ArticlePublisher preview available

Influences of Hearing Impairment on Early Language Development

SAGE Publications Inc
Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

It is difficult to determine exactly the effects of chronic otitis media on early language development, in part because we do not know whether hearing loss resulting from otitis media is intermittent or constant, and in part because it is difficult to assess the precise language ability of very young children. This paper focuses on those aspects of language development which one might expect hearing impairment to affect, and presents several hypotheses about the possible effects of mild-to-moderate hearing loss on the earliest stages of language development.
INFLUENCES OF HEARING IMPAIRMENT ON
EARLY LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT
RITA
C.
NAREMoRE,
PhD
BLOOMINGTON,
INDIANA
It
is difficult to determine exactly the effects of chronic otitis media on early language de-
velopment, in
part
because we do not know whether hearing loss resulting from otitis media is
intermittent or constant,
and
in
part
because it is difficult to assess the precise language ability
of very young children. This
paper
focuses on those aspects of language development which
one might expect hearing impairment to affect,
and
presents several hypotheses
about
the pos-
sible effects of mild-to-moderate hearing loss on the earliest stages of language development.
It
is difficult to make any set of con-
clusive statements about the early lan-
guage development of hearing-impaired
children. Most of the available research
into the relationship between hearing
loss and language development involves
school-age children, or children who are
enrolled in some kind of special training
program. Information about what these
children do in that crucial language-
learning period between birth
and
36
months is sadly lacking. One reason for
this, of course, is that mild-to-moderate
hearing loss may be extremely difficult
to detect in this age range. Parents are
unlikelv to ask for a hearing test unless
something in the child's behavior causes
them to suspect that the child does not
hear,
and
whether it is because parents
don't recognize the signs of hearing loss
or because there are no readily identi-
fiable signs, many children with hearing
loss go undetected. The consequences
of hearing loss in these early years can
sometimes be striking. Roughly
60%
of
the children who come through our clin-
ic with language problems, many
labeled "learning disabled," have some
degree of hearing loss, and most of these
have histories of chronic otitis media.
In most instances, of course, we cannot
determine the age of onset of the hear-
ing loss, nor are we able to say whether
it has been constant or intermittent. The
constellation of symptoms, however, is
too frequent to ignore. More informa-
tion about early language development
in hearing-impaired children is needed,
not onlv to help us predict the later pro-
gress of such children,
but
also to illumi-
nate the role played by specific levels of
auditory input in young children's com-
prehension and production of language.
This
paper
will focus on the possible
implications of hearing loss in terms of
the prerequisites for language learning
in young children. A final section will
deal with the difficulties of assessing
language development in children in
this age range.
PREREQUISITES FOR LANGUAGE
LEARNING
Because we all use language so read-
ily as a means of communicating, we
tend to take it for granted,
and
to be un-
aware of the complexity of the behavior.
What
does it mean to be able to learn
alanguage
and
use it in everyday com-
munication? To learn a language, one
must segment the stream of sounds, as-
sign meaning to the segments, and un-
derstand the rules governing the com-
bination of segments into novel utteran-
ces. This does not sound like a terribly
difficult task for an adult who already
knows a language,
and
who can ap-
proach the language-learning task in
terms of what one already perceives
about language structure. Adults know
that things have names, and
that
words
are combined to make sentences. They
know about noun plurals and verb
tenses. One difference between the
adult's situation and that of the young
child would be that children learning a
first language obviously cannot be guid-
ed in this attempt by prior knowledge
of language structure.
What
then, does
From
the
Speech
and
Hearing
Center,
Indiana
University,
Bloomington,
Indiana.
54
... Children experiencing hearing loss during the initial months of life and whose auditory thresholds are above 65 dB often exhibit defective language development. Successful education is directly dependent on early detection and treatment (22,23). Infants discharged from specialized neonatal therapy could benefit from hypoacusis screening prior to reaching 1 year of age. ...
Article
