No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Incretin‐based therapies: Therapeutic rationale and pharmacological promise for type 2 diabetes
Abstract
Purpose: To highlight the therapeutic promise of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), the consequent rationale for therapies acting through GLP-1-mediated pathways in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and the emerging clinical role of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists.
Data sources: The PubMed database was searched (using terms including incretins, GLP-1, GIP, DPP-4), along with recent ADA and EASD abstracts.
Conclusions: Many traditional drugs used for T2DM fail to achieve and maintain glycemic control, and possess limitations such as risk for hypoglycemia and weight gain. GLP-1 is a gut-derived hormone that glucose-dependently stimulates insulin secretion while simultaneously reducing gastric emptying and appetite. Other physiological actions of GLP-1 may benefit the cardiovascular system and beta-cell function. Recently developed drug therapies that mimic or prolong the action of this hormone, therefore, have great promise in the treatment of T2DM.
Implications for practice: The GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors are incretin-based therapies that are now becoming established as effective therapies for T2DM to be used either as monotherapy or added to other antidiabetes drugs. They enable improvements to be made in glycemic control without weight gain, with a low risk for hypoglycemia, and with potential additional clinical benefits.
... The result of this research has led to the development of incretin-based therapies as an alternative to the currently available conventional OADs. These therapies are based on the physiological systems that operate the ''incretin effect,'' notably the naturally occurring gut hormones gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), which amplify the pancreatic insulin response to oral ingestion of nutrients (see other articles in this supplement: Wick, & Newlin, 2009;Robertson, 2009). The incretin hormones produce a variety of regulatory effects that lower both pre-and postprandial glucose with a glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin release and inhibition of glucagon secretion from the pancreas, as well as appetite suppression (Drucker & Nauck, 2006). ...
... In patients with T2DM, the natural incretin effect is diminished (Nauck, Stöckmann, Ebert, & Creutzfeldt, 1986), but incretin-based therapies such as the depeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and the GLP-1 receptor agonists can help to potentiate the natural physiological response to these hormones. As noted in the preceding articles (Wick, & Newlin, 2009;Robertson, 2009), the incretin-based therapies may circumvent some of the barriers to adherence noted previously, and assist patients and providers in achieving an optimal level of glycemic control. These agents have potential advantages with regard to tolerability compared with conventional therapies: they carry a low risk for hypoglycemia, and are either weight-neutral or cause weight loss (Aschner et al., 2006). ...
... The characteristics of a selection of currently available glucose-lowering interventions are summarized in Table 1; this enables comparison of the available or soonto-be available incretin-based therapies with the more familiar established drug classes. As discussed previously, incretin-based therapies can be divided into GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors (see other articles in this supplement: Wick, & Newlin, 2009;Robertson, 2009). ...
Purpose: To introduce the role of incretin therapies and suggest strategies for nurse practitioners to implement them in practice.
Data sources: PubMed, Medline, summary of product characteristics/package inserts.
Conclusions: Incretin-based therapies offer a new alternative to currently available agents. They provide adequate levels of glycemic control and are associated with low incidence of hypoglycemia and weight gain. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, for example sitagliptin, have a modest effect on A1c levels (−0.7%) as monotherapy; however, they reduce A1c to a greater extent when combined with metformin (∼2.0%). Typical starting dose of sitagliptin is 100 mg; dose adjustments are required in subjects with renal complications. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, exenatide and liraglutide, reduce A1c levels (often in excess of 1.5%) and body weight. Exenatide has a starting dose of 5 μg and is not recommended for patients with hepatic impairment or severe/end-stage renal disease. Liraglutide has been found to benefit from a stepwise dose escalation (i.e., 0.6 mg weekly increments) until a 1.8-mg dose is reached. Unlike exenatide, dose adjustments in patients with renal and hepatic complications are not required.
Implications for practice: Incretin-based therapies may help to overcome some of the drawbacks of current therapies used to treat type 2 diabetes.
... The incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is predominantly secreted from enteroendocrine L-cells of the distal small intestine [9]. Released in response to nutrient uptake [10], GLP-1 acts upon pancreatic β-cells to stimulate insulin secretion and biosynthesis in a glucose-dependent manner [11]. The multiple physiological actions of GLP-1, which have been reviewed extensively elsewhere [10,12], include inhibition of glucagon secretion, improved β-cell function and survival, reduced rates of gastric emptying and enhanced satiety. ...
... Early studies found that the incretin effect is blunted in subjects with T2D, with GLP-1 secretion substantially lower than normal [13,14]; however, a recent meta-analysis has suggested that instead of a reliable progressive decline in the GLP-1 response in T2D subjects, changes can be predicted by characteristics such as age, weight, fasting glucagon and fasting non-esterified fatty acid levels [15]. As insulin stimulation occurs only in the presence of elevated glucose levels, the incretin system represents a potential for development of novel therapies for T2D with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia than conventional therapies [11]; therapies were therefore developed which either mimicked GLP-1 or inhibited dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). ...
... The first of these was exenatide, identified as exendin-4 from Gila monster (Heloderma suspectum) saliva, which has 53% identity to native GLP-1 [17]. Liraglutide, with one amino acid change, has 97% sequence identity with the native molecule [11,18]; a fatty acid side chain promotes albumin binding, while the larger size and strong selfassociation , as well as partial DPP-4 resistance, are thought to delay absorption [19,20]. The long (13-h) half life of liraglutide makes it suitable for once-daily injection [21,22]. ...
... Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a member of the incretin family of hormones, which collectively stimulate 50–70% of total postprandial insulin secretion [4]. In addition, GLP-1 has a variety of other pancreatic effects, including increasing insulin biosynthesis, decreasing glucagon secretion and increasing beta-cell glucose sensitivity and beta-cell mass (animal models only) [5]. The GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is also widely expressed in extra-pancreatic tissues and therefore the effects ofFigure 1. Summary of the physiological effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) on the cardiac, gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. ...
The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) exenatide and liraglutide have been shown to improve glycaemic control and beta-cell function with a low risk of hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes. GLP-1 receptors are also expressed in extra-pancreatic tissues and trial data suggest GLP-1RAs also have effects beyond their glycaemic actions. Preclinical studies using native GLP-1 or GLP-1RAs provide substantial evidence for cardioprotective effects, while clinical trial data have demonstrated beneficial actions on hypertension and dyslipidaemia in people with type 2 diabetes. Significant weight loss has been reported with GLP-1RAs in both people with type 2 diabetes and obese people without diabetes. GLP-1RAs also slow gastric emptying, but pre-clinical data suggest that the main mechanism behind GLP-1RA-induced weight loss is more likely to involve their effects on appetite signalling in the brain. GLP-1RAs have also been shown to exert a neuroprotective role in rodent models of stroke, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. These extra-pancreatic effects of GLP-1RAs could provide multi-factorial benefits to people with type 2 diabetes. Potential adverse effects of GLP-1RA treatment are usually manageable, but may include gastrointestinal effects, increased heart rate, and renal injury. While extensive further research is still required, early data suggest that GLP-1RAs may also have the potential to favourably impact cardiovascular disease, obesity or neurological disorders in people without diabetes in the future.
Aims
To design and screen a potent GLP-1/GIP/Gcg receptors triagonist with therapeutic potential in rodent animals with diabetes and obesity.
Main methods
First, we obtained a 12-mer dual GIP/Gcg receptor agonist from a large combinatorial peptide library via high-throughput screening technique and then fused to the Exendin (9–39) to generate a potent GLP-1/GIP/Gcg triagonist. Further site fatty chain modification was performed to improve the druggability via enhancing in vivo stability and cyclic half-life. In vitro signaling and functional assays in cell lines expressing each receptor and in vivo efficacy evaluation in rodent model animals with hyperglycemia and obesity were all carefully performed.
Key findings
We screened and obtained a potent GLP-1/GIP/Gcg triagonist, termed XFL0, which promotes in vitro GLP-1, GIP, Gcg receptor activation comparable to native GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, respectively. Site-specific fatty acid modification significantly enhanced plasma stability of XFL0 and exhibited no obvious impact on receptor activation. The selected XFL0 conjugates termed XFL6, showed glucose-dependent insulin secretion and improved glucose tolerance by acting on all GLP-1, GIP and Gcg receptors in gene-deficient mice of which the effects were all significantly greater than any single receptor agonist. After chronic treatment in rodent animals with diabetes and obesity, XFL6 potently decreased body weight and food intake, ameliorated the hyperglycemia and hemoglobin A1c levels as well as the lipid metabolism and diabetic nephropathy related disorders.
