ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Some philosophers of education have recently argued that educators can more or less ignore children's global self-esteem without failing them educationally in any important way. This paper draws on an attachment theoretic account of self-esteem to argue that this view is mistaken. I argue that understanding self-esteem's origins in attachment supports two controversial claims. First, self-esteem is a crucial element of the confidence and motivation children need in order to engage in and achieve educational pursuits, especially in certain domains of instruction such as physical education. Second, self-esteem can be facilitated socially, through an appropriate arrangement of school institutions, thus without hindering the pursuit of other high priority aims such as a challenging academic curriculum. Consequently I maintain that educators who ignore self-esteem overlook something educationally important.
1
ApaperforsubmissiontothePhilosophyofEducationSocietyofGreatBritain
Conference2008:
Title:TheEducationalImportanceofSelfEsteem
Author:
MattFerkany
VisitingAssistantProfessor
DepartmentofPhilosophy
506S.KedzieHall
MichiganStateUniversity
EastLansing,MI48824
Email:ferkany@msu.edu
Wordcount:5821
1.
Should school teachers and administrators worry themselves much about the esteem
children have for themselves as persons, i.e. their 'global' selfesteem (henceforth, just
'selfesteem')? In recent work on the subject, two authors have advanced an array of
argumentsmaintainingthattheyneednotatall(Kristjánsson,2007)ornotmuch(Smith,
2002,2006).Someareconsequentialist—effortstofosterselfesteemintheclassroom,it
is argued, conflict with the pursuit of other more important educational aims, such as
academic achievement or character education (Smith, 2002). Others are more
deontological—itisclaimedthatlowselfesteempersonsarenotall'headcases'afterall,
inneedofbeingcured;rather,theycanbelovableandperfectlysuccessful(Smith,2006).
Anotherargumentisconceptual:Selfesteemissupposedlynotconnectedconceptuallyto
the con fidence , and thus the motivation, ch ildren n eed in order to  be good learne rs or
behave well (Kristjánsso n,2007 ).A related ,emp irical argument claims that selfestee m
is not connec ted to it causall y either (ibid). Were these arguments pe rsuasive, it wou ld
2
seem educators could largely igno rechildren's selfesteem without failing them in any
educationallyimportantway.
Idonotthinkthisisso.Whilethereis acommonaccountofselfesteemandits
educational significance that is somewhat vulnerable to the arguments of Kristjánsson
and Smith, I will argue that their arguments are unsound or do not apply to an
appropriat ely sophisticated acco unt, which I call th e attachment account. Accordin g to
that account, selfesteem is importantly connected to the confidence and motivation
childrenneedinordertoengageinandachieveeducationalgoalsandcan andshouldbe
fosteredsocially,i.e.notjust,orevenprimarily,throughtheinteractionsbetweenteacher
and student,butbetweenstudent andthesocialenvironmentofthe schoolitself.This is
especially the case, I will argue, in certain domains of instruction such as physical
education and the arts. Consequ ently, school educators shou ld concern themse lvesw ith
theselfesteemofchildren,especiallyinthesedomainsofinstruction.
The argu ment proceeds as  follo ws. Section  2 outlines a simp le account of sel f
esteem and its educational significance and discusses its vulnerability to Smith and
Kristjánsson's arguments. Section 3 introduces the attach ment account and responds to
Kristjánsson's conceptual and empirical arguments. Section 4 then elaborates the
significanceofselfesteemforeducationinlightoftheattachmentaccountandresponds
to Smith’s consequentialist argument. Section 5 responds to Smith's deontological
argumentandconcludes.
2.
The current literature features various accounts of selfesteem and its educational
3
significance,e.g.RuthCigman's 'situatedselfesteem'(2004) or Kristjánsson's'justified'
conception(2007).HereIoutlinea standardaccount ofwhichsomeoftheseotherscan
be seen as variations. I use this account in what follows for two reasons. One, while
Smith and Kristjánsson do not explicitly treat it as the target of their critiques, it
illustrateswelltheforceoftheirarguments.Second,itisalsoaverycommon accountin
bothprofessionalliteratureandordinarytalkaboutselfesteem.
According to the standard account, selfesteem is how a person feels about
herself,goodorbad,andasmanifested inavarietyofways,e.g.inprideorshame,but
especial lyin  selfconfidence (U.S. Dep t. of Health and Hu man Services  (U.S. DHHS),
n.d.). Bec ause people c anfee l more or less well about the mselves and be more or les s
selfconfident, the standard account asserts that selfesteem can be high, low, and
somewhere in between. However, high selfesteem is claimed to have a variety of
behavioral benefits. These include independence, responsibility taking, toleration of
frustration, resistancetopeerpressure, willingness toattemptnewtasksandchallenges,
ability to  handle positive and negative e motions, and  willingness to o ffer assi stance to
others(ibid).
Obviously,thesebehaviorsareverydesirableeducationally.Peopleabletohandle
frustration, take risks, and work independently make good learners. Were high self
esteem also rel ated to responsibility taking, imp erviousness to peer pressure ,e motional
stability, and altruism, it would appear to be crucial to good moral character as well.
Scholars of education and public policy makers have not overlooked these supposed
benefits. The California Task Force to Promote SelfEsteem and Personal and Social
Responsibilityendorsesvirtuallyallofthem(Mecca,1990).Morerecently,RuthCigman
4
maintains that selfesteem is a crucial component of the confidence, and so the
motivat ion,th at children need in orde rto su cceed academically and  as persons (2004).
Callthisthemotivationalclaim.
While decidedly controversial, the reasoning behind the motivational claim is
both intuitive and supported by introspection. Relative to achieving a difficult or
challengingtask,apersonwhoispreoccupiedwithselfdoubtcannotjustgetonwithitor
focus on it to the degree that doing it well demands. Moreover, nervous selfdoubt
impairs the  functioning of th e faculties ne eded to execute e ffective ly, for in stance, the
ability to think clearly and critically. It is also intuitive and seemingly confirmed by
introspection that the confidence manifesting high selfesteem is important to good
character. On the one hand, people who doubt their worth or competence can be
maddeningly difficult to deal with, shuttered to the bright side and susceptible to envy
and jealousy.Ontheotherhand, aperson who isconfidentofherworth can respond to
threats without anxious concern to defend herself or simply shrug them off as they
deserve.