Recent advances in neonatal life-support systems have contributed to the survival of high-risk newborns. However, protection of the auditory system and the prevention of sequelae is still paramount in neonatal neurology. The aim of this study was to compare auditory-evoked responses with a toy test and acoustic reflex in the early detection of hearing loss in infants. Three groups were studied. The first was composed of infants showing less than a 30 dB biaural threshold in the neurophysiological test. The second group was made up of infants showing peripheral alterations on one side or both ears. The third group was comprised of infants who showed no responses at 95 dB HL in both ears after neurophysiological testing. The neurophysiological test, toy test, and acoustic reflex were performed on the same day, with masked results given to each investigator. Sensitivity and specificity for each toy test and acoustic reflex were calculated afterward. Forty-five controls, 44 peripheral alterations, and 8 non-response infants were studied. Most patients studied were born prior to the 37(th) week of gestation with a birthweight of less than 2,250 g, received required administration of potential ototoxic drugs and mechanical ventilation, and showed hyperbilirubinemia and hypoxia. Sensitivity for each toy was as follows: drum 0.54; wooden rattle 1.0, and metallic ratle 0.88. Specificity was 0.95, 1.0, and 1.0, respectively. Acoustic reflex sensitivity was 0.38 and specificity was 0.97. Results suggest that the wooden and the metallic rattles of the toy test can be useful tools in the study of hearing in the high-risk infant and deserve more attention in future studies.
Article
Analyses have been made of serial data from children aged 6 to 18 years. These data relate to auditory thresholds, noise exposure obtained from questionnaires and dosimetry records and the results of otoscopic, tympanometric and speech discrimination tests. For those children also enrolled in the Fels Longitudinal Study of Growth and Development, there are serial data for body size, maturity, and blood pressure.
Article
Middle ear disease is today's primary aural health problem in school-age children. Until recently, pediatric health researchers were aware only of the medical consequences that middle ear disease had on children. Except in a few cases of chronic otitis media, the effects of middle ear disease were considered transitory. However, current research on middle ear disease suggests permanent changes in hearing sensitivity, reduced development of the auditory neural network and developmental delays in speech, language and cognitive skills dependent on hearing. This article presents a review of recent studies on the physical and behavioral aspects of middle ear disease and its sequelae in school children.
Chapter
This chapter provides an overview of language acquisition and cognitive development. The relationship between linguistic theory and the study of the way the (epistemic) speaker–listener understands and produces utterances is parallel to the position Piaget has adopted on logic and cognitive psychology. Logic is an axiomatization of reasoning and is a purely formal discipline. Starting from axioms, theorems are derived in a mechanical, deductive manner. There is, however, a corresponding experimental science, which should not be confused with the formal discipline, and that is the psychology of thinking. Recent studies show that there are close links between knowledge in one field and that in another but also show that what were initially described as universal cognitive structures are more properly considered as symptoms in the field of logical thinking of even more general structures that also underlie concepts of causality and time, where they may acquire rather different forms.
Chapter
This chapter describes a few strategies for the first two years of language learning. Studies of children's texts and of such other performances as comprehension and imitation have given some basis for testing plausible generalizations about what is necessary for language processing in its early stages. The prerequisites to language are environmental circumstances, cognitive development, and children's information storage. On the basis of these considerations, the basic acquisition of regularities of order and inflection, the fundamental grammatical features found in the early performances of children, can be examined. There are three categories of prerequisites to language learning, the first consisting of what the environment must provide, the others the knowledge that language refers to, and the processing skills that the child brings to the learning task. At the onset of grammar in children, while surface markers of simple structure may facilitate the discovery of processing heuristics, they are not absolutely necessary. The abstracting process that allows children to discover formal similarities, presumably from distributional features, is at least as early in development as the appearance of the auxiliary system in English.
Article
The assumption that language acquisition is relatively independent of the amount and kind of language input must be assessed in light of information about the speech actually heard by young children. The speech of middle-class mothers to 2-year-old children was found to be simpler and more redundant than their speech to 10-year-old children. The mothers modified their speech less when talking to children whose responses they could not observe, indicating that the children played some role in eliciting the speech modifications. Task difficulty did not contribute to the mothers' production of simplified, redundant speech. Experienced mothers were only slightly better than nonmothers in predicting the speech-style modifications required by young children. These findings indicate that children who are learning language have available a sample of speech which is simpler, more redundant, and less confusing than normal adult speech.
Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development
  • C Nelson
Nelson C: Structure and Strategy in Learning to Talk, publication 38, Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 1973
Language acquisition and cognitive development
  • H Sinclair-Dezwart
  • T Moore
Some aspects of the conceptual basis for first language acquisition
  • E Clark
  • R Schiefelbusch
  • L Lloyd
From signal to sign: A Piagetion view of thought and language
  • D Morehead
  • A Morehead
  • R Schiefelbusch
  • L Lloyd