social spending. Such perspectives overlook the analysis of the success story of the small, world-market oriented welfare states, combining social partnership, fairly encompassing trade unions and wage restraint with a fairly tight social net after 1945. 16 of the 20 global leading countries according to the World Bank Regulatory Quality Index correspond to this model. Based on the published literature on the efficiency and effectiveness of social spending, we develop a clear empirical method based on the analysis of data from ILO, Eurostat and the OECD data, calculating the residuals from poverty before and after social transfers as the measure of the efficiency of poverty reduction, and calculating then the residuals from social protection expenditures and this newly derived measure of the efficiency of poverty reduction as the new final measure of the efficiency of social protection expenditures in poverty reduction. The empirical results of our efforts then can be summarized in the following six main theses: 1) Our re-analysis of the Angela Merkel hypothesis based on 169 countries for which we have recent ILO Social Protection data and World Bank GNI PPP data reveals that the 27 EU countries with complete data spend only 33% of global world social protection expenditures, while the 13 non-EU-OECD members, among them the major other Western democracies, spend 40% of global social protection expenditures, the BRICS 18% and the Rest of the World 9% of global social protection expenditures. A theme for reflection on the agenda of Chancellor Merkel thus could be the current relatively successful social Keynesianism of the Anglo-Saxon overseas democracies, which are in stark contrast to the savings agenda in the framework of the European “fiscal pact”. 2) In this article we will also find some empirical confirmation for the ILO's thesis according to which social security plays an important role in the realization of the human right to social security for all, for reducing poverty and inequality and for the support of inclusive growth. It indeed improves human capital and productivity, supports domestic demand and facilitates structural change in economies. 3) Our results show that the following members of the EU currently (2012) had the most efficient use of social protection expenditures in poverty reduction: Czech Republic; Ireland; Hungary; Netherlands; Slovakia; Slovenia; Luxembourg; Finland; Denmark; and Malta. This replicates the ranking described in earlier studies by the present author, and in particular emphasizes again that the Czech Republic has a very efficient social model. The "sick man on the Bosporus" of social policy in Europe by contrast was Greece; Italy; Spain; Bulgaria; Portugal; Croatia; Germany; Latvia; Poland; and France, also partially replicating results from earlier studies. 4) Sufficient data are now available in the time series in order to present reliable results on which countries improved their efficiency and which countries did not during the time period from 2005 to 2013. The superstars of improving efficiency of social protection in poverty reduction over time were Austria; Lithuania; and the Netherlands. 5) Our macro-quantitative comparisons show that an efficient social protection is indeed an important guarantee for a satisfactory overall development in the areas of gender, education, EU-2020 Performance, democracy, societal tolerance, life satisfaction, Happy Life Years, stability of democracy, and reducing the difference between the poorest and the richest strata. 6) Our results show a large concordance between findings, based on data from Eurostat and from the OECD. JEL Classification: C43, C21, F15, R11, F2, F5 Keywords: social spending, European Commission, index numbers and aggregation, cross-sectional models, spatial models, economic integration, regional economic activity, international factor movements, international political economy
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015