Thestandard accountofselfesteem and itseducationalsignificanceis,however,
vulnerable to Smith and Kristjánsson's arguments to some extent. Consider the
consequentialist argument. It says, contra the motivational claim, that efforts to foster
selfesteem in the classroom hinder the pursuit of o ther high priority aims, including
those forwhichthestandardaccountclaimsselfesteemisanecessaryprecondition,e.g.
a high  degree of acade mic accomplishment . The argument  gets traction in  light of the
supposed pedagogical requirements of fostering selfesteem. The authors of 'Building
SelfEsteem in Children', for instance, instruct parents to “be generous with praise”,
5
“teach po sitive selfstatements ,” and “avoid criticism tha t takes the form o f ridicu le or
shame” (U.S. DHHS). Presumably, teachers should follow suit, and apparently many
have. Smith cites the Cantors who instruct teachers to swap talk of punishment for
misbehavior with talk of 'consequences' (2002, p. 93). But academic and behavioral
instructioninherentlyrequirecriticismwhichisliabletoengendernegativefeelingsabout
theself,which, onthestandard account,isjustwhat low selfesteemcomesto.Thus,it
appears that teachers cannot both instruct children academically and behaviorally and
fostertheirselfesteematthesametime.
Theapparentconflictbetweenfosteringselfesteemandacademicandbehavioral
instruction  is a central p roblem for those who  favor mak ing selfeste em an educational
priority.Yetevenwereitresolvable,SmithandKristjánsson’sotherargumentsconstitute
theirowncase againstworryingmuchaboutschoolchildren'sselfesteem.Theempirical
argument,forinstance,maintains thatexperimentalsupportforthemotivationalclaimis
too weak. As Kristjánsson has noted, many studies find only what most psychologists
consider a weak correlation, about .20, between low selfesteem and undesirable
educational outcomes such as academic underperformance (2007). Furthermore, many
studiesfindasmuchevidencethatachievementcausesselfesteemastheopposite.Ifthe
empirical argument is cogent, whether the consequentialist one is sound is beside the
point—evenifteacherscouldbothfosterselfesteemandappropriatelycritiquechildren's
workandpunishtheirbadbehavioratthesametime,thepayoffwouldbeinsignificant.
Empiric ale vidence aside, K ristjánsso no bjects that the standard accoun t of self
esteem anditssignificanceismistakentoconnectselfesteem andselfconfidenceinthe
waythatthemotivationalclaimrequires.Themotivationalclaimconnectsselfesteemto
6
achievement by connecting it to selfconfidence, wh ich has fairly ob vious educational
advantage s. But, as Kristján sson argues, selfest eem and selfconfid ence seem to be  in
some sense distinct, neither being sufficient for the other. For example, consider a
“student(...movingcountries)whose schoolbasedselfesteem inherhomecountrywas
low,butwhorelishesthechance ofmovingtoanewplacewhereshethinksshewillbe
abletodobetter”(2007,p.260).Hereconfidenceappears tobeunaffectedbylowself
esteem.Butthen,ifitisconfidencethatiscrucialtomotivation,educatorsoughttofocus
notonselfesteembutselfconfidence.AccordingtoKristjánsson,thisviewissupported
byempirical research finding a“muchstrongerlinkbetweenselfconfidenceandschool
performancethanbetweenselfesteemandschoolperformance”(ibid).
Finally,Smithmaintainsthatthereisaseriousquestionconcerningthecoherence
ofourbeliefs aboutlowselfesteem'sstatusasacharacterdefect.Thestandardaccount
seems toassume thatourbeliefshere areunifiedand whollynegative—lowselfesteem
isadefectandshouldbe“managed”or“cured”throughthetechniquesofselfhelp,Circe
Time,assertivenesstraining,or'personalizedlearning'(inwhicheverytaskistailoredto
the capacities of the child) (Smith, 2006, p. 56). But when we investigate our beliefs
carefully, Smith claims, we also find admiration and love for diffidence and low self
esteem. Citing examples of diffident sorts, such as Fanny in Austen's Mansfield Park,
Smith argues against Hume's claim that we love the diffident person because of her
capacitytodevelopintothemodestoneandmaintainsthat,“Welovethediffidentperson
because o f her very diffidence and not because , by being 'improved', she will become
otherwise”(ibid,p.54).Smithconcludesthatthereisthus“somethingchilling”aboutthe
deploymentofinstructionaltechniquesinthe service ofraising selfesteem,asifpeople
7
likeFanny“wouldbeimprovedbybeingcuredof”theirdiffidence(ibid,p.56).
On the basis of arguments like these, Kristjánsson and Smith conclude that
educators ought not worry themselves at all (Kristjánsson) or much (Smith) about
children 's selfest eem. Though the arguments are differen t and their final  positions not
quite the same, the shared upshot is that educators would not fail children in any
importantwayiftheyputconcernforselfesteemlargelyaside.
3.
The argumen tso f Kristján sson and Smith fail, I will argue , to show that educato rs can
safely put aside concern for children's selfesteem. Some of the arguments on critical
scrutiny are simply not very strong. On the other hand, thinking about selfesteem’s
educational significance in terms of the attachment account reveals responses to the
others.
Tobegin with the attachmentaccount,itisbestintroducedbycontrasttowhatI
willcall a cognitiveJamesian account ,bec ause of its origins in the though tof William
James(1950).Jamesmaintained thattheesteemapersonhasforherselfisafunctionof
the ratio o f her a spirations to  acknowledged succes ses. Th ati s, the more that a perso n
believessheissuccessfulaccordingtoherownstandards,themoreesteemshewillhave
for hersel f. The cognitiveJam esian account is thus 'cogn itive' because it main tains that
selfesteemisstructuredbyourbeliefs.
TheroleassignedtobeliefinthecognitiveJamesianaccountisattheheartofthe
difference between it and the attachment account. Like the standard account, which
identifies selfesteem with feelings, the attachment account denies that selfesteem is
8
structuredatitsfoundationbybeliefs.However,unlikethestandardaccount,itmaintains
that the most fundamental determinant of selfesteem is not any feeling itself, but a
relativel y stable dispo sition to be liefs and feelin gs expressing pos itive or negative self
regard,e.g.prideorshameorconfidenceor selfdoubt.Onthisview,thesedispositions
tend to precede and determine which beliefs about our merits we will accept. The
attachmentaccountthusviewsselfesteemasarelativelystablecharactertraitconstituted
byanarrayofcognitiveandaffectivedispositions,namelyallthoseexpressingapositive,
negative,orotherattitudetowardtheself.
The attachment account is ‘attachment theoretic’ because it maintains that
whetherwearedisposedtolargelypositive,negative,ormoreneutralbeliefsandfeelings
is primarily a function of the quality of our childhood  attachment to our parents.