Significance
XFL6, as a novel GLP-1/GIP/Gcg receptor triagonist, held potential to deliver outstanding improvement in correcting hyperglycemia, obesity and diabetic nephropathy.
Here, we design and evaluate novel long-lasting GLP-1R G-protein-biased agonists with promising pharmacological virtues. Firstly, six GLP-1R G-protein-biased peptides (named PX01–PX06), screened by using a previous reported high-throughput autocrine-based method, were fused to the N-terminus of GLP-1(9-37) to generate six fusion peptides (PX07–PX012). In vitro surface plasmon resonance (SPR) measurements showed that PX09 exerts the highest binding affinity for both human and mouse GLP-1R extracellular domains (ECD). We further used the PX09 as a starting point to conduct site-specific modifications yielding twelve lysine-modified conjugates, termed PX13–PX24. Of these conjugates, PX17 retained relatively better in vitro GLP-1R activation potency and plasma stability compared with other ones. Preclinical studies in db/db mice demonstrated that acute treatment of PX17 exerts enhanced hypoglycemic and insulinotropic activities in a dosage dependent model within the range of 0.1–0.9 mg kg⁻¹. Similarly, prolonged glucose-lowering abilities were exhibited in modified multiple oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) and a hypoglycemic duration test. Apparently prolonged in vivo half-lives of ∼96 and ∼141 h were observed after a single subcutaneous administration of PX17 at 0.1 and 0.3 mg kg⁻¹, respectively, in healthy cynomolgus monkeys. In addition, twice-weekly treatment of PX17 in db/db mice for 8 weeks obviously improved the hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), and was more effective at improving the insulin resistance, glucose tolerance as well as function of pancreatic beta cells compared with Semaglutide. Furthermore, subcutaneously dosed PX17 in diet induced obese (DIO) mice achieved long-term beneficial effects on food intake and body weight control, HbA1C and inflammation-related factor level lowering. The above results indicate that PX17, as a novel GLP-1R G-protein-biased agonist, may be a promising candidate for antidiabetic therapies.
Introduction:
Exenatide once weekly (ExeOW, Bydureon(®), Astra Zeneca), a drug belonging to the class of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, is the first agent approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) that can be administered on a weekly basis.
Methods:
Data concerning treatment of T2D with ExeOW are reviewed with special reference to its long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety. Relevant literature was identified through the PubMed database from inception to January 2015.
Results:
In randomized clinical trials ExeOW, as add-on to oral antidiabetics, achieved significantly improved glycemic control compared to maximum recommended doses of exenatide twice daily, sitagliptin, pioglitazone, and insulin glargine, as measured by HbA1c. In drug-naïve patients ExeOW was superior to sitagliptin and non-inferior to metformin, whereas non-inferiority to pioglitazone and liraglutide was not proven. In different trials reductions in HbA1c ranged from -1.1% to -2.0%. ExeOW therapy over 6 months was also associated with a mean weight loss of -2 to -4 kg, improved systolic blood pressure and lipid profile, and no hypoglycemia unless associated to sulfonylurea. ExeOW long-term therapy up to 3-6 years allowed persistent glycemic control (HbA1c -1.6%), sustained decreases in blood pressure (-2 mmHg), and improvements of lipid profile. ExeOW tolerability was comparable to that of the other GLP-1 receptor agonists, with better gastrointestinal tolerability when direct comparison was done (namely liraglutide and exenatide BID), but higher incidence of injection site reactions and few treatment discontinuations mainly due to gastrointestinal events.
Conclusion:
ExeOW is a well-tolerated and convenient option for long-term treatment of T2D allowing significant and persistent glycemic control with moderate weight loss and low risk of hypoglycemia unless associated with sulfonylureas.
Aim to confirm whether the treatment of GLP-1 can modulated body weight, lipid metabolism, insulin content, pancreas oxidative stress, improved T-AOC, MDA levels related to FFA-Induced oxidative stress in C57BL/6 mice and INS-1 cells. In this study, GLP-1 makes the expression of AMPK, PPARα, CPT1A and SIRT1 increased, and the expression of SREBP1c, miR-33 and miR-370 decreased. Interestingly, the effects of GLP-1 were less dose dependent as GLP-1 regulated the FFA, which related to gene expression at much lower doses (3 μg/kg, 10 mM, mice and INS-1 respectively) and effects were relatively maintained at higher dose (30 μg/kg, 100 mM, mice and INS-1 respectively) as well. Subsequently, the analysis showed that inhibited expression of miR-33 and miR-370 upregulated the expression of CPT1A and SIRT1, reversely mimics. These results demonstrated for the first time that GLP-1 improve lipotoxic oxidative stress of pancreas by regulate expression of microRNAs.
Currently, six glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are approved for treating type 2 diabetes. These fall into two classes based on their receptor activation: short-acting exenatide twice daily (BID) and lixisenatide once daily (OD); and longer-acting liraglutide OD, exenatide once weekly (OW), albiglutide OW and dulaglutide OW. The phase 3 trial of a seventh GLP-1RA, taspoglutide OW, was stopped due to unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Nine phase 3 head-to-head trials and one large phase 2 study have compared the efficacy and safety of these seven GLP-1RAs. All trials were associated with notable reductions in HbA1c, although liraglutide led to greater decreases than exenatide formulations and albiglutide, and HbA1c reductions did not differ between liraglutide and dulaglutide. As the short-acting GLP-1RAs delay gastric emptying, they have greater effects on postprandial glucose levels than the longer-acting agents, whereas the longer-acting compounds reduced plasma glucose throughout the 24-h period studied. Liraglutide was associated with weight reductions similar to those with exenatide BID but greater than those with exenatide OW, albiglutide and dulaglutide. The most frequently observed AEs with GLP-1RAs were gastrointestinal disorders, particularly nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea; nausea, however, occurred less frequently with exenatide OW and albiglutide than exenatide BID and liraglutide. Both exenatide formulations and albiglutide may be associated with higher incidences of injection-site reactions than liraglutide and dulaglutide. GLP-1RA use in clinical practice should be customized for individual patients, based on clinical profile and patient preference. Ongoing assessments of novel GLP-1RAs and delivery methods may further expand future treatment options.
This article provides an overview of the currently available treatments for type 2 diabetes (T2D), outlining the most up to date information to assist nurse practitioners (NPs) to make informed prescribing decisions for T2D therapy once patients are no longer able to maintain blood glucose control using lifestyle modification and/or metformin therapy.
Published guidelines for the management of T2D, review articles, primary manuscripts, and FDA prescribing information documents.
In the past, options for the treatment of T2D were limited. However, there is now an ever increasing number of available therapeutic choices for T2D, that, as well as glycemic control, offer significant additional benefits, particularly in terms of reducing hypoglycemic risk and weight gain. Consequently, these newer agents provide both patients and NPs with a much greater choice for ongoing therapy.
The differing benefits and risk profiles shown by the currently available antidiabetic treatments provide NPs with a unique opportunity to tailor treatment plans more closely to the requirements of each patient. This approach can ensure that the right drug reaches the right patient, which should in turn promote greater treatment compliance and improved outcomes, ultimately slowing disease progression.
