In this paper, we intend to quantify the contribution of turbulent events to the total Reynolds shear stresses u ′ v ′ , u ′ w ′ , and v ′ w ′ from the four different quadrants of three different planes (xy, xz, yz); and to make a comparative study among the planes in the scour geometry developed by short circular cylinder of fixed length with a fixed diameter placed over the sand bed transverse to the flow. We also intend to predict the magnitude of covariance terms u ′ v ′ , u ′ w ′ , and v ′ w ′ and their contributions in the four quadrants by making use of the conditional probability distribution of the Reynolds shear stresses −u ′ v ′ , −u ′ w ′ , and −v ′ w ′ , which can be derived by applying the cumulant-discard method to the Gram-Charlier probability distribution of the two variables. This consideration motivates the work on the flow over the obstacle marks generated on sand bed using different short cylinders. The contributions of burst-sweep cycles to the Reynolds shear stresses from the planes over and within the scour around the obstacle are computed using the quadrant analysis to identify the leading shear stress plane, which are responsible to form the scour geometry. It is discovered that the yz and xy-planes are much more important in the scouring regions, whereas xz-plane is important for the smooth surface. Using cumulant-discard method (taking into account the cumulants of less than fourth order), it is shown that the qualitative behaviours of turbulent events agree well with experimental data. Thus, it is confirmed that even the third-order probability distribution of the Reynolds stresses can describe the experimental results very well. KEYWORDS conditional probability, covariance terms, Gaussian distribution, open channel flow, scour-bed, turbulence 1 INTRODUCTION Turbulent flow has always been a challenge for scientists, that is common in nature and has an important role in several geophysical processes related to a variety of phenomena such as river morphology, landscape modelling, atmospheric dynamics, and ocean currents. As the turbulent flows are Nomenclature: a r = D c ∕L, cylinder aspect ratio; d 50 , mean sediment size; D c , diameter of cylinder; F s , sediment Froude number; H w , water depth; h ′ , thickness of sand bed; h = H w − h ′ , water depth over the sand bed; L, length of cylinder; Q, flow discharge; Re, flow Reynolds number; u, v, w, flow velocities along stream-wise, transverse and vertical to the flow; u m , maximum flow velocity; ̄ u, ̄ v, ̄ w, time-averaged flow velocities; u ′ , v ′ , w ′ , fluctuations in u, v and w; w s , width of the scour hole; x, y, z, Cartesian coordinates; í µí¼, kinematic viscosity of the fluid; í µí¼, fluid density; í µí¼ g , geometric standard deviation of the grain size distribution; Fr, froude number; í µí¼ xy , í µí¼ xz , í µí¼ yz , shear stresses; F ku , stream-wise flux of turbulent kinetic energy; F kw , vertical flux of turbulent kinetic energy; S u , coefficients of skewness in the direction of u; S w , coefficients of skewness in the direction of w; σ u = √ u ′2 , turbulence intensity (r.m.s value) in x direction; σ v = √ v ′2 , turbulence intensity (r.m.s value) in y direction; σ w = √ w ′2 , turbulence intensity (r.m.s value) in z direction. irregular, seemingly random (chaotic) and complex, till today no analytical solutions exist for turbulent flows. We believe that even after 516 years (Leonardo da Vinci around 1500, see Gad-El-Hak, 2000), turbulence studies are still in their infancy. We are still discovering how turbulence behaves, in many respects. We do have a crude, practical, working Environmetrics. 2017;28:e2442. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/env