1 All
children expect that their parents will be readily available to pay attention to them,
especial lyin times o f distress. But repeate d frustration of this expec tation is though tto
ramify into a habit of selfdoub t for the child about he r worthiness of that atten tion, or
indeedoftheattentionofanyoneatall.Inotherwords,intolowselfesteem.
As a general theory of selfesteem, the attachment account has significant
advantages over the cognitiveJamesian account. As a matter of introspection, the
experience of selfesteem seems more affectively charged than a mere belief in one’s
success,worthiness,orlackthereof.Furthermore,thecognitiveJamesianaccountmakes
socialacceptanceorapprovala matterofselfesteemonlyinsofarasweaspiretoit, but
this seems mistaken. Probably the majority of people, including selfprofessed rugged
individualists, desire social acceptance and are weighed down by its absence. For
another,itisoddtothinkofhighselfesteemasabelief,asifhighselfesteempeoplego
9
aroundconstantlythinkingtothemselves,“I’mgreat”andlowselfesteemone'sthinking,
“I'maloser.”Ontheotherhand,itiscomparativelynaturaltothinkofitasadisposition
to assent to some such belief when prompted. However, even this disposition is
insufficient to explain selfesteem, since many persons have it, yet we would not be
willing to say that they are high selfesteem persons. What is missing is a basic
disposition to experience the self as somehow good or bad unmediated by accepted
beliefs. Imagine an academic who is high achieving, beloved by her intimates and
associates, and knows it. She has and acknowledges every reason to believe in her
success andworthinessofthe love,respect,andesteemofothers.Imaginehoweverthat,
well into tenure, she anxiously doubts and interrogates herself in the face o f ordinary
tasks, such as writing or presenting a new paper, asking an associate for a relatively
minorfavor,orconfronting atroublestudent.Onsuchoccasions,she encountersherself
asaproblemthatmustbeovercomebeforeanythingelsecanhappen.AmIgoodenough
to work on this prob lem? Do I really belon g in academia? And when ever things do go
wrong,shethinks,“I'manidiot,howcouldIbesostupid?”Iseenoreasontothinksuch
peopledonotexist,yettheylacktheconfidentsenseofcompetenceandworthinessthat
belongstonormalhighselfesteem.
Sotherearemanyreasonsforunderstandingselfesteemattachmenttheoretically.
NotehoweverthattheattachmentaccountrejectsKristjánsson'sconceptualargument,for
it maintains that some threshold level of dispositional selfconfidence is necessary for
high selfesteem. But in light of its advantages, this seems correct. Moreover, it is
perfectlycompatiblewith Kristjánsson'sclaim.Ofcoursenoteveryoccasiononwhicha
person judges herself to be inadequate must she lack selfconfidence about her
10
possibilities of future success. Perhaps there's something different about the imagined
future that, to her mind, justifies the optimism. But ongoing patterns of anxious self
doubt stillmanifestlow selfesteem.Therelevant questioninthecase ofKristjánsson's
schoolgirl is, what happens when she begins to confront genuine challenges to her
abilitiesinhernewcircumstances?
In reconnecting selfesteem to qualities in turn connected to a person's
motivationalcapacities,theattachmentaccount alsothusrejectsKristjánsson'sempirical
argument. It is noteworthy that this argument's strength is in any case not obviously
overwhelming, for it is (or should be) controversial how weak the socalled weak
correlationsKristjánssoncitesare.Whilea.20correlationiscommonlyregardedasweak
in psycho logical science, in med ical science, a correlation of this magnitude be tween,
say,smokingandcancer,wouldseemtobeamplereasontoquitsmoking,foritsuggests
that 1 /5 of smokers will develop a  commonly fatal disease. Th is is significan t inde ed.
Similarly, if 1/5 of low selfesteem students do much worse than others, this would
appeartobeamplereasonforconcern.
But suppose I am wrong about that. Nevertheless, as just argued, habits of
nervous selfdoubt and selfrecrimination are conceptually tied to lower selfesteem,
habitsofbasicselfconfidencetohigherselfesteem.Nowmanystudies,as Kristjánsson
notes, connect selfconfidence to achievement more strongly than to selfesteem. So
educators shouldfosterselfconfidence. But in lightoftheattachment account,thiswill
oftennotbepossiblewithoutalsoaddressingtheirselfesteem,sinceforlowselfesteem
persons,therootcauseofhabitsofselfdoubtisadeeplyingrainedsenseofunworthiness
stemming from experiences of rejection. Furthermore, some newly emerging research
11
finds th ats ecure parental attachme nt is positively associ ated with a cademic motivation
(DuchesneandLarose,2007) andperformance(Cotterell,1992).Otherresearch,though
moregeneralinscope,hasobviouseducationalimplications.SueGerhardt,forinstance,
reviews in detail research connecting poor infantp arent attachment to low selfesteem
and unde rdevelopment of parts  of the brain respo nsible for regul ating emotions (2004 ,
PartI).Inturn,sheconnectsbothtoeducationallydamagingbehavioraltendencies,such
as an inability to inhibit inappropriate behaviors or seek relief from intense emotions
throughstrategiesofselfdistractionorinthe supportofothers(ibid,PartII).Butwhile
thedamageGerhardtoutlinesisnotnecessarilypermanent, because attachment andself
esteemaretiedtogether,aprimaryavenuetoitsrepairrunsthoughselfesteem(ibid,Part
III, Ch. 9). Hence, in the educational domain, addressing selfesteem may be a
requirement of resolving confidence or attachment problems that affect academic
motivationandperformance.
I conclude that the empirical record is at worst ambiguous on the educational
significance of selfesteem and possibly very supportive. From this claim, it does not
follow that fosteringselfesteemshould jumpto the top of the list of educationalgoals.
However,itdoesmeanthatinthinkingabout selfesteem'seducational significance,we
must, for no w, fall ba ckon  reason more than  Kristjánsson h as. As I will argue belo w,
there are many good reasons for believing that low selfesteem is an important
impedimenttoachievement or the willtobehavewell,especiallyincertaindomainsof
instruction.
4.
12
Understandingselfesteem attachmenttheoretically,Iwillargue,shows that selfesteem
is important to the confidence that children need in order to engage and succeed in
educationalpursuits,especially in certaindomainsofinstruction,butalsothatitcanbe
fosteredwithouthindering the pursuitofotherimportant educationalaims.Thedefense
ofthisclaimwilltaketheremainderofthissection.Butinlightofit,Imaintainthat(a)
fostering selfesteem, at least indirectly, is generally an important educational priority
and that (b) relative tocertaindomainsofinstruction,especiallyphysicaleducationand
the arts, school educators should make concern for selfesteem among their highest
priorities.