Background Improved blood-glucose control decreases the progression of diabetic microvascular disease, but the effect on macrovascular complications is unknown. There is concern that sulphonylureas may increase cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and that high insulin concentrations may enhance atheroma formation. We compared the effects of intensive blood-glucose control with either sulphonylurea or insulin and conventional treatment on the risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes in a randomised controlled trial. Methods 3867 newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes, median age 54 years (IQR 48-60 years), who after 3 months' diet treatment had a mean of two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentrations of 6.1-15.0 mmol/L were randomly assigned intensive policy with a sulphonylurea (chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, or. glipizide) or with insulin, or conventional policy with diet. The aim in the intensive group was FPG less than 6 mmol/L. in the conventional group, the aim was the best achievable FPG with diet atone; drugs were added only if there were hyperglycaemic symptoms or FPG greater than 15 mmol/L. Three aggregate endpoints were used to assess differences between conventional and intensive treatment: any diabetes-related endpoint (sudden death, death from hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure, stroke, renal failure, amputation [of at least one digit], vitreous haemorrhage, retinopathy requiring photocoagulation, blindness in one eye,or cataract extraction); diabetes-related death (death from myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, renal disease, hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia, and sudden death); all-cause mortality. Single clinical endpoints and surrogate subclinical endpoints were also assessed. All analyses were by intention to treat and frequency of hypoglycaemia was also analysed by actual therapy. Findings Over 10 years, haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) was 7.0% (6.2-8.2) in the intensive group compared with 7.9% (6.9-8.8) in the conventional group-an 11% reduction. There was no difference in HbA(1c) among agents in the intensive group. Compared with the conventional group, the risk in the intensive group was 12% lower (95% CI 1-21, p=0.029) for any diabetes-related endpoint; 10% lower (-11 to 27, p=0.34) for any diabetes-related death; and 6% lower (-10 to 20, p=0.44) for all-cause mortality. Most of the risk reduction in the any diabetes-related aggregate endpoint was due to a 25% risk reduction (7-40, p=0.0099) in microvascular endpoints, including the need for retinal photocoagulation. There was no difference for any of the three aggregate endpoints the three intensive agents (chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, or insulin). Patients in the intensive group had more hypoglycaemic episodes than those in the conventional group on both types of analysis (both p<0.0001). The rates of major hypoglycaemic episodes per year were 0.7% with conventional treatment, 1.0% with chlorpropamide, 1.4% with glibenclamide, and 1.8% with insulin. Weight gain was significantly higher in the intensive group (mean 2.9 kg) than in the conventional group (p<0.001), and patients assigned insulin had a greater gain in weight (4.0 kg) than those assigned chlorpropamide (2.6 kg) or glibenclamide (1.7 kg). Interpretation Intensive blood-glucose control by either sulphonylureas or insulin substantially decreases the risk of microvascular complications, but not macrovascular disease, in patients with type 2 diabetes. None of the individual drugs had an adverse effect on cardiovascular outcomes. All intensive treatment increased the risk of hypoglycaemia.
Liraglutide is a novel once-daily human glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analog in clinical use for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. To study metabolism and excretion of [(3)H]liraglutide, a single subcutaneous dose of 0.75 mg/14.2 MBq was given to healthy males. The recovered radioactivity in blood, urine, and feces was measured, and metabolites were profiled. In addition, [(3)H]liraglutide and [(3)H]GLP-1(7-37) were incubated in vitro with dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) to compare the metabolite profiles and characterize the degradation products of liraglutide. The exposure of radioactivity in plasma (area under the concentration-time curve from 2 to 24 h) was represented by liraglutide (≥89%) and two minor metabolites (totaling ≤11%). Similarly to GLP-1, liraglutide was cleaved in vitro by DPP-IV in the Ala8-Glu9 position of the N terminus and degraded by NEP into several metabolites. The chromatographic retention time of DPP-IV-truncated liraglutide correlated well with the primary human plasma metabolite [GLP-1(9-37)], and some of the NEP degradation products eluted very close to both plasma metabolites. Three minor metabolites totaling 6 and 5% of the administered radioactivity were excreted in urine and feces, respectively, but no liraglutide was detected. In conclusion, liraglutide is metabolized in vitro by DPP-IV and NEP in a manner similar to that of native GLP-1, although at a much slower rate. The metabolite profiles suggest that both DPP-IV and NEP are also involved in the in vivo degradation of liraglutide. The lack of intact liraglutide excreted in urine and feces and the low levels of metabolites in plasma indicate that liraglutide is completely degraded within the body.
In type-2 diabetes, the overall incretin effect is reduced. The present investigation was designed to compare insulinotropic actions of exogenous incretin hormones (gastric inhibitory peptide [GIP] and glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP-1] [7-36 amide]) in nine type-2 diabetic patients (fasting plasma glucose 7.8 mmol/liter; hemoglobin A1c 6.3 +/- 0.6%) and in nine age- and weight-matched normal subjects. Synthetic human GIP (0.8 and 2.4 pmol/kg.min over 1 h each), GLP-1 [7-36 amide] (0.4 and 1.2 pmol/kg.min over 1 h each), and placebo were administered under hyperglycemic clamp conditions (8.75 mmol/liter) in separate experiments. Plasma GIP and GLP-1 [7-36 amide] concentrations (radioimmunoassay) were comparable to those after oral glucose with the low, and clearly supraphysiological with the high infusion rates. Both GIP and GLP-1 [7-36 amide] dose-dependently augmented insulin secretion (insulin, C-peptide) in both groups (P < 0.05). With GIP, the maximum effect in type-2 diabetic patients was significantly lower (by 54%; P < 0.05) than in normal subjects. With GLP-1 [7-36 amide] type-2 diabetic patients reached 71% of the increments in C-peptide of normal subjects (difference not significant). Glucagon was lowered during hyperglycemic clamps in normal subjects, but not in type-2 diabetic patients, and further by GLP-1 [7-36 amide] in both groups (P < 0.05), but not by GIP. In conclusion, in mild type-2 diabetes, GLP-1 [7-36 amide], in contrast to GIP, retains much of its insulinotropic activity. It also lowers glucagon concentrations.
We examined the effect of intravenously infused glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) on subjective appetite sensations after an energy-fixed breakfast, and on spontaneous energy intake at an ad libitum lunch. 20 young, healthy, normal-weight men participated in a placebo-controlled, randomized, blinded, crossover study. Infusion (GLP-1, 50 pmol/ kg.h or saline) was started simultaneously with initiation of the test meals. Visual analogue scales were used to assess appetite sensations throughout the experiment and the palatability of the test meals. Blood was sampled throughout the day for analysis of plasma hormone and substrate levels. After the energy-fixed breakfast, GLP-1 infusion enhanced satiety and fullness compared with placebo (treatment effect: P < 0.03). Furthermore, spontaneous energy intake at the ad libitum lunch was reduced by 12% by GLP-1 infusion compared with saline (P = 0.002). Plasma GLP-1, insulin, glucagon, and blood glucose profiles were affected significantly by the treatment (P < 0.002). In conclusion, the results show that GLP-1 enhanced satiety and reduced energy intake and thus may play a physiological regulatory role in controlling appetite and energy intake in humans.
Studies in animals suggest a physiological role for glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36)-amide (GLP-1) in regulating satiety. The role of GLP-1 in regulating food intake in man has, however, not been investigated. Subjects-Sixteen healthy male subjects were examined in a double blind placebo controlled fashion.
The effect of graded intravenous doses (0, 0.375, 0.75, and 1.5 pmol/kg/min) of synthetic human GLP-1 on food intake and feelings of hunger and satiety was tested in healthy volunteers.
Graded GLP-1 infusions resulted in a dose dependent reduction in food intake (maximal inhibition 35%, p<0.001 v control) and a similar reduction in calorie intake (32%; p<0.001). Fluid ingestion was also reduced by GLP-1 (18% reduction, p<0.01). No overt side effects were produced by GLP-1, but subjects experienced less hunger and early fullness in the period before a meal during GLP-1 infusion at the highest dose (p<0.05).
Intravenous infusions of GLP-1 decrease spontaneous food intake even at physiological plasma concentrations, implying an important role for GLP-1 in the regulation of the early satiety response in humans.
To elucidate the causes of the diminished incretin effect in type 2 diabetes mellitus we investigated the secretion of the incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose- dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and measured nonesterified fatty acids, and plasma concentrations of insulin, C peptide, pancreatic polypeptide, and glucose during a 4-h mixed meal test in 54 heterogeneous type 2 diabetic patients, 33 matched control subjects with normal glucose tolerance, and 15 unmatched subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. The glucagon-like peptide-1 response in terms of area under the curve from 0-240 min after the start of the meal was significantly decreased in the patients (2482 +/- 145 compared with 3101 +/- 198 pmol/liter.240 min; P = 0.024). In addition, the area under the curve for glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide was slightly decreased. In a multiple regression analysis, a model with diabetes, body mass index, male sex, insulin area under the curve (negative influence), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide area under the curve (negative influence), and glucagon area under the curve (positive influence) explained 42% of the variability of the glucagon-like peptide-1 response. The impaired glucose tolerance subjects were hyperinsulinemic and generally showed the same abnormalities as the diabetic patients, but to a lesser degree. We conclude that the meal-related glucagon-like peptide-1 response in type 2 diabetes is decreased, which may contribute to the decreased incretin effect in type 2 diabetes.