To begin with an obvious objection, there is a definite sense in which
understand ing selfesteem attachme nt theoretically makes  it vulnerable to the prob lems
raisedbytheconsequentialistargument.Becausechildrenaredependentmostheavilyon
theirparents fortheirselfesteem,teacherscanhaverelativelylittledirectimpact.Their
relationship to their students is simply not that important. In fact, some theorists have
suggested that children's relationship to their peers is more important (Harter, 1999).
Consequently,teacherscertainlyshouldnotattempttotakeonsucharole.Anyeffortsto
foster selfesteem reaching this level must indeed interfere with the pursuit of higher
priority educational aims, since it must quite literally take  the place of care giving or
friendship.
However,itdoesnotfollowthattherearenotveryimportantthingseducatorscan
and ought to do th atw ill foster se lfesteem  without hindering the pursuit of oth erh igh
priorityaims,e.g.achallengingcurriculum.Toshowwhy,Ineedtotakeafairlylengthy
detour through political philosophy via a corollary of the attachment account of self
13
esteem.
ThecorollaryIhaveinmindclaimsthatselfesteemisinawaysocialinnature.
Because the fundamental element of selfesteem is the extent to which a person takes
herself to be worthy of the love, respect, or esteem of others, the attachment account
implies thatexperiencing the self as sociallyexcluded or rejectedisespecially liableto
trigger feelings of shame or humiliation, and therefore, reinforce habits of self
recriminationortendenciestobeliefsandfeelingsofunworthiness.Sopeoplearetosome
extentdependentupontheacceptanceofothersfortheirselfesteem.
To elaborate this, imagine that your social world is like this. You have some
associatesthatyougetalongwith,butyoudonotgenerallyfeelthatyoufitinverywell
withanyofthem.Infact,itseemstoyouthatyoualwayshavetomakequiteaneffortto
fit in. Thus, you try at first to do things that they clearly value and for which they will
thereforerespectyou.Buttoyourshameyoufindthatyouarenotverygoodatthemand
beingbadatthemseemstomakemattersworse.Whereasbeforeitwasmerelysuspected
thatyouwereincompetent,youhavenowremovedalldoubt.Asaconsequence,youstop
trying these things unless you are forced to or else find yourself in that rare situation
wheresuccessisguaranteed.Thoughthisleavesyousomethingofanoutsider,atleastas
invisible youarenotsovulnerabletoshameorhumiliation.Ontheotherhand,thereare
somethingsthatyoudoratherwell,butyouhavenotfoundmanyforumsfortheirpursuit
and it has been  your expe rience that you r talents are not very highl y valued by others .
Indeed many others find your excellences comical or ridiculous  and have on occasion
tauntedyouforthem.Someofthemhaveeventhreatenedyouphysically.
The situation in thisstoryisafamiliarworry in politicalphilosophy.Thereitis
14
widelybelieved thatthesocialnatureofselfesteemgroundsadutyofjustice toarrange
social ins titutions in ways conducive  to people acquiring and maintaining selfesteem.
There is disagreement about precisely which arrangements of institutions satisfy this
duty, but wide agreement on the general criteria. Just arrangements do not shame or
humili ate anyone, at least not undese rvingly, and they make it possible for eve ryone to
find and participateinanassociationwheretheyandtheirtalents and accomplishments
canbeesteemedbylikemindedothers (calltheseesteemgroups).BorrowingfromJohn
Rawls (1971),callfreedom from undeservedshameandhumiliationandesteemgroups
thesocialbasesofselfesteem.Forthepersoninthestoryabove,thesocialbasesofself
esteemaresorelylacking.
Not eve ry theorist agrees to precisely the se criteria for the  social bases o f self
esteem,someadvancingstrongerrequirements.
2 Itisalsocontroversialhowstringentthe
requireme nt to supply the  social bases o f selfes teem is  or how central  it is to justi ce.
However,itispowerfullyintuitivethatthereissomesuchrequirementandthatitcarries
significant weight. Imagine that, by virtue of the design of social institutions, specific
segments of society (women, say) are disproportionately vulnerable to the shame and
outsiderstatus justdescribed.Thevulnerabilityisa significantburden and disadvantage
and,insofarasitisowingtothedesignofchangeablesocialinstitutions,thearrangement
isprimafacieunjust.
Nowschools aresocialworldswiththeirownbasicsocialstructure,onethatcan
bemoreorlesssupportiveofselfesteem.Assuming that thesocialbasesofselfesteem
for school children are the same as those for adults, schools support and foster self
esteem just when they do not shame or humiliate children undeservedly and make it
15
possibleforallto enjoy anappropriateesteemgroup.Unfortunately,itseemsthatmany
school en vironments, like the soc ial world described  above, are not very s upportive of
selfesteem.Insomeways,thisseemsobvious.Childrenthemselves tendtomakethings
difficult by forming esteem groups that are incredibly exclusive and hostile toward
outsiders. Fo rch ildren who find themselves on  the outside , the experience c an be very
painful. Insofar as this is the case, however, it points to two important general ways
educatorscanseektofosterselfesteem.
First, they can make efforts to ameliorate the 'popularity contest' between
children. This presumably is what advocates of strategies like Circle Time have been
trying to do d irectly. I think they are  right to, though it is no teworthy that, on the one
hand,notalldirectstrategiesneed tohavethischaracter,andsuchstrategiesmaynotbe
the best anyway. Take the first claim first. It seems to me, for instance, that normal
practices of punishing children who behave cruelly to others are at least as important,
though thismayseem tothreatentheselfesteemoftheculprit.However,asIwillargue
below, the threat to selfesteem of punishment is exaggerated. Second, because the
problem of fostering selfesteem socially is a systematic one, one deriving from the
design of social institutions, it needs a systematic solution. Consequently, the best
strategies may well be indirect ones setting up a school and classroom environment
minimiz ing occasion s for shame/humiliation and motivating  children to work together
collegially. This is more easily said than done, but that does not imply that teachers
should not try. Nordo esi tnecess arily imply, for example, that allc ompetition between
children must be avoided, for whether a loss is humiliating, say, depends on the
collegialityofthesocialenvironment.Hence,ifcollegialityistaught,aneffortismadeto
16
fosterselfesteeminawaythatneednotconflictwithinstructionrequiringcompetition.
Second, the organization of welladvertised and funded extracurricular clubs,
beyond traditionaloneslikedebateclub, isanindependentwaytoworktowardaschool
environmentsupplyingthesocialbasesofselfesteem.Suchclubswouldprovideforums
in whichchildrenofdiversetalentscould findthemselves and theiraspirations affirmed
by those whose op inion rea lly matters, namel y those who sh are their interests. Wh at is
importantfromthestandpointofsupplyingthesocialbasesofselfesteem isthatthereis
adiversitysuchassociations,fromcomputerclubforthecomputernerdstoGayStraight
Alliancesforhomosexualchildren.
The social nature of selfesteem, however, I believe has even more specific
implicationsfor certaindomainsofinstruction.Takephysicaleducation.Becauseof the
publicnature ofperformancein thisdomain,achild'sdegreeofexcellence init,orlack
thereof, is t ypically widel y availab le publicl y, not l east, to her pee rs. Consequently, in
thisdomainmanychildren—especiallytheunathletic—arehighlyvulnerabletoshameor
humiliation, for it is precisely public exposure as inadequate or powerless that trigger
those feelings. Furthermore, the vulnerability here is particularly acute given the value
commonly placed on athletic excellence among both adults and children. As a
consequence,manychildrenareliabletowithdrawfromathleticparticipationfirstchance
theyget.
Isubmitthatthismove,thoughinonewayprotectiveforthechild,canbedeeply
damaging educ ationally. For one thing, the child ha sno wlo stth e will top articipate in
athletics, which is a, if not the, primary avenue to lifelong fitness and health. Since
inculcatinginchildrenalifelongrelationshiptofitnessispresumablyaveryhighpriority
17
educationalaim,especiallygiventheemergingepidemicofobesity,schoolenvironments
havingthiseffectarefailuresonanimportantlevel.Second,itiswidelyagreedthatthere
areimportantreciprocal selfesteembenefitsfromsportparticipationthatbear againon
thechild'srelationshiptofitnessandgeneralselfconfidence.Thegeneralselfesteemand
confidence of those who participate benefits, while those receiving the benefits are
further motivated to participate. Children who withdraw thus cut themselves out of a
crucial avenueto fitness andahigherdegreeofwellbeing.Third,because sport figures
so large  in children's social s tatus, those who do not participate  are liable to withd raw
more generally from social life, particularly if they also do not excel in other socially
valued ways. But children in this situation are vulnerable, as the motivational claim
maintains, to lose the sort of basic confidence needed to take risks and confront
challengessmoothly.Thisisadisadvantageforthemaslearnersandasmoralpersons.
In many American schools, this situation seems needlessly exacerbated by the
institution of school sponsored intermural sport. Despite some progress, boy's sports
appear to remaindisproportionatly favored in the social worldof schools to both girl's
sports and no nathletic activities such as the arts.
3 But as a symbolic expression of the
relativelygreaterimportanceofmaleathleticism,thisisitselfanaffronttotheselfworth
ofgirlsandtheunathletic.Atthesametime,itservestoreproducetheculturalobsession
with male sport, which as I have just argued, is problematic with regard to children's
physicaleducationand,throughitsselfesteemrelatedeffects,potentiallytheireducation
generally.
Now the consequentialist argument maintains that efforts to foster selfesteem
impede the pursuitofotherhighpriorityaims,such as ahighlychallengingcurriculum.
18
However, relative to domains of instruction like physical education and the arts,
instruction that inculcates a lifelong desire for involvement is more important than
instructionsecuringahighdegreeofachievement.Thus,theconsiderationsthatdrivethe
consequentialistargumentarenotoperativehere.Moreover,inthesedomainsthereisan
important co incidence between ins truction that wi lli nculcate a life of involvemen t and
that fostering selfesteem. Physical education instructors, for instance, will likely best
achieve  the aim of inculc ating a lifelong desi re for in volvement by pursuin g strategies
that minimize sh ame and humiliation and maximize inclusiveness , in other words, that
willfoster selfesteem.Furthermore, insofar as schoolinstitutions surroundingsportare
problematic in the way I have described, some aspects of the institution could be
modified to better support selfesteem with relative ease. No doubt performance in
physicaleducationwill always bepublic,thus rendering childrenparticularlyvulnerable
to shame/humiliation. Yet participation and hoopla surrounding sport could be made
more equal between boy's sports, girl's sports, and other nonacademic domains of
instructionsuchasthearts.Sportsandartsparticipation(where‘art’includesvisualarts,
music,theater,dance,creativewriting,etc)couldalsobemademandatoryforallstudents
andexclusivelyintramural.Suchchangeswouldpotentiallyhavetheeffectofunraveling
thebias toward sportin theschoolpopularitycontestandsoraising the probabilitythat
all chi ldren will st ay engaged in both athletics and the a rts. In turn , it is reason able to
thinkthatthiswouldensurethatmorechildrenstayengagedsocially,findanappropriate
esteemgroup,andsocontinuetoadjustsocially.
Hence, in at least some domains of instruction, selfesteem is motivationally
important and susceptible to instruction without undue cost to the pursuit of other
19
importantaims.However,Iwould also like toargue that, in light ofthe social basesof
selfesteem, the requirements of instruction in academics and behavior also need not
radicallyconflictwithimportanteffortstofosterselfesteem.
Firstconsideracademics.Thesocialbasesofselfesteeminclude esteem groups.
Relative to the classroomcontext, this implies that teachersarefosteringselfesteem so
long astheymakeeffortstoensurethatallchildrenfeelwelcome,safe,andcanfind an
esteem group. Again, this aim may be achieved directly through activities like Circle
Time,butasdiscussedabovesuchstrategiesarenotintrinsicallynecessary.Whatmatters
isthattheteachersfindways togetchildrentocooperatewithone anotherandengender
anenvironmentmakingcompetition safe. Second, critiquingstudents' workneednot be
particularly shame or humiliation producing. While criticism is often frustrating or
disappointing,onlyparticularlytactlessorimpolitecriticismcouldbeexpectedtohurtso
much as sh ame or humiliation. Mo reover, sha mean d humiliation tend to be rou sed by
publicexposure asinadequateorpowerless.Butacademicevaluationstendtobelargely
private, marks on a piece of paper easily concealed from others. Moreover, unlike
athletics,childrentendnottoevaluateoneanothersomuchongroundsofacademics,so
even exposure as inadequate here is not so much of a threat. Hence, contra the
consequentialist argument, instructing students academically and fostering selfesteem
neednotradicallyconflict.