To investigate whether features of the insulin resistance syndrome are associated with altered incretin responses to food intake.
From a population-based study, 35 men were recruited, representing a wide spectrum of insulin sensitivity and body weight. Each subject underwent a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp to determine insulin sensitivity. A mixed meal was given, and plasma levels of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), as well as insulin, glucagon, and glucose were measured.
Insulin resistance was associated with impaired GIP and GLP-1 responses to a mixed meal. The total area under the curve (AUC) of the GIP response after the mixed meal was associated with insulin sensitivity (r = 0.54, P < 0.01). There was a significant difference between the highest and the lowest tertile of insulin sensitivity (P < 0.05). GLP-1 levels 15 min after food intake were significantly lower in the most insulin-resistant tertile compared with the most insulin-sensitive tertile. During the first hour, the AUC of GLP-1 correlated significantly with insulin sensitivity (r = 0.47, P < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that insulin resistance, but not obesity, was an independent predictor of these decreased incretin responses.
In insulin resistance, the GIP and GLP-1 responses to a mixed meal are impaired and are related to the degree of insulin resistance. Decreased incretin responsiveness may be of importance for the development of impaired glucose tolerance.
Oral agents are the mainstay of pharmacologic treatment for type 2 diabetes, and physicians now have a number of agents to choose from. However, more choices translate into more complex decision making. Many patients with diabetes have associated comorbidities, and most diabetic patients will require more than 1 agent to achieve good glycemic control. This article illustrates several of the pharmacologic approaches to type 2 diabetes through 4 situations that use principles of evidence-based medicine. The scenarios also highlight some of the difficulties in choosing the optimal pharmacologic treatment regimen for individual patients. Physicians should also recognize that type 2 diabetes is a multisystem disorder that requires multidisciplinary care, including education and ongoing counseling for effective patient self-management of the disease. Finally, patient preferences are a vital component of informed decision making for pharmacologic treatment of diabetes.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), a polypeptide hormone secreted by the l-cells in the gastrointestinal tract, has shown promising effects as a new treatment modality for patients with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. However, the pharmacokinetic profile of native GLP-1 with a rapid elimination has limited its therapeutic potential. NN2211 is a fatty acid derivative of GLP-1, which pre-clinically has shown a protracted pharmacokinetic profile, while maintaining its biological activity. This study aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NN2211 in healthy male subjects following seven days treatment.
In a double-blind, randomized, dose escalation, placebo controlled study, healthy male subjects were enrolled at five consecutive dose levels of NN2211 (1.25, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5 microg/kg). Six subjects were allocated at random at each dose level to active or placebo treatment with a ratio of 2:1. Dosing with NN2211 was performed on day 1, and days 5-11. The 84-h pharmacokinetics and 24-h glucose and insulin profiles were assessed on day 1 and day 11.
Following s. c. administration the half-life of NN2211 was found to be 12.6 +/- 1.1 h, with a subsequent accumulation index after a daily dose for seven days of 1.4-1.5. There were dose-proportional increases in exposure (AUC and C(max)) with increasing doses. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences from placebo in the 24-h glucose and insulin profiles. In subjects treated with NN2211 rather than placebo, there was a higher incidence of adverse events, most notably dizziness and adverse events related to the gastrointestinal system. There were no serious adverse events but three subjects were nonetheless withdrawn because of dizziness, fever and nausea. There were no clinically relevant changes in vital signs, ECG parameters, physical examination or safety laboratory parameters. A significantly lower diuresis was observed in the actively treated subjects, without a clinically relevant change in packed cell volume.
This study shows NN2211 has a pharmacokinetic profile supporting a daily dose in human beings, but also that subjects treated with NN2211 rather than placebo, had a higher incidence of adverse events, most notably dizziness and adverse events related to the gastrointestinal system.
We have previously shown that type 2 diabetic patients have decreased plasma concentrations of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) compared with healthy subjects after ingestion of a standard mixed meal. This decrease could be caused by differences in the metabolism of GLP-1. The objective of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of GLP-1 in healthy subjects and type 2 diabetic patients after iv bolus doses ranging from 2.5-25 nmol/subject. Bolus injections iv of 2.5, 5, 15, and 25 nmol of GLP-1 and a meal test were performed in six type 2 diabetic patients [age, mean (range): 56 (48-67) yr; body mass index: 31.2 (27.0-37.7) kg/m(2); fasting plasma glucose: 11.9 (8.3-14.3) mmol/liter; hemoglobin A(1C): 9.6 (7.0-12.5)%]. For comparison, six matched healthy subjects were examined. Peak plasma GLP-1 concentrations increased linearly with increasing doses of GLP-1 and were similar for type 2 diabetic patients and healthy subjects. The peak concentrations of total GLP-1 (C-terminal) after 2.5, 5, 15, and 25 nmol of GLP-1 were 357 +/- 56, 647 +/- 141, 1978 +/- 276, 3435 +/- 331 pmol/liter in the type 2 diabetic patients and 315 +/- 37, 676 +/- 64, 1848 +/- 146, 3168 +/- 358 pmol/liter, respectively, in the healthy subjects (not statistically significant). Peak concentrations of the intact GLP-1 peptide (N-terminal) were: 69 +/- 17, 156 +/- 44, 703 +/- 77, and 1070 +/- 117 pmol/liter in the type 2 diabetic patients and 75 +/- 14, 160 +/- 40, 664 +/- 79, 974 +/- 87 in the healthy subjects (not statistically significant). GLP-1 was eliminated rapidly with clearances of intact GLP-1 after 2.5, 5, 15, and 25 nmol of GLP-1 amounting to: 9.0 +/- 5.0, 8.1 +/- 6.0, 4.0 +/- 1.0, 4.0 +/- 1.0 liter/min in type 2 diabetic patients and 8.4 +/- 4.2, 7.6 +/- 4.5, 5.0 +/- 2.0, 5.0 +/- 1.0 liter/min in healthy subjects. The volume of distribution ranged from 9-26 liters per subject. No significant differences were found between healthy subjects and type 2 diabetic subjects. We conclude that elimination of GLP-1 is the same in obese type 2 diabetic patients and matched healthy subjects. The impaired incretin response seen after ingestion of a standard breakfast meal must therefore be caused by a decreased secretion of GLP-1 in type 2 diabetic patients.
GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion, suppresses glucagon secretion, delays gastric emptying, and inhibits small bowel motility, all actions contributing to the anti-diabetogenic peptide effect. Endothelial dysfunction is strongly associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus and may cause the angiopathy typifying this debilitating disease. Therefore, interventions affecting both endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance may prove useful in improving survival in type 2 diabetes patients. We investigated GLP-1's effect on endothelial function and insulin sensitivity (S(I)) in two groups: 1) 12 type 2 diabetes patients with stable coronary artery disease and 2) 10 healthy subjects with normal endothelial function and S(I). Subjects underwent infusion of recombinant GLP-1 or saline in a random crossover study. Endothelial function was measured by postischemic FMD of brachial artery, using ultrasonography. S(I) [in (10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1))/(muU/ml)] was measured by hyperinsulinemic isoglycemic clamp technique. In type 2 diabetic subjects, GLP-1 infusion significantly increased relative changes in brachial artery diameter from baseline FMD(%) (3.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.0%, P < 0.05), with no significant effects on S(I) (4.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.9, P = NS). In healthy subjects, GLP-1 infusion affected neither FMD(%) (11.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 10.3 +/- 1.0%, P = NS) nor S(I) (14.8 +/- 1.8 vs. 11.6 +/- 2.0, P = NS). We conclude that GLP-1 improves endothelial dysfunction but not insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. This beneficial vascular effect of GLP-1 adds yet another salutary property of the peptide useful in diabetes treatment.