Second, consider behavioral instruction. It is true, of course, that punishment
renders childrenhighly vulnerabletopublicexposure asinadequate andconsequentlyto
shameorhumiliation.Ofnecessity,punishmentstendtobepublicaffairs. However,and
first, as a matter of ordinary decency, teachers can and should avoid carrying out
20
punishmen ts that children are li kely to experience as humili ating. But where this is not
possible,deservedpunishmentscausingshameorhumiliationtendtobedeservedshames
orhumiliations.Sincethereisnosocialresponsibilityto avoidthese,teachersinflicting
them cannot be charged with failing to foster selfesteem. Second, while systematic,
arbitrary experiences of shame or humiliation can lower selfesteem, presumably
punishments will not amount to systematic, arbitrary public shames/humiliations, but
deserved and temporary retributions for wrongs. Hence, the threat to selfesteem of
ordinarypracticesofpunishmentisexaggerated.
5.
Ihavearguedthatselfesteemisimportanttothemotivationchildrenneedinordertobe
successful in school, especially in certain domains of instruction such as physical
education,andthateducators canseektoprovideits socialbaseswithouthinderingthe
pursuit of other high priority aims such as academic achievement. If so, facilitating
children’sselfesteeminschoolsmayafterallbeaveryimportanteducationalaim.This
is not to su ggest that se lfesteem is a unifying aim of education or the highest prio rity
aim. Othe r aims play crucial roles and some, such as achievement, are presumably of
higher priorityinatleastsomecontexts,forinstance, theacademicone.Neitherisitto
imply that selfesteem facilitating education is a complete moral education, for good
charactercallsformanyqualities,someofwhichmayevencompetewithselfesteem.On
someaccounts,selfrespectforinstance,isanimportantbutdistinctcharactertraitcalling
foradegreeofmodestyoraccuracyofselfregard.
4 Nevertheless,facilitatingselfesteem
isanimportanteducationalpriority,andthisistosaythatomittingitisagenuinewayof
21
failingchildreneducationally.
There is a last objection that I have not addressed, namely Smith’s character
argument.Thisargumentclaimsthat we find low selfesteem personsperfectlylovable,
thus, we cannot coherently think that low selfesteem is something to be cured. I
wholeheartedlyagree.Nevertheless,itdoesnotfollowthatconcernforselfesteemisnot
an important educationalvalue.First, much hangsonwhetherourresponseto low self
esteempersonsismereloveorsomething morerobustlikeadmirationoresteem.Tosay
thatwelovethembecauseoftheirdiffidenceisnottosaywefindthemvirtuousbecause
ofit,butonlythatbecausetheyareendearing,wefindtheirfaultsforgivable.Butifthat
isso,educatingforselfesteemisaperfectlylegitimateaimofmoraleducation.Second,
iflowselfesteemisindeed animpedimenttoachievement,as Ihaveargued,itcertainly
issomethingtobeovercomeifnotcured.Ifso,Iseenoreasonwhyeducatorsshouldnot
do what they can to help low selfesteem children through the process. If I am right,
doing this in anycase primarily requiresthatwedosomethingweought todoanyway,
namelystrivetocreateaschoolenvironmentinwhichthesocialbasesofselfesteemare
readilyavailabletoallchildren.
NOTES
1 For more extensive elaboration of attachment and its role in the development of self
esteem, see Sue Gerhardt's
Why Love Matters: How affection shapes a baby's brain
(2004,
Part 2).
2 See, for example, James Tully's particularly strong requirements for social esteem in
Strange multiplicity: constitutionalism in an age of diversity
(1995, pp. 189191).
3 That male athletes have traditionally been favored in the school popularity contest is old
news investigated at length by James S. Coleman
et al
in
The adolescent society: The
social life of the teenager and its impact on education
(1961).
4 See, for example, Kristjánsson (2007, p. 13) and chapter 2 of my dissertation
The
Nature and Importance of SelfRespect
(2006).
22
REFERENCES
Cigman, R. (2004) Situated SelfEsteem,
Journal of Philosophy of Education
, 38.1, pp. 91
105.
Coleman, J.S., Johnstone, J.W.C. and Jonassohn, K. (1961)
The adolescent society: The social
life of the teenager and its impact on education
(New York, Free Press of Glencoe).
Cotterell, J. L. (1992) The Relation of Attachments and Supports to Adolescent WellBeing
and School Adjustment,
Journal of Adolescent Research
, 7.1, pp. 2842.
Duchesne, S., and Larose, S. (2007) Adolescent Parental Attachment and Academic
Motivation and Performance in Early Adolescence,
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
,
37.7, pp. 15011521.
Ferkany, M. (2006)
The Nature and Importance of SelfRespect
. PhD dissertation. University
of Wisconsin, Madison.
Gerhardt, S. (2004)
Why Love Matters: How affection shapes a baby's brain
(London,
Routledge).
Harter, S. (1999)
The construction of the self: a developmental perspective
(New York,
Guilford Press).
James, William. (1950) The Consciousness of the Self,
Principles of Psychology
, vol. 1 (New
York, Dover).
Kristjánsson, K. (2007) Justified SelfEsteem,
Journal of Philosophy of Education
, 41.2, pp.
247261.
Mecca, A., (1990)
Toward A State of Esteem: The Final Report of the California Task Force
to Promote SelfEsteem and Personal and Social Responsibility
(Sacramento: California
State Department of Education).
Rawls, J. (1971)
A Theory of Justice
(Harvard, Belknap Press).
Smith, R. (2002) Selfesteem: the kindly apocalypse,
Journal of Philosophy of Education
,
36.1, pp. 87100.
Smith, R. (2006) On Diffidence: The Moral Psychology of SelfBelief,
Journal of Philosophy of
Education
, 40.1, pp. 5162.
Tully, J. (1995)
Strange multiplicity: constitutionalism in an age of diversity
(Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press).
United States Department of Health and Human Services, n.d. Building SelfEsteem in
Children. [Online]. Available at: http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/publications/allpubs/Ca
0048/default.asp [accessed 2 January 2008].
... At public TVET college context, self-esteem should be a central concept that is related to sustainable learning of students. Self-esteem motivates students to be academically successful (Ferkany, 2008;Lawrence, 2006;Van Laar, 2000), and facilitating students' self-esteem might be a part that supports the public TVET colleges` academic goals, without making it as an educational priority (Ferkany, 2008). On the other hand, self-esteem is a construct that mediates between ability and achievement; self-esteem influences sustainable learning and students` achievements also influence subsequent levels of self-esteem (Humphrey, 2004;Mruk, 2006). ...
... At public TVET college context, self-esteem should be a central concept that is related to sustainable learning of students. Self-esteem motivates students to be academically successful (Ferkany, 2008;Lawrence, 2006;Van Laar, 2000), and facilitating students' self-esteem might be a part that supports the public TVET colleges` academic goals, without making it as an educational priority (Ferkany, 2008). On the other hand, self-esteem is a construct that mediates between ability and achievement; self-esteem influences sustainable learning and students` achievements also influence subsequent levels of self-esteem (Humphrey, 2004;Mruk, 2006). ...
... The study found that students at a public TVET college lacked self-confidence which negatively affected their self-esteem. In support, Ferkany (2008) argued that self-esteem is an important element of the confidence and motivation students need in order to engage in and achieve educational pursuits. Maruyama et al., (2008) also stated that students who generally feel confident perform well academically possess high self-esteem while students who with less confidence perform poorly academically and possess low self-esteem. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper reports on the exploration of the impact of self-esteem on sustainable learning of a public TVET (Technical and Vocational Education and Training) college student in South Africa. I approached it from the premise that says building students` self-esteem for sustainable learning plays a vital role in students` academic achievements and their lives. This qualitative study employed Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a research design. The population for this study comprised 120 students (18–21-year-olds); four lecturers; one SRC (Student Representative Council) member; one Student Development Practitioner (SDP); one Social Worker; one Educational Psychologist; and one Assistant Director for student support services (SSS) from one public TVET college in South Africa. Students in this study were voluntarily selected through advert. Other participants were purposively and conveniently selected. Data were generated through participant observation, focus group discussions, and motivational talk conducted by social worker. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) was used as data analysis. This study used Student Development Theory (SDT) by Chickering and Resseir, which focused on developing identity of students. The overall findings of this study revealed that students with low self-esteem do not achieve academically for sustainable learning. Based on this study, it is recommended that all co-researchers from this public TVET college should be aware of the consequences of the factors which negatively impact the self-esteem of students. There was a correlation between self-esteem and academic achievements of students for sustainable learning. Recommendations were discussed.
... Self-esteem has long been recognised as a key motivational driver that affects a broad spectrum of an individual's behaviours, including academic performance (Baumeister et al., 2003). Studies in the field of educational psychology often posit self-esteem as a crucial motivational construct for reaching desired academic outcomes (Alves-Martins et al., 2002;Ferkany, 2008;Keltikangas-Järvinen, 1992). However, recent studies have questioned the credibility of such a straightforward relationship, presenting contradictory findings that complicate our current understanding of the interplay between self-esteem and academic achievement. ...
Article
Full-text available
While the individual roles of general cognitive ability and motivation in predicting academic achievement are well established, how they interact with one another and the extent of their combined effect on students' learning outcomes leave much to be explained. The present study investigates the relationships among general cognitive ability, selected motivational constructs (i.e., academic self‐efficacy, academic self‐concept, self‐esteem and student engagement) and academic achievement within a structural model. A total of 346 (M = 52%, F = 48%; Mage = 12.98 ± 0.98) middle school students completed Primary Abilities Test 6–8, Myself as A Learner Scale, Academic Self‐Efficacy Scale, School Short‐Form of the Coopersmith Self‐Esteem Inventory and Student Engagement Scale. Path analysis revealed that general cognitive ability had a direct effect on academic achievement and significant indirect effects on academic achievement through academic self‐efficacy, as well as on student engagement through both academic self‐efficacy and academic self‐concept. Moreover, academic self‐efficacy had significant direct effects on both academic achievement and student engagement. Additionally, self‐esteem and academic self‐concept had significant direct effects on student engagement, as well as indirect effects on both academic achievement and student engagement through academic self‐efficacy. The present study contributes to the understanding of dynamics between cognitive and motivational variables in shaping academic achievement and provides valuable insights for educators and policymakers to develop effective pedagogical designs and strategies for improving student learning outcomes.
... However, the study did find a link between experience and social recognition. Teachers with more experience tended to feel more recognized, similar to Ferkany's (2008) findings with employees. This contradicts Kang et al. (2010) who saw no experience-related difference in social recognition . ...
Article
This study investigated the potential link between social recognition and self-esteem among secondary school teachers in Punjab, Pakistan. Employing a descriptive correlational design, the research explored the participants' perceptions and the correlation between the two variables. A multi-stage random sampling technique yielded a sample of 450 teachers from 100 schools across four randomly chosen districts (Lahore, Multan, Rawalpindi, and Okara). Data collection involved administering two questionnaires (Social Recognition Scale (SRS) and the Self-Esteem Measurement Scale (SMS)), and statistical analysis utilized techniques such as mean scores, Correlation coefficient r, t-tests, and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests. The results revealed that teachers' self-esteem and their perceived social recognition were not correlated. Based on these results, the study recommends the implementation of specific psychological practices such as praise, thanks, and respect that are aimed at enhancing social recognition and its potential association with increased self-esteem among teachers. Further research in this area, particularly.
... Research shows that students with VI have a smaller circle of friends than their sighted peers and work hard to form relationships [40]. Self-esteem plays a vital role in fostering the confidence and motivation necessary for children to excel both academically and personally [45,46]. Encouraging selfdetermination in school environments may pose difficulties for students with visual impairments [40]. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The paper investigates the dynamic relationship between technology and inclusive mathematics education for students with vision impairments. The paper examines the transformative potential of technology integration in fostering an inclusive educational environment while acknowledging the challenges that need to be addressed. The authors highlight the imperative of teacher training, data privacy, and ethical considerations in effectively integrating technology into educational practices. The evolving role of educators in facilitating meaningful and inclusive learning experiences is emphasized. A collaborative effort involving governments, educational institutions, technology developers, and the community is indispensable in pursuing inclusive education; by collectively addressing challenges, embracing technological advancements, and adhering to ethical principles, a transformative educational landscape can be cultivated.
... El concepto de autoestima se refiere a la manera como una persona se siente acerca de sí (Ferkany, 2008), construcción que incluye un juicio personal de valía (Coopersmith, 1967), aprobación o desaprobación, que indica cuánto confía el individuo en sí mismo (Pierce y Gardner, 2009), así como el examen global de las características y atributos que distinguen a los sujetos (Elliott, 1986), lo cual se visualiza en el respeto personal (Sciarroni, 2021). Por otra parte, con respecto a la felicidad, es el fin último al que aspira el ser humano (Aristotle, 2020), concepto que, desde la psicología positiva, está constituido por un sentido individual de bienestar, caracterizado por altos niveles de satisfacción personal, con beneficios para la salud mental y física (Diener, 1994;Veenhoven, 2005;Hervás, 2009). ...