Background
In patients with type 2 diabetes, intensive blood-glucose control with insulin or sulphonylurea therapy decreases progression of microvascular disease and may also reduce the risk of heart attacks. This study investigated whether intensive glucose control with metformin has any specific advantage or disadvantage.
Methods
Of 4075 patients recruited to UKPDS in 15centres, 1704 overweight (>120% ideal bodyweight) patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, mean age 53 years, had raised fasting plasma glucose (FPG;6·1–15·0 mmol/L) without hyperglycaemic symptoms after 3 months' initial diet. 753 were included in a randomised controlled trial, median duration 10·7 years, of conventional policy, primarily with diet alone (n=411) versus intensive blood-glucose control policy with metformin, aiming for FPG below 6 mmol/L (n=342). A secondary analysis compared the 342 patients allocated metformin with 951 overweight patients allocated intensive blood-glucose control with chlorpropamide (n=265), glibenclamide (n=277), or insulin (n=409). The primary outcome measures were aggregates of any diabetes-related clinical endpoint, diabetes-related death, and all-cause mortality. In a supplementary randomised controlled trial, 537 non-overweight and overweight patients, mean age 59 years, who were already on maximum sulphonylurea therapy but had raised FPG (6·1–15·0 mmol/L) were allocated continuing sulphonylurea therapy alone (n=269) or addition of metformin (n=268).
Findings
Median glycated haemoglobin (HbA 1c) was 7·4%in the metformin group compared with 8·0% in the conventional group. Patients allocated metformin, compared with the conventional group, had risk reductions of 32% (95% CI 13–47, p=0·002) for any diabetes-related endpoint, 42% for diabetes-related death (9–63, p=0·017), and 36% for all-cause mortality (9–55, p=0·011). Among patients allocated intensive blood glucose control, metformin showed a greater effect than chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, or insulin for any diabetes-related endpoint (p=0·0034), all-cause mortality (p=0·021), and stroke (p=0·032). Early addition of metformin in sulphonylurea-treated patients was associated with an increased risk of diabetes-related death (96% increased risk [95% CI 2–275], p=0·039) compared with continued sulphonylurea alone. A combined analysis of the main and supplementary studies showed fewer metformin-allocated patients having diabetes-related endpoints (risk reduction 19% [2–33], p=0·033). Epidemiological assessment of the possible association of death from diabetes-related causes with the concurrent therapy of diabetes in 4416 patients did not show an increased risk in diabetes-related death in patients treated with a combination of sulphonylurea and metformin (risk reduction 5% [−33 to 32], p=0·78).
Interpretation
Since intensive glucose control with metformin appears to decrease the risk of diabetesrelated endpoints in overweight diabetic patients, and is associated with less weight gain and fewer hypoglycaemic attacks than are insulin and sulphonylureas, it may be the first-line pharmacological therapy of choice in these patients.
The objective of the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study is to determine whether improved blood glucose control in type LI diabetes will prevent the complications of diabetes and whether any specific therapy is advantageous or disadvantageous. The study will report in 1998, when the median duration from randomization will be 11 years, This report is on the efficacy of therapy over 6 years of follow-up and the overall incidence of diabetic complications, Subjects comprised 4,209 newly diagnosed type II diabetic patients who after 3 months' diet were asymptomatic and had fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 6.0-15.0 mmol/l, The study consists of a randomized controlled trial with two main comparisons: 1) 3,867 patients with 1,138 allocated to conventional therapy, primarily with diet, and 2,729 allocated to intensive therapy with additional sulfonylurea or insulin, which increase insulin supply, aiming for FPG <6 mmol/l; and 2) 753 obese patients with 411 allocated to conventional therapy and 342 allocated to intensive therapy with metformin, which enhances insulin sensitivity, Zn the first comparison, in 2,287 subjects studied for 6 years, intensive therapy with sulfonylurea and insulin similarly improved glucose control compared with conventional therapy, with median FPG at 1 year of 6.8 and 8.2 mmol/l, respectively (P < 0.0001), and median HbA(1c) of 6.1 and 6.8%, respectively (P < 0.0001), During the next 5 years, the FPG increased progressively on all therapies (P < 0.0001) with medians at 6 years in the conventional and intensive groups, FPG 9.5 and 7.8 mmol/l, and HbA,, 8.0 and 7.1%, respectively, The glycemic deterioration was associated with progressive loss of p-cen function, In the second comparison, in obese subjects studied for 6 years, metformin improved glucose control similarly to intensive therapy with sulfonylurea or insulin, Metformin did not increase body weight or increase the incidence of hypoglycemia to the same extent as therapy with sulfonylurea or insulin, A high incidence of clinical complications occurred by g-year follow-up, Of all subjects, 18.0% had suffered one or more diabetes-related clinical endpoints, with 12.1% having a macrovascular and 5.7% a microvascular endpoint, Sulfonylurea, metformin, and insulin therapies were similarly effective in improving glucose control compared with a policy of diet therapy, The study is examining whether the continued improved glucose control, obtained by intensive therapy compared with conventional therapy (median over 6 years HbA(1c) 6.6% compared with 7.4%), will be clinically advantageous in maintaining health.
Purpose:
To update readers on developments in incretin therapies since the previous JAANP supplement in 2007; specifically, to describe clinical data for currently available incretin-based therapies as well as those under consideration by regulatory agencies.
Data source:
Medline search for peer-reviewed publications.
Conclusions:
Incretin-based therapies have pharmacologic properties that avoid some key limitations of previous treatments, such as hypoglycemia and weight gain. Certain agents also lower blood pressure and have the potential to reduce cardiovascular risk. The insulin-secreting action of incretin-based therapies only occurs under hyperglycemic conditions, thus minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia, unless combined with a sulfonylurea. The DPP-4 inhibitors are orally administered and demonstrate modest A1c reductions (0.6%-0.8%); the best results occur when combined with metformin. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists liraglutide and exenatide have shown greater A1c reductions (typically ≥ 1.1% and as high as 1.7%), and these agents have beneficial ancillary effects, including weight and systolic blood pressure reduction. Both DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists have shown the ability to improve pancreatic beta-cell function in early studies.
Implications for practice:
Data are provided on the efficacy and tolerability of approved incretin therapies, and on treatments currently in regulatory review, in order to inform readers and guide their practice.
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in the United States and across the world, and better therapies are constantly being sought to improve patient outcomes. Recent studies have brought our attention to the mechanisms of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Not only does it demonstrate beneficial effects in regard to cardiovascular risk factors (i.e., diabetes, lipid management, and weight control), but it also has been shown in animal studies to have positive cardiac effects irrespective of its effects on glucose control and weight loss. This review discusses the biology of GLP-1 and its effects on cardiovascular risk factors, and it also elaborates on the positive direct cardiovascular outcomes of GLP-1 in animal studies.
This trial was sponsored by Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark. We would like to thank the following investigators and their staff. Denmark: K. Kølendorf, H. Perrild, S. Madsbad, T. Krarup, O. Schmitz, H. H. Lervang; France: J. P. Courreges, E. Aboud, C. Le Devehat, M. Vimeaux, D. Gouet, T. Godeau, M. v. Bernardin, M. Issa-Sayegh, Y. Hadjali, A. Blaimont, R. Mira, F. Galtier, A. Farret, J. P. Gagnol, Y. Lorcy, M. Rodier, A. Maubon, S. Schuldiner, B. Vialettes, C. Mattei, B. Catargi, B. Gatta, P. Duvezin-Caubat, P. Serusiat; Slovakia: Z. Nemethyova, T. Kupcova, M. Macko, I. Tkac, K. Suschozova, I. Buganova, L. Fabryova, V. Uliciansky, K. Raslova, P. Farkas, J. Okapcova, J. Fabry; the Netherlands: J. B. L. Hoekstra, P. H. L. M. Geelhoed-Duvestijn, P. A. Van Meurs, R. P. Verhoeven, H. Seinen, F. H. Kauw. We thank Ann Olling MSc for assistance in preparation of this manuscript.