... Self-esteem is important to provide the required motivation in order to be academically successful (Ferkany, 2008, Prihadi andChuo, 2012). Also self-esteem might be a part that supports the school's academic goals, without making it as an academic priority (Ferkany, 2008). Career choice is one of the domains that need to be developed by students (Mahad et al, 2015)), and explained that career selection process is a very complex process and it involves a wide range of applications such as knowledge, skills and experiences related to career decision-making. ...
Article
Full-text available
The study investigated the relationship between self-esteem and career choice among undergraduate students in Mkwawa University College of Education in Iringa region, Tanzania. The purpose of the study was to assess the self-esteem of students and its influence on career choice. Convergent parallel research design was adopted in this study. Sample size of the study was 199 undergraduate students from Education and Science faculties for quantitative and qualitative data. A stratified sampling technique was used to separate males and females and then simple random sampling was applied to get the sample size for quantitative data. Self-esteem adapted standardized instrument developed by Rosenberg (1965) scale of ten items to collect data. Validity for qualitative instruments was obtained through triangulation and rich or thick description. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 23 and qualitative data was analysed using content analysis. The results showed that students have positive attitude of self-esteem towards themselves. Also the findings indicated that there was a relationship between self-esteem and career choice among students.
... Self-esteem is important to provide the required motivation in order to be academically successful (Ferkany, 2008, Prihadi andChuo, 2012). Also self-esteem might be a part that supports the school's academic goals, without making it as an academic priority (Ferkany, 2008). Career choice is one of the domains that need to be developed by students (Mahad et al, 2015)), and explained that career selection process is a very complex process and it involves a wide range of applications such as knowledge, skills and experiences related to career decision-making. ...
Article
Full-text available
The study investigated the relationship between self-esteem and career choice among undergraduate students in Mkwawa University College of Education in Iringa region, Tanzania. The purpose of the study was to assess the self-esteem of students and its influence on career choice. Convergent parallel research design was adopted in this study. Sample size of the study was 199 undergraduate students from Education and Science faculties for quantitative and qualitative data. A stratified sampling technique was used to separate males and females and then simple random sampling was applied to get the sample size for quantitative data. Self-esteem adapted standardized instrument developed by Rosenberg (1965) scale of ten items to collect data. Validity for qualitative instruments was obtained through triangulation and rich or thick description. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 23 and qualitative data was analysed using content analysis. The results showed that students have positive attitude of self-esteem towards themselves. Also the findings indicated that there was a relationship between self-esteem and career choice among students.
Chapter
Self‐respect and self‐esteem are forms of self‐regard involving one's worth. Although the terms are often used interchangeably, the two differ in a number of ways. The principal difference is this: self‐respect is a normative concept, while self‐esteem is not. While there is widespread agreement that self‐respect is something of great moral importance, there is significant disagreement about whether self‐esteem is morally valuable. Self‐respect is variously treated by philosophers as a moral duty connected with the duty to respect all persons, as something to which all persons have a right and that it would be unjust to undermine, as a moral virtue essential to morally good living, and as something one earns by living up to demanding moral standards. Self‐esteem is generally regarded by social scientists as central to healthy psychological functioning and well‐being, although they note that it has no necessary connection to moral values and can lead to harm unless appropriately constrained. While appropriate self‐esteem could be morally valuable, self‐respect is a reliable motivation for morally appropriate living and being.
Article
In the inaugural set of Seeley Lectures, the distinguished political philosopher James Tully addresses the demands for cultural recognition that constitute the major conflicts of today: supranational associations, nationalism and federalism, linguistic and ethnic minorities, feminism, multiculturalism and aboriginal self government. Neither modern nor post-modern constitutionalism can adjudicate such claims justly. However, by surveying 400 years of constitutional practice, with special attention to the American aboriginal peoples, Tully develops a new philosophy of constitutionalism based on dialogues of conciliation which, he argues, have the capacity to mediate contemporary conflicts and bring peace to the twenty-first century. Strange Multiplicity brings profound historical, critical and philosophical perspectives to our most pressing contemporary conflicts, and provides an authoritative guide to constitutional possibilities in a multicultural age.
Article
This study examined the relationship between adolescents 'adjustment and their supportive relations with significant others. It linked the Bowlby concept of social attachment with that of social support (derived from social network theory) in describing the exchange content of adolescents' interactions with parents, peer-friends, and adult nonkin. Within each of these three support systems, only moderate relationships were found between adolescents' number of supports and the strength of attachments to members of the respective support systems. Fewer relationships were found between supports and adjustment than between attachments and adjustment. For both sexes, the strength of attachments to parents and to teachers was associated with young people's positive feelings about themselves. Network ties providing informational support (encouragement, guidance, and advice) were related to girls'and boys'academic outcomes in different ways: among girls, support from parents and adult nonkin was related to academic self-concept, whereas among boys, support from friends was negatively related to self-concept and educational plans.
Article
Acknowledgements. Permissions Acknowledgements. List of Figures. Foreword by Steve Biddulph Introduction to the Second Edition. Part One - The Foundations: Babies and their brains 1. Before we meet them 2. Back to the beginning 3. Building a brain 4. Corrosive Cortisol. Conclusion to Part 1. Part 2 - Shaky Foundations and their Consequences 5. Trying Not to Feel 6. Melancholy Baby 7. Active Harm 8. Torment 9. Original Sin. Part 3 - Too Much Information, Not Enough Solutions 10. 'If all else fails, hug your teddy bear' 11. Birth of the Future. Bibliography. Index.
Article
In this study, the links between adolescents' attachment to parents and academic motivation and performance were examined while considering problem behaviors and perceived teacher support as potential mediators of those links. Participants were 121 early adolescents who completed the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) to assess the quality of attachment to their mothers and fathers. Adolescents' attachment to both parents was positively associated with academic motivation. These significant links were mediated by adolescents' perceptions of support from teachers. Results are discussed in light of the different mechanisms that can relate attachment quality to adolescents' academic motivation and performance.
Article
This paper develops a thread of argument from previous contributions to this journal by Richard Smith and Ruth Cigman about the educational salience of self-esteem. It is argued—contra Smith and Cigman—that the social science conception of self-esteem does serve a useful educational function, most importantly in undermining the inflated self-help conception of self-esteem that has commonly been transposed to the educational arena. Recent findings about a lack of significant correlation between low global self-esteem and relevant educational variables help us to focus on the type of self-esteem that does matter in the classroom: justified domain-specific self-esteem, in which the chief domains in question are the school subjects and students' self-respect. Moreover, this paper suggests that low self-confidence—which is a real problem for many students—may often be mistaken for low self-esteem.