The consensus algorithm for the medical management of type 2 diabetes was published in August 2006 with the expectation that it would be updated, based on the availability of new interventions and new evidence to establish their clinical role. The authors continue to endorse the principles used to develop the algorithm and its major features. We are sensitive to the risks of changing the algorithm cavalierly or too frequently, without compelling new information. An update to the consensus algorithm published in January 2008 specifically addressed safety issues surrounding the thiazolidinediones. In this revision, we focus on the new classes of medications that now have more clinical data and experience.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), a gastrointestinal hormone mainly produced in the post-prandial state, reduces blood glucose through the stimulation of insulin secretion and the inhibition of glucagon release. Long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors which increase GLP-1 levels, are used as hypoglycemic treatments in type 2 diabetes. This paper aims at reviewing the potential benefit of those treatments in the prevention of cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetic patients.
Experimental studies have shown that GLP-1 has several potentially beneficial actions on cardiovascular risk. Some of those, such as protection from myocardial ischemic damage and improvement of cardiac function, have also been demonstrated in humans. However, the equivalence of GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors with GLP-1, with respect to cardiovascular risk profile, cannot be assumed or taken for granted. Drugs of those two classes have been shown to effectively reduce glycated hemoglobin and to have a specific effect on post-prandial glucose; furthermore, they seem to reduce blood pressure and to have some favorable effects on lipid profiles. Additionally, GLP-1 agonists induce weight loss in diabetic patients.
The profile of action of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors suggests the possibility of an actual reduction in cardiovascular risk, which needs to be confirmed by large long-term clinical trials.
Inhibition of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 represents the latest pharmacologic intervention to become available to assist patients with Type 2 diabetes to achieve glycemic control. A combination tablet of sitagliptin (Januvia) and metformin HCl (Glucophage) is now available from Merck (Janumet). The FDA has approved this drug for use in patients who are not adequately controlled by taking either sitagliptin or metformin HCl alone or for patients who are at present taking both simultaneously. Sitagliptin has been shown to be safe and effective at 100 mg daily doses. When given in combination with metformin the effect on glycemic control is thought to be complementary and possibly additive.
Endothelial dysfunction is a major characteristic of the atherosclerotic process and can be used to predict the outcome of cardiovascular disease in humans. Together with obesity and insulin resistance, such dysfunction is common among patients with type 2 diabetes and may explain their poor prognosis in connection with such a disease. Insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and the liver, a well-characterized feature of obesity and type 2 diabetes, contributes to the impairment of glucose homeostasis. Furthermore, the myocardial muscle can also be resistant to insulin, which might, at least in part, explain the frequent development of heart failure in individuals suffering from type 2 diabetes. The relationship between insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction has prompted investigations, which reveal that regular exercise, dietary changes, and/or pharmacological agents can both increase insulin sensitivity and improve endothelial function. Glucagon-like peptide-1, an incretin, lowers blood levels of glucose and offers a promising new approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its extensive extra-pancreatic effects, including a favorable influence on cardiovascular parameters, are extremely interesting in this connection. The potential pharmacological effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 and its analogues on the endothelium and the heart are discussed in the present review.
This study evaluated the effects of exenatide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, and sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), insulin and glucagon secretion, gastric emptying, and caloric intake in T2D patients.
This double-blind, randomized cross-over, multi-center study was conducted in metformin-treated T2D patients: 54% female; BMI: 33 +/- 5 kg/m(2); HbA(1c): 8.5 +/- 1.2%; 2-h PPG: 245 +/- 65 mg/dL. Patients received exenatide (5 microg BID for 1 week, then 10 microg BID for 1 week) or sitagliptin (100 mg QAM) for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, patients crossed-over to the alternate therapy. Postprandial glycemic measures were assessed via standard meal test; caloric intake assessed by ad libitum dinner (subset of patients). Gastric emptying was assessed by acetaminophen absorption (Clinicaltrials.gov Registry Number: NCT00477581).
After 2 weeks of therapy, 2-h PPG was lower with exenatide versus sitagliptin: 133 +/- 6 mg/dL versus 208 +/- 6 mg/dL, p < 0.0001 (evaluable, N = 61). Switching from exenatide to sitagliptin increased 2-h PPG by +73 +/- 11 mg/dL, while switching from sitagliptin to exenatide further reduced 2-h PPG by -76 +/- 10 mg/dL. Postprandial glucose parameters (AUC, C(ave), C(max)) were lower with exenatide than sitagliptin (p < 0.0001). Reduction in fasting glucose was similar with exenatide and sitagliptin (-15 +/- 4 mg/dL vs. -19 +/- 4 mg/dL, p = 0.3234). Compared to sitagliptin, exenatide improved the insulinogenic index of insulin secretion (ratio exenatide to sitagliptin: 1.50 +/- 0.26, p = 0.0239), reduced postprandial glucagon (AUC ratio exenatide to sitagliptin: 0.88 +/- 0.03, p = 0.0011), reduced postprandial triglycerides (AUC ratio exenatide to sitagliptin: 0.90 +/- 0.04, p = 0.0118), and slowed gastric emptying (acetaminophen AUC ratio exenatide to sitagliptin: 0.56 +/- 0.05, p < 0.0001). Exenatide reduced total caloric intake compared to sitagliptin (-134 +/- 97 kcal vs. +130 +/- 97 kcal, p = 0.0227, N = 25). Common adverse events with both treatments were mild to moderate in intensity and gastrointestinal in nature.
Although this study was limited by a 2-week duration of exposure, these data demonstrate that, exenatide had: (i) a greater effect than sitagliptin to lower postprandial glucose and (ii) a more potent effect to increase insulin secretion and reduce postprandial glucagon secretion in T2D patients. In contrast to sitagliptin, exenatide slowed gastric emptying and reduced caloric intake. These key findings differentiate the therapeutic actions of the two incretin-based approaches, and may have meaningful clinical implications.
The physiological role of glucagon-like peptide-1 7-36 amide (GLP-1 7-36) in man was investigated. GLP-1 7-36-like immunoreactivity was found in the human bowel; its circulating level rose after oral glucose and after a test breakfast. When it was infused into seven volunteers at a rate to mimic its postprandial plasma concentration in the fasting state, plasma insulin levels rose significantly and glucose and glucagon concentrations fell. During an intravenous glucose load, it greatly enhanced insulin release and significantly reduced peak plasma glucose concentrations, compared with a control saline infusion, even inducing postinfusion reactive hypoglycaemia. By comparison, infusion of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) to physiological levels was less effective in stimulating insulin release. These observations suggest that GLP-1 7-36 is a physiological incretin and that it is more powerful than GIP. The observation of greatly increased postprandial plasma GLP-1 7-36 levels in patients with postgastrectomy dumping syndrome suggests that it may mediate the hyperinsulinaemia and reactive hypoglycaemia of this disorder.
Insulin secretion is controlled by a complex set of factors. Although blood glucose levels serve as the major stimulus of insulin secretion in mammals, insulin release is also modulated by amino acids, catecholamines, glucagon, and other, intestinal hormones. The identification of factors that modulate insulin production has engendered much interest because of their potential importance in the altered dynamics of insulin secretion in response to glucose characteristic of maturity-onset diabetes mellitus. Decoding of the glucagon gene has uncovered two additional glucagon-like peptides encoded in proglucagon, the polypeptide precursor of glucagon. One of these peptides, glucagon-like peptide I, is processed from proglucagon in two forms, of 31 and 37 amino acids. We report that the smaller of the two glucagon-like peptides potently increases cAMP levels, insulin mRNA transcripts, and insulin release in cultured rat insulinoma cells. These results indicate that glucagon-like peptide I may be a physiologic modulator of insulin gene expression.
Integrated incremental immunoreactive insulin and connecting peptide responses to an oral glucose load of 50 g and an "isoglycaemic" intravenous glucose infusion, respectively, were measured in 14 Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients and 8 age- and weight-matched metabolically healthy control subjects. Differences between responses to oral and intravenous glucose administration are attributed to factors other than glucose itself (incretin effect). Despite higher glucose increases, immunoreactive insulin and connecting peptide responses after oral glucose were delayed in diabetic patients. Integrated responses were not significantly different between both groups. However, during "isoglycaemic" intravenous infusion, insulin and connecting peptide responses were greater in diabetic patients than in control subjects as a consequence of the higher glycaemic stimulus. The contribution of incretin factors to total insulin responses was 72.8 +/- 6.9% (100% = response to oral load) in control subjects and 36.0 +/- 8.8% in diabetic patients (p less than or equal to 0.05). The contribution to connecting peptide responses was 58.4 +/- 7.6% in control subjects and 7.6 +/- 14.5% (p less than or equal to 0.05) in diabetic patients. Ratios of integrated insulin to connecting peptide responses suggest a reduced (hepatic) insulin extraction in control subjects after oral as compared to intravenous glucose. This was not the case in diabetic patients. Immunoreactive gastric inhibitory polypeptide responses were not different between control subjects and diabetic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The effect of very highly purified gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) on insulin secretion in man was tested in normal volunteers. Administration of physiological doses of GIP together with glucose by IV infusion resulted in potentiation of the rise in IRI in the blood and improvement in glucose tolerance. It is concluded that GIP is a potent insulinotropic hormone and probably takes part in physiological potentiation of insulin secretion in response to hyperglycemia during absorption of nutrients from the intestine.
The action of watery rat gut extracts on glucose-induced insulin release in anaesthetized rats was examined before and after removal of GIP by immunoadsorption. Infusions of GIP-containing rat gut extracts nearly doubled the insulin release induced by intravenous glucose (1 g X kg -1 X h -1). Peak insulin secretion was 98 +/- 11 mU/l (mean +/- SEM) after intravenous glucose and increased to 178 +/- 16 mU/l following infusion of glucose plus gut extract (p less than 0.005). After injection of GIP antiserum in sufficient amounts to neutralize the GIP activity in the gut extract preparation, the additional insulin release due to the gut extract was reduced by only 30%. After complete removal of GIP from gut extracts by immuno-absorption, more than 50% of the incretin effect remained. These data suggest that the insulinotropic activity of rat gut extracts can only be partially related to GIP. The existence of additional insulinotropic gut factors which may also be released following oral glucose is postulated.
Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) (7-36 amide) is a physiological incretin hormone that is released after nutrient intake from the lower gut and stimulates insulin secretion at elevated plasma glucose concentrations. Previous work has shown that even in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients GLP-1 (7-36 amide) retains much of its insulinotropic action. However, it is not known whether the magnitude of this response is sufficient to normalize plasma glucose in Type 2 diabetic patients with poor metabolic control. Therefore, in 10 Type 2 diabetic patients with unsatisfactory metabolic control (HbA1c 11.6 +/- 1.7%) on diet and sulphonylurea therapy (in some patients supplemented by metformin or acarbose), 1.2 pmol x kg-1 x min-1 GLP-1 (7-36 amide) or placebo was infused intravenously in the fasting state (plasma glucose 13.1 +/- 0.6 mmol/l). In all patients, insulin (by 17.4 +/- 4.7 nmol x 1-1 x min; p = 0.0157) and C-peptide (by 228.0 +/- 39.1 nmol x 1-1 x min; p = 0.0019) increased significantly over basal levels, glucagon was reduced (by -1418 +/- 308 pmol x 1-1 x min) and plasma glucose reached normal fasting concentrations (4.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) within 4 h of GLP-1 (7-36 amide) administration, but not with placebo. When normal fasting plasma glucose concentrations were reached insulin returned towards basal levels and plasma glucose concentrations remained stable despite the ongoing infusion of GLP-1 (7-36 amide). Therefore, exogenous GLP-1 (7-36 amide) is an effective means of normalizing fasting plasma glucose concentrations in poorly-controlled Type 2 diabetic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Despite the fact that it is the prevalent view that insulin resistance is the main genetic factor predisposing to development of type 2 diabetes, review of several lines of evidence in the literature indicates a lack of overwhelming support for this concept. In fact, the literature better supports the case of impaired insulin secretion being the initial and main genetic factor predisposing to type 2 diabetes, especially 1) the studies in people at high risk to subsequently develop type 2 diabetes (discordant monozygotic twins and women with previous gestational diabetes), 2) the studies demonstrating compete alleviation of insulin resistance with weight loss, and 3) the studies finding that people with type 2 diabetes or IGT can have impaired insulin secretion and no insulin resistance compared with well matched NGT subjects. The fact that insulin resistance may be largely an acquired problem in no way lessens its importance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Life style changes (exercise, weight reduction) and pharmacological agents (e.g., biguanides and thiazolidendiones) that reduce insulin resistance or increase insulin sensitivity clearly have major beneficial effects (122, 144-146, 153-155).
Methods for assessment, e.g., anthropometric indicators and imaging techniques, of several phenotypes of human obesity, with special reference to abdominal fat content, have been evaluated. The correlation of fat distribution with age, gender, total body fat, energy balance, adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase and lipolytic activity, adipose tissue receptors, and genetic characteristics are discussed. Several secreted or expressed factors in the adipocyte are evaluated in the context of fat tissue localization. The body fat distribution and the metabolic profile in nonobese and obese individuals is discussed relative to lipolysis, antilypolysis and lipogenesis, insulin sensitivity, and glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism. Finally, the endocrine regulation of abdominal visceral fat in comparison with the adipose tissue localized in other areas is presented.
Care of patients with type 2 diabetes has been revolutionized throughout the past several years-first, by the realization of the importance of tight glycemic control in forestalling complications, and second, by the availability of several unique classes of oral antidiabetic agents. Deciphering which agent to use in certain clinical situations is a new dilemma facing the primary care physician.
To systematically review available data from the literature regarding the efficacy of oral antidiabetic agents, both as monotherapy and in combination.
A MEDLINE search was performed to identify all English-language reports of unique, randomized controlled clinical trials involving recently available oral agents for type 2 diabetes. Bibliographies were also reviewed to find additional reports not otherwise identified.
Studies (63) were included in the analysis if they had a study period of at least 3 months; if each group contained at least 10 subjects at the study's conclusion; and if hemoglobin A(1c) was reported. When multiple dosages of a drug were tested, the results of the highest approved dosage were used. In placebo-controlled trials, hemoglobin A(1c) data are presented as the difference between the change in treated vs placebo subjects.
Five distinct oral drug classes are now available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Compared with placebo treatment, most of these agents lower hemoglobin A(1c) levels approximately 1% to 2%. Equivalent efficacy is usually demonstrated when different agents are compared with one another in the same study population. When they are used in combination, there are additional glycemic benefits. Long-term vascular risk reduction has been demonstrated only with sulfonylureas and metformin.
With few exceptions, the available oral antidiabetic agents are equally effective at lowering glucose concentrations. Their mechanisms of action are different, however, and as a result they appear to have distinct metabolic effects. These are reflected in their adverse effect profiles and their effect on cardiovascular risk, which may influence drug choice.
This paper describes a new method for evaluating glucose metabolism in man using an oral glucose load. The procedure permits the calculation of a blood glucose disappearance rate constant (K) and thereby makes it possible to compare quantitatively the response to oral and intravenous glucose administration in a given individual. Ten metabolically normal adult humans were studied under carefully controlled conditions. Each received similar amounts (20 g) of glucose both orally and intravenously (2–7 days apart) by constant infusion for 1 hr. The effects on blood glucose disappearance rate constants (K) and plasma insulin concentrations (immunoassay) during and for 1 hr following the infusion were compared. Blood glucose concentrations and K values with the 2 routes of glucose administration were similar. In contrast, plasma insulin responses showed a significant difference: oral glucose resulted in a significant and sustained rise, whereas intravenous glucose was associated with a smaller and transient inc...
Peptide hormones are secreted from endocrine cells and neurons and exert their actions through activation of G protein-coupled receptors to regulate a diverse number of physiological systems including control of energy homeostasis, gastrointestinal motility, neuroendocrine circuits, and hormone secretion. The glucagon-like peptides, GLP-1 and GLP-2 are prototype peptide hormones released from gut endocrine cells in response to nutrient ingestion that regulate not only energy absorption and disposal, but also cell proliferation and survival. GLP-1 expands islet mass by stimulating pancreatic beta-cell proliferation and induction of islet neogenesis. GLP-1 also promotes cell differentiation, from exocrine cells or immature islet progenitors, toward a more differentiated beta-cell phenotype. GLP-2 stimulates cell proliferation in the gastrointestinal mucosa, leading to expansion of the normal mucosal epithelium, or attenuation of intestinal injury in experimental models of intestinal disease. Both GLP-1 and GLP-2 exert antiapoptotic actions in vivo, resulting in preservation of beta-cell mass and gut epithelium, respectively. Furthermore, GLP-1 and GLP-2 promote direct resistance to apoptosis in cells expressing GLP-1 or GLP-2 receptors. Moreover, an increasing number of structurally related peptide hormones and neuropeptides exert cytoprotective effects through G protein-coupled receptor activation in diverse cell types. Hence, peptide hormones, as exemplified by GLP-1 and GLP-2, may prove to be useful adjunctive tools for enhancement of cell differentiation, tissue regeneration, and cytoprotection for the treatment of human disease.
The available evidence suggests that about two-thirds of the insulin response to an oral glucose load is due to the potentiating effect of gut-derived incretin hormones. The strongest candidates for the incretin effect are glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). In patients with type 2 diabetes, however, the incretin effect is lost or greatly impaired. It is hypothesized that this loss explains an important part of the impaired insulin secretion in patients. Further analysis of the incretin effects in patients has revealed that the secretion of GIP is near normal, whereas the secretion of GLP-1 is decreased. On the other hand, the insulintropic effect of GLP-1 is preserved, whereas the effect of GIP is greatly reduced, mainly because of a complete loss of the normal GIP-induced potentiation of second-phase insulin secretion. These two features, therefore, explain the incretin defect of type 2 diabetes. Strong support for the hypothesis that the defect plays an important role in the insulin deficiency of patients is provided by the finding that administration of excess GLP-1 to patients may completely restore the glucose-induced insulin secretion as well as the beta-cells' sensitivity to glucose. Because of this, analogs of GLP-1 or GLP-1 receptor activations are currently being developed for diabetes treatment, so far with very promising results.
Glucose-insulin-potassium infusions are beneficial in uncomplicated patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but are of unproven efficacy in AMI with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction because of volume requirements associated with glucose infusion. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a naturally occurring incretin with both insulinotropic and insulinomimetic properties that stimulate glucose uptake without the requirements for concomitant glucose infusion.
We investigated the safety and efficacy of a 72-hour infusion of GLP-1 (1.5 pmol/kg per minute) added to background therapy in 10 patients with AMI and LV ejection fraction (EF) <40% after successful primary angioplasty compared with 11 control patients. Echocardiograms were obtained after reperfusion and after the completion of the GLP-1 infusion. Baseline demographics and background therapy were similar, and both groups had severe LV dysfunction at baseline (LVEF=29+/-2%). GLP-1 significantly improved LVEF (from 29+/-2% to 39+/-2%, P<0.01), global wall motion score indexes (1.94+/-0.11-->1.63+/-0.09, P<0.01), and regional wall motion score indexes (2.53+/-0.08-->2.02+/-0.11, P<0.01) compared with control subjects. The benefits of GLP-1 were independent of AMI location or history of diabetes. GLP-1 was well tolerated, with only transient gastrointestinal effects.
When added to standard therapy, GLP-1 infusion improved regional and global LV function in patients with AMI and severe systolic dysfunction after successful primary angioplasty.
Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), a gut incretin hormone that stimulates insulin secretion, also activates antiapoptotic signaling pathways such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase in pancreatic and insulinoma cells. Since these kinases have been shown to protect against myocardial injury, we hypothesized that GLP-1 could directly protect the heart against such injury via these prosurvival signaling pathways. Both isolated perfused rat heart and whole animal models of ischemia/reperfusion were used, with infarct size measured as the end point of injury. In both studies, GLP-1 added before ischemia demonstrated a significant reduction in infarction compared with the valine pyrrolidide (an inhibitor of its breakdown) or saline groups. This protection was abolished in the in vitro hearts by the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin (9-39), the cAMP inhibitor Rp-cAMP, the PI3kinase inhibitor LY294002, and the p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor UO126. Western blot analysis demonstrated the phosphorylation of the proapoptotic peptide BAD in the GLP-1-treated groups. We show for the first time that GLP-1 protects against myocardial infarction in the isolated and intact rat heart. This protection appears to involve activating multiple prosurvival kinases. This finding may represent a new therapeutic potential for this class of drug currently undergoing clinical trials in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Sitagliptin (MK-0431 [(2R)-4-oxo-4-(3-[trifluoromethyl]-5,6-dihydro[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazin-7[8H]-yl)-1-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)butan-2-amine]) is an orally active, potent, and selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) currently in phase III development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, alternating-panel studies evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single oral doses of sitagliptin (1.5-600 mg) in healthy male volunteers.
Sitagliptin was well absorbed (approximately 80% excreted unchanged in the urine) with an apparent terminal half-life ranging from 8 to 14 hours. Renal clearance of sitagliptin averaged 388 mL/min and was largely uninfluenced by the dose administered. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve for sitagliptin increased in an approximately dose-dependent manner and was not meaningfully influenced by food. Single doses of sitagliptin markedly and dose-dependently inhibited plasma DPP-IV activity, with approximately 80% or greater inhibition of DPP-IV activity occurring at 50 mg or greater over a 12-hour period and at 100 mg or greater over a 24-hour period. Compared with placebo, sitagliptin produced an approximately 2-fold increase in postmeal active glucagon-like peptide 1 levels. Sitagliptin was well tolerated and was not associated with hypoglycemia.
This study provides proof of pharmacologic characteristics for sitagliptin in humans. By inhibiting plasma DPP-IV activity, sitagliptin increases the postprandial rise in active glucagon-like peptide 1 concentrations without causing hypoglycemia in normoglycemic healthy male volunteers. Sitagliptin possesses pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics that support a once-daily dosing regimen.
Gut peptides, exemplified by glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are secreted in a nutrient-dependent manner and stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Both GIP and GLP-1 also promote beta cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis, leading to expansion of beta cell mass. GLP-1, but not GIP, controls glycemia via additional actions on glucose sensors, inhibition of gastric emptying, food intake and glucagon secretion. Furthermore, GLP-1, unlike GIP, potently stimulates insulin secretion and reduces blood glucose in human subjects with type 2 diabetes. This article summarizes current concepts of incretin action and highlights the potential therapeutic utility of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Data from the UKPDS (U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study) indicate a continuous decline in beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes. We studied longitudinal changes in beta-cell function (follow-up of 5.2 years) in subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and type 2 diabetes, using acute insulin response (AIR) and insulin sensitivity index (S(i)) from a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test among African-American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white subjects aged 40-69 years. At baseline, decreasing levels of both S(i) and AIR (either unadjusted or adjusted for S(i)) mirrored deteriorating glucose tolerance status at baseline and at follow-up. A different pattern was found with respect to longitudinal changes; S(i) declined in each glucose tolerance category, ranging from -0.81 x10(-4) min(-1) x muU(-1) x ml(-1) in NGT at baseline and NGT at follow-up (NGT/NGT) to -1.06 x10(-4) in NGT/diabetes, whereas the directional change in AIR principally determined the glucose tolerance status at follow-up. In NGT/NGT S(i) decreased by 35% and AIR increased by 34%. Results were similar in each of the three ethnic groups. These data shed light on the natural course of beta-cell function; over 5.2 years, mean insulin sensitivity declined in each glucose tolerance category. The change in AIR, however, principally determined glucose tolerance status at follow-up; NGT was maintained by a compensatory increase in insulin secretion. Failure to increase insulin secretion led to IGT, and a decrease in insulin secretion led to overt diabetes. This data may have important implications for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a gut-derived incretin hormone that stimulates insulin and suppresses glucagon secretion, inhibits gastric emptying, and reduces appetite and food intake. Therapeutic approaches for enhancing incretin action include degradation-resistant GLP-1 receptor agonists (incretin mimetics), and inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) activity (incretin enhancers). Clinical trials with the incretin mimetic exenatide (two injections per day or long-acting release form once weekly) and liraglutide (one injection per day) show reductions in fasting and postprandial glucose concentrations, and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (1-2%), associated with weight loss (2-5 kg). The most common adverse event associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists is mild nausea, which lessens over time. Orally administered DPP-4 inhibitors, such as sitagliptin and vildagliptin, reduce HbA1c by 0.5-1.0%, with few adverse events and no weight gain. These new classes of antidiabetic agents, and incretin mimetics and enhancers, also expand beta-cell mass in preclinical studies. However, long-term clinical studies are needed to determine the benefits of targeting the incretin axis